SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leo Carlsson

Créé par: Skytown
Équipe: 2023-24 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 22 juin 2023
Publié: 22 juin 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Was going to post without Peeke and Garland, but changed my mind.

Here we go…

I realize moving into the top 3 isn’t an easy feat, and I doubt it happens. What would it cost Vancouver? I’ve seen people saying Vancouver would need to send someone like Miller/Hronek/Kuzmenko, but Columbus wouldn’t want Millers contract, and already have a pretty good looking back end, ruling out Hronek. I can’t see Allvin moving Kuzmenko, so this is what I came up with.

I feel like the value is there, but I’m not an expert. Columbus gets the value of two 1sts (11OA and Lekkerimaki), and three 3rds (TOR 3rd, Podkolzin, Garland)
Some may even have Garland and Podkolzin as 2nds. I feel like that’s more than enough.

Also…. Just how good/bad is Peeke? Would he be able to slide onto Hughes’ right side, or is he a bottom pairing guy? I have no clue.

Am I close? Way off? You be the judge. Cheers!
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 200 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
54 750 000 $
55 250 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Carlsson, Leo
3925 000 $
Transactions
VAN
  1. Peeke, Andrew
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Garland, Conor
  2. Lekkerimäki, Jonathan
  3. Podkolzin, Vasily
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de CBJ
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de DET
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NJD
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $81 842 917 $850 000 $0 $1 657 083 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Carlsson, Leo
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 juin 2023 à 12 h 33
#1
Be formless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 2,901
Mentions "j'aime": 1,051
God no. There is nothing there that makes the CBJ even think about it.
mmccRed198913, JoeROFLCOPTER, NJDevils1317 and 4 others a aimé ceci.
22 juin 2023 à 12 h 35
#2
Démarrer sujet
Canucks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 749
Mentions "j'aime": 147
Quoting: Hockey_Soul
God no. There is nothing there that makes the CBJ even think about it.


Whaaaat!!! You don’t like bottom 6 forwards? 😂
Hockey_Soul, CaseyFlyman et mokumboi a aimé ceci.
22 juin 2023 à 12 h 37
#3
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,566
Mentions "j'aime": 25,421
Columbus is looking for a franchise centerman with that pick, and you aren't offering them any center at all in that package. I think that they'd have a pretty easy No.
mokumboi et benjgc a aimé ceci.
22 juin 2023 à 12 h 39
#4
Démarrer sujet
Canucks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 749
Mentions "j'aime": 147
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Columbus is looking for a franchise centerman with that pick, and you aren't offering them any center at all in that package. I think that they'd have a pretty easy No.


Maybe they can get one at 11OA? Lol
22 juin 2023 à 12 h 47
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,103
Mentions "j'aime": 1,780
Yeah, Columbus says no. It's a good effort, but we need a couple star pieces, not a bunch of darts that have a ceiling of top-6 (we've got plenty of that already). Fact of the matter is Columbus has to draft or use 3OA to get a legit 1C under 25 with term, so unless it's a package involving Petey, Columbus just isn't interested.

"Also…. Just how good/bad is Peeke? Would he be able to slide onto Hughes’ right side, or is he a bottom pairing guy?" I'll qualify that I'm not a Peeke fan, but he can slide up and down the lineup. If he's forced to play top pair, he's going to look bad. He's best suited for 3RD, maybe 2RD in a pinch. He's going to be physical, but IMO that's about it. There's a lot of misplaced physicality in his game (checks that don't make sense, penalties he doesn't need to take), and he's frequently out of position. He's another big crease-clearing D-man who's going to look bad in any other role.
mokumboi, OldNYIfan, Skytown and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
22 juin 2023 à 13 h 6
#6
Démarrer sujet
Canucks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 749
Mentions "j'aime": 147
Quoting: CaseyFlyman
Yeah, Columbus says no. It's a good effort, but we need a couple star pieces, not a bunch of darts that have a ceiling of top-6 (we've got plenty of that already). Fact of the matter is Columbus has to draft or use 3OA to get a legit 1C under 25 with term, so unless it's a package involving Petey, Columbus just isn't interested.

"Also…. Just how good/bad is Peeke? Would he be able to slide onto Hughes’ right side, or is he a bottom pairing guy?" I'll qualify that I'm not a Peeke fan, but he can slide up and down the lineup. If he's forced to play top pair, he's going to look bad. He's best suited for 3RD, maybe 2RD in a pinch. He's going to be physical, but IMO that's about it. There's a lot of misplaced physicality in his game (checks that don't make sense, penalties he doesn't need to take), and he's frequently out of position. He's another big crease-clearing D-man who's going to look bad in any other role.



Very informative. Thanks!
CaseyFlyman et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage