Sabres ain't trading from a position of weakness for a player they don't need. Especially not trading Sammy

Power/Dahlin? You call that weakness.

No more of these Jesus that hurt to look at

Thanks for the easy “nope”

- Anaheim

Defensive dmen

Outside of those two and Samuelson, their defense is the greatest

McTavish has higher upside than Nylander. He’ll be close to a PPG player playing C vs Nylander on the wing.

I’d rather have 5 years of Keller at $7.1m, than 1 year of Willy’s bargain contract and then 8 years of whatever absurd number he wants

there has been nothing from AZ side that they were open to trading keller for nylander - the reports were TML approached nylander about extension and he declined. idk if AZ was open or not to it, id hope not.

Yeah Keller is untouchable, they’ll never move him unless he point blank says he’s done here.

@wojme is absolutely correct
But let’s not go too overboard at @fangm
He actually had a pretty levelheaded take, in thinking that a Nylander to Buffalo trade “wasn’t reasonable”

And as @fangm (basically) said,
we frankly just have way too much offensive forward talent to be interested in Nylander

And to the point wojme made,
Samuelsson is too important a part of our defense
He’s been a great partner for Dahlin, & there just isn’t a reason to break them up & restart the 3year cycle it took to find Dahlin a quality partner to begin with

I don’t wanna say Samuelsson is “untouchable”
But it’s really hard to imagine a scenario in which we’d move him

If the Bruins are trading Carlo, it will be for a 1/2 center.