SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tell how bad of a idea this is

Créé par: RavensShadow
Équipe: 2023-24 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 28 sept. 2023
Publié: 28 sept. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Boston gives a little to get a little, with not much room to play with. Ulmark might work with a third team involved. Or what would you add.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
57 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Zegras, Trevor [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Boston gets a top center
ANA
  1. Grzelcyk, Matt
  2. Swayman, Jeremy
Détails additionnels:
The Ducks get a goalie they can control or trade later
2.
BOS
  1. Luukkonen, Ukko-Pekka
Détails additionnels:
Just a example
BUF
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (BOS)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $83 745 834 $4 500 000 $500 000 $-245 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
837 500 $837 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 137 500 $1 137 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 sept. 2023 à 9 h 17
#1
LBS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 1,518
Mentions "j'aime": 559
If Boston can succesfully fleece two teams, they should jump at the opportunity.
ANA has Gibson and Dostal, no real need for a goalie.
BUF could trade UPL but, he's at least worth a 3rd and they have a 3way goaltending battle going on, UPL could be the best one for this coming year, why trade him now?
RavensShadow, tupty, aedoran and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2023 à 9 h 47
#2
Pop Pop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 14,633
Mentions "j'aime": 8,285
It's a great idea but it's not enough to get Zegras
RavensShadow, aedoran et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2023 à 10 h 26
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,273
Mentions "j'aime": 6,247
Can't imagine Anaheim is doing that. Might be selling low on upl, but it's not crazy low. Probably would need a stable option behind Levi before upl gets moved.
aedoran, RavensShadow, OldNYIfan and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2023 à 10 h 32
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,832
Mentions "j'aime": 8,854
For the Ducks it’s a terrible idea. Add a 1st they still decline.

FYI - Boston does not need a goalie if they trade one.
RavensShadow, OldNYIfan, gretzkyghosts and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2023 à 10 h 53
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 526
Mentions "j'aime": 378
Quoting: Gofnut999
For the Ducks it’s a terrible idea. Add a 1st they still decline.

FYI - Boston does not need a goalie if they trade one.


This was the first draft, I think a 3 way with Buffalo being the third team might work. They have the young talent and Boston have parts Buffalo could use.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2023 à 7 h 36
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 280
Mentions "j'aime": 39
Quoting: lowblocksniper
If Boston can successful fleece two teams, they should jump at the opportunity.
ANA has Gibson and Dostal, no real need for a goalie.
BUF could trade UPL but, he's at least worth a 3rd and they have a 3way goaltending battle going on, UPL could be the best one for this coming year, why trade him now?



Gibson has been terrible the last two years, His GAA was 3.99 last year. It's a big contract but he's not a top guy now. I think him being the 35% behind a top goalie's 65% would be better for Anaheim, with that said, B's aren't trading Swayman, if they ship a goalie it'll be Ully.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2023 à 7 h 38
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 280
Mentions "j'aime": 39
Zegras is only looking for $5M on a 2-3 year contract. 100% if they could swing a trade they should just give him the $5M over 3. He'd still be an RFA at the end of that and they could offrer sheet him and either work something out or if someone comes in to snipe him get significant compensation by letting him go.
RavensShadow et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2023 à 7 h 42
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 280
Mentions "j'aime": 39
Quoting: Gofnut999
For the Ducks it’s a terrible idea. Add a 1st they still decline.

FYI - Boston does not need a goalie if they trade one.


No **** right. Bussi easily fills the back up role going forward and Kyser and Dipeitro are more than serviceable. Plus they also have Svedeback who had an incredible year at Providence College. The goalie depth in this system is ridiculous.
29 sept. 2023 à 8 h 58
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 526
Mentions "j'aime": 378
Quoting: DLussier
Gibson has been terrible the last two years, His GAA was 3.99 last year. It's a big contract but he's not a top guy now. I think him being the 35% behind a top goalie's 65% would be better for Anaheim, with that said, B's aren't trading Swayman, if they ship a goalie it'll be Ully.


The biggest problem with Ulmark is his M-NTC. If they move him it's just another obstacle. Swayman has more value and is easier to move. Boston only has a handful of players they can move. Most are older and or on a M-NTC so it makes things difficult for them.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
29 sept. 2023 à 9 h 2
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 280
Mentions "j'aime": 39
Quoting: RavensShadow
The biggest problem with Ulmark is his M-NTC. If they move him it's just another obstacle. Swayman has more value and is easier to move. Boston only has a handful of players they can move. Most are older and or on a M-NTC so it makes things difficult for them.


Ullmarks M-NTC is only 15 teams and realistically if you are trading him to a contending team, I doubt he will put up a fuss. Especially considering if he doesn;t want to approve it he becomes the 30% of the 70/30 split
RavensShadow et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage