Modifié 22 sept. 2023 à 22 h 32
Quoting: NHLfan10506
If I took all the suggestions….
ANA gives: Zegras
ANA gets: Pinto, Joseph, Greig, 1st
CAR gives: Jarvis, Drury, 1st, 2nd
CAR gets: Zegras
OTT gives: Pinto, Greig, Joseph
OTT gets: Jarvis, Drury, 2nd
I don’t think Anaheim considers that. If anything, they would probably opt for the package Carolina is giving here (Jarvis, Drury, 1st, 2nd) over the final group (Pinto, Greig, Joseph, 1st).
Sens wouldn't trade either Pinto or Greig for Chychrun (which was a TOP need), they're not going to move BOTH for Jarvis lol
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I meant adding Greig if they were getting Jarvis
I am just not trading Greig, period.
I would do Pinto for Jarvis even though it creates a hole at 3rd line Center for this season. But personally wouldn't mind having Greig there if Giroux is on his wing
Quoting: NHLfan10506
ANA gives: Zegras, Luneau
ANA gets: Jarvis, Pinto, Joseph, Ostapchuk, 1st
CAR gives: Jarvis, Necas
CAR gets: Zegras
OTT gives: Pinto, Joseph, Ostapchuk, 1st
OTT gets: Necas, Luneau
This is closer but why would Ottawa want to do major trades? Pinto and Ostapchuk are pretty much in their plans, they specifically drafted them, they developed them and projected them into their future core
Sens don't want to trade cost controlled futures like Ostapchuk and a 1st (and even Pinto) for a guy who will be expensive as soon as next year. They already have all their stars. They'll only need to replace Tarasenko next season and that's pretty much it
They only need to save about 1.5 AAV for THIS season. They are totally fine cap wise after that. Why would they want to make a big trade to fix a very simple issue?
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Pinto + Greig + Joseph for Jarvis
I view that as fairly even swap.
It's ok if you do. We don't
All of Greig, Jarvis and Pinto have been ranked in the same range in prospects rankings over the years. Why would one of them be worth the other 2?