Canucks pass easily

Not a chance we are trading EP40.IMHO.

Considering the package that the OP has posted is a better package than what Eichel, Duchene first trade, B. Schenn, St. Louis, Kessel first trade, Pronger (to PHI), Pronger (to ANA), and is pretty darn close to, if not better than what the Oilers got for Gretzky. 2 1st, a 2nd, Canes top RHD prospect that you Canucks fans won’t leave alone, and Turbo who can, at the absolute least, be flipped for 2 extra 2nds, or even a 1st and 2nd at the deadline. Not to mention, EP40 is due a contract after next season, likely at 9.5mil or above. If anything needs to be added, it shouldn’t be anything significant, cause that is a pretty fair offer, all things considered. But I digress. I’m not going to get into why EP won’t be traded and all that.

This is definitely not better than the Echiel return and tbh it should be better than the Echiel return everyone knows vegas underpaid because of Echiels neck surgery, Pettersson is untouchable in Vancouver there for you are going to have to overpay for the canucks to consider trading him, 2 late 1st a top 6 winger and a A- prospect isn't getting you a 24 year old top 10 center in the leauge

EP40 is not a top 10 center in the league, but go off

Hes OUR top center and hes not for trade.IMHO.

Weird because he is top 5 in center scoring this year while being one of the best 2 way centers in the leauge, also not sure I'd trust your ranking of players, you were the same guy telling everyone Bear would have been traded for a 2nd...

One of the best 2 way centers in the league... OH BUDDY... where do we begin here. He's not as bad as Miller, but he's not special defensively. Evolving hockey has him as a net negative... he might be 10-15 range, but top 10 centers? Absolute clown. Not sure why I'm surprised, aren't you the one that kept saying JT Miller is an elite player?

https://twitter.com/EvolvingWild/status/1636476856986750977?t=FVa5WT9oTe7EziiglSlPWg&s=19 weird that you say he is negative defensively yet he is positive defensively at even strength and this model servely underrated him compared to others, Pettersson this year is 2nd in sh points, the reason behind the negative impact on the pk is from the Canucks having a historic bad pk from having to use their 3/4th string goalie all year, also I know the canes really haven't had many elite players but yes typically players that have 99 point years are considered elite

Canucks counter with OEL and 2nd for Aho

It's best for everyone if you use the internet sober

better offer than gretzky... come on man you just lost all credibility

the gretzky offer would be like 3 first jarvis and aho on top off a bazillion dollar.

I am sober buddy, maybe it would help if you knew what you were talking about before commenting

https://evolving-hockey.com/stats/rapm_charts/?_inputs_&dir_rapmchrt=%22Single%20Skater%22

Yup, elite defensively huh? GTFO lmao

Your going to have to use a public chart I am not a subscriber

Sounds like a you problem

Lol how come your so mad today? Need to talk about something?

No, just not my problem. I can't fix that. What about you? You seem a little more out of touch than usual even for you. Everything good?

Well I asked you to use a public Info to back up your claim Pettersson is a negative defensive player, and you failed to do so, I've used public models to show my points, if you want to argue and name call that just looks bad on you. I hope you are feeling better for the rest of your day

I provided a model which you can have access to, and it's not a model that is particularly expensive either. If you do not wish to do so, I cannot control that. It's out of my control. At that point, out difference of opinions is no longer worth the time to continue. I hope you get over whatever is going on, and do not be afraid to reach out to people if it is affecting you this badly

I am not the one name calling but thank you I will if youd ever like to provide a fact based debate let me know other wise have a lovely day

I have provided a statistically backed debate, you just do not wish to use the same stats. If you'd ever like to have a statistical conversation where we both use stats, I'd be an incredibly willing participant. I hope you remain in good spirits!

I am an evolving hockey subscriber and it just shows he is a good defensive player

McDavid, Mackinnon, Matthews, Draisaitl, Crosby, Bergeron, Barkov, Hughes, Pettersson, and Point/Thompson is the top 10, but go off

This season Pettersson has been a top 5 C, but go off