SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Retool again this year at tdl

Créé par: Missouri
Équipe: 2023-24 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 29 déc. 2023
Publié: 29 déc. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
OTT
  1. Johansen, Ryan
  2. Olausson, Oskar
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (COL)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (COL)
COL
  1. Tarasenko, Vladimir (2 500 000 $ retained)
2.
OTT
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (ARI)
Détails additionnels:
Conservative buyers for Yotes.
3.
OTT
  1. Smith, Ty
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de COL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de TBL
Logo de PIT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de ARI
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2026
Logo de OTT
Logo de COL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2083 500 000 $82 080 713 $0 $1 850 000 $1 419 287 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
835 000 $835 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
838 333 $838 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
762 500 $762 500 $
AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
805 000 $805 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
775 000 $775 000 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 déc. 2023 à 16 h 36
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,617
Mentions "j'aime": 4,590
Avs decline. Tarasenko isn't a C.
NMAvsFan, GiggywithGibby, HockeyManiac95 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
29 déc. 2023 à 16 h 37
#2
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,275
Mentions "j'aime": 24,117
I think Tarasenko just gets a late 1st. Brannstrom gets more. Smith is worthless
Missouri a aimé ceci.
29 déc. 2023 à 16 h 38
#3
Representing the 505
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,503
Mentions "j'aime": 3,689
Quoting: TJTwolf
Avs decline. Tarasenko isn't a C.


That is highway robbery for Tarasenko anyhow.
29 déc. 2023 à 16 h 38
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,617
Mentions "j'aime": 4,590
Quoting: NMAvsFan
That is highway robbery for Tarasenko anyhow.


There's that too!
29 déc. 2023 à 16 h 44
#5
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,275
Mentions "j'aime": 24,117
Quoting: NMAvsFan
That is highway robbery for Tarasenko anyhow.


Johansen at this point is probably a cap dump too
Missouri a aimé ceci.
29 déc. 2023 à 16 h 55
#6
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,895
Mentions "j'aime": 4,466
1. Colorado declines

2. Arizona accepts.

3. Pittsburgh accepts.
29 déc. 2023 à 18 h 20
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,474
Mentions "j'aime": 9,109
Quoting: csick
Johansen at this point is probably a cap dump too


He’s not a cap dump but he doesn’t have a lot of value he is just a really poor fit stylistically for the Avs because of his mediocre at best skating.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
29 déc. 2023 à 19 h 21
#8
Démarrer sujet
Retired V2 V3 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 3,617
Mentions "j'aime": 1,142
Quoting: TJTwolf
Avs decline. Tarasenko isn't a C.


Who said anything about a C?? Colorado has been linked to some wingers as well. Yes they need a C but they are reportedly looking to go all in this year. They’ve been rumoured to be going after Guentzel. So I figured if they don’t get him Tarasenko is another option who is also cheaper.


Quoting: csick
I think Tarasenko just gets a late 1st. Brannstrom gets more. Smith is worthless


Brannstrom I honestly wasn’t sure on his value. Smith is worthless, he’s just a throw in for roster spot.

Quoting: NMAvsFan
That is highway robbery for Tarasenko anyhow.


Quoting: TJTwolf
There's that too!


Quoting: csick
Johansen at this point is probably a cap dump too


Quoting: Xqb15a
He’s not a cap dump but he doesn’t have a lot of value he is just a really poor fit stylistically for the Avs because of his mediocre at best skating.


Johansen is viewed as a cap dump in this deal. 1st + prospect to get $4 million off the books for the next 2 years. And a 2nd rd pick for Tarasenko is how I broke it down. Some can argue Tarasenko should be worth more or less. The debate on Johansen being a cap dump or not is also something to consider. Some say he is, some say he isn’t. There is no right or wrong answer here. All of this is a consideration.

Thank you guys for the discussion! Have a Happy New Year!
29 déc. 2023 à 21 h 26
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,617
Mentions "j'aime": 4,590
Quoting: Missouri
Who said anything about a C?? Colorado has been linked to some wingers as well. Yes they need a C but they are reportedly looking to go all in this year. They’ve been rumoured to be going after Guentzel. So I figured if they don’t get him Tarasenko is another option who is also cheaper.

.


Brannstrom I honestly wasn’t sure on his value. Smith is worthless, he’s just a throw in for roster spot.









Johansen is viewed as a cap dump in this deal. 1st + prospect to get $4 million off the books for the next 2 years. And a 2nd rd pick for Tarasenko is how I broke it down. Some can argue Tarasenko should be worth more or less. The debate on Johansen being a cap dump or not is also something to consider. Some say he is, some say he isn’t. There is no right or wrong answer here. All of this is a consideration.

Thank you guys for the discussion! Have a Happy New Year!


Avs need help at C. I've not really seen the Avs linked to any wingers, they just traded one out for starters. Johansen is a stylistically bad fit that was a bit of a gamble for the Avs. It didn't really pay off. He isn't, however, the pure cap dump some like to make him out to be. The Avs certainly aren't going to pay that to 'dump' him. Tarasenko isn't a guy you go for (nor Guentzel) when you absolutely NEED help at C
Xqb15a et Missouri a aimé ceci.
30 déc. 2023 à 1 h 16
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,474
Mentions "j'aime": 9,109
Quoting: Missouri
Who said anything about a C?? Colorado has been linked to some wingers as well. Yes they need a C but they are reportedly looking to go all in this year. They’ve been rumoured to be going after Guentzel. So I figured if they don’t get him Tarasenko is another option who is also cheaper.




Brannstrom I honestly wasn’t sure on his value. Smith is worthless, he’s just a throw in for roster spot.









Johansen is viewed as a cap dump in this deal. 1st + prospect to get $4 million off the books for the next 2 years. And a 2nd rd pick for Tarasenko is how I broke it down. Some can argue Tarasenko should be worth more or less. The debate on Johansen being a cap dump or not is also something to consider. Some say he is, some say he isn’t. There is no right or wrong answer here. All of this is a consideration.

Thank you guys for the discussion! Have a Happy New Year!


That’s some imaginative math, first off it doesn’t get $4M in cap off this year, it gets $2.3M for this year off because all contracts are prorated, second when is a dude who is on pace for 25 goals a cap dump Tarasenko is on pace for 17-20. I’ll give you RyJo’s perceived value isn’t high but damn a team like CHI would take him for future considerations, and the Avs have traded exactly 1 1st rd pick under the current regime not a chance in hell they do this trade.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
30 déc. 2023 à 19 h 46
#11
Démarrer sujet
Retired V2 V3 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 3,617
Mentions "j'aime": 1,142
Quoting: TJTwolf
Avs need help at C. I've not really seen the Avs linked to any wingers, they just traded one out for starters. Johansen is a stylistically bad fit that was a bit of a gamble for the Avs. It didn't really pay off. He isn't, however, the pure cap dump some like to make him out to be. The Avs certainly aren't going to pay that to 'dump' him. Tarasenko isn't a guy you go for (nor Guentzel) when you absolutely NEED help at C


I understand that for sure. I’m more saying go for Tarasenko over Guentzel as a winger. Chris Johnston was just discussing the avs potential to go for a winger as well. So that’s why I made this.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage