SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

actualPlayoffTeam

Créé par: Ludefice
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 18 mai 2023
Publié: 18 mai 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
1775 000 $
11 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
56 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
44 000 000 $
54 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CHI)
CHI
  1. Murray, Matt
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (ANA)
3.
TOR
  1. Wilson, Tom
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (WSH)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de WSH
Logo de CHI
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $81 635 950 $0 $0 $864 050 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 166 667 $5 166 667 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C
UFA - 4
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 4
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 mai 2023 à 22 h 21
#1
Joe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 7,678
Mentions "j'aime": 5,600
Even as ****ty as Toronto is, I don't think they take on a 6 mil cap hit to only move up what, 7 spots?
18 mai 2023 à 22 h 23
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: JoeROFLCOPTER
Even as ****ty as Toronto is, I don't think they take on a 6 mil cap hit to only move up what, 7 spots?


you referring to the Murray trade? It's like 4.6mill and they did basically the same trade last year with Mrazek on the same term and he's worse than Murray
18 mai 2023 à 22 h 26
#3
Joe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 7,678
Mentions "j'aime": 5,600
Quoting: Ludefice
you referring to the Murray trade? It's like 4.6mill and they did basically the same trade last year with Mrazek on the same term and he's worse than Murray


Did forget that there's some contract retention, but the best ability is availability.
18 mai 2023 à 22 h 30
#4
Casual Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 738
Mentions "j'aime": 207
Washington isn’t going to trade for Mitch Marner at $10M, no thanks and that’s a dramatic overpayment.
18 mai 2023 à 22 h 32
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Kuzbackov
Washington isn’t going to trade for Mitch Marner at $10M, no thanks and that’s a dramatic overpayment.


Depends if they want to try for the cup or not, pretty good guy to play with Ovechkin+help the PK and no that's not an overpayment for a 100 point selke nominee with 2 years left vs 1 year left. If anything it's a bit light.
18 mai 2023 à 22 h 40
#6
Interim Avian GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 77
Mentions "j'aime": 42
Quoting: Ludefice
you referring to the Murray trade? It's like 4.6mill and they did basically the same trade last year with Mrazek on the same term and he's worse than Murray


Hawks needed a goalie then, they don’t anymore.
SociallyHawkward et Garak a aimé ceci.
18 mai 2023 à 22 h 41
#7
Casual Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 738
Mentions "j'aime": 207
Quoting: Ludefice
Depends if they want to try for the cup or not, pretty good guy to play with Ovechkin+help the PK and no that's not an overpayment for a 100 point selke nominee with 2 years left vs 1 year left. If anything it's a bit light.

Did you just say the Capitals could compete for the Cup with Marner? Yeah that worked so well for the Leafs. Capitals politely decline and keep their pick, time to start looking to the future and absolutely no reason to pay anyone $10M. Look at the Leafs. Having a bunch of Skill Forwards making over $10M is not how winning teams are built.
18 mai 2023 à 22 h 47
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Kuzbackov
Did you just say the Capitals could compete for the Cup with Marner? Yeah that worked so well for the Leafs. Capitals politely decline and keep their pick, time to start looking to the future and absolutely no reason to pay anyone $10M. Look at the Leafs. Having a bunch of Skill Forwards making over $10M is not how winning teams are built.


I agree the caps should look to the future, but it seems at least with the moves they have made they are looking to retool and run with Ovechkin again rather than rebuild. This fits...not saying they will win or anything and it would probably need another move or 2 to actually be competitive realistically. I don't see them winning, but I could see them making a move like this.

I would also argue that Marner is a better fit on the Caps than the Leafs anyways, likewise Wilson is a better fit on the Leafs than the Caps. Leafs have small skill forwards in abundance, the caps don't.
18 mai 2023 à 22 h 50
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: GMtommyhawk
Hawks needed a goalie then, they don’t anymore.


My mistake actually I thought Mrazek was done...forgot how horrible that contract was, rip that deal. I would just do a similar deal with another team where it's a better fit.
18 mai 2023 à 23 h 16
#10
Casual Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 738
Mentions "j'aime": 207
Quoting: Ludefice
I agree the caps should look to the future, but it seems at least with the moves they have made they are looking to retool and run with Ovechkin again rather than rebuild. This fits...not saying they will win or anything and it would probably need another move or 2 to actually be competitive realistically. I don't see them winning, but I could see them making a move like this.

I would also argue that Marner is a better fit on the Caps than the Leafs anyways, likewise Wilson is a better fit on the Leafs than the Caps. Leafs have small skill forwards in abundance, the caps don't.

You seem to be completely ignoring the Salary Cap. The Capitals do not need any skilled Wingers making $10M. In that case the Capitals should re-sign Wilson and spend the difference in salary on a DMan.
OldNYIfan et All_Knowing a aimé ceci.
18 mai 2023 à 23 h 23
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,036
Mentions "j'aime": 3,235
Caps pass. I love Marner but Caps are most likely getting Michkov with their pick and Wilson is a unicorn.
All_Knowing a aimé ceci.
18 mai 2023 à 23 h 24
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Kuzbackov
You seem to be completely ignoring the Salary Cap. The Capitals do not need any skilled Wingers making $10M. In that case the Capitals should re-sign Wilson and spend the difference in salary on a DMan.


This isn't a Caps team this is a Leafs team. Obviously the Caps would have to make more moves...and really they should make more moves. Or better yet, they don't do the trade and trade Wilson + more for futures. However, I see them trying to retool and try again with Ovi based on some of the moves they have made recently.
18 mai 2023 à 23 h 29
#13
Casual Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 738
Mentions "j'aime": 207
Quoting: Ludefice
This isn't a Caps team this is a Leafs team. Obviously the Caps would have to make more moves...and really they should make more moves. Or better yet, they don't do the trade and trade Wilson + more for futures. However, I see them trying to retool and try again with Ovi based on some of the moves they have made recently.


Most appropriately based on all the comments from the Capitals themselves they plan on building around Ovi AND Wilson.
18 mai 2023 à 23 h 50
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Kuzbackov
Most appropriately based on all the comments from the Capitals themselves they plan on building around Ovi AND Wilson.


If that's actually their plan that's wild. They can't do a rebuild around them in that case, so it's a retool. Not sure how they can make that team competitive. Will be an interesting offseason for them if they follow through with that plan.
18 mai 2023 à 23 h 50
#15
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 7,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,852
All you're doing here is making the team slower and the Capitals A LOT better. Probably a little counterintuitive if you're in a wildcard chase.
19 mai 2023 à 0 h 17
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: NickC1988
All you're doing here is making the team slower and the Capitals A LOT better. Probably a little counterintuitive if you're in a wildcard chase.


Yeah a bit slower true, but a better playoff team. They aren't a wild card team now, or with this team imo. They look to be a 2 or 3 in the division with this roster in my opinion with better odds of going deep assuming they don't have some catastrophic injury issues.
19 mai 2023 à 1 h 38
#17
Casual Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 738
Mentions "j'aime": 207
Quoting: Ludefice
If that's actually their plan that's wild. They can't do a rebuild around them in that case, so it's a retool. Not sure how they can make that team competitive. Will be an interesting offseason for them if they follow through with that plan.

At least they won something once, what’s the Leafs plan? They’re going to have to lose some trades to shed salary or they’re out of luck. Tavares is getting older and his contract getting worse, how do they improve the team that they’re not going to be able to keep together already?
19 mai 2023 à 2 h 16
#18
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,980
Mentions "j'aime": 6,770
Caps only have 7 mil in cap space next season, this deal would eat basically all of that, and they wouldn't even be able to fill out a 20 man roster afterwards.

If Marber to the Caps, Toronto needs to take back 9+ in cap. Didn't Kuznetsov want out of Washington?
19 mai 2023 à 5 h 54
#19
BlackhawksReboot
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 51
Mentions "j'aime": 41
Blackhawks decline. Counter: Instead of the CHI 2nd round pick, they offer NYR 2nd round pick.
Garak a aimé ceci.
19 mai 2023 à 10 h 9
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Kuzbackov
At least they won something once, what’s the Leafs plan? They’re going to have to lose some trades to shed salary or they’re out of luck. Tavares is getting older and his contract getting worse, how do they improve the team that they’re not going to be able to keep together already?


Tavares is the only player they would 'lose a trade' on because of salary and he's not going anywhere due to his NMC. If they trade Nylander they are getting great value for a 40 goal scorer under 7 mill. If they trade Marner they should get great value for a 100 pt selke nominee that's just getting better every year with 2 years left. If they trade Matthews they should get great value for a guy who is money in the bank for at least 40, plus a hart&ted lindsay, 2 rockets, etc. Marner, Matthews, and Nylander all get more than they are getting now on the open market as UFAs.

This team is just what I think would more reasonably happen as a general direction to improve the balance of the team. I would personally hit the reset button and trade at least Matthews and Marner. The goal would be to get very good young players that are more hard nosed and futures, then some guy to make the cap work out for a year or whatever is needed. Nylander could wait until the trade deadline since he only has a M-NTC on July 1...maybe they keep him maybe not. There is a world where Matthews and Marner are gone and they are still a competitive team in the playoffs. Their problem recently has always been balance, even with Tavares/Nylander/maybe O'Reilly they would have enough star power with what they get back from trades + free agency to compete.
19 mai 2023 à 10 h 16
#21
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Modifié 19 mai 2023 à 10 h 22
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Caps only have 7 mil in cap space next season, this deal would eat basically all of that, and they wouldn't even be able to fill out a 20 man roster afterwards.

If Marber to the Caps, Toronto needs to take back 9+ in cap. Didn't Kuznetsov want out of Washington?


That's just not an argument the cap difference isn't that egregious given their space and this trade doesn't stop them from making another move or 2 or whatever they want. We all know they are multiple moves away from a reasonable retool, or rebuild.
19 mai 2023 à 10 h 58
#22
Always have 2018
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,021
Mentions "j'aime": 934
Fair value for Marner for sure. I don't think the caps can give up both Wilson and 8OA.
19 mai 2023 à 12 h 7
#23
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,980
Mentions "j'aime": 6,770
Quoting: Ludefice
That's just not an argument the cap difference isn't that egregious given their space and this trade doesn't stop them from making another move or 2 or whatever they want. We all know they are multiple moves away from a reasonable retool, or rebuild.


Assuming another cap strapped team is going to add ~6 million in cap in one trade is also unreasonable. Toronto is going to have to take more cap back to move Marner to a competitor.
19 mai 2023 à 15 h 51
#24
NoQuitInNewYork
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,124
Mentions "j'aime": 743
Quoting: Ludefice
you referring to the Murray trade? It's like 4.6mill and they did basically the same trade last year with Mrazek on the same term and he's worse than Murray


Yes but Chicago doesn’t need any more goalies
19 mai 2023 à 16 h 14
#25
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 34
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Quoting: Scooter81
Yes but Chicago doesn’t need any more goalies


Just not reading the comments here I guess
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage