SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The Duchene and DeBrincat fiascoes both mean we need to stop trading firsts

Créé par: sensonfire
Équipe: 2023-24 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 10 juill. 2023
Publié: 10 juill. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
They also mean we need to fire Pierre Dorion as GM of the Ottawa Senators.


This should not be about coping and seething.


This should not be about chasing our losses.


This should be about resolve.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
1840 000 $
1787 500 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
32 750 000 $
Transactions
VGK
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TBL)
Détails additionnels:
Vegas receives whichever 4th round pick is lowest between Detroit, Ottawa and Tampa.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2026
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2284 833 333 $84 367 380 $0 $1 850 000 $465 953 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 2
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
835 000 $835 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
805 000 $805 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
787 500 $787 500 $
AG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 juill. 2023 à 13 h 58
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,567
Mentions "j'aime": 3,319
That's only 2 strikeouts ump! Let Chychrun swing.
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
10 juill. 2023 à 14 h 1
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,878
Mentions "j'aime": 14,573
We already know what the cap is. It isn't 84.83 million...
10 juill. 2023 à 14 h 2
#3
Démarrer sujet
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,893
Mentions "j'aime": 4,466
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
We already know what the cap is. It isn't 84.5 million...


The Leafs will buy out Matt Murray, giving Ottawa additional cap space.

You can't buy out a retained salary in AGM.
10 juill. 2023 à 14 h 12
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,567
Mentions "j'aime": 3,319
Honestly, looking back at his trades, I think he got more out of Duchene than he gave up, if you don't count Turris. Hindsight is 20/20 of course.

He did pretty good with the Karlsson and Pageau trades, but the Zibanejad and Stone trades haven't turned out well (so far).
10 juill. 2023 à 14 h 36
#5
TkachukNorris79
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 1,256
Mentions "j'aime": 377
Quoting: GMBL
Honestly, looking back at his trades, I think he got more out of Duchene than he gave up, if you don't count Turris. Hindsight is 20/20 of course.

He did pretty good with the Karlsson and Pageau trades, but the Zibanejad and Stone trades haven't turned out well (so far).


They traded away Turris, Bowers (bust) but most importantly the 1st that led to the Avs taking Bowen Byram 4th overall in 2019.

When trading Duchene, they got 19th overall (Lassi Thomson), Davidsson (bust) and Abramov (Russia). Lassi's value is now closer to a late 2nd early 3rd if they're lucky.

They most definitely lost that trade.

EK trade worked out very well for them but I don't give Dorion too much credit there as no one expected the Sharks to fall off that quickly and gift them a franchise player in Stutzle at 3rd overall.

Stone and Zibanejad trades were trash.

He did very well in getting assets back for Brassard, but then traded Gus for an expiring UFA in Talbot and JBD is currently a 5/6/7 and at best will become a #4.

Dorion needs to go. His asset management is embarassing.
sensonfire et Xspyrit a aimé ceci.
10 juill. 2023 à 14 h 53
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,567
Mentions "j'aime": 3,319
Quoting: TkachukNorris79
They traded away Turris, Bowers (bust) but most importantly the 1st that led to the Avs taking Bowen Byram 4th overall in 2019.

When trading Duchene, they got 19th overall (Lassi Thomson), Davidsson (bust) and Abramov (Russia). Lassi's value is now closer to a late 2nd early 3rd if they're lucky.

They most definitely lost that trade.

EK trade worked out very well for them but I don't give Dorion too much credit there as no one expected the Sharks to fall off that quickly and gift them a franchise player in Stutzle at 3rd overall.

Stone and Zibanejad trades were trash.

He did very well in getting assets back for Brassard, but then traded Gus for an expiring UFA in Talbot and JBD is currently a 5/6/7 and at best will become a #4.

Dorion needs to go. His asset management is embarassing.


Couldn't have predicted that SJ was going to fall off but the same could be said for the 2018/19 pick. Moreover, when they chose to select Tkachuk in 2018 4th OV it was obvious that they would be bad but who knew their pick would have been 4th OV again but I'm sure your glad with having Tkachuk over who knows who (might not even have been Byram).
sensonfire et TkachukNorris79 a aimé ceci.
10 juill. 2023 à 15 h 32
#7
B
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 7,995
Mentions "j'aime": 1,453
Chychrun is next. Avoid any pending big name American ufa should be priority for most Canadian teams
10 juill. 2023 à 19 h 5
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 5,370
Mentions "j'aime": 3,424
Quoting: TkachukNorris79
They traded away Turris, Bowers (bust) but most importantly the 1st that led to the Avs taking Bowen Byram 4th overall in 2019.

When trading Duchene, they got 19th overall (Lassi Thomson), Davidsson (bust) and Abramov (Russia). Lassi's value is now closer to a late 2nd early 3rd if they're lucky.

They most definitely lost that trade.

EK trade worked out very well for them but I don't give Dorion too much credit there as no one expected the Sharks to fall off that quickly and gift them a franchise player in Stutzle at 3rd overall.

Stone and Zibanejad trades were trash.

He did very well in getting assets back for Brassard, but then traded Gus for an expiring UFA in Talbot and JBD is currently a 5/6/7 and at best will become a #4.

Dorion needs to go. His asset management is embarassing.


I actually agree. I've wanted to see Ottawa succeed with all of the raw talent they have, but Dorion is a disaster.

Not to mention the Chychrun trade. Giving up a first (12OA) and two seconds for a player in a position you absolutely do not need more of. I mean, you can always roll your lines, but seriously?
10 juill. 2023 à 23 h 7
#9
TkachukNorris79
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 1,256
Mentions "j'aime": 377
Quoting: Ennis
I actually agree. I've wanted to see Ottawa succeed with all of the raw talent they have, but Dorion is a disaster.

Not to mention the Chychrun trade. Giving up a first (12OA) and two seconds for a player in a position you absolutely do not need more of. I mean, you can always roll your lines, but seriously?


I disagree on Chychrun. I think he's a true Top pairing guy, just needs to stay healthy. Much higher likelihood of him staying as he has Ottawa ties and family here. Ottawa definitely needed defence so not sure what you mean by that. I get they have Chabot, Sanderson and Branny at LD too but one can easily play 1RD with Zub as the shutdown guy on the 2nd pairing.
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2023 à 3 h 22
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 5,370
Mentions "j'aime": 3,424
Quoting: TkachukNorris79
I disagree on Chychrun. I think he's a true Top pairing guy, just needs to stay healthy. Much higher likelihood of him staying as he has Ottawa ties and family here. Ottawa definitely needed defence so not sure what you mean by that. I get they have Chabot, Sanderson and Branny at LD too but one can easily play 1RD with Zub as the shutdown guy on the 2nd pairing.


Brannstrom hasn’t panned out in the slightest. They were calling him the next EK65 and he ended up becoming a fine middle/bottom pairing guy.

Sure, Chych is great… if hes healthy. Dudes never played a full season ever, and you’re just taking a spot away from Sanderson to flourish. If Dorion wanted to upgrade on the back end, he couldn’t have payed that price for a RHD with less of an injury history? That trade was brutal and had everyone shaking their heads.
11 juill. 2023 à 12 h 49
#11
TkachukNorris79
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 1,256
Mentions "j'aime": 377
Quoting: Ennis
Brannstrom hasn’t panned out in the slightest. They were calling him the next EK65 and he ended up becoming a fine middle/bottom pairing guy.

Sure, Chych is great… if hes healthy. Dudes never played a full season ever, and you’re just taking a spot away from Sanderson to flourish. If Dorion wanted to upgrade on the back end, he couldn’t have paid that price for a RHD with less of an injury history? That trade was brutal and had everyone shaking their heads.


Firstly, Brannstrom didn't put those expectations on himself, his GM and fans did. He has developed very well over the past couple years and is now going to be a solid #5 on a very good D core. He can be in your Top 4 if you have an injury. Every defenceman who played with Branny last year was much better with him than without.

There is a pretty clear issue of keeping players in Ottawa - how many RHD that are available would consider staying long term in Ottawa? Karlsson is the only one and we can't afford him. Chychrun is from here and will stay here long term, unlike Cat who just bolted.

I would trade 12th overall plus a couple of late 2nds any day for a 25 year old top pairing defender with 2 years left at $4.6M, especially if I know he is likely to stay after that.

Also not sure what you mean by him blocking Sanderson from flourishing - Sanderson is already the best defenceman on this team and will get #1 minutes this year, likely more than Chabot and Chychrun.
sensonfire et Xspyrit a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2023 à 12 h 57
#12
Démarrer sujet
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,893
Mentions "j'aime": 4,466
Quoting: TkachukNorris79
Firstly, Brannstrom didn't put those expectations on himself, his GM and fans did. He has developed very well over the past couple years and is now going to be a solid #5 on a very good D core. He can be in your Top 4 if you have an injury. Every defenceman who played with Branny last year was much better with him than without.

There is a pretty clear issue of keeping players in Ottawa - how many RHD that are available would consider staying long term in Ottawa? Karlsson is the only one and we can't afford him. Chychrun is from here and will stay here long term, unlike Cat who just bolted.

I would trade 12th overall plus a couple of late 2nds any day for a 25 year old top pairing defender with 2 years left at $4.6M, especially if I know he is likely to stay after that.

Also not sure what you mean by him blocking Sanderson from flourishing - Sanderson is already the best defenceman on this team and will get #1 minutes this year, likely more than Chabot and Chychrun.


What we paid also needs to be weighed against what Arizona's asking price was.

2023 1st
2024 1st
Solid prospect (i.e. Ridly Greig)

vs

2023 1st
2024 2nd
2026 2nd


And like you said, Chychrun's family is from the Ottawa Valley.

I would do this trade all over again as well.
TkachukNorris79 a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2023 à 14 h 12
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,506
Mentions "j'aime": 3,721
Like you said in the description, all we need to do is stop having Pierre Dorion as our GM

Quoting: Ennis
Brannstrom hasn’t panned out in the slightest. They were calling him the next EK65 and he ended up becoming a fine middle/bottom pairing guy.

The problem was more that some people can't project players at all. I have projected Brannstrom as a future Tobias Enstrom for years and it's looking more and more like it. EK is an ultra rare player, the chance that Brannstrom developed into an EK was extremely slim. Vegas would have never traded him if that was possible

That said, Brannstrom has not finished rising, he is already a quality 2-way D-man with very good advanced stats. He is panning out but not the way some wanted, which was overhype.

Quoting: TkachukNorris79
Every defenceman who played with Branny last year was much better with him than without.

That's an argument I haven't used enough. And Brannstrom mostly played his NHL games with Josh Brown (barely NHL level), Nick Holden (declined version) and now Travis Hamonic (declinign too)? Poor guy, he had to do it all by himself in a lot of adversity
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
11 juill. 2023 à 14 h 16
#14
we miss leo k
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 5,979
Mentions "j'aime": 5,113
Quoting: Xspyrit
Like you said in the desc., all we need to do is stop having Pierre Dorion as our GM


The problem was more that some people can't project players at all. I have projected Brannstrom as a future Tobias Enstrom for years and it's looking more and more like it. EK is an ultra rare player, the chance that Brannstrom developed into an EK was extremely slim. Vegas would have never traded him if that was possible

That said, Brannstrom has not finished rising, he is already a quality 2-way D-man with very good advanced stats. He is panning out but not the way some wanted, which was overhype.


That's an argument I haven't used enough. And Brannstrom mostly played his NHL games with Josh Brown (barely NHL level), Nick Holden (declined version) and now Travis Hamonic (declinign too)? Poor guy, he had to do it all by himself in a lot of adversity


I know it's not how you meant it, but I can't stop laughing at how rude the phrasing "future Tobias Enstrom" comes across as.
11 juill. 2023 à 15 h 40
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,506
Mentions "j'aime": 3,721
Quoting: dannibalcorpse
I know it's not how you meant it, but I can't stop laughing at how rude the phrasing "future Tobias Enstrom" comes across as.


Damn, you'll have to explain this one

I have absolutely no idea what is rude in there lol

Tobias Enstrom was a pretty good player, not a star but solid all around
12 juill. 2023 à 9 h 21
#16
we miss leo k
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 5,979
Mentions "j'aime": 5,113
Quoting: Xspyrit
Damn, you'll have to explain this one

I have absolutely no idea what is rude in there lol

Tobias Enstrom was a pretty good player, not a star but solid all around


It's definitely my own weird brain - I haven't even thought of the name Tobias Enstrom in years, so just the idea of his ceiling being "guy you will not think about for years before randomly remembering" gave me a chuckle
12 juill. 2023 à 10 h 53
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,506
Mentions "j'aime": 3,721
Modifié 12 juill. 2023 à 11 h 2
Quoting: dannibalcorpse
It's definitely my own weird brain - I haven't even thought of the name Tobias Enstrom in years, so just the idea of his ceiling being "guy you will not think about for years before randomly remembering" gave me a chuckle


I see, but why did you use "rude"? Rude for Brannstrom to be compared to a player "we forgot about"?

I use players of past and present to project/compare a young player and in that case, I couldn't think about a more recent player. Both 5'10 LHD from Sweden, thought to be offensive D-men but primarily good defensively. Can run a PP really well but excel in puck retrieval and in transition. They move the puck swiftly. Both can get physically dominated in front of the net or in the corners but won't shy away from contact to make the play.

The main difference between the 2 is that Toby started his NHL career at 23 y/o (EB played his first NHL game at 19 y/o), the age Branny is now. Enstrom averaged 35 pts per 82 games during his career so we'll see what Brannstrom can do offensively from now on. 20 from 23 Brannstrom has averaged 21 pts per 82 games.


Speaking of players of the past, do you know who I compare Shane Pinto with? A less physical David Backes. However, doesn't come from me, it was a fellow Sens fan on another forum.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage