SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

JT Nuller

Créé par: TampaBayFan94
Équipe: 2023-24 Blue Jackets de Columbus
Date de création initiale: 15 sept. 2023
Publié: 15 sept. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Bean, Jake
  2. Sillinger, Cole
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (CBJ)
2.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de LAK
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
2025
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de VGK
2026
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $79 668 333 $0 $6 900 000 $3 831 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 750 000 $9 750 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C, AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 200 000 $$3M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 525 000 $1 525 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 583 333 $9 583 333 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
825 000 $825 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 sept. 2023 à 1 h 54
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2023
Messages: 234
Mentions "j'aime": 101
Not close on Miller.

Asking price at last year's deadline was an A prospects, 1st, 1st, 2nd.

Hasn't come down by much.
fangm a aimé ceci.
15 sept. 2023 à 8 h 3
#2
not a he )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 3,383
Mentions "j'aime": 4,701
Columbus declines both of these without a second thought.
BoomerTheHero et benjgc a aimé ceci.
15 sept. 2023 à 12 h 10
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,870
Mentions "j'aime": 2,587
Quoting: NucksExec
Not close on Miller.

Asking price at last year's deadline was an A prospects, 1st, 1st, 2nd.

Hasn't come down by much.


Enjoy him then, because no one is paying that. That contract will be an albatross in 2-3 years
15 sept. 2023 à 14 h 23
#4
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,080
Mentions "j'aime": 913
Quoting: squashmaple
Columbus declines both of these without a second thought.


You've clearly not seen Peterson. This dude may be a legit top 6 guy
15 sept. 2023 à 15 h 11
#5
not a he )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 3,383
Mentions "j'aime": 4,701
Quoting: AStovetop
You've clearly not seen Peterson. This dude may be a legit top 6 guy


A fifth round pick from 2017 with 25 points 77 career NHL games, who was traded from a contender for basically nothing last year? Color me skeptical.
benjgc et CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
15 sept. 2023 à 15 h 30
#6
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,080
Mentions "j'aime": 913
Quoting: squashmaple
A fifth round pick from 2017 with 25 points 77 career NHL games, who was traded from a contender for basically nothing last year? Color me skeptical.


You're elaborating on my point. You just looked him up and have never actually seen him play. He had 8 points in 11 games on a garbage offensive team and was the best player (outside of Karlsson) to end the season. idk why you're even bringing up draft position lol. That's like saying St. Louis was bad because he went undrafted

Peeke is average (at best) defensively over his career and only gotten worse (Being the green jacket winner last season) and has a career high of 15 points in a season. Easy pass
15 sept. 2023 à 16 h 32
#7
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 7,030
Mentions "j'aime": 3,597
canucks pass.

sillinger fumbled the bag, not a winner
15 sept. 2023 à 21 h 1
#8
not a he )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 3,383
Mentions "j'aime": 4,701
Quoting: AStovetop
You're elaborating on my point. You just looked him up and have never actually seen him play. He had 8 points in 11 games on a garbage offensive team and was the best player (outside of Karlsson) to end the season. idk why you're even bringing up draft position lol. That's like saying St. Louis was bad because he went undrafted

Peeke is average (at best) defensively over his career and only gotten worse (Being the green jacket winner last season) and has a career high of 15 points in a season. Easy pass


You’re right, I don’t know anything about the player beyond what I looked up just now. Because he is not a significant player who gets you a return in a trade. Being the best player on the post-Karlsson 2022-23 San Jose Sharks isn’t an achievement.

I can’t stand Andrew Peeke. I can’t wait until he’s traded and I never have to watch him make boneheaded decisions on the ice and whine to the officials again. But what he is is a large defensive defenseman who happened to be the only one to stay healthy on a decimated team last year, forced into first pair minutes when his skillset should never be forced into that role. His handedness also means he has more value than a depth wing. I’m all for trading Peeke, but not giving him away for a player who might be middle-six in Cleveland.
CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
18 sept. 2023 à 16 h 58
#9
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,080
Mentions "j'aime": 913
Quoting: squashmaple
You’re right, I don’t know anything about the player beyond what I looked up just now. Because he is not a significant player who gets you a return in a trade. Being the best player on the post-Karlsson 2022-23 San Jose Sharks isn’t an achievement.

I can’t stand Andrew Peeke. I can’t wait until he’s traded and I never have to watch him make boneheaded decisions on the ice and whine to the officials again. But what he is is a large defensive defenseman who happened to be the only one to stay healthy on a decimated team last year, forced into first pair minutes when his skillset should never be forced into that role. His handedness also means he has more value than a depth wing. I’m all for trading Peeke, but not giving him away for a player who might be middle-six in Cleveland.


I don't know what else to say other than watch hockey outside of your team. If YOU don't want to do this trade then that's great, because the Sharks wouldn't either.

I'd take Peterson 10 times out of 10 even with how thin our RD is
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage