PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
14
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
JTBF81
Membre depuis
23 juill. 2019
Équipe favorite
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Deuxième équipe favorite
Avalanche du Colorado
Messages dans les forums
2503
Messages par jour
1.4
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 13 heures
Sujet:
Solidifying The Middle
Tampa declines. Cirelli isn't going anywhere without a significant piece coming back. Even more so to a team within the division.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 13 heures
Sujet:
Better Than -37
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Tampa GM JBB loves Tanner J. He's not getting traded for two 3rd's.</div></div>
JBB already made a terrible mistake by trading for him. There's no need to compound his error by not taking an offer like this for a low end 3rd/4th liner that is injury prone, especially when Tampa needs that 2.665 on players that are actually needed.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
il y a 13 heures
Sujet:
Better Than -37
Tampa accepts. They need to use Jeannot's cap space on areas of far greater need. Two 3rd round picks would be a fine return at this point.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Hier à 1 h 3
Sujet:
Reloading for next year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMDannyB</b></div><div>I could see the flyers liking this</div></div>
I think Tampa could still get a late round pick for him, but if they had to pay a mid to late pick, so be it. If they want to improve for next year at all, they need to move his 2.65 out so they can use it for re-signings/ufa adds that will actually contribute. I'm sure they won't because JBB won't admit he made a very bad trade, but they 100% need to clear his cap.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 10 h 51
Sujet:
Offseason
Dumba can go period, since he's terrible. As much as keeping Duclair and Stamkos would be great, this team needs an actual upgrade on the blueline very badly. Save some by getting a lesser cost F for.the middle 6, get rid of Jeannot, and then use that space and some of the space from the Duclair deal to.hopefully sign a higher quality RD in ufa.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mer. à 10 h 47
Sujet:
Lou stays
If Tampa can get a 4th+ for Jeannot, they should do it. They need to clear all or most of his cap for other, more important moves, and Wahlstrom can be waived if he doesn't work out.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 14 h 48
Sujet:
Younger
I don't think Tampa would do it because of the 1st, but adding a player of Nelson's caliber and moving out Jeannot is a significant upgrade. The other concern is whether Tampa could keep Nelson after next season, as.depsite the additional cap increase, Tampa will have a big contract in Hedman already to work out. Tampa should definitely move on from Jeannot though, as his cap will be.needed for much more important areas of need.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
mar. à 11 h 4
Sujet:
Realistic Bolts
Stamkos likely needs 500k more to have a chance at keeping him. Sheary has to be gone, and Jeannot should be moved as well. Neither player is vital to the team having success next season. Clearing both of them gives the team enough room for Duclair or another top 6 F in the ~4 aav range. You boost Stamkos up to 6 and you fill in the bottom 6 F spot with one of several talented Syracuse players. There's still ~3 million for a.blueline addition, and just over 300k left over that can be used to add a little more to a ufa dman or one of Stamkos/Duclair if needed. Tampa would run with s 22 player roster, but that's not a dealbreaker.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
lun. à 15 h 16
Sujet:
Offseason no Duclair
I'd actually improve the defense if no Duclaor. Save 500k-1 million by paying Stamkos 6-6.5, get rid of Dumba(since he sucks) and promote Crozier or just re-sign Fleury to save 200k more. Trade Jeannot and save 1.5 by replacing him with a ~1 million aav 4th liner, and trade Perbix, whi also isn't good. They could then spend around 3.5-4 on an actual defensive upgrade for next year instead of rolling out the same trash after the main 3 or 4 guys.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
sam. à 23 h 5
Sujet:
New Year New Squad
Tampa likely accepts. Perbix is worth at best in the 3rd range, and it will take a mid round pick to move Sheary. Tampa gains needed cap space and still gets a 4th, so it probably works for them.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
sam. à 14 h 15
Sujet:
a offseason of goodness
Tampa would never move all those pieces in the Edmonton deal, and I'm pretty sure the Oilers are pretty happy with what they have in Bouchard.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
sam. à 14 h 11
Sujet:
TBL offseason moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>johnjeffcena</b></div><div>trading sheary and pics for future considerations makes absolutely no sense and probably a worse trade than the jeannot trade to put him into tampa; which trading jeannot for a price that low would also lead us to be scammed</div></div>
Sheary has negative value and has been one of the worst signings that JBB has ever made. His 2 million cap hit is badly needed elsewhere this offseason, so if a mid round pick or two is needed to move him, no problem. Jeannot has been a bust. It was a massive overpay and the player that JBB and the scouts thought they were getting isn't the player he really is. He fights well, but is nothing special offensively nor.defensively. He's also been very injury prone, as he's missed more time in a season and change than most. It's a loss of a trade anyway one looks at it, but they might as well try and recoup something and be able to re-allocate 2.665 million of valuable cap space in the process on areas of greater importance.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
ven. à 19 h 59
Sujet:
if oilers dont win the cup
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>I really don't get all the Perbix hate on this site. He makes some mistakes, but he's a solid, affordable 3rd pair option.</div></div>
He's been their worst dman outside of CDH (who doesn't even play much), for the last third of the season. He's regressed pretty badly after a solid rookie campaign. JBB may still be able to get some value for him, and with his low cap hit, he won't be hard to move if Tampa needs the space(which they probably will). Crozier and then Schmidt will likely replace him soon enough, not to mention Powell, who has looked better than Perbix did when.comparing NCAA careers.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
ven. à 15 h 40
Sujet:
if oilers dont win the cup
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Tampa Bay declines. They aren't using $2.75m in cap space for a 3rd pair D man.</div></div>
They probably should spend 2.5-3 for a 3RD upgrade, as long as they move out the Sheary and Perbix contracts(which they should). Kulak wouldn't be the one I'd target, though, since he plays the left mainly, and there are likely better options in ufa
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 avr. à 13 h 50
Sujet:
Bolts Next Season
Lafferty is a solid signing for the bottom 6 if they move on from Jeannot. I don't think it would be a terrible move, but I doubt JBB is willing to admit his blunder and trade Jeannot for that. I would also upgrade the defense by trading Perbix and not running theb14tb F, then use the available 2.5 or so on a better 3RD. Perbix regressed considerably this year, so if Tampa could get some value for him and upgrade, all the better. Either Fleury or Crozier can be the 7D, but I think Crozier likely gets the spot.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 avr. à 23 h 40
Sujet:
Summer Plans
Those are definitely the three players that should be moved in order to have the room to upgrade. However, I don't see Tampa running just a 21 player roster and not adding on the blueline. I also think in order to keep Duclair, they'll need to pay him somewhere in the 3.5-4 range. Stephenson would be amazing, but I think rolling with 22 and spending 2.5-3.5 on a better 3RD and a bit less on a bottom 6 F may be a more well rounded plan. I do think Crozier should get a roster spot next year, but not sure he's the full time plan at 3RD.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 avr. à 17 h 58
Sujet:
Keeping Stamkos and Duclair
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>The Sheary, Perbix and Jeannot trades all seem realistic value wise. If the Bolts do trade Jeannot, I think they'd give one of the young guys from Syracuse a shot at filling that spot over trading for Armia. UFA signings all seem reasonable as well.</div></div>
Yeah, I saw the Armia trade in another thread and decided to use it here. I hadn't really considered trading for him tbh. This sort of template at least gives some rough idea of how much Tampa could spend on a defensive upgrade at 3RD/bottom 6 F. Of course, if Tampa does promote another Crunch F as you said, that would, in theory, open up additional cap space for a better blueline add (up to ~3.5 possibly) or more $ for the Stamkos and Duclair extensions if needed.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 avr. à 18 h 49
Sujet:
Offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Brolekb2b</b></div><div>So glad we can finally stop talking that nonsense about Hanifin to TB. Actually allows us to preserve a decent top six forward group, something we all complained about during last off-season.
Can see Duke and Stamkos probably agreeing to that. Wouldn't mind another year of Duke either. Indifferent on a 7th D as long as do their job well enough.</div></div>
Yeah, it became more and more clear, especially with the play of Duclair, that Hanifin was never coming here. It's for the best, as the defense would be taking up far too much cap space and ghe F group would be very limited. I think JBB can add a better dman though by trading Jeannot as well. You can either spend closer to 3 million on better value than Dumba, or perhaps find better value in another bottom 6 F. Jeannot has been far too injury prone and hasn't done nearly enough to remain imo, but I have my doubts that JBB is willing to admit his mistake and take the big loss on the trade. Moving the weaker players Sheary, Perbox and Jeannot does give the team the best chance to not only have flexibility with Stamkos and Duclair, but to add at least one other solid depth piece elsewhere.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
9 avr. à 14 h 47
Sujet:
Offseason No Hanifin
There's really no need to have Cole return, as.Lilleberg is fine as a 3LD. Duclair likely gets a little more than 3.35. Roy seems like a good add, but not at the expense of Stamkos imo. Lastly, Howard is nowhere near ready for a top 6 NHL role yet. Another year at MSU, and then maybe he makes the team in '25-'26 seems a more likely path for him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 avr. à 19 h 13
Sujet:
reunited
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Brolekb2b</b></div><div>TB probably passes. Not exactly sold on Smith or what his role would be in TB. Realistically we only need to move Sheary to open up cap space to resign Duclair and Stamkos for our top six, and though he had a rough start to the year because of a new system Perbix is a really decent RD for the money, I understand why he's lucrative in that regard.
The only way Perbix is on the way out is if we resign Dumba or add a good RD in UFA, and even then I think they'd want to keep him as a 7th, either him or Raddysh.</div></div>
Tampa probably declines because of cap limitations, but not because Perbix is some high value piece. Moving him and Sheary allows Tampa to much more easily re-sign both Stamkos and Duclair, as well as having enough left over(after re-signing 3 other near league min contracts) to actually upgrade the 3RD spot. Whether that's with Dumba or another ufa in the 2.5-3 range, they can definitely upgrade there.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
4 avr. à 0 h 13
Sujet:
Colin Graf
Not a bad lineup if Stamkos ends up leaving. Tampa probably would want to run a 22nd player, and Duclair would probably need a little more imo. I'd trade Perbix for a 3rd/4th, and then add either Crozier or Fleury and a 13th F promotion from Syracuse like Goncalves, Groshev, Merela or Edmunds.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 12 h 48
Sujet:
Tweaks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rooster</b></div><div>I’ve paid pretty close to TB this year and know the exact role Nick Paul plays. He is an incredibly versatile centreman who can also slot to LW as needed, and plays specialty minutes. But in TB depth, he slots behind Point and Cirelli on any given night, hence the 3C designation. This is not debatable, unless you think Point or Cirelli slot lower. And to argue so passionately about Perbix reminds me of Sens fans arguing that Brannstrom is a legit top 4 guy.
Listen, I like both of the TB players, but if Brisbois was ever offered this deal, he should jump at it. Chychrun is entering his prime years and would be able to shelter Hedman’s minutes as he inevitably faces the aging curve.
At the end of the day, maybe we disagree on this deal. All good. I’ll be a tourist in the playoffs again as a Sens fan and am hopeful that the Lightning can take another run with this core.</div></div>
You're pretty spot on with your analysis. While I doubt Ottawa would offer this deal, Tampa would easily accept based on the reasons you provided. Perbix still had some positive value, but despite what that other poster(imo it's in your best interest to ignore them) thinks, Perbix has regressed this year and is not a top 4 dman at this time. He could rebound as it could just be a rough 2nd full year, but as is he's a liability most nights for Tampa as of late.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 avr. à 0 h 0
Sujet:
Tweaks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rooster</b></div><div>Don’t you mean your 3C and 3rd pairing RD? And obviously a deal like this would come with an extension for Chychrun who is actually a top 4 dman on any team. So yes, that’s my take. And it is brilliant for TB as it leaves your top 6 and top 4 untouched.</div></div>
Yeah, provided the extension with Chychrun was in place, Tampa accepts this imo. Perbix is definitely a 3RD and while Paul has been very solid in his role, replacing him would be far easier than getting g a top 4 dman long term.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 avr. à 23 h 58
Sujet:
TBL 24-25 with Hanifin
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kyle_Okposo_Lover</b></div><div>I thought they can do 8? Or a sign and trade with Vegas</div></div>
They can do a sign and trade maybe, but I think there's a clause in the cba that prevents a player from extending for 8 years with any team except the one they were on at the deadline. I could be wrong though.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 avr. à 20 h 13
Sujet:
TBL 24-25 with Hanifin
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kyle_Okposo_Lover</b></div><div>youd need to trade for his rights to get the 8th year but I think he also gets more. probably 8x7 or 7x7.285</div></div>
I guess Tampa could only offer him 7 years regardless of whether they trade for his rights. Oh well, they'd still make it work if that was their plan and Hanifin wanted Tampa(still hope not though).
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com