SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Big EDM trade but lots of value for both teams - if you can't see that you're an

Créé par: NSHAbs
Équipe: 2017-18 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 26 juin 2017
Publié: 26 juin 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Edm gets 2 solid D men to sure up their top 6 and both at huge bargain for what they bring so they can sign big names due pay increases..... MTL gets solid C to add in, flexibility to drop Chucky down to 3rd so faces less stiff opp to hone in complete 200 ft game at centre
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
14 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
66 650 000 $
54 750 000 $
23 750 000 $
11 100 000 $
Transactions
MTL
  1. Benning, Matthew
  2. Nugent-Hopkins, Ryan
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2018 (EDM)
  4. Choix de 5e ronde en 2018 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Benn, Jordie
  2. Plekanec, Tomas
  3. Schlemko, David
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2018 (MTL)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de TBL
2019
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2020
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2375 000 000 $73 837 976 $0 $300 000 $1 162 024 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
912 500 $912 500 $
C
UFA - 1
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
839 166 $839 166 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 4
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 6
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
1 166 667 $1 166 667 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
650 000 $650 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 4
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 9
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG
UFA
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
1 062 500 $1 062 500 $
G
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 1
1 425 000 $1 425 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 juin 2017 à 21 h 55
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 3,996
Mentions "j'aime": 930
No thanks if I'm moving nuge I want Gallagher
26 juin 2017 à 21 h 57
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 138
Mentions "j'aime": 0
K good luck winning the Cup with the D you currently have + holding onto all those huge contracts after next year smile
26 juin 2017 à 22 h 11
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,725
Mentions "j'aime": 430
Quoting: Dylan1995
No thanks if I'm moving nuge I want Gallagher


As a Habs fan, I'd do this trade in a second. As an Oilers fan, I'd wonder if I couldn't have got a lot more.

Biggest problem, though, is you've left no money for a raise for Price this year and Danault and MaxPac next year. The cap management is out the window.
26 juin 2017 à 22 h 19
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 3,996
Mentions "j'aime": 930
Quoting: Truebeliever
Quoting: Dylan1995
No thanks if I'm moving nuge I want Gallagher


As a Habs fan, I'd do this trade in a second. As an Oilers fan, I'd wonder if I couldn't have got a lot more.

Biggest problem, though, is you've left no money for a raise for Price this year and Danault and MaxPac next year. The cap management is out the window.


Nuge and a second round pick for Gallagher and a first or Gallagher and Juulsen or give Davidson back
26 juin 2017 à 22 h 21
#5
Trade is one for one
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 538
Mentions "j'aime": 170
Quoting: NSHAbs
K good luck winning the Cup with the D you currently have + holding onto all those huge contracts after next year smile


The Oilers D-core is better with Benning than with Schlemko and Benn and Nuge is far better than Pleckanec. I'd even go as far to say Oilers d-core with Sekera is better:
Klefbom>Markov Weber>Larsson, Sekera>Benn, Petry>Russell, Nurse>Davidson, and Benning>Schlemko.
26 juin 2017 à 22 h 30
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 3,996
Mentions "j'aime": 930
The oilers have a young d core besides sekera and Russell.

In a couple years it will be

Klefbom - Larsson
Nurse - benning
Jones -Bear
26 juin 2017 à 23 h 6
#7
CFGM Game Moderator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 2,683
Mentions "j'aime": 1,510
HABS are already in a panic to fill out their blueline, so why would they trade away even more of what they already have?
26 juin 2017 à 23 h 17
#8
Simpleton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,365
Mentions "j'aime": 502
At this point I'm not convinced that the Oilers are looking for big changes to their 6-man defensive unit. Their top pair is locked down. They need some temporary help for the second pair, but the future number 2 pair is developing nicely, and should become much stronger as Nurse and Benning rotate in with Russell. If they sign Gryba as an inexpensive stop-gap its the same collection of players from last season, but the entire D improves as the young guys gain more experience. Losing Reinhart stung them a bit, but they have some other young d-men who might be close, so depth isn't the same issue it was just a couple years ago.

Only reasons to part with RNH would be to acquire a bigger, stronger centre who is better with face-offs, or to free cap space. The cap pressure isn't real until next summer. The Oilers have $18M in space now, and probably $11M to $11.5M after they sign Draisaitl. Fayne and Korpikosky come off the books after next season, that frees an additional $3.6M. If they buy out Pouliot, they clear another $2.67M.
27 juin 2017 à 0 h 14
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 166
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Quoting: OilersNation
Quoting: NSHAbs
K good luck winning the Cup with the D you currently have + holding onto all those huge contracts after next year smile


The Oilers D-core is better with Benning than with Schlemko and Benn and Nuge is far better than Pleckanec. I'd even go as far to say Oilers d-core with Sekera is better:
Klefbom>Markov Weber>Larsson, Sekera>Benn, Petry>Russell, Nurse>Davidson, and Benning>Schlemko.


did you just say Klefbom is better than Markov and Weber
27 juin 2017 à 0 h 56
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 3,996
Mentions "j'aime": 930
Quoting: shabbaranks
Quoting: OilersNation


The Oilers D-core is better with Benning than with Schlemko and Benn and Nuge is far better than Pleckanec. I'd even go as far to say Oilers d-core with Sekera is better:
Klefbom>Markov Weber>Larsson, Sekera>Benn, Petry>Russell, Nurse>Davidson, and Benning>Schlemko.


did you just say Klefbom is better than Markov and Weber


No he said klefbom > markov but weber > Larsson

But klefbom is better then markov
27 juin 2017 à 7 h 8
#11
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,630
Mentions "j'aime": 23,317
You pay Gally 4.75m to protect him on the third line (might work with home games) but then your number one centre is Danault.
27 juin 2017 à 9 h 8
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 166
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Quoting: Dylan1995
Quoting: shabbaranks


did you just say Klefbom is better than Markov and Weber


No he said klefbom > markov but weber > Larsson

But klefbom is better then markov


actually, statistically, markov is better. Klefbom is only more valuable because of age
27 juin 2017 à 10 h 31
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,392
Mentions "j'aime": 2,885
Quoting: shabbaranks
Quoting: Dylan1995


No he said klefbom > markov but weber > Larsson

But klefbom is better then markov


actually, statistically, markov is better. Klefbom is only more valuable because of age


Uh, Klefbom is vastly better per Garret Holh's WAR charts via Twitter.
27 juin 2017 à 11 h 59
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 166
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Quoting: phillyjabroni
Quoting: shabbaranks


actually, statistically, markov is better. Klefbom is only more valuable because of age


Uh, Klefbom is vastly better per Garret Holh's WAR charts via Twitter.


whats the account
1 juill. 2017 à 22 h 16
#15
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Both teams lost that deal badly.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage