SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Thrift shopping

Créé par: GiggywithGibby
Équipe: 2023-24 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 15 juill. 2023
Publié: 28 juill. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Taking a look at what's still out there for free.99 (i.e. late round pick cap casualties)

All picked up players are listed under scratches in likelihood of the trade turning into reality.

Important to note, not all of these trades would happen, just trying to pinpoint players I think could be available for not a lot of investment due to their teams cap constraints and what I think they are trying to do.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
87 500 000 $
87 750 000 $
2950 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Vaakanainen, Urho
Détails additionnels:
The classic Forbort for Vaakainen swap.

Yes, I could also make this a 7th round pick, or FC, but Vaaks could be cheap depth for the Bruins, and he was looking like he could start doing things in the NHL when he was healthy.

There's really no point to squabble on the price since it's going to be low one way or another, For pet is just one of the guys I've identified as a likely cap casualty.
2.
VAN
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
This one's as old as dirt, been talked about for ages.

Only happens if Vancouver is in on Dumba (possible, given their coach and desire to be less soft) or finds another young RHD to give up a first for.
3.
VGK
    I don't even begin to know what the value would be here, as it's entirely dependant on what the hell is going on with Lehner. If he stays on LTIR they're fine, if he doesn't though, they're in a tight spot and could have to pay to dump him, look at a buyout, or look at moving other cap.

    Martinez would hurt to loose on their depth, but they got over the hill, so who knows.
    4.
    ANA
    1. Gudbranson, Erik (1 000 000 $ retained)
    CBJ
    1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
    Détails additionnels:
    This one's mostly/totally dependant on what Jiricek does at camp. If he's ready to go, one of Peeke or Gudbranson has to go.

    While CBJ is retaining which isn't ideal for them, they are still freeing up 3 million in space and it should be looked at that way. With the additions they made this FA, I think Guddy's 4 mil AAV is too rich a luxury to keep on the third pairing or riding pine.
    5.
    LAK
    1. McGinn, Brock (750 000 $ retained)
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
    Détails additionnels:
    This one's difficult to peg as LA is running 13-6-3 right now and is over the cap by a single Dave Rittich.

    The reason Roy might be available is that LA has plenty of organizational depth at RHD and If one of them takes a step this training camp such as Clarke or Spence, it would be a more natural pairing with Anderson on the 2nd pairing, at which point you are shoving Roy down to third pairing, which he seems rather expensive for.

    However, the only depth upgrades I think LA would be interested in making is bottom 6 F or goaltending, and given they are running some combo of Copley-Talbot-Rittich already, I think they're standing pat.

    While this trade likely doesn't happen, Roy isn't a big enough name to get caught up on the "LA and Anaheim don't trade" discussion.
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    2025
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    2026
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2583 500 000 $85 995 417 $0 $3 425 000 $-2 495 417 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
    C, AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
    AG, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    775 000 $775 000 $
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    762 500 $762 500 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    425 000 $425 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    950 000 $950 000 $
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    762 500 $762 500 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
    3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1

    Unités spéciales

    Infériorité numérique 1
     
     
    Infériorité numérique 2
     
     
     

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    28 juill. 2023 à 19 h 48
    #1
    VGKNation702
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 5,088
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,627
    Lehner is going to stay on LTIR or be moved to a team where he can get a fresh start. Don’t see the later happening tho, regardless. Marty stays
    28 juill. 2023 à 19 h 52
    #2
    not a he )
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2022
    Messages: 3,228
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,401
    What Gudbranson brings to the team is irrelevant to if he’s actually playing or not. He’s too important in the room and on the bench with a roster of kids, not to mention a coach who may need checked every so often. You know, the role he played in Calgary, basically.

    Maybe in another year. It won’t hurt Jiricek to keep dominating the AHL a little longer, or to let a market for Peeke and/or Boqvist to develop.
    CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
    28 juill. 2023 à 19 h 54
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 14,579
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,154
    Matt Roy is not available. If he were to be traded, he would cost a 1st round pick and more. Similar return to Gavrikov in March.
    28 juill. 2023 à 19 h 56
    #4
    Dolzhenkov Is Coming
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2022
    Messages: 3,647
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,277
    In a vacuum, it's great to clear up that cap space from moving out Gudy. In reality, his voice is going to be pretty important in the room over the next few years. He had no problem being vocal about how poorly practices were being run by Larsen and I expect he would have no issue calling out Babcock if things are going awry as well. Add on that he still provides a level of physicality that the team lacks and will need with how many young, skilled players are in the lineup and I don't believe the Jackets will be trading him away any time soon. He was also given a certain amount of security for his new family to put down roots in Columbus with the contract and trade protection he got so I think he'd be putting as many teams as possible that could realistically fit his contract in on his no trade list. Anaheim would certainly be one of those teams.
    CaseyFlyman et Lactic_Flaccid a aimé ceci.
    28 juill. 2023 à 20 h 6
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Future Ducks legend
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2022
    Messages: 9,980
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,770
    Quoting: squashmaple
    What Gudbranson brings to the team is irrelevant to if he’s actually playing or not. He’s too important in the room and on the bench with a roster of kids, not to mention a coach who may need checked every so often. You know, the role he played in Calgary, basically.

    Maybe in another year. It won’t hurt Jiricek to keep dominating the AHL a little longer, or to let a market for Peeke and/or Boqvist to develop.


    Yeah, I could see that, and it's not that you guys are hurting for cap space at the moment either, unless you need the money for a big swing you can afford to stash him if need be. Just on last year's injury luck alone I could see Columbus hanging onto all it's current D.
    squashmaple et CaseyFlyman a aimé ceci.
    28 juill. 2023 à 20 h 7
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2022
    Messages: 491
    Mentions "j'aime": 157
    All pretty accurate and reasonable, only one I would say not likely is the LAK as they have no desire/need for McGinn and all he would do is block a prospect from a lineup spot and would probably much rather have the cap space then him

    Can see CBJ fans saying they would rather keep E.G than trade him for that, which I guess I understand but he isn’t worth much so if they were to trade him then I would say this or touch more would be the return
    28 juill. 2023 à 20 h 11
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Future Ducks legend
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2022
    Messages: 9,980
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,770
    Quoting: tkecanuck341
    Matt Roy is not available. If he were to be traded, he would cost a 1st round pick and more. Similar return to Gavrikov in March.


    Oh right, I forgot, every Kings player is worth a first.....

    Roy and Gavrikov are not on the same level and you know it. Gavrikov is a bonafide top pairing D, Roy is a 2nd pairing guy.

    And you seem to be forgetting the "and more" part was a third, for which you got Korpisalo and dumped Quick off the books for.
    28 juill. 2023 à 20 h 20
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 14,579
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,154
    Quoting: GiggywithGibby
    Oh right, I forgot, every Kings player is worth a first.....

    Roy and Gavrikov are not on the same level and you know it. Gavrikov is a bonafide top pairing D, Roy is a 2nd pairing guy.

    And you seem to be forgetting the "and more" part was a third, for which you got Korpisalo and dumped Quick off the books for.


    Gavrikov is not a top pairing defender. He's a 2nd pairing defenseman. He might have played on the top pair in Columbus, but only because Werenski was hurt.

    Matt Roy and Vlad Gavrikov are actually very good comparables. Both are top quality #3 defensemen that can play on the top pair when needed (Roy was the Kings #1 defenseman in 2022 when Doughty went down with an injury).

    The return for Gavrikov was at the trade deadline, you're wanting an entire season of Roy. That's why Roy costs the "and more". If you want him at the deadline, then you can leave the "and more" part out.
    28 juill. 2023 à 21 h 15
    #9
    LosPatos
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2019
    Messages: 3,358
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,884
    Quoting: tkecanuck341
    Matt Roy is not available. If he were to be traded, he would cost a 1st round pick and more. Similar return to Gavrikov in March.


    Matt Roy is not worth a 1st +
    28 juill. 2023 à 21 h 50
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 14,579
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,154
    Quoting: LosPatos
    Matt Roy is not worth a 1st +


    That's what it will take to pry him away from the Kings. I expect his long-term extension to be announced any day now.
    29 juill. 2023 à 11 h 35
    #11
    Bahstun
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2023
    Messages: 81
    Mentions "j'aime": 14
    The only way I see Forbort being traded now is if there is a plan to clear cap to get a 'Bergeron' replacement. Otherwise, his PK skills and shot blocking will be needed. Unless some blockbuster happens or the arbitrators for Swayman and Frederic give out unusually high payouts, I think the Bruins run with what they have until the trade deadline.
    29 juill. 2023 à 12 h 18
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 3,674
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,632
    Kings are sending 1 goalie, most likely Rittich, to the AHL.

    ZERO reason for the kings to do this trade.
    29 juill. 2023 à 13 h 19
    #13
    Démarrer sujet
    Future Ducks legend
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2022
    Messages: 9,980
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,770
    Quoting: KINGS67
    Kings are sending 1 goalie, most likely Rittich, to the AHL.


    Gee wiz mister, figured that one out on your own did you?

    Read the explanation I laid out as to why it could happen. The two biggest suspects on the Kings roster this year is goaltending and bottom 6 depth. Anaheim doesn't have any goalies we'd be willing to send to LA, but we have upgrades on bottom 6 forward. Add to that 1.25 million in additional cap space for further upgrades, or carrying more than a 21 man roster. If one of the young RHD pushes themselves onto the roster in camp, then Roy is excess goods.
    29 juill. 2023 à 19 h 18
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 3,674
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,632
    Quoting: GiggywithGibby
    Gee wiz mister, figured that one out on your own did you?

    Read the explanation I laid out as to why it could happen. The two biggest suspects on the Kings roster this year is goaltending and bottom 6 depth. Anaheim doesn't have any goalies we'd be willing to send to LA, but we have upgrades on bottom 6 forward. Add to that 1.25 million in additional cap space for further upgrades, or carrying more than a 21 man roster. If one of the young RHD pushes themselves onto the roster in camp, then Roy is excess goods.

    “This one's difficult to peg as LA is running 13-6-3 right now and is over the cap by a single Dave Rittich.”

    They aren’t over the cap.

    Get off your rag little one.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage