SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Difficult Decisions

Créé par: Joekings09
Équipe: 2023-24 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 23 juin 2023
Publié: 23 juin 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
1825 000 $
1825 000 $
88 000 000 $
2825 000 $
1825 000 $
1840 000 $
1830 000 $
12 000 000 $
1850 000 $
1850 000 $
1870 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
LAK
  1. Dubois, Pierre-Luc [Droits de RFA]
WPG
  1. Arvidsson, Viktor
  2. Iafallo, Alex
  3. Turcotte, Alex
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (LAK)
2.
LAK
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (VGK)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (MIN)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais de résiliation
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de LAK
Logo de VGK
Logo de PIT
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2024
Logo de LAK
Logo de MIN
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2025
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $83 466 667 $0 $3 795 000 $33 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
870 000 $870 000 $
C, AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
825 000 $825 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
825 000 $825 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 juin 2023 à 7 h 49
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,937
Mentions "j'aime": 14,600
If thats the best offer for dubois then Winnipeg is screwed
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2023 à 7 h 53
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6,335
Mentions "j'aime": 2,234
I think Vilardi gets more, bit over reliant on the youth especially at RD and its a real, REAL hope on that goaltending duo
23 juin 2023 à 10 h 38
#3
Moose
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 260
Mentions "j'aime": 145
I’m wondering if a Kings fan can explain to me why we’re interested in PLD. Is his ceiling higher than his past production? If not, I’m not seeing the benefit in throwing so many assets at a guy who’s never been happy with his situation and is expecting to be paid like a 1C. I personally hope they don’t pull the trigger.
OldNYIfan et Shanesaw9 a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2023 à 10 h 40
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,972
Mentions "j'aime": 7,100
No from Winnipeg. There's nothing worth moving PLD for there. 2 bad contracts and a bust don't have much value.
23 juin 2023 à 11 h 9
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 180
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
If thats the best offer for dubois then Winnipeg is screwed

Yeah essentially and it would be plausible since Dubois has basically taken a lot of leverage away from Chevy regarding the trade
23 juin 2023 à 11 h 21
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 180
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Arvidsson scored at a very similar rate to Dubois this past season for only 4 million and Iafallo is a versatile forward all coaches would love who scores at a second line forward rate, also only for 4 million and is very good defensively. A far cry from being bad contracts. Turcotte like Vilardi has battled injuries early in his pro career and Vilardi figured it out this past season so it’s a good possibility Turcotte can as well and not be a bust. Plus a first round pick which is still high draft capital regardless of draft class. The best thing that can happen for Winnipeg is a bidding war but the whole league knows PLD wants out so whoever gets him still probably won’t put together a great package for him[/quote]
Shanesaw9 a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2023 à 11 h 32
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,972
Mentions "j'aime": 7,100
Quoting: Joekings09
Arvidsson scored at a very similar rate to Dubois this past season for only 4 million and Iafallo is a versatile forward all coaches would love who scores at a second line forward rate, also only for 4 million and is very good defensively. A far cry from being bad contracts. Turcotte like Vilardi has battled injuries early in his pro career and Vilardi figured it out this past season so it’s a good possibility Turcotte can as well and not be a bust. Plus a first round pick which is still high draft capital regardless of draft class. The best thing that can happen for Winnipeg is a bidding war but the whole league knows PLD wants out so whoever gets him still probably won’t put together a great package for him
[/quote]

No, Arvidsson and Iafallo are bad contracts. Both are 30 or close to it, don't produce to their contract value and only have one year of term. Turcotte has been around long enough to be what he is. It's an extreme longshot that he gets much better.

With multiple teams bidding on PLD the Jets won't have to settle for a package that just makes them older and worse. They will get something they want.

Trades don't work like fans want them to. It won't be a bunch of pieces that you couldn't care less about losing because you realize they have little value, hence why you offer them, there will be at least one piece you don't want to lose.
23 juin 2023 à 11 h 42
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 180
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Modifié 23 juin 2023 à 12 h 45
Quoting: Hammerwise
I think Vilardi gets more, bit over reliant on the youth especially at RD and its a real, REAL hope on that goaltending duo
Quote:
It is a big hope but when Adin Hill wins a cup, you know you don’t have to have an elite goalie solely to win. Vilardis contract in this hypothetical is similar to Mikey Andersons contract from a year ago. Low contract for 1 season which turned into a bigger contract the next year
23 juin 2023 à 12 h 39
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 180
Mentions "j'aime": 49
We can agree to disagree about Turcotte but his underlying stats in the AHL are excellent(good predictor of future success)and he makes everyone he plays with better, when he’s not injured of course. Iafallo is signed for 2 seasons and produced a 48 point rate per 82 games this season, plus plays responsible and can play up and down the lineup and is good defensively. I can understand the bias against his age but objectively he does produce to his contract. Arvidsson same thing. He scored only 4 less points than Dubois in only 4 more games. It’s easy to surmise that he produces to his contract. If anything you could argue Dubois produces the least relative to his contract of all 3 players. I also named it difficult decisions because contrary to your belief, most Kings fans would say that these would not be all pieces that we would just want to get rid of for low value etc. Time will tell what Winnipegs return will be and if with such a massive departure of much of their core if they will be even remotely competitive when they almost missed the playoffs this season already as it is. Of course trades don’t happen the way fans want, then why participate in the website at all then. Lol
23 juin 2023 à 13 h 7
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 180
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Quoting: MNKingsFan
I’m wondering if a Kings fan can explain to me why we’re interested in PLD. Is his ceiling higher than his past production? If not, I’m not seeing the benefit in throwing so many assets at a guy who’s never been happy with his situation and is expecting to be paid like a 1C. I personally hope they don’t pull the trigger.

The easy answer is time to allow Byfield to develop into the Center the team drafted him to be. He’s a bit behind on his development due to injuries mainly so PLD entering his prime could become the # 1 center when Kopitar retires and Danault can slot into the 3C and hopefully Byfield could at least be the 2C by then. I’m apprehensive about him being unsatisfied too but Columbus and Winnipeg as markets leave a lot to be desired. Not sure how it will shake out but it’s fun to pretend on here so why not
23 juin 2023 à 13 h 31
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 17
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Quoting: Windjammer


"No, Arvidsson and Iafallo are bad contracts. Both are 30 or close to it, don't produce to their contract value and only have one year of term. Turcotte has been around long enough to be what he is. It's an extreme longshot that he gets much better.

With multiple teams bidding on PLD the Jets won't have to settle for a package that just makes them older and worse. They will get something they want.

Trades don't work like fans want them to. It won't be a bunch of pieces that you couldn't care less about losing because you realize they have little value, hence why you offer them, there will be at least one piece you don't want to lose. [/quote] "
_________________________________________________________________________

This is wrong. Per The Athletic's player value models Arvidsson was worth $3.7 million in surplus value last year. Iafallo generated $3.6 million in surplus value. Those metrics can vary from methodology to methodology, but there is no world in which those are bad contracts. None.

I'm not saying that two very-good-but-not-young-and-soon-expiring-contract players are specifically what WPG is going to want for PLD, but its not because the contracts are bad and you wouldn't want them on your team. They absolutely make the Kings better (as they would any team). As a Kings fan I would be very VERY bummed if we had to jettison both those guys (and frankly, they are so valuable to the team I don't think they will move both). I am sad that we probably will have to lose one of them to make sure we get a #1 goalie.
Joekings09 et Shanesaw9 a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2023 à 14 h 28
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 389
Mentions "j'aime": 123
Fair value for Durzi, Wild could accept if the move on from Addison.
Joekings09 a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2023 à 14 h 33
#13
Osiecki death stare
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,366
Mentions "j'aime": 573
Quoting: DollaBillaz
Fair value for Durzi, Wild could accept if the move on from Addison.


Is it though? Two 2nds seems like too much.
Shanesaw9 a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2023 à 14 h 41
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 389
Mentions "j'aime": 123
Quoting: Digitalbooya06
Is it though? Two 2nds seems like too much.


its close, maybe a bit too much. But looking at his numbers and cap hit for next year/team control its not far off.
Joekings09 a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2023 à 16 h 17
#15
Moose
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 260
Mentions "j'aime": 145
Quoting: Joekings09
The easy answer is time to allow Byfield to develop into the Center the team drafted him to be. He’s a bit behind on his development due to injuries mainly so PLD entering his prime could become the # 1 center when Kopitar retires and Danault can slot into the 3C and hopefully Byfield could at least be the 2C by then. I’m apprehensive about him being unsatisfied too but Columbus and Winnipeg as markets leave a lot to be desired. Not sure how it will shake out but it’s fun to pretend on here so why not


I’d rather hold out for Byfield to improve. He made the first line better in the second half and has a much higher ceiling than PLD.
Joekings09 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage