SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rebuild Retool

Créé par: Flames1217
Équipe: 2023-24 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 8 janv. 2024
Publié: 11 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Kuzmenko, Andrei
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
VAN
  1. Lindholm, Elias (2 425 000 $ retained)
2.
CGY
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Tanev, Christopher (2 250 000 $ retained)
3.
CGY
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (LAK)
4.
CGY
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (SEA)
5.
CGY
  1. McLeod, Michael
  2. Misyul, Daniil
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
NJD
  1. Markström, Jacob (2 000 000 $ retained)
6.
CGY
  1. Bolduc, Samuel
  2. Dufour, William
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (NYI)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de SEA
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de NJD
Logo de NYI
Logo de CGY
Logo de LAK
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $68 477 499 $0 $227 500 $15 022 501 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
813 333 $813 333 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 janv. à 10 h 17
#1
Devils
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 362
Mentions "j'aime": 75
Love Mikey and I don’t think he’s on the market rn but I probably take this if it’s offered
Flames1217 et SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
11 janv. à 10 h 20
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 4,367
Mentions "j'aime": 1,347
Idk. McLeod is so valuable to this team it'd be tough to move him. I'd rather up the pick to a first and move a lesser piece
Flames1217 et SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
11 janv. à 10 h 22
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 7,048
Mentions "j'aime": 2,034
Better CF ACGM offer with the previous offer of VV and a 1st.
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
11 janv. à 10 h 37
#4
westleysnipez
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,382
Mentions "j'aime": 587
The point of getting a center like Lindholm would be for them to run the 2nd line with Kuzmenko and Mikheyev, I don't believe the Canucks would move Kuzmenko to acquire a 2nd line center. If Kuzmenko is being moved, its for another Top-6 winger (that's unlikely, too)

That said, Lindholm has to fetch Horvat value; a 1st + B-tier prospect + cap dump roster player; more if he's being retained 50% (or 75%).

If Vancouver was pitching an offer, I'd imagine it would be something like Cond. 1st + one of Raty/Bains/Karlsson + Aman + 3rd; Condition: If Vancouver makes the Conference Final, Calgary can choose between the 2024 1st and 2025 1st. If Lindholm plays in at least 50% of the games to the Conference Finals, the Flames acquire Vancouver's 2025 2nd.

Then pay a 3rd team a 4th round pick to retain 50% more on Lindholm.
11 janv. à 10 h 44
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,932
Mentions "j'aime": 2,066
Vancouver does that in a heart beat
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
11 janv. à 11 h 23
#6
Avid Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 711
Mentions "j'aime": 352
Quoting: westleysnipez
The point of getting a center like Lindholm would be for them to run the 2nd line with Kuzmenko and Mikheyev, I don't believe the Canucks would move Kuzmenko to acquire a 2nd line center. If Kuzmenko is being moved, its for another Top-6 winger (that's unlikely, too)

That said, Lindholm has to fetch Horvat value; a 1st + B-tier prospect + cap dump roster player; more if he's being retained 50% (or 75%).

If Vancouver was pitching an offer, I'd imagine it would be something like Cond. 1st + one of Raty/Bains/Karlsson + Aman + 3rd; Condition: If Vancouver makes the Conference Final, Calgary can choose between the 2024 1st and 2025 1st. If Lindholm plays in at least 50% of the games to the Conference Finals, the Flames acquire Vancouver's 2025 2nd.

Then pay a 3rd team a 4th round pick to retain 50% more on Lindholm.


I don't agree with that thought process Lindholm is a better face-off taker then Petey. Lotto line shouldn't be permanent as becomes easier to check against us. Bringing Petey back and having him-Lindholm- Mikheyev would be better than Kuzmenko imo. This would also give us cap space to make another deal (ie. Bring a speed forechecker to play on Miller's LW)

Though I do think we'd have to give a prospect (like Raty) to get the deal done as horvat deal as a comparable is fair. If we deal a 1st should only be this year's and not next years cause team could get riddled with injuries again and then we are giving a good pick away.
11 janv. à 11 h 30
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 204
Mentions "j'aime": 69
Quoting: CM_Insane
I don't agree with that thought process Lindholm is a better face-off taker then Petey. Lotto line shouldn't be permanent as becomes easier to check against us. Bringing Petey back and having him-Lindholm- Mikheyev would be better than Kuzmenko imo. This would also give us cap space to make another deal (ie. Bring a speed forechecker to play on Miller's LW)

Though I do think we'd have to give a prospect (like Raty) to get the deal done as horvat deal as a comparable is fair. If we deal a 1st should only be this year's and not next years cause team could get riddled with injuries again and then we are giving a good pick away.


Will add a prospect to the deal.

The deal on my end makes sense for both teams as Vancouver currently has the need for a solid two way centre. Lindholm is a 1B/2A centre and would fit with Vancouver like a glove and alleviate a huge amount of pressure off Petey. He's great defensively, great at face-offs and can play any style of game.

Calgary needs RH shooters on the wing, almost all of our wingers are playmakers and it's been effecting the powerplay. Obviously losing Lindholm sucks but at the end of the day we need to trade him.

Seems like a win/win for both teams.
11 janv. à 11 h 52
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,848
Mentions "j'aime": 1,230
Canucks decline.
Canucks don’t need another Swede.
A team like Colorado would get Lindholm.
Canucks are unlikely to get Lindholm.
11 janv. à 11 h 53
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 204
Mentions "j'aime": 69
Quoting: Vancity2196
Canucks decline.
Canucks don’t need another Swede.
A team like Colorado would get Lindholm.
Canucks are unlikely to get Lindholm.


What do you mean don't need another Swede ?
11 janv. à 11 h 58
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,848
Mentions "j'aime": 1,230
Quoting: Flames1217
What do you mean don't need another Swede ?


I don’t understand why Vancouver would acquire another Swede?
Pettersson is better than Lindholm.
There’s not point for Calgary to do a trade with Vancouver.
I don’t see this trade happening.
A team like Colorado would make sense for Elias Lindholm.
11 janv. à 12 h 25
#11
westleysnipez
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,382
Mentions "j'aime": 587
Quoting: CM_Insane
I don't agree with that thought process Lindholm is a better face-off taker then Petey. Lotto line shouldn't be permanent as becomes easier to check against us. Bringing Petey back and having him-Lindholm- Mikheyev would be better than Kuzmenko imo. This would also give us cap space to make another deal (ie. Bring a speed forechecker to play on Miller's LW)

Though I do think we'd have to give a prospect (like Raty) to get the deal done as horvat deal as a comparable is fair. If we deal a 1st should only be this year's and not next years cause team could get riddled with injuries again and then we are giving a good pick away.


I disagree, I think having the Lotto line rolling makes the Canucks that much more of a threat, they'd have four lines that are scoring threats.

Pettersson-Miller-Boeser
Mikheyev-Lindholm-Kuzmenko
Joshua-Blueger-Garland
Hoglander-Suter-Lafferty

All the players in bold are on pace for 20 goals or more and those in italics are on pace for 40 points or more. That's this entire lineup with a hypothetical Lindholm.

Once the Canucks get a 2nd line center who can get Mikheyev and Kuzmenko rolling again, I don't see another team in the league that has the scoring potential that Vancouver has. Who cares if the opposing team is sending their top pairing out against the Lotto line? There are three other lines with 20 goal-scorers on them, three other lines with 40+ point producers. That's not even including the scoring threat the defense is right now. Besides, the Lotto line made the Devils and Rangers defenses (two of the best defensive corps in the league right now) look silly in the two games they played.

I trust Tocchet as a coach, he's capable of switching up the styles and getting these guys to produce. Kuzmenko is still a scoring threat despite his struggles (20g-pace despite 6 healthy scratches and reduced minutes), I think replacing him with a guy like PDG or Karlsson or Bains wouldn't be the play if they're looking for a deep run this season. Getting him and Mikheyev a center who isn't Petey takes some of the pressure off of them and allows them to open up their games more.

I think it's also worth mentioning that if the Canucks can roll four lines (like they've been doing already), it gives the Lotto line more rest and allows them to produce more. If they're only playing 17 mins/night and the opposing team doesn't have that same level of depth, it gives them that much more of an edge.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage