SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lets get it

Créé par: Kyle_Davidson
Équipe: 2023-24 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 11 juin 2023
Publié: 11 juin 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
14 500 000 $
13 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Bedard, Connor
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Ekman-Larsson, Oliver (1 260 000 $ retained)
  2. Garland, Conor
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
VAN
  1. Murphy, Connor
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
2.
CHI
  1. Bailey, Josh
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NYI)
3.
CHI
  1. Murray, Matt
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (NYR)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (DAL)
4.
CHI
  1. Granlund, Mikael
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
PIT
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de VAN
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $74 008 457 $0 $1 387 500 $9 491 543 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Bedard, Connor
925 000 $925 000 $
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance505 000 $$505K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
990 000 $990 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
859 167 $859 167 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 juin 2023 à 9 h 39
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 645
Mentions "j'aime": 292
Pens decline.

Too big a drop to dump Granlund.

Granlund and #14 or 19th seems to work for both.
11 juin 2023 à 9 h 41
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,308
Mentions "j'aime": 4,961
Quoting: PensGMwannabe
Pens decline.

Too big a drop to dump Granlund.

Granlund and #14 or 19th seems to work for both.


10M in cap dumps over two years, hawks would need more than 5 draft slots
exo2769, Garak et Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
11 juin 2023 à 9 h 42
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,308
Mentions "j'aime": 4,961
I'd hope the hawks stay far away from OEL. Shorter term cap dumps are fine but I wouldn't want anything more than two years. Cap space isn't an issue but cap space over time is
11 juin 2023 à 9 h 42
#4
CoachQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 153
Mentions "j'aime": 97
Gudas probably won't take a one-year deal, for that little as well. Besides, the Hawks have the poor man's version of him in Tinordi. I think you're overpaying a little for OEL, but it's not unreasonable. I think the second draft pick in the Toronto and Pittsburgh deals is a little too much. Both are cap dumps and the Hawks don't need to give up more than the first picks in those deals.
Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
11 juin 2023 à 9 h 46
#5
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,772
Mentions "j'aime": 9,946
Quoting: PensGMwannabe
Pens decline.

Too big a drop to dump Granlund.

Granlund and #14 or 19th seems to work for both.


Pass on that PIT trade. $11M owed for 5 slots??? Clear L for the Hawks.
Hawksguy81 et LivingAnew a aimé ceci.
11 juin 2023 à 9 h 47
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 394
Mentions "j'aime": 67
Canucks would prob rather buy out OEL
11 juin 2023 à 9 h 47
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 2,659
Mentions "j'aime": 1,174
As a Canucks fan, i dont mind that trade.Seems fair both ways.IMHO.
Kyle_Davidson a aimé ceci.
11 juin 2023 à 10 h 9
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,127
Mentions "j'aime": 11,000
Take out Murphy and I still wouldn't do that VAN trade.
Hawksguy81, LivingAnew et newman23 a aimé ceci.
11 juin 2023 à 10 h 14
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,127
Mentions "j'aime": 11,000
Modifié 11 juin 2023 à 13 h 19
Quoting: Wadejos123
I'd hope the hawks stay far away from OEL. Shorter term cap dumps are fine but I wouldn't want anything more than two years. Cap space isn't an issue but cap space over time is


Four years will be fine. Just think about it. Line up when players are coming up and will be due their next contracts. Even after Reichel and Bedard get their raises, CHI will still have PLENTY of space. And after Bedard gets his that will leave one year on the books for OEL, where he can serve as a #7, be bought out, or sit on IR/LTIR. Also he is a leader and a veteran that wouldn't be bad for the youngins. It is well worth the 11th overall plus whatever other pieces it takes to get it done, IMHO.

I definitely wouldn't send Murphy or the 1st and 2nd back though.
remowilliams et Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
11 juin 2023 à 10 h 57
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 8,971
Mentions "j'aime": 10,868
That Vancouver trade is awful for the Hawks. They take on $11m in cap for 3 years and give up Murphy and a 2nd for #11? No thanks. That's just too rich.

Not sure why Hawks are giving up two picks in the Murray trade? That's an overpay.
Garak a aimé ceci.
11 juin 2023 à 11 h 24
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,528
Mentions "j'aime": 1,063
Canucks should consider. OEL is the only player they should potentially use pick 11 to dump.
Kyle_Davidson a aimé ceci.
11 juin 2023 à 12 h 35
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,308
Mentions "j'aime": 4,961
Quoting: Garak
Four years will be fine. Just think about it. Line up when players are coming up and will be due their next contracts. Even after Reichel and Bedard get their raises, CHI will still have PLENTY of space. And after Bedard gets his that will leave one year on the books for OEL, where he can serve as a #7, be bought out, or sit on IR/LTIR. Also he is a leader and a veteran that wouldn't be bad for the youngins. It is well worth the 11th overall plus whatever other pieces it takes to get it done, IMHO.

I definitely wouldn't send that 1st and 2nd back though.


I'd hope within 4 years the hawks would be using that cap to make win now moves and not for a 35 year old OEL who likley isn't an NHL level dman by then
LivingAnew a aimé ceci.
11 juin 2023 à 13 h 14
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,127
Mentions "j'aime": 11,000
Quoting: Wadejos123
I'd hope within 4 years the hawks would be using that cap to make win now moves and not for a 35 year old OEL who likley isn't an NHL level dman by then


I doubt they ever go out of their way to do "win now" moves, seems they are pretty adamant about building from within. At least not that soon. But even if they do, it should be more than simple enough to work around his cap hit for a year or two. The 11th overall pick could mean bringing in one of Reinbacher, Moore, Barlow, Danielson, Willander, etc. Not sure how much you have been scouting this year, but any one of those players (plus whatever else we get to take him) would be well worth it for the long term success of CHI. The buyout cap hit with one year left on his deal is $4.2M for one year and then $1.5M for the second year, which reduces his cap hit by a little more than $3M. Same for two years but double the term. It is a more than maneuverable move to add a very good piece to our rebuild.
11 juin 2023 à 13 h 19
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,308
Mentions "j'aime": 4,961
Quoting: Garak
I doubt they ever go out of their way to do "win now" moves, seems they are pretty adamant about building from within. At least not that soon. But even if they do, it should be more than simple enough to work around his cap hit for a year or two. The 11th overall pick could mean bringing in one of Reinbacher, Moore, Barlow, Danielson, Willander, etc. Not sure how much you have been scouting this year, but any one of those players (plus whatever else we get to take him) would be well worth it for the long term success of CHI. The buyout cap hit with one year left on his deal is $4.2M for one year and then $1.5M for the second year, which reduces his cap hit by a little more than $3M. Same for two years but double the term. It is a more than maneuverable move to add a very good piece to our rebuild.


I just think there's a way to get higher than 19 in the draft without taking OEL, if even if there isn't you're still getting an impact player at 19. In that 11-19 range i'm looking at a guy like Mathew Wood or Samuel Honzek. I see the hawks trying to add some size to a F group that really needs it
Garak a aimé ceci.
11 juin 2023 à 13 h 30
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,127
Mentions "j'aime": 11,000
Quoting: Wadejos123
I just think there's a way to get higher than 19 in the draft without taking OEL, if even if there isn't you're still getting an impact player at 19. In that 11-19 range i'm looking at a guy like Mathew Wood or Samuel Honzek. I see the hawks trying to add some size to a F group that really needs it


I would like to reiterate that I am not advocating for sending Murphy or ANY picks back to VAN. But taking on OEL for that 11th OA (plus) while NOT giving up the 19th is a no brainer, IMO. I would also like to add size like Wood, Barlow, Honzek, and/or Danielson. With both the 11th and 19th OA picks we could add two of them, or one of them and a Moore/Yager/etc. None of those guys are coming directly to the NHL, either. Which means if they come up for the 24-25 season, their ELC's will end at the same time as OEL's contract and CHI will all of a sudden have $7.26M in cap space to resign them and maybe even bring in another player. Same with guys like Nazar, Korchinski, etc. OEL's contract will fall of just in time for raises to start happening and the "win now" moves to begin. For the sake of the rebuild, this is a no brainer, and I'm not sure why so many people are so adamantly against OEL. I promise you if we did that and ended up with a guy like Moore with that pick, you and everyone else will be singing KD's praises in a couple years about it.
Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage