sedin33

Membre depuis
8 jui 2018
Équipe préférée
Canucks de Vancouver
Localisation
vancouver
Messages dans les forums
1468
Messages par jour
2
Sujets de discussion
57
Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 3:04 pm
Sujet: FOA Roster
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>alwaysnextyear</b></div><div>I agree with all of the points on Marky, Toffoli and Tanev, but even if all three of those D prospects are on track to be solid NHL'ers the team should still look to sign one FA Dman if the cost isn't too high. Obviously Hughes and Myers are around long-term, but Edler is getting older and the jury is still out on whether Stecher can be a solid 2nd pairing guy. Ideally those prospects get acclimated to the big league by starting in sheltered 3rd pairing minutes and matchups rather than being thrown in over their heads too soon.</div></div>

I like the "Chicago" model where you leave enough cap room to sign a difference maker to get you over the top. They had a young core, many very good supporting pieces, and then added Hossa. Miller might be that for Vancouver. No issues adding around the edges as well as you indicate.
Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 2:29 pm
Sujet: FOA Roster
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>alwaysnextyear</b></div><div>Yep. Unfortunately we won't know if these guys will be able to do that until 2021 at the earliest. The team has some cap decisions to make before then.</div></div>

Don't disagree, but I'm not sure why the team is in a rush. If you believe in these prospects as Benning claims he does, then this team will be a contender for a long period because of Pettersson and Hughes. So why spend assets to get rid of bad contracts, only to sign other veterans on long-term contracts.

Sign Markstrom to a reasonable 3-4 year deal &lt; $6M and let Taffolli and Tanev walk. The team will be worse next year, but will have cap space to sign Hughes and Pettersson. By then some of the prospects should start to contribute.
Forum: Armchair-GMSun at 8:38 am
Forum: Armchair-GMSat at 3:31 pm
Sujet: A very interesting and completely legal cap circumvention
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sedin33</b></div><div>I think this would be considered cap circumvention or collusion. Article 26.2 specifically prohibits this.</div></div>

26.2 Undisclosed Terms and Revenues.
A Club (directly or indirectly through a "Club Actor," i.e., any owner, shareholder, Club
Affiliated Entity, the NHL or third party acting at the behest of a Club) and a Player (directly or
indirectly through a "Player Actor," i.e., his Certified Agent or any other individual, any entity,
or the NHLPA, acting on behalf of the Player) may not, at any time, enter into undisclosed
agreements of any kind, express or implied, oral or written, or promises, undertakings,
representations, commitments, inducements, assurances of intent, or understandings of any kind
involving consideration of any kind to be paid, furnished or made available or guaranteed to the
Player, or Player Actor, by the Club or Club Actor either prior to, during, or after the term of the
Player's SPC.