SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What I would do if I was Holland

Créé par: yikes
Équipe: 2023-24 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 30 nov. 2023
Publié: 30 nov. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Kähkönen, Kaapo
Détails additionnels:
EDM receives a very strong back up/ competition for Skinner.
I’m not going to argue about stat lines, anyone who watches hockey/ SJS knows Blackwoods been a phenom that will cost too much and Kaapo has actually been very strong and there is evident improvement in his play when you watch this year vs last (not just opinion, it’s visible since his first game this year).
SJS
  1. Campbell, Jack
  2. Holloway, Dylan
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (EDM)
  5. Choix de 4e ronde en 2026 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Looks like the Oilers are on a big upswing, I’d offer the Sharks a conditional first for this year - which would start the conversation of taking Campbell on more than any other asset on the table.

*CONDITIONS: Top 15 Protected Pick*
- Essentially playoffs or no pick -

Next - I offer a 2nd next year which SJS would easily jump on. I think a 1st and 2nd are more than fair for taking on Campbell, but I’ll add Holloway to close the deal. He’s nothing special so I can’t see it hurting EDM and SJ can invest some time into a 22y that EDM can no longer afford.
2.
EDM
  1. Rutta, Jan
Détails additionnels:
San Jose also includes Rutta.
He’s a leader, good voice in the room (if you watch some of the Sharks content he’s already an admired leader in the Sharks room), and brings cup winning experience and desire to win into their room. I think he’s a perfect example of a player EDM could use to bolster their team on and off paper; for cheap.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
To keep the first layer of the trade from being massive I split it into two; these two trades happen in sync.
3.
EDM
  1. Monahan, Sean
Détails additionnels:
A return to glory. A cap dump from Calgary turns into a potential dagger into Calgary, in season or in the playoffs.

It would be a great pickup overall for depth, but also if you do face Calgary in a playoff race/ in the playoffs; you have a secret weapon on your third line.

BUT… BUT BUT BUT,
He won’t return a ransom. With his injury history, less then 50 games in the last two years, he’ll return MTL a good asset, but nothing to write home about. You already got a first to take on a real good NHL player, this is just a cherry MTL fans. Let Sean fly.
MTL
  1. Foegele, Warren
  2. Lavoie, Raphael
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Financially EDM needs Foegele gone, he could probably return a mid round pick so MTL flips him almost immediately or keeps him idc.
4.
EDM
  1. Chinakhov, Yegor
Détails additionnels:
Chinakhov and his agent are supposedly very unhappy and have requested a trade.

He was stretch of a pick and if he’s demanding out he won’t return a first or a 2nd or a 3rd. I’ll put up a Broberg in a 1 for 1 with Janmark.
CBJ
  1. Broberg, Philip
  2. Janmark, Mattias
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (NSH)
Détails additionnels:
CBJ gonna be making some trades so I’d expect Broberg to be relied upon more and more and receive heavier ice time/ investment as the year goes on.
5.
EDM
    I think SM and Allen are going to be pricey (over a 3rd fully retained) and I see Monahan as who EDM is really scouting.

    SJS get a first this year if not next (if EDM somehow regresses), and CBJ get a fair swap for a depreciating asset.

    MTL gets a good prospect and pick, with an asset returning flip. SJS gets a pick they need in this draft, a 2nd + more. CBJ gets a quality swap.
    MTL
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    2025
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    2026
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2283 500 000 $82 446 667 $850 000 $3 240 000 $1 053 333 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
    AG, C
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    807 500 $807 500 $
    AD, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AD, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 985 000 $1 985 000 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    775 000 $775 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 225 000 $$3M)
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    900 000 $900 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    762 500 $762 500 $
    DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    30 nov. 2023 à 18 h 25
    #1
    HockeyLeagueThreads
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2022
    Messages: 547
    Mentions "j'aime": 344
    If I'm the Sharks I don't touch that trade at all.
    30 nov. 2023 à 18 h 30
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    EklundCelebriniSmith
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2019
    Messages: 10,072
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,828
    Modifié 30 nov. 2023 à 18 h 37
    Quoting: Bobrick
    If I'm the Sharks I don't touch that trade at all.


    I don’t understand this notion of sharks fans (or not) and the idea of declining a first + a 2nd + a former first. It’s not trying to be rude towards you, I just truly don’t get it at all.

    You pray that the Pens miss but aren’t top 11 and you hope to select Zayne Parekh (or draft up, which having EDM first or another first helps you tremendously)

    hope the hockey gods/ lottery allows to select Celebrini and not CHI, then you collect more assets to accelerate your rebuild.

    Holloway is a waste, a first a quality draft/ any draft is valuable if you hit, and a 2nd is solid.

    San Jose DOES NOT NEED TO BE STINGY.
    Can you outline why SJS is better off not taking on Campbell for a 1st, Holloway, 2nd (we can disregard Rutta and other assets). Because I guarantee no fan can provide a valid argument to why SJS should not accept.

    - he’s a waste of AAV/ cap
    —SJS does not have any cap problems if they trade/ let the following walk
    . Hoffman, Duclair, Barabanov, Kahkonen, Labanc
    Labanc is guaranteed gone, the other 4 are highly likely trade bait and gone either way. I’ve literally got a draft where I trade for Weber and have Vlasic as a HS just so I can make the cap floor and I did not make any trades that matter.

    -Campbell is bad
    — and the sharks aren’t tanking?

    - Holloway is bad
    — repeat, and he’s 22 lol

    - Campbell should cost more
    — and if EDM refuses to pay more then we should accept this (proposed and fair) offer for both parties.
    30 nov. 2023 à 18 h 36
    #3
    HockeyLeagueThreads
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2022
    Messages: 547
    Mentions "j'aime": 344
    Quoting: yikes
    I don’t understand this notion of sharks fans (or not) and the idea of declining a first + a 2nd + a former first. It’s not trying to be rude towards you, I just truly don’t get it at all.

    You pray that the Pens miss but aren’t top 11 and you hope to select Zayne Parekh (or draft up, which having EDM first or another first helps you tremendously)

    hope the hockey gods/ lottery allows to select Celebrini and not CHI, then you collect more assets to accelerate your rebuild.

    Holloway is a waste, a first a quality draft/ any draft is valuable if you hit, and a 2nd is solid.

    San Jose DOES NOT NEED TO BE STINGY.
    Can you outline why SJS is better off not taking on Campbell for a 1st, Holloway, 2nd (we can disregard Rutta and other assets). Because I guarantee no fan can provide a valid argument to why SJS should not accept.

    - he’s a waste of AAV/ cap
    —SJS does not have any cap problems if they trade/ let the following walk
    . Hoffman, Duclair, Barabanov, Kahkonen, Labanc
    Labanc is guaranteed gone, the other 4 are highly likely trade bait and gone either way. I’ve literally got a draft where I trade for Weber and have Vlasic as a HS just so I can make the cap floor and I did not make any trades that matter.


    If you're willing to eat $20 million for that, go for it. It's not a great trade for the Sharks to basically give the Oilers the out that they're looking for.
    30 nov. 2023 à 18 h 39
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2023
    Messages: 83
    Mentions "j'aime": 26
    Oilers already have a good goalie
    30 nov. 2023 à 18 h 42
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    EklundCelebriniSmith
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2019
    Messages: 10,072
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,828
    Modifié 30 nov. 2023 à 18 h 49
    Quoting: Bobrick
    If you're willing to eat $20 million for that, go for it. It's not a great trade for the Sharks to basically give the Oilers the out that they're looking for.


    It’s also brutal cap management to not weaponize cap for assets? Can you name any other team that will take on Campbell?

    Anaheim - they’re trying to exit their rebuild
    Montreal - repeat
    Ottawa and most of the league - no money
    PHI - trying to exit their rebuild
    CBJ - repeat
    ARI - also not trying to tank anymore

    So let’s divulge this notion of “sure you’re willing to accept 20m to help EDM”.

    Campbell firstly isn’t a Vlasic contender for brutal buyouts (Vlasics buyout for the last two seasons is the only reason why is still in the NHL). Campbell as a buyout isn’t brutal. So if SJS doesn’t accept this proposed offer.. EDM will just ride it out.

    So your suggesting, a tanking team who’s bad, doesn’t need cap space because they have a ton - not utilize their cap space to receive multiple high round picks and a former first round pick because….??

    Sorry, that just makes zero sense to me and seems stubborn if Grier declines first + former first + a second.
    30 nov. 2023 à 18 h 45
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    EklundCelebriniSmith
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2019
    Messages: 10,072
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,828
    Quoting: LastDaze_
    Oilers already have a good goalie


    Where. Skinner? He needs someone to push him.
    30 nov. 2023 à 18 h 51
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 15,512
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,439
    Habs aren't trading Monahan for less than what we got for Lehkonen especially with his playoff history. We don't have to move him, he has already said he would like to resign and Habs love his skill and play style. He would be a great leader for the young guys when we do start to complete too
    yikes a aimé ceci.
    30 nov. 2023 à 18 h 55
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2023
    Messages: 83
    Mentions "j'aime": 26
    Quoting: yikes
    Where. Skinner? He needs someone to push him.


    Yes I think he’s perfectly fine as the Oiler’s starter. He’s had good numbers in the past and shutout few games ago.
    The D is the issue. The forwards also don’t play defense. If someone needs to be traded with picks it should be Nurse. Trading assets with Campbell would only make sense to me if they didn’t have a capable tender. They could use a better backup than Pickard or Campbell though for sure.
    30 nov. 2023 à 19 h 3
    #9
    sharks88
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 348
    Mentions "j'aime": 174
    Quoting: yikes
    It’s also brutal cap management to not weaponize cap for assets? Can you name any other team that will take on Campbell?

    Anaheim - they’re trying to exit their rebuild
    Montreal - repeat
    Ottawa and most of the league - no money
    PHI - trying to exit their rebuild
    CBJ - repeat
    ARI - also not trying to tank anymore

    So let’s divulge this notion of “sure you’re willing to accept 20m to help EDM”.

    Campbell firstly isn’t a Vlasic contender for brutal buyouts (Vlasics buyout for the last two seasons is the only reason why is still in the NHL). Campbell as a buyout isn’t brutal. So if SJS doesn’t accept this proposed offer.. EDM will just ride it out.

    So your suggesting, a tanking team who’s bad, doesn’t need cap space because they have a ton - not utilize their cap space to receive multiple high round picks and a former first round pick because….??

    Sorry, that just makes zero sense to me and seems stubborn if Grier declines first + former first + a second.


    Take off the condition on the 1st and that will make it better.

    This isn't a SJ fan/Grier issue not wanting the 'free' assets for taking on a bad contract, it's the fact that ownership has seemingly made it clear that they don't want to spend and use cap space for a poor on-ice product, otherwise EK would've (should've) been retained 30-50% for a much better return.
    30 nov. 2023 à 19 h 35
    #10
    Prime Primeau
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2023
    Messages: 5,437
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,153
    Habs laugh at that and trade Monahan to the stars for Faksa, Bourque and a second/third
    30 nov. 2023 à 19 h 42
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 3,774
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,246
    Chinakhov did not ask for a trade. He’s mad he’s not playing more. He specifically said he did not ask for one.
    yikes et squashmaple a aimé ceci.
    30 nov. 2023 à 19 h 59
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 1,631
    Mentions "j'aime": 531
    Quoting: Bobrick
    If I'm the Sharks I don't touch that trade at all.


    that's my purse, I don't know you!

    agree this needs a bit more for Campbell starting with removing or drastically reducing the conditions on the 1st

    I really don't see SJ getting good again for 3-4 years minimum, so taking Campbell's contract to get better over time seems like a good rebuild strategy
    30 nov. 2023 à 20 h 5
    #13
    Démarrer sujet
    EklundCelebriniSmith
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2019
    Messages: 10,072
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,828
    Quoting: sharksdoee
    Take off the condition on the 1st and that will make it better.

    This isn't a SJ fan/Grier issue not wanting the 'free' assets for taking on a bad contract, it's the fact that ownership has seemingly made it clear that they don't want to spend and use cap space for a poor on-ice product, otherwise EK would've (should've) been retained 30-50% for a much better return.


    They’re already using bad money on:
    Labanc
    Granlund (a tad overpaid)
    Vlasic
    Hoffman (overpaid kinda)

    Using Campbell as a goalie for the rest of the rebuild isn’t bad money if we’re receiving assets. Ownership, at its core, doesn’t want to rebuild and many have argued they’re the reason Wilson made many of his final/ late moves before moving on and that he wasn’t solely to blame for many of the decisions.

    So, if acquiring Campbell - accelerates the rebuild, Ownership will buy in.

    Quoting: Friendly_Cannon
    Chinakhov did not ask for a trade. He’s mad he’s not playing more. He specifically said he did not ask for one.


    My bad

    Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
    Habs laugh at that and trade Monahan to the stars for Faksa, Bourque and a second/third


    And everyone on this site traded Zadorov for over a first, so I take what you say with a grain of salt.

    Monahans injury history (less than 50 games in two years) doesn’t make you get a near blue chip prospect and a second - that’s a pipe dream.

    Quoting: Campabee
    Habs aren't trading Monahan for less than what we got for Lehkonen especially with his playoff history. We don't have to move him, he has already said he would like to resign and Habs love his skill and play style. He would be a great leader for the young guys when we do start to complete too




    This makes far more sense guyguyguy

    Quoting: LastDaze_
    Yes I think he’s perfectly fine as the Oiler’s starter. He’s had good numbers in the past and shutout few games ago.
    The D is the issue. The forwards also don’t play defense. If someone needs to be traded with picks it should be Nurse. Trading assets with Campbell would only make sense to me if they didn’t have a capable tender. They could use a better backup than Pickard or Campbell though for sure.



    Exactly why I gave Kaapo. A guy who can push Skinner, provide quality starts - but not takeaway Skinners job unless Skinner fails or Kaapo shines. It’s really a non issue (acquiring Kaapo) and has only upside if you get immediate cap space for the suggested other players acquired here.
    Quoting: poeticentropy

    I really don't see SJ getting good again for 3-4 years minimum, so taking Campbell's contract to get better over time seems like a good rebuild strategy

    EDM insiders states EDM put everything on the table except their 2024 first so it’s not feasible to believe they will offer their 2024 first without protection. A 2024 first to be a 2025 first if they miss is fair. As you said what I’ve been harping on. Campbell deal helps the rebuild, so there’s no issue in paying him.
    30 nov. 2023 à 20 h 13
    #14
    Prime Primeau
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2023
    Messages: 5,437
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,153
    Quoting: yikes

    And everyone on this site traded Zadorov for over a first, so I take what you say with a grain of salt.

    Monahans injury history (less than 50 games in two years) doesn’t make you get a near blue chip prospect and a second - that’s a pipe dream.


    Health is overrated in Monahan’s case. If he gets traded, it would be at the deadline if he is healthy. If that happens, that means he is pretty much healthy again from his hip injury, wich was the problem in the last few years. So he would be back to his old form and not more injury prone than any guy you trade for
    30 nov. 2023 à 21 h 38
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 358
    Mentions "j'aime": 89
    Modifié 1 déc. 2023 à 0 h 56
    Sharks absolutely accept. They could give him the 24-25 season as a backup to Blackwood and to see if he regains some form. If not they can buy him out summer of 2025 for low cost. Reasonable risk/reward
    30 nov. 2023 à 22 h 12
    #16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 4,184
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,001
    The best thing holland could do for the Oliers is Resign
    30 nov. 2023 à 22 h 45
    #17
    Boris Bagel
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2016
    Messages: 2,834
    Mentions "j'aime": 605
    Habs pass
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage