SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Chris Drury

Créé par: Coachchippy
Équipe: 2024-25 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 10 août 2023
Publié: 10 août 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3825 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
64 750 000 $
54 500 000 $
43 275 000 $
54 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Mittelstadt, Casey [Droits de RFA]
BUF
  1. Belzile, Alex
  2. Jones, Zachary
  3. Panarin, Artemi (5 500 000 $ retained)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2026 (NYR)
2.
MIN
  1. Goodrow, Barclay
  2. Lindgren, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (DAL)
  4. Choix de 5e ronde en 2025 (MIN)
3.
TOR
  1. Kakko, Kaapo
  2. McConnell-Barker, Bryce
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NYR)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (NYR)
4.
MTL
  1. Trocheck, Vincent (1 000 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2026
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2087 500 000 $87 990 000 $512 500 $530 000 $-490 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 437 500 $4 437 500 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
825 000 $825 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
775 000 $775 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
838 333 $838 333 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 872 000 $3 872 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 666 667 $5 666 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
775 000 $775 000 $
G
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
846 667 $846 667 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 275 000 $3 275 000 $
DD
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 août 2023 à 19 h 49
#1
Servant of Chaos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 1,113
Mentions "j'aime": 455
Is not nearly dumb enough to lose this many trades this badly.
Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
10 août 2023 à 19 h 51
#2
Démarrer sujet
CHYTIL 4 Conn Smythe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2023
Messages: 1,151
Mentions "j'aime": 228
Quoting: FreeTacosAreBestTacos
Is not nearly dumb enough to lose this many trades this badly.


Which do you think he's losing? Panarin, Goodrow, and Trocheck contracts are going to age terribly. Lindgren and Kakko are unfortunate casualties. But Marner, Mittelstadt, and Newhook would be good additions
10 août 2023 à 19 h 53
#3
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,772
Mentions "j'aime": 22,808
I would suggest you look at the players MNC or NTC or even M NTCs before posting trades like this.
Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
10 août 2023 à 19 h 54
#4
Démarrer sujet
CHYTIL 4 Conn Smythe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2023
Messages: 1,151
Mentions "j'aime": 228
Quoting: palhal
I would suggest you look at the players MNC or NTC or even M NTCs before posting trades like this.


They can always be convinced to waive
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
10 août 2023 à 19 h 54
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,202
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Counter: Kakko, Laf, Schneider, pick for Marner, Jarnkrok, Timmins

ie. No thank you. And PS Marner declines, he has a full NMC
10 août 2023 à 19 h 58
#6
Démarrer sujet
CHYTIL 4 Conn Smythe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2023
Messages: 1,151
Mentions "j'aime": 228
Quoting: leafs101
Counter: Kakko, Laf, Schneider, pick for Marner, Jarnkrok, Timmins

ie. No thank you. And PS Marner declines, he has a full NMC


I'd actually consider sending all of those except Schneider. You don't think Marner could be convinced to waive, for NYC of all locations?
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
10 août 2023 à 20 h 1
#7
Servant of Chaos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 1,113
Mentions "j'aime": 455
Quoting: Coachchippy
Which do you think he's losing? Panarin, Goodrow, and Trocheck contracts are going to age terribly. Lindgren and Kakko are unfortunate casualties. But Marner, Mittelstadt, and Newhook would be good additions


Let's go top to bottom here, shall we?
- Panarin at 50% brings back a 1st+top prospect, minimum. Over the last 4 years, he's 4th in the league in points. Panarin @50% + 1st >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mittelstadt.
- Goodrow can be bought out for a pittance, and you have us trading Lindgren (a significantly better, not to mention younger, DMan than Middleton), to get rid of him, then adding picks on top
- You're giving up Kakko, a 1st, and a 2nd for a guy who can walk in a year, and will demand 10m+ in his next contract
- Newhook had every chance to earn a Top 6 spot in Colorado this year, and absolutely blew it. You're giving up the Rangers 2C for him. And retaining for 4 years.

In summary, every trade is a loss for the Rangers, and multiple are genuinely terrible.
gretzkyghosts, Fox_Czar_Cup, NYR1983 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
10 août 2023 à 20 h 28
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,537
Mentions "j'aime": 6,451
Montreal isn't trading Newhook whomever they JUST acquired unless you are sending Laf the other way
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
10 août 2023 à 21 h 32
#9
Démarrer sujet
CHYTIL 4 Conn Smythe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2023
Messages: 1,151
Mentions "j'aime": 228
Quoting: Campabee
Montreal isn't trading Newhook whomever they JUST acquired unless you are sending Laf the other way


This is for the 2024-25 year not the upcoming season
10 août 2023 à 21 h 35
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 782
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: Campabee
Montreal isn't trading Newhook whomever they JUST acquired unless you are sending Laf the other way


You should seriously reconcider. Trocheck with a little retention is worth way more than laf.
NYR1983 a aimé ceci.
10 août 2023 à 21 h 37
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 782
Mentions "j'aime": 339
I cant believe how much worse you've made the rangers.
HOCKEYBOY448 a aimé ceci.
10 août 2023 à 22 h 19
#12
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,772
Mentions "j'aime": 22,808
Quoting: Coachchippy
They can always be convinced to waive


I guess the cap means nothing too. Sorry just silly trades to entertain.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
10 août 2023 à 22 h 36
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,537
Mentions "j'aime": 6,451
Quoting: DDossett
You should seriously reconcider. Trocheck with a little retention is worth way more than laf.


Trochek is on the wrong side of 30 to fit the Habs window, Laf would be worth the risk if you really believe he will hit his ceiling. I am not convinced he will but I can see Hughes taking that risk.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
11 août 2023 à 0 h 56
#14
Démarrer sujet
CHYTIL 4 Conn Smythe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2023
Messages: 1,151
Mentions "j'aime": 228
Quoting: palhal
I guess the cap means nothing too. Sorry just silly trades to entertain.


These trades left the Rangers cap compliant though?
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
11 août 2023 à 1 h 6
#15
Démarrer sujet
CHYTIL 4 Conn Smythe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2023
Messages: 1,151
Mentions "j'aime": 228
Quoting: FreeTacosAreBestTacos
Let's go top to bottom here, shall we?
- Panarin at 50% brings back a 1st+top prospect, minimum. Over the last 4 years, he's 4th in the league in points. Panarin 50% + 1st >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mittelstadt.
- Goodrow can be bought out for a pittance, and you have us trading Lindgren (a significantly better, not to mention younger, DMan than Middleton), to get rid of him, then adding picks on top
- You're giving up Kakko, a 1st, and a 2nd for a guy who can walk in a year, and will demand 10m+ in his next contract
- Newhook had every chance to earn a Top 6 spot in Colorado this year, and absolutely blew it. You're giving up the Rangers 2C for him. And retaining for 4 years.

In summary, every trade is a loss for the Rangers, and multiple are genuinely terrible.


Sadly I disagree about Panarin. He's aging, and since this team is for 2024-25 he would be pushing 35. Retaining salary is the only way to get another team to take on his albatross contract. Literally no one would want him (or those that would, wouldn't be able to because of cap) without doing that. You also probably need to add the first to sweeten the deal, and it still isn't going to land you someone like Draisaitl. Mittelstadt is 7 yrs younger than Panarin, was a top ten pick, and is good for putting up 60+ points per season. Not a bad return at all imo

Fair enough about Goodrow. I figured to package him up with Lindgren because Lindgren, while great, plays a style that ages extremely poorly. Like Dan Girardi. You can pay Middleton under 2.5 mil on a short term and he would be serviceable. Lindgren would likely ask for more money and a much longer term and it just doesn't fit with our needs imo.

I don't see what's wrong with signing Marner for more than 10 million, assuming that he would want to extend in NY. We are paying Panarin more than that to put up less points, plus Marner is defensively responsible (in fact Selke caliber) unlike Panarin. And again, Marner is significantly younger than Panarin. So if we are just talking extremely expensive wingers, Marner is an upgrade in every sense.

Trocheck honestly should have never been signed. We did Chytil dirty with that acquisition because he is going to be the real 2C probably even this upcoming year. Therefore, we don't need to be paying that much for a 3C (Trocheck). Newhook is serviceable and like half the price of Trocheck so I don't really get how it's that bad of a trade. It would be bad if we were playing him in the top six but we are burying him on the third/fourth line
11 août 2023 à 2 h 22
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,682
Mentions "j'aime": 3,754
As a Sabres fan,
I’d accept that trade in a heart beat

Idk what you’re thinking though?
That’s an insane overpay by NyR
11 août 2023 à 9 h 57
#17
Make it Work
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 772
Mentions "j'aime": 175
Quoting: Coachchippy
Sadly I disagree about Panarin. He's aging, and since this team is for 2024-25 he would be pushing 35. Retaining salary is the only way to get another team to take on his albatross contract. Literally no one would want him (or those that would, wouldn't be able to because of cap) without doing that. You also probably need to add the first to sweeten the deal, and it still isn't going to land you someone like Draisaitl. Mittelstadt is 7 yrs younger than Panarin, was a top ten pick, and is good for putting up 60+ points per season. Not a bad return at all imo

Fair enough about Goodrow. I figured to package him up with Lindgren because Lindgren, while great, plays a style that ages extremely poorly. Like Dan Girardi. You can pay Middleton under 2.5 mil on a short term and he would be serviceable. Lindgren would likely ask for more money and a much longer term and it just doesn't fit with our needs imo.

I don't see what's wrong with signing Marner for more than 10 million, assuming that he would want to extend in NY. We are paying Panarin more than that to put up less points, plus Marner is defensively responsible (in fact Selke caliber) unlike Panarin. And again, Marner is significantly younger than Panarin. So if we are just talking extremely expensive wingers, Marner is an upgrade in every sense.

Trocheck honestly should have never been signed. We did Chytil dirty with that acquisition because he is going to be the real 2C probably even this upcoming year. Therefore, we don't need to be paying that much for a 3C (Trocheck). Newhook is serviceable and like half the price of Trocheck so I don't really get how it's that bad of a trade. It would be bad if we were playing him in the top six but we are burying him on the third/fourth line


Just from a Habs perspective; even before what you just wrote above, the Habs are not doing this!
It'll cost you Laf if you want Newhook and the Habs may add a piece; It'll also cost you to get rid of Trocheck, Gallagher is offered as part of the return.
Coachchippy a aimé ceci.
11 août 2023 à 11 h 38
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 782
Mentions "j'aime": 339
Quoting: Campabee
Trochek is on the wrong side of 30 to fit the Habs window, Laf would be worth the risk if you really believe he will hit his ceiling. I am not convinced he will but I can see Hughes taking that risk.


Actually for the habs he's on the right side of 30. Unless your taking the sabres track and just collect prospect to get excited about losing. Compare yourself to past stanley cup winners and how many guys on those teams where "on the wrong side of 30". I believe montreal made a cup run not to long ago, thanks to two guys on the wrong side of 30 that came off IR for the year some how. If you think weber and price weren't major parts of that run then theres a reason your a pretend gm.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage