SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sabres need to trim the fat

Créé par: BigDog91
Équipe: 2023-24 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 27 avr. 2023
Publié: 27 avr. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
12 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 000 000 $
25 000 000 $
25 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
SEA
  1. Luukkonen, Ukko-Pekka
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (BUF)
2.
BUF
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (NYR)
STL
  1. Olofsson, Victor (2 300 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (PHI)
3.
BUF
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de BUF
Logo de NYR
Logo de BUF
Logo de TOR
Logo de LAK
Logo de VAN
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2024
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2025
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de NSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $72 939 403 $0 $4 070 000 $9 560 597 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 100 000 $7 100 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
918 333 $918 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
918 333 $918 333 $
C
RFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 285 714 $4 285 714 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 avr. 2023 à 10 h 13
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 2,665
Mentions "j'aime": 1,176
Canucks pass we are in fat trimming mode big time.No cap.
27 avr. 2023 à 10 h 14
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 28,054
Mentions "j'aime": 14,667
You didn't trim the fat. You added to it.

Wtf are those gudas and rantaa contracts?

Gudas isn't better than Lyubushkin
DumbHockeyTrades, Prison_Goalie_Rick, majormoose007 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
27 avr. 2023 à 10 h 14
#3
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,251
Mentions "j'aime": 23,112
Sabres don't have that much fat, but teams aren't taking on Sabres fat and giving up good assets for them either.
27 avr. 2023 à 10 h 20
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 3,103
Mentions "j'aime": 1,495
Honestly the blues don't really need another winger. Plus we don't have that much cap and we still need to sign some RFA's
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
27 avr. 2023 à 10 h 22
#5
Lol
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 208
Mentions "j'aime": 41
the contracts and the trades are just horrible
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
27 avr. 2023 à 10 h 23
#6
A-toad-a-so
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 608
Mentions "j'aime": 275
😂 trimming fat by adding Gudas and Raanta at $5m
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
27 avr. 2023 à 10 h 45
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,735
Mentions "j'aime": 984
naw
27 avr. 2023 à 10 h 51
#8
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,625
laugh laugh You say that Buffalo needs to trim the fat, But yet you sign Gudas and Raanta to 2 x $5,000,000 deals. I call that hardly trimming the fat.
27 avr. 2023 à 10 h 56
#9
Démarrer sujet
BigDog91
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 1,509
Mentions "j'aime": 374
Quoting: HockeyIsMyPassion61
laugh laugh You say that Buffalo needs to trim the fat, But yet you sign Gudas and Raanta to 2 x $5,000,000 deals. I call that hardly trimming the fat.


Gudas is one of the better defensive Dman in the league. He also brings playoff experience and grit missing from the team

Raanta has played well and will help keep pressure off Levi. Without giving up a lot of asset or term I believe it works for the Sabres.

Not sure wat you are expecting from Sabres this year but I think this is something you should expect.
27 avr. 2023 à 11 h 0
#10
Démarrer sujet
BigDog91
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 1,509
Mentions "j'aime": 374
Quoting: palhal
Sabres don't have that much fat, but teams aren't taking on Sabres fat and giving up good assets for them either.


Sabres fat is better than most teams. Sabres just have so many offensive prospects they have the ability to trade good player to fit them on team. A guy who will score 20+ goals, young goalie, and legit RHD are all very good trade assets.
27 avr. 2023 à 11 h 2
#11
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,625
Quoting: BigDog91
Gudas is one of the better defensive Dman in the league. He also brings playoff experience and grit missing from the team

Raanta has played well and will help keep pressure off Levi. Without giving up a lot of asset or term I believe it works for the Sabres.

Not sure wat you are expecting from Sabres this year but I think this is something you should expect.


Sorry but neither player is worth $5,000,000 even for 2 years. Gudas is worth 3 x 3 mil and Raanta 3 x 2.5 mil at the very most.
27 avr. 2023 à 11 h 3
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 2,856
Mentions "j'aime": 1,455
Blues are solid on all offense wingers. Olofsson doesn’t really do much.

Wouldn’t be terribly mad if they made this trade, but it doesn’t make sense for them to.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
27 avr. 2023 à 11 h 5
#13
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,647
Mentions "j'aime": 11,476
Quoting: AC14
Blues are solid on all offense wingers. Olofsson doesn’t really do much.

Wouldn’t be terribly mad if they made this trade, but it doesn’t make sense for them to.


I would be absolutely livid. Making this trade would be a fireable offense.
27 avr. 2023 à 11 h 6
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 2,856
Mentions "j'aime": 1,455
Quoting: mokumboi
I would be absolutely livid. Making this trade would be a fireable offense.


Moving down what’s assumed 9-10 spots from 24-32 to like 39 isn’t a big difference in this draft. It’s not worth it. But certainly not fireball
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
27 avr. 2023 à 11 h 19
#15
Démarrer sujet
BigDog91
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 1,509
Mentions "j'aime": 374
Quoting: HockeyIsMyPassion61
Sorry but neither player is worth $5,000,000 even for 2 years. Gudas is worth 3 x 3 mil and Raanta 3 x 2.5 mil at the very most.


Other teams would bid that and could lose them. Also rather pay more for two years then give them an extra year when they wouldn’t even make our team.
27 avr. 2023 à 11 h 20
#16
Démarrer sujet
BigDog91
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 1,509
Mentions "j'aime": 374
Quoting: AC14
Moving down what’s assumed 9-10 spots from 24-32 to like 39 isn’t a big difference in this draft. It’s not worth it. But certainly not fireball


Exactly the trade down would be worth a late second. Which I think would be fair trade. Especially with eating half salary.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
27 avr. 2023 à 12 h 0
#17
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,647
Mentions "j'aime": 11,476
Quoting: AC14
Moving down what’s assumed 9-10 spots from 24-32 to like 39 isn’t a big difference in this draft. It’s not worth it. But certainly not fireball


It's a rather large difference and the Blues have zero use or cap for Olofsson, who is basically the antithesis of a Blues/Chief type player. It would be pure idiocy. I think Army has already used up all his idiocy mulligans on Leddy.
27 avr. 2023 à 12 h 4
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 2,856
Mentions "j'aime": 1,455
Quoting: mokumboi
It's a rather large difference and the Blues have zero use or cap for Olofsson, who is basically the antithesis of a Blues/Chief type player. It would be pure idiocy. I think Army has already used up all his idiocy mulligans on Leddy.


I guess to a degree you’re right. It is a dumb move. My main point was value wise I don’t think it’s terrible. It’s another fairly low risk move to get a guy who has offensive capabilities but a lot of deficiencies to try and get the player right or scoring. I think we’ve used up all the ice time for that though.

And it’s very hard to judge where a pick is value wise. There are probably 45 very good looking junior players from an untrained eye. I’d venture to guess after extensive viewing our scouting dept has some guys they’d prefer, and honestly we have no reason to doubt them. The Blues drafting in that area has been ridiculously good for a while now
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
27 avr. 2023 à 12 h 33
#19
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,647
Mentions "j'aime": 11,476
Quoting: AC14
I guess to a degree you’re right. It is a dumb move. My main point was value wise I don’t think it’s terrible. It’s another fairly low risk move to get a guy who has offensive capabilities but a lot of deficiencies to try and get the player right or scoring. I think we’ve used up all the ice time for that though.

And it’s very hard to judge where a pick is value wise. There are probably 45 very good looking junior players from an untrained eye. I’d venture to guess after extensive viewing our scouting dept has some guys they’d prefer, and honestly we have no reason to doubt them. The Blues drafting in that area has been ridiculously good for a while now


He's not gonna get right. He's a one zone player, a poor man's Hoffman.

For me, the clear tiers are about like this:

1-2 (yes, I feel Fantilli is close enough to Bedard)
3-4
5-12
13-24
25-35
35-55

But yeah, doing this deal would solve no problems. We need to get this team back to the system, not add any one trick passengers.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage