Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 978
Mentions "j'aime": 255
Think many teams see Peeke as a 3rd pairing guy, if not a decent7/8. Consequently your cost may seem high as is the CAP hit/term. Vancouver for instance may take a chance on him if they get to move out CAP too for a position of greater need. Garland may be the appropriate (same term) player coming back the other way (as many others have pointed out), although he has done very well on the third line of late. Perhaps CBJ could add another player they want to offload (again, as many have pointed out) to make the deal work. Olivier? It could look like: CBJ: Peeke/Olivier Van: Garland/Studnicka (Van retains $900K). Studnicka is 24, can play C or W and can be buried (100%) in minors. Laine/Fantilli/Garland ?