Too much for Laffy, not enough for Dubé

Calgary could get more for Dube and he doesn't actually play center

Pass on dumba
Pass on broissoit
Pass on including wallinder
Pass on dube

Drury says thanks for the laugh with that offer but no thanks and then offers you a 7th round draft pick for Zadina.

Raymond?

Wallinder is a top 20 prospect in the entire league, not really interested in trading him for a draft pick that has yet to sniff his draft status AND shipping off a top 43 pick to boot.

You want a 40 point 24 year old for a 3rd and a 4th? Lol, Flames hang up immediately



Um based on what? Where has he ever been rated top 20?

No I’m not saying I want the guy for free, moreso just uninterested in moving Wallinder, let alone him +.

This is the first ranking I clicked on and he’s ranked 21st.
https://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-top-100-prospects-ranking/

I had no idea that you could get young 45pt players on a cheap contract (2.3M) for a 3rd and a 4th. The Flames should get a couple of those as well then.

That's not top 20 though is it.
Scott Wheeler who is arguably the best writer when it comes to prospects doesnt have him In his top 50
Elite Prospects ranked him at 60

So based on all 3 of those it's probably a safe bet that he is probably around the 40-60 range in prospect rankings

You’re gonna nitpick over 1 spot? And one guy doesn’t make or break anything anyhow. You asked for a list, I sent you one.

The point is you made a claim that was incorrect. Provided an example that didn't back up your point, and I provided 2 more examples that again disagreed with you even more. Wallinder is a good prospect but he's not a top 20 prospect in the league. Simple as that

My man take ur little pettiness somewhere else. A little dignity would do you good.

Maybe don't go around spouting nonsense and no one will call you out on it

If you think calling a guy a top 20 prospect and sending a list where he’s ranked 21st is “nonsense” you need to re-evaluate ur life buddy.

Say you don't want Laffy without telling me you don't want him.

Wow more of the insults. Hope it helps you feel justified for being proven wrong. Again I then provided 2 more examples where he was ranked outside the top 50 with one by a much more renowned writer, but apparently that means nothing

My man, there is no scientific or matter of fact distinction of if a player is literally the 16th best or 27th best player etc, it’s an impossible, made up, subjective opinion.

You asked for an example, I provided one. Then you complained about the ranking being off by one. That’s a lame, wack move on your part.

You’re just a confrontational person and you enjoy arguing. Somebody says a guy shoot 50% from the field and ur the guy that says no he shot 49.8% from the field. Again, lame and also weird.