SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TDL moving Cirelli

Créé par: JTBF81
Équipe: 2023-24 Lightning de Tampa Bay
Date de création initiale: 5 janv. 2024
Publié: 6 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
While it's probabaly unlikely that Tampa considers moving Cirelli this early in his deal, he would be the most enticing trade piece to add help on the blueline. Colorado seems like a team that may be interested. Tampa adds Lindholm as a likely rental but who knows, if Stamkos walks in the offseason, they may be able to extend him.
Transactions
1.
TBL
  1. Byram, Bowen
  2. O'Connor, Logan
  3. Olausson, Oskar
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (COL)
COL
  1. Cirelli, Anthony
  2. Perbix, Nick
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (TBL)
2.
PHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (TBL)
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2025 (TBL)
3.
TBL
  1. Duclair, Anthony (1 500 000 $ retained)
SJS
  1. Barré-Boulet, Alex
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (TBL)
4.
TBL
  1. Lindholm, Elias (2 425 000 $ retained)
CGY
  1. Duke, Dylan [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (COL)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (TBL)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de MIN
2025
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de MIN
2026
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $83 416 665 $0 $0 $83 335 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
2 665 000 $2 665 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 200 000 $5 200 000 $
DD
UFA - 8
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 8
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
775 000 $775 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
762 500 $762 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
776 665 $776 665 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 janv. à 22 h 5
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 978
Mentions "j'aime": 148
Incoming Avs fans for saying no. As if Cirelli isn’t one of the best playoff performers in NHL history.
6 janv. à 22 h 16
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,503
Mentions "j'aime": 556
Quoting: la_scaloneta
Incoming Avs fans for saying no. As if Cirelli isn’t one of the best playoff performers in NHL history.


I mean it may be too much going Tampa's way, but I feel pretty sure that Byram would have to be the centerpiece coming back. Maybe the picks/prospects would need a bit of altering though.
6 janv. à 22 h 33
#3
Exhausted Ranger Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 1,043
Mentions "j'aime": 451
Quoting: la_scaloneta
Incoming Avs fans for saying no. As if Cirelli isn’t one of the best playoff performers in NHL history.


Cirelli @ 6.5 does not bring you back a great developing young blueliner and a first
A_Habs_fan et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
6 janv. à 22 h 49
#4
Donald
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 309
Mentions "j'aime": 238
replace the third with Mikhail Gulyayev, there will be a bidding war for lindy
mcsr a aimé ceci.
6 janv. à 23 h 34
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,503
Mentions "j'aime": 556
Quoting: Goalie
Cirelli 6.5 does not bring you back a great developing young blueliner and a first


Eh, maybe the 1st can be dropped or lowered, but Byram would be needed or there's no deal more than likely.
6 janv. à 23 h 36
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,503
Mentions "j'aime": 556
Quoting: donald
replace the third with Mikhail Gulyayev, there will be a bidding war for lindy


Tampa doesn't have Gulyayev, so unless they acquire him from the Avs in the Cirelli trade, it would have to be a different prospect if replacing the 3rd.
Anus_McLeod et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
6 janv. à 23 h 54
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,147
Mentions "j'aime": 2,825
I just don’t see how cirelli would be worth Byram, and a first+. Maybe a few years ago. Probably need to drop byram
Quaider11 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
6 janv. à 23 h 59
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,503
Mentions "j'aime": 556
Quoting: SK101
I just don’t see how cirelli would be worth Byram, and a first+. Maybe a few years ago. Probably need to drop byram


The 1st can be dropped, but if Byram isn't available, I doubt Cirelli is.
7 janv. à 5 h 1
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,561
Mentions "j'aime": 4,573
Avs decline.
MeetYourMakar a aimé ceci.
7 janv. à 8 h 0
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,830
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
I would do 1 for 1 because Byram is having a down year.
JTBF81 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
7 janv. à 13 h 2
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,584
Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
I was a Cirelli fan before most, but I'm not sure I'd do Byram for him. If he were making 5M or less it would be a different story, and I feel like the contract will age fine when the cap actually starts to rise, but it's just a tough ask at the moment.

That said, I don't think this is a bad proposal and appreciate that you added Perbix to try and address a need for Colorado (if they were to trade Bo). It's pretty well thought out, but I just don't think it happens.
JTBF81, MeetYourMakar et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
7 janv. à 13 h 53
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,503
Mentions "j'aime": 556
Quoting: MeetYourMakar
I would do 1 for 1 because Byram is having a down year.


In the end, that could end up being the deal if neither side wad interested in adding.
MeetYourMakar et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
7 janv. à 13 h 57
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,503
Mentions "j'aime": 556
Quoting: Anus_McLeod
I was a Cirelli fan before most, but I'm not sure I'd do Byram for him. If he were making 5M or less it would be a different story, and I feel like the contract will age fine when the cap actually starts to rise, but it's just a tough ask at the moment.

That said, I don't think this is a bad proposal and appreciate that you added Perbix to try and address a need for Colorado (if they were to trade Bo). It's pretty well thought out, but I just don't think it happens.

Thanks for the feedback!

I can definitely see the 1st being removed or lowered going to Tampa, and as far as the secondary pieces, they could also be up for negotiation(if at all included), but I believe that the crux of the trade would have to be Cirelli for Byram. Tampa would need the defensive addition to address the blueline, so I think whether it was the Avs or another team, Tampa would need a #3/4 type RD coming back.
MeetYourMakar et Anus_McLeod a aimé ceci.
7 janv. à 19 h 44
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,561
Mentions "j'aime": 4,573
Quoting: JTBF81
Thanks for the feedback!

I can definitely see the 1st being removed or lowered going to Tampa, and as far as the secondary pieces, they could also be up for negotiation(if at all included), but I believe that the crux of the trade would have to be Cirelli for Byram. Tampa would need the defensive addition to address the blueline, so I think whether it was the Avs or another team, Tampa would need a #3/4 type RD coming back.


Poor match then. Byram CAN play RD after a fashion. He's a LHD who is much better on his natural side and average to weak on the right.
JTBF81 a aimé ceci.
7 janv. à 21 h 7
#15
Exhausted Ranger Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 1,043
Mentions "j'aime": 451
Quoting: JTBF81
Eh, maybe the 1st can be dropped or lowered, but Byram would be needed or there's no deal more than likely.


Can’t see them giving up Bo for cirelli tbh
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage