SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fairly Quiet Deadline

Créé par: Stan_Bowman_Burner
Équipe: 2023-24 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 4 janv. 2024
Publié: 4 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
CHI
  1. Chibrikov, Nikita
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2026 (WPG)
WPG
  1. Dickinson, Jason (1 325 000 $ retained)
  2. Foligno, Nick (2 000 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de WPG
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2026
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de WPG
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $73 242 623 $0 $6 002 500 $10 257 377 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance505 000 $$505K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
875 833 $875 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
962 500 $962 500 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
859 167 $859 167 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 janv. à 10 h 36
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 16,090
Mentions "j'aime": 7,174
Winnipeg doesn't need replacement level players.
4 janv. à 10 h 38
#2
Go Jets Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 5,464
Mentions "j'aime": 4,212
Can't see the Jets doing this one. Chibrikov has also been lights out in the NHL, great looking prospect for WPG.
4 janv. à 10 h 52
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,299
Mentions "j'aime": 11,248
CHI declines.

Quoting: Windjammer
Winnipeg doesn't need replacement level players.


I'd like to see a replacement level player with half the offensive production, defensive responsibility, and leadership qualities that Dicky and Fliggy have.
JK74, Hawksguy81 et YeahRighttt a aimé ceci.
4 janv. à 11 h 9
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 161
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Quoting: Rooney
Can't see the Jets doing this one. Chibrikov has also been lights out in the NHL, great looking prospect for WPG.


Good luck finding room in the top-6 or even the top-9 for Chibrikov once Lambert, Barlow, Lucius, and McGroarty are getting regular minutes along with Connor, Scheifele, Ehlers, Perfetti, Valardi, Niederreiter, and Iafallo.
4 janv. à 11 h 12
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 16,090
Mentions "j'aime": 7,174
Quoting: Garak
CHI declines.



I'd like to see a replacement level player with half the offensive production, defensive responsibility, and leadership qualities that Dicky and Fliggy have.


Okay, bottom sixers if it makes you happy. Anyways they aren't pulling a top prospect from anyone and the Jets don't need bottom sixers at that price.
4 janv. à 11 h 38
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,299
Mentions "j'aime": 11,248
Quoting: Windjammer
Okay, bottom sixers if it makes you happy. Anyways they aren't pulling a top prospect from anyone and the Jets don't need bottom sixers at that price.


Any contending team in the NHL would love to have those two in their bottom 6 going into the playoffs. Plus, this proposal is asking for max retention on both players. Chib's is interesting, but I don't think he is as valuable as you seem to think. Then again, all I have seen of him this year was against the Icehogs. So, I'm not an expert on him.
Hawksguy81, Stan_Bowman_Burner, YeahRighttt and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
4 janv. à 11 h 41
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 16,090
Mentions "j'aime": 7,174
Quoting: Garak
Any contending team in the NHL would love to have those two in their bottom 6 going into the playoffs. Plus, this proposal is asking for max retention on both players. Chib's is interesting, but I don't think he is as valuable as you seem to think. Then again, all I have seen of him this year was against the Icehogs. So, I'm not an expert on him.


Sure, bottom 6 depth is helpful, but at a reasonable cost. Asking for the top performing prospect on the Moose isn't reasonable.

If they can't be had for a 3rd or 4th, oh well, they're not difference makers anyways and would have to fight hard for 4th line time.
4 janv. à 11 h 45
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 161
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Quoting: Windjammer
Sure, bottom 6 depth is helpful, but at a reasonable cost. Asking for the top performing prospect on the Moose isn't reasonable.

If they can't be had for a 3rd or 4th, oh well, they're not difference makers anyways and would have to fight hard for 4th line time.


You need start paying more attention to the NHL outside of your bubble in Winnipeg.
Garak et SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
4 janv. à 11 h 57
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,299
Mentions "j'aime": 11,248
Quoting: Windjammer
Sure, bottom 6 depth is helpful, but at a reasonable cost. Asking for the top performing prospect on the Moose isn't reasonable.

If they can't be had for a 3rd or 4th, oh well, they're not difference makers anyways and would have to fight hard for 4th line time.


Both of them would easily beat out guys on WPG's 3rd and 4th lines for roster spots and could even float further up the lineup as needed. But.. ok, if you say so. I doubt CHI even trades either of them. Sounds like they are planning on extending them, anyway.
YeahRighttt a aimé ceci.
4 janv. à 12 h 6
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 16,090
Mentions "j'aime": 7,174
Quoting: Garak
Both of them would easily beat out guys on WPG's 3rd and 4th lines for roster spots and could even float further up the lineup as needed. But.. ok, if you say so. I doubt CHI even trades either of them. Sounds like they are planning on extending them, anyway.


The Jets 3rd line is fantastic, they don't come close to replacing anyone there, obviously they aren't top sixers, so the 4th line is the only place for them.

Hopefully Chicago does extend them.
Wpgman a aimé ceci.
4 janv. à 12 h 46
#11
Wpgman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,072
Mentions "j'aime": 452
Winnipeg will have to put some players on the waiver wire soon. Adding 2 more forwards will just put more on waivers and maybe screw up the chemistry. Winnipeg will not be trading top prospects or top picks unless it is top 6 forward (preferably a center) or a top 4 rhd.
Windjammer et Jonesy204 a aimé ceci.
4 janv. à 13 h 21
#12
Pitter Patter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 189
Mentions "j'aime": 71
Quoting: Garak
CHI declines.



I'd like to see a replacement level player with half the offensive production, defensive responsibility, and leadership qualities that Dicky and Fliggy have.


JD would be a nice add, Foligno can pound sand though, Jets need a soldier not a leader and they are #1 at 5v5 so defensively they are doing pretty, pretty good. Neither of these dudes would be as productive on a better, deeper team (such as WIN), opportunities would be far more limited. IMO, Jets will take a big swing or stand pat. Chibrokov would be a nice piece for CHI.
4 janv. à 13 h 24
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,299
Mentions "j'aime": 11,248
Quoting: Jonesy204
JD would be a nice add, Foligno can pound sand though, Jets need a soldier not a leader and they are #1 at 5v5 so defensively they are doing pretty, pretty good. Neither of these dudes would be as productive on a better, deeper team (such as WIN), opportunities would be far more limited. IMO, Jets will take a big swing or stand pat. Chibrokov would be a nice piece for CHI.


I doubt CHI would have much interest in Chibrikov. We have plenty of prospects in that archetype who project similarly or better. He is fine, though.
4 janv. à 23 h 19
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2023
Messages: 543
Mentions "j'aime": 428
Modifié 4 janv. à 23 h 26
Let’s start with…Why exactly does WPG want Foligno?
- we are flush on wing and have zero room or need for any more adds in that position

Then go to…Why exactly does WPG want Dickinson?
- we need a bonified 2C who has offensive production and defensive capabilities

Lastly let’s go with….Why exactly does WPG trade Chibrikov+ for 2 pure rentals?
- as stated earlier by @Rooney, Chibrikov has also been playing well and looks to be a good prospect for WPG.
Windjammer a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage