Keep Dubois, we don't want for that.

Hawks decline. Getting rid of the last 2 years of Schmidt's deal costs way more than a one round move up in the draft.

You have to understand that Dach is part of our young core now. He's no more available than Suzuki or Caufield. We're looking to add to our core, not up/side-grade.
The exception is on LHD, where Guhle is a lock but we have an excess behind him that could be available in the right deal.

Habs are in no rush to get PLD - however... this offer will definitaly keep KH up at night for a few days. You would likely have to take some $$ back (like Dvorak).

You guys add Dvorak we add in vesalainen who is doing amazing in liiga

LMAO, the difference between PLD and Dach is not a top 16 2023 1st round pick, it's not even a 1st round pick!

Oh I forgot that you know exactly what's gonna happen and it's only what the os would be. You know that anything is possible he could go for 4 firsts it's all speculation. So let's not shoot down ideas because of bias or overvaluation of players. This is just a agm that is PREDICTING what MIGHT occur doesn't mean it's wrong. Let's just agree that any agm including Dubois has the right to do what they want because everyone views and values this differently.

Or just bring Vesalainen back and see what he can do this time around, give him some 2nd pp time and tell him to hammer the damn puck!

The only way he goes for 4 firsts is if he suddenly puts up 60 points in his last 16 games! So no not anything is possible.

Also, you are one to talk about shooting down ideas on ACGM, that is the kettle calling the pot black LMAO!!

Since you feel that anything is possible, from now on I am only trading a 7th round pick for PLD and I don't want to see any comments from you about how it's unrealistic or it wouldn't happen cause if I do I will just refer you to your comments here.

Go right ahead idc you might just get roasted by others.

I will just refer them to your comment as well

Okay and they will still say that what I said with a ground of salt are you trading Connor McDavid for future considerations? No, the point I'm saying is when someone puts in an honest trade that could be seen as a deal they think is possible to respect that. This is getting way beyond capfriendly with alternate dimensions where it does happen but that's not the point. Just try to understand where they are coming from and accept that "hey they see this differently than me but that's okay because we don't need to see eye to eye as we both have reasons why we think they way we do" I respect that you try and take logic into what you believe it's nice and helps you prove your points but other people can see it a different way with the same Information