SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

CGY TOR

Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 17 août 2023
Publié: 17 août 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CBJ
  1. Timmins, Conor
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (NYI)
2.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $79 781 584 $0 $0 $3 718 416 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 725 000 $2 725 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 août 2023 à 6 h 5
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 976
Mentions "j'aime": 835
No incentive to move Peeke for a 3rd. Better just to hold him.
17 août 2023 à 6 h 19
#2
GO LEAFS GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2023
Messages: 288
Mentions "j'aime": 91
These are horrible for Toronto
17 août 2023 à 7 h 2
#3
Be formless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 2,911
Mentions "j'aime": 1,056
Quoting: Trevor31lv
No incentive to move Peeke for a 3rd. Better just to hold him.


No incentive? How about not have 2.75m sitting in the press box? Peeke and/or Boqvist are extra. I'd take a 3rd for Peeke or a 2nd for Boq. Jiricek is too damn good. He needs to play. I'm fine with keeping one and brining up Jiricek when there is injury, but both Peeke and Boqvist don't need to stay.
17 août 2023 à 7 h 33
#4
FKA Bigtittielarper
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 7,750
Mentions "j'aime": 2,231
Don’t want zadorov
17 août 2023 à 8 h 32
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 976
Mentions "j'aime": 835
Quoting: Hockey_Soul
No incentive? How about not have 2.75m sitting in the press box? Peeke and/or Boqvist are extra. I'd take a 3rd for Peeke or a 2nd for Boq. Jiricek is too damn good. He needs to play. I'm fine with keeping one and brining up Jiricek when there is injury, but both Peeke and Boqvist don't need to stay.


Yes, no incentive. They don't need that cap for anything else this season and if they're only getting a 3rd, they'd be better off just holding him. I don't have a problem with keeping Jiricek in the AHL for a few months to start the season and I'd rather move Boqvist than Peeke anyway, but a 3rd is not enough for me to move him just because RD is a position of strength. They can absolutely get a 2nd out of a team at some point during the season, so I'm not gonna rush things and take a 3rd.
Ajp_18 a aimé ceci.
17 août 2023 à 8 h 58
#6
Be formless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 2,911
Mentions "j'aime": 1,056
Quoting: Trevor31lv
Yes, no incentive. They don't need that cap for anything else this season and if they're only getting a 3rd, they'd be better off just holding him. I don't have a problem with keeping Jiricek in the AHL for a few months to start the season and I'd rather move Boqvist than Peeke anyway, but a 3rd is not enough for me to move him just because RD is a position of strength. They can absolutely get a 2nd out of a team at some point during the season, so I'm not gonna rush things and take a 3rd.


I get they don't have to trade him, but a 3rd is fair value. Maybe a 2nd but that's only in a unique situation that may never come to fruition. I'd take the pick and relieve a bit of the log jam in front of Jiricek. There's no rushing, he's a stud and should be getting NHL minutes.
17 août 2023 à 9 h 19
#7
Rip
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 11,835
Mentions "j'aime": 3,144
Quoting: SomeonesOffended
Don’t want zadorov


I'd take him. He's good for the 3rd pair, hulking brute who hits and can keep the crease clear. He's not very good though but come the playoffs when the refs let everything go, he'll become more valuable. As much as I hate it, you need some of these goons in the playoffs. N
17 août 2023 à 9 h 20
#8
Rip
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 11,835
Mentions "j'aime": 3,144
Quoting: Trevor31lv
Yes, no incentive. They don't need that cap for anything else this season and if they're only getting a 3rd, they'd be better off just holding him. I don't have a problem with keeping Jiricek in the AHL for a few months to start the season and I'd rather move Boqvist than Peeke anyway, but a 3rd is not enough for me to move him just because RD is a position of strength. They can absolutely get a 2nd out of a team at some point during the season, so I'm not gonna rush things and take a 3rd.


You aren't getting a 2nd for an overpriced 6/7 defenceman.
17 août 2023 à 9 h 35
#9
not a he )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 3,267
Mentions "j'aime": 4,473
Quoting: Trevor31lv
Yes, no incentive. They don't need that cap for anything else this season and if they're only getting a 3rd, they'd be better off just holding him. I don't have a problem with keeping Jiricek in the AHL for a few months to start the season and I'd rather move Boqvist than Peeke anyway, but a 3rd is not enough for me to move him just because RD is a position of strength. They can absolutely get a 2nd out of a team at some point during the season, so I'm not gonna rush things and take a 3rd.


Quoting: Hockey_Soul
I get they don't have to trade him, but a 3rd is fair value. Maybe a 2nd but that's only in a unique situation that may never come to fruition. I'd take the pick and relieve a bit of the log jam in front of Jiricek. There's no rushing, he's a stud and should be getting NHL minutes.


The move is to hold him til the trade deadline and reap more than a third from a team desperate for a shutdown RD.
Hockey_Soul et Ajp_18 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage