SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sell off

Créé par: AK50
Équipe: 2023-24 Blue Jackets de Columbus
Date de création initiale: 29 nov. 2023
Publié: 30 nov. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CBJ
  1. Kadri, Nazem (1 500 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
They get out of this deal, CBJ gets a centre
CGY
  1. Gudbranson, Erik
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (CBJ)
2.
CBJ
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
3.
4.
CBJ
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
WPG
  1. Teräväinen, Teuvo (2 700 000 $ retained)
5.
CBJ
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
6.
CBJ
  1. Faksa, Radek
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (DAL)
DAL
  1. Roslovic, Jack (2 000 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CAR
Logo de WPG
Logo de DAL
Logo de CBJ
Logo de LAK
Logo de VAN
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de PIT
2025
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de VGK
2026
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $75 739 166 $0 $5 900 000 $7 760 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 750 000 $9 750 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 200 000 $$3M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 525 000 $1 525 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 583 333 $9 583 333 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 333 333 $2 333 333 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
825 000 $825 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 nov. 2023 à 9 h 43
#1
EuroTrash Hockey Vet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 762
Mentions "j'aime": 370
whats the value on Kent Johnson?
30 nov. 2023 à 9 h 47
#2
On the Rod Meal Plan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 503
Mentions "j'aime": 306
Necas gets plenty of (somewhat justified) flak for his lack of defensive play. Laine does not pass the eye test defensively. Add on that Necas is an RFA and I wouldn't trade him 1 for 1 for Laine, especially since his next contract will likely come in under Laine's 8.7M (although probably not by much).

Also for this year Necas has more than twice the points that Laine has.

Chinakhov is an interesting prospect, but frankly with how well Turbo has played this year as well as his psychic link to Aho, I don't see him being traded either.
30 nov. 2023 à 9 h 54
#3
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 8,733
Mentions "j'aime": 3,601
Necas gets flak for defensive play? I don’t see that…my knocks on him would be confidence and decision making with the puck. When he’s engaged and confident, he’s one of the best playmakers in the league. When he’s not - he might as well not be on the ice. However, I don’t think he’s a liability defensively, he’s adequate.

Agree on the Laine point, just don’t see the fit.

Quoting: Huge_Caniac_Abe_Lincoln
Necas gets plenty of (somewhat justified) flak for his lack of defensive play. Laine does not pass the eye test defensively. Add on that Necas is an RFA and I wouldn't trade him 1 for 1 for Laine, especially since his next contract will likely come in under Laine's 8.7M (although probably not by much).

Also for this year Necas has more than twice the points that Laine has.

Chinakhov is an interesting prospect, but frankly with how well Turbo has played this year as well as his psychic link to Aho, I don't see him being traded either.
30 nov. 2023 à 10 h 5
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 1,725
Mentions "j'aime": 666
Kadri's been one of Calgary's best forwards lately, don't need out of the deal, especially not retaining for Gudbransson.
30 nov. 2023 à 11 h 3
#5
not a he )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 3,174
Mentions "j'aime": 4,293
Columbus shouldn't have any interest in the future of Kadri's contract, which would be an anchor as soon as next season as Fantilli and Sillinger mature and as long as Jenner is still on the team. Gudbranson's important to the room of young guys. Definitely pass on that one.

Carolina passes on the second one, so therefore the Winnipeg deal can't happen.

They're not moving Danforth. He's the perfect fourth liner and veteran and he's stupid cheap.

I don't know what Dallas's needs are, but no way does Jack have that kind of value especially right now with a broken ankle.

Quoting: YoungPattyKane
whats the value on Kent Johnson?


Considering they just called him back up, I'd say with confidence he is not available.
YoungPattyKane et CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
30 nov. 2023 à 11 h 13
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 941
Mentions "j'aime": 408
These look pretty bad for Calgary and Carolina IMO.
Sure, Calgary gets out of the Kadri deal. But they take on another defenseman when their blue line is already pretty crowded, and that's 6 years of retention on Kadri.
Teravainen and Necas are combined for 16 goals, 40 points on the year. Chinakov and Laine combine for 7 goals, 11 points. Carolina's a contender and they aren't going to give you a first to get worse.

I as a Pens fan will happily take Justin Danforth off your hands, though.
evelutions2 a aimé ceci.
30 nov. 2023 à 11 h 31
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 978
Mentions "j'aime": 255
Think many teams see Peeke as a 3rd pairing guy, if not a decent7/8. Consequently your cost may seem high as is the CAP hit/term. Vancouver for instance may take a chance on him if they get to move out CAP too for a position of greater need. Garland may be the appropriate (same term) player coming back the other way (as many others have pointed out), although he has done very well on the third line of late. Perhaps CBJ could add another player they want to offload (again, as many have pointed out) to make the deal work. Olivier? It could look like: CBJ: Peeke/Olivier Van: Garland/Studnicka (Van retains $900K). Studnicka is 24, can play C or W and can be buried (100%) in minors. Laine/Fantilli/Garland ?
30 nov. 2023 à 12 h 2
#8
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,644
Mentions "j'aime": 3,473
Laine doesn’t have the value that a lot of people seem to think he has.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage