SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Big Changes

Créé par: Chapee44
Équipe: 2024-25 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 3 janv. 2024
Publié: 4 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
For the record I fully expect the most boring next 12 months player movement wise from Buffalo but that's not fun lol

Mock Draft:
7 - Cayden Lindstrom
13 - Carter Yakemchuk
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 800 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
79 500 000 $
24 000 000 $
21 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Lizotte, Blake [Droits de RFA]
  2. Ziemmer, Koehn
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
Détails additionnels:
2024 Trade Deadline
LAK
  1. Tuch, Alex
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
2.
BUF
  1. Andersson, Rasmus
Détails additionnels:
Offseason
3.
BUF
  1. Eriksson Ek, Joel
Détails additionnels:
Offseason
MIN
  1. Mittelstadt, Casey [Droits de RFA]
4.
BUF
  1. Gaucher, Nathan
  2. Luneau, Tristan
Détails additionnels:
Offseason when they finally trade Gibson
5.
BUF
  1. Dowd, Nic
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WSH)
Détails additionnels:
Draft Day
WSH
  1. Jokiharju, Henri [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
Détails additionnels:
Moving up from 20-13
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BUF
Logo de WSH
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2025
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de MIN
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de NSH
2026
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 500 000 $85 624 404 $0 $2 580 000 $1 875 596 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
UFA
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
855 833 $855 833 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
886 667 $886 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 100 000 $7 100 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
800 000 $800 000 $
AG
UFA
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 285 714 $4 285 714 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
865 000 $865 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
DD
RFA - 3
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 janv. à 0 h 58
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,711
Mentions "j'aime": 6,216
That would be a tough haul to give up as a Kings fan, but I'd do it. Alex Tuch is a quality player and the Kings really need a right-handed power forward.
Chapee44 a aimé ceci.
4 janv. à 1 h 7
#2
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,403
Mentions "j'aime": 9,109
Value of these players is all over the place
Lightman13 a aimé ceci.
4 janv. à 1 h 15
#3
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,239
Mentions "j'aime": 7,025
Buddy, we don't add a first and a second to a Gibson trade, Gaucher and Luneau are not on the block.
4 janv. à 1 h 17
#4
Patient gm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,879
Mentions "j'aime": 1,002
Quoting: Shibbal18
Value of these players is all over the place


Forgot to add 2 1sts and a 2nd for ek
4 janv. à 2 h 40
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,639
Mentions "j'aime": 3,535
Minnesota blocks your number
4 janv. à 7 h 7
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 28,054
Mentions "j'aime": 14,667
Quoting: tkecanuck341
That would be a tough haul to give up as a Kings fan, but I'd do it. Alex Tuch is a quality player and the Kings really need a right-handed power forward.


What haul? He's giving Tuch away
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
4 janv. à 7 h 8
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 28,054
Mentions "j'aime": 14,667
Quoting: Lightman13
Forgot to add 2 1sts and a 2nd for ek


You forgot to delete this before accidently revealing you think Ek is worth more than any player has gotten in a trade in 30 years
4 janv. à 8 h 34
#8
14m in dead cap
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 3,619
Mentions "j'aime": 3,089
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
You forgot to delete this before accidently revealing you think Ek is worth more than any player has gotten in a trade in 30 years


That's definitely not "way more than any player has gotten in a trade in 30 years".

The reality is that type of return is 100% what it would take to even start a conversation with Minnesota about moving a center they desperately need signed long term to a steal of a contract. They have absolutely no reason to trade him, so you would have to offer something really dumb to get them to even entertain the conversation.
Lightman13 a aimé ceci.
4 janv. à 8 h 55
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 28,054
Mentions "j'aime": 14,667
Quoting: JayTea
That's definitely not "way more than any player has gotten in a trade in 30 years".

The reality is that type of return is 100% what it would take to even start a conversation with Minnesota about moving a center they desperately need signed long term to a steal of a contract. They have absolutely no reason to trade him, so you would have to offer something really dumb to get them to even entertain the conversation.


Who has gotten more than 2 1sts, a 2nd and a top 6 forward who still has rfa eligibility since atleast lindros?
4 janv. à 9 h 4
#10
14m in dead cap
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 3,619
Mentions "j'aime": 3,089
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Who has gotten more than 2 1sts, a 2nd and a top 6 forward who still has rfa eligibility since atleast lindros?


You said way more, not just more. But to answer your question, Jack Eichel basically got that return with similar term on his deal, a questionable future in the NHL, and twice the cap hit. Kind of surprised you forgot that one, you sure you're a Sabres fan?

Your turn, name another player who has been traded with 5 years left on their deal that wasn't because of some form of sign and trade.
4 janv. à 9 h 8
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 28,054
Mentions "j'aime": 14,667
Quoting: JayTea
You said way more, not just more. But to answer your question, Jack Eichel basically got that return with similar term on his deal, a questionable future in the NHL, and twice the cap hit. Kind of surprised you forgot that one, you sure you're a Sabres fan?

Your turn, name another player who has been traded with 5 years left on their deal that wasn't because of some form of sign and trade.


I don't think the trade proposed is reasonable at all.

But it's more reasonable that what you proposed, which is really saying something.

And no, this is quite a bit more than the eichel trade. Especially at the time of the trade.
4 janv. à 9 h 18
#12
14m in dead cap
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 3,619
Mentions "j'aime": 3,089
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
I don't think the trade proposed is reasonable at all.

But it's more reasonable that what you proposed, which is really saying something.

And no, this is quite a bit more than the eichel trade. Especially at the time of the trade.


Uhh.. how is this quite a bit more?

Mittlestadt (pending RFA) + 2 1sts + 2nd for a sure thing top 6 center with cost certainty over the next 5 years
Tuch (signed long term on a great contract) + Krebs (recent 1st round pick still young enough to not be considered a bust) + 2022 1st and 2023 2nd for a player that there was literally a chance he never played a single game for the Golden Knights if his surgery went bad.

Those are right about the same offer, with much more certainty on actually getting production out of the player you're receiving. We can argue about the value of Tuch vs. Mittlestadt or Krebs vs. a 1st we have no idea where it will land, but they're pretty close in value.

I'm glad you're at least admitting there isn't another case of a player with 5 years left getting traded in a similar situation. You're proving my point for me.
Lightman13 a aimé ceci.
4 janv. à 9 h 44
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 28,054
Mentions "j'aime": 14,667
Quoting: JayTea
Uhh.. how is this quite a bit more?

Mittlestadt (pending RFA) + 2 1sts + 2nd for a sure thing top 6 center with cost certainty over the next 5 years
Tuch (signed long term on a great contract) + Krebs (recent 1st round pick still young enough to not be considered a bust) + 2022 1st and 2023 2nd for a player that there was literally a chance he never played a single game for the Golden Knights if his surgery went bad.

Those are right about the same offer, with much more certainty on actually getting production out of the player you're receiving. We can argue about the value of Tuch vs. Mittlestadt or Krebs vs. a 1st we have no idea where it will land, but they're pretty close in value.

I'm glad you're at least admitting there isn't another case of a player with 5 years left getting traded in a similar situation. You're proving my point for me.


Tuch was essentially mittelstadt at the time of the trade

Also, are you suggesting ek = eichel?

Woof

I also never said the trade proposed was good. Just that yours is worse. So congrats?
4 janv. à 10 h 6
#14
14m in dead cap
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 3,619
Mentions "j'aime": 3,089
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Tuch was essentially mittelstadt at the time of the trade

Also, are you suggesting ek = eichel?

Woof

I also never said the trade proposed was good. Just that yours is worse. So congrats?


So if Tuch was essentially Middlestedt and Krebs was essentially a 1st round pick still, the trades were about the same. I didn't actually say Ek was Eichel, I was pushing back on your debunked claim that the suggested return Minnesota would want was more than any player had received in the past 30 years. I am also saying 100% Eichel had the stain on him at the time of not knowing what Vegas was actually getting due to his injury. You know what you're getting in JEEK.

Currently however? They're not far off in contract value and getting $8.9m in value out of a $5.25m cap hit player is a pretty sweet deal compared to $10.1m value on a $10m cap hit. Eichel puts up more points, JEEK has been a top 10 Selke nominee the last few seasons so they're just different types of players.

You still can't name another player with 5 years left that's been traded can you? Keep shifting the goalpost all you want, you could at least admit you don't know of one so we can both agree the likelihood the Wild would even consider moving JEEK is slim to none and it would take a stupid overpayment to get them to consider. The trade we're talking about is a stupid overpayment btw. Buffalo would need to be pretty dumb to do it, just like I honestly thought Vegas was insane to give up what they did for Eichel given his health but hey that seemed to work out for them so what do I know.
Lightman13 et RazWild a aimé ceci.
5 janv. à 8 h 59
#15
Patient gm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,879
Mentions "j'aime": 1,002
Quoting: JayTea
So if Tuch was essentially Middlestedt and Krebs was essentially a 1st round pick still, the trades were about the same. I didn't actually say Ek was Eichel, I was pushing back on your debunked claim that the suggested return Minnesota would want was more than any player had received in the past 30 years. I am also saying 100% Eichel had the stain on him at the time of not knowing what Vegas was actually getting due to his injury. You know what you're getting in JEEK.

Currently however? They're not far off in contract value and getting $8.9m in value out of a $5.25m cap hit player is a pretty sweet deal compared to $10.1m value on a $10m cap hit. Eichel puts up more points, JEEK has been a top 10 Selke nominee the last few seasons so they're just different types of players.

You still can't name another player with 5 years left that's been traded can you? Keep shifting the goalpost all you want, you could at least admit you don't know of one so we can both agree the likelihood the Wild would even consider moving JEEK is slim to none and it would take a stupid overpayment to get them to consider. The trade we're talking about is a stupid overpayment btw. Buffalo would need to be pretty dumb to do it, just like I honestly thought Vegas was insane to give up what they did for Eichel given his health but hey that seemed to work out for them so what do I know.


I did think sabres fans would recognize the compare to eichel. Nearly twice the cap hit injury prone and a total diva be ek who’s everything you want in a player. He produces, gives 100% every shift, plays injured, steal of a contract, in his prime and signed long term. Any team in the nhl’s ears would perk up in a heartbeat if there was a wiff of ek being on the trading block. With eichel only a handful of teams kicked tires because of his cap hit and cost. Ek’s cap hit would be a blessing for any team.
JayTea a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage