SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If Jeannot got a haul can Lafferty get one also

Équipe: 2022-23 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 27 févr. 2023
Publié: 27 févr. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Tanner Jeannot: (6"2) age 25, (LW/RW) RFA
2021-2022, 24 goals 17 assists = 41 pts 81 games
2022-2023, 5 goals 9 assists = 14 pts 56 games

Sam Lafferty: (6"1) age 27 (LW/C/RW) 1.5 years left on contract
2021-2022, 5 goals 6 assists = 11 pts 46 games
2022 -2023, 10 goals 11 assists = 21 pts 51 games

Tanner Jeannot and Sam Lafferty and Lafferty seem like they could get similar returns. Jeannot is having a down year, but is still better than Lafferty. I do think that Lafferty makes up for that value in skill with his contract, as teams like EDM might be looking to add players with term that can play anywhere in the lineup.
Lafferty is exactly like Brandon Hagel, but he is a bit older. People may not expect him to go for this much, except Davidson is going to get a bidding war for him.
This would be an incredible return for the Blackhawks and although it seems unlikely, remember that Hagel and Jeannot both got returns pretty similar to this.
Transactions
CHI
  1. Tullio, Tyler
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
  4. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de EDM
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de EDM
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2482 500 000 $74 862 629 $237 500 $947 500 $7 637 371 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
762 500 $762 500 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
823 333 $823 333 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
AD
RFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
859 167 $859 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 févr. 2023 à 9 h 48
#1
Joe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 7,674
Mentions "j'aime": 5,595
Id say no but Holland is Holland
27 févr. 2023 à 9 h 51
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 840
Mentions "j'aime": 959
One GM making a baffling deal doesn't imply that another GM will make an equally baffling deal.

I think Laff and Raddysh have more value than the average ACGM trade suggests, but...not THIS much. The Jeannot deal was probably an outlier.
Hawksguy81, Garak et Ritzy a aimé ceci.
27 févr. 2023 à 9 h 52
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,836
Mentions "j'aime": 10,611
Well, there is a big difference between a protected 2025 1st and a 2023 1st. But, otherwise, yeah, I agree. CHI SHOULD technically be able to get a comparable haul. I have a suspicion that CHI won't get the kind of hauls all the other teams are getting, though.
27 févr. 2023 à 9 h 53
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 638
Mentions "j'aime": 201
rumor was the ask for lafferty was a 2nd and holland said it was too much so uh, hate to burst your bubble dude
27 févr. 2023 à 9 h 57
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,836
Mentions "j'aime": 10,611
Quoting: rext7177
rumor was the ask for lafferty was a 2nd and holland said it was too much so uh, hate to burst your bubble dude


What he is trying to say is that the market says otherwise. So, if EDM wants to improve their team at this deadline they are going to pay a premium no matter who it is.
TheRealKyleDavidson a aimé ceci.
27 févr. 2023 à 10 h 0
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 638
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Quoting: Garak
What he is trying to say is that the market says otherwise. So, if EDM wants to improve their team at this deadline they are going to pay a premium no matter who it is.


If the ask for these horribly mid players is 1st rounders i think id rather gamble with the current roster, if im edmonton, its Erik Karlsson or bust
Newgod77 a aimé ceci.
27 févr. 2023 à 10 h 4
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,836
Mentions "j'aime": 10,611
Quoting: rext7177
If the ask for these horribly mid players is 1st rounders i think id rather gamble with the current roster, if im edmonton, its Erik Karlsson or bust


EK would be a dumb move for EDM. Total waste of assets and cap space for something that they don't need in the least bit.
27 févr. 2023 à 10 h 4
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,567
Mentions "j'aime": 3,319
Lafferty never got 20G though, he isn't thought to have that potential like Jeannot. So, maybe he fetches a 2nd+3rd or two 2nds now, but he won't be getting a 1st+ I don't think.
27 févr. 2023 à 10 h 5
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,567
Mentions "j'aime": 3,319
Quoting: Garak
EK would be a dumb move for EDM. Total waste of assets and cap space for something that they don't need in the least bit.


The NHL needs it.
27 févr. 2023 à 10 h 6
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,836
Mentions "j'aime": 10,611
Quoting: GMBL
The NHL needs it.


Huh, why?
27 févr. 2023 à 10 h 7
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 638
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Quoting: Garak
EK would be a dumb move for EDM. Total waste of assets and cap space for something that they don't need in the least bit.


our top players have made it clear they would like a puck mover on the top pair, a lot of the teams struggles are due to Ceci playing above his weight class and nurse not being able to carry him, put a puck mover next to Nurse forces nurse to do what hes good at (being a more defensively sound 2-way dman) essentially EK is meant to be an upgrade on Barrie who can actually play 1st pair and not result in constant failed exits and icings
27 févr. 2023 à 10 h 14
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,567
Mentions "j'aime": 3,319
Quoting: Garak
Huh, why?


Dont you want to see that PP with Karlsson on it? Or 3v3 overtime with 97 and 29? Would make the regular season more interesting even if it doesn't help the Oilers in the playoffs.

I do think upgrading on Barry is a good thing, tge other options aren't good for them, tgey will need to develop some defenders themselves.
27 févr. 2023 à 10 h 14
#13
Billy739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 6,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
Its the same logic behind why they overpaid for Goodrow and Coleman giving up in essence 3 first round picks for them.
Cant say it didnt work last time around and Jeanot is one Tough SOB and a good goal scorer.

The price tag minus a 1st round made sense but adding Cal Foot through the idea of a 1st being required out , or so i thought.
I mean he's a good player but thats a lot and his cap isnt even that low with term like that due from CHI last year
27 févr. 2023 à 10 h 15
#14
Démarrer sujet
TheRealKyleDavidson
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 472
Mentions "j'aime": 165
Quoting: rext7177
rumor was the ask for lafferty was a 2nd and holland said it was too much so uh, hate to burst your bubble dude


the market has clearly changed since then. The hawks should get at least 2 2nd rounders + a prospect for Lafferty
Garak a aimé ceci.
27 févr. 2023 à 10 h 20
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,836
Mentions "j'aime": 10,611
Quoting: GMBL
Dont you want to see that PP with Karlsson on it? Or 3v3 overtime with 97 and 29? Would make the regular season more interesting even if it doesn't help the Oilers in the playoffs.

I do think upgrading on Barry is a good thing, tge other options aren't good for them, tgey will need to develop some defenders themselves.


Quoting: rext7177
our top players have made it clear they would like a puck mover on the top pair, a lot of the teams struggles are due to Ceci playing above his weight class and nurse not being able to carry him, put a puck mover next to Nurse forces nurse to do what hes good at (being a more defensively sound 2-way dman) essentially EK is meant to be an upgrade on Barrie who can actually play 1st pair and not result in constant failed exits and icings


Well, it sounds like it is not happening and EK will be staying put at the deadline. If EDM goes for him, good luck, I guess. But EDM has much more obvious holes and shortcomings in their roster than spending an absolute BUTTLOAD adding another offensive weapon with a gigantic cap hit. And EK's price will only go up, the more retention there is, which will be very expensive considering his actual salary and term.

EK to EDM has "MISTAKE" written all over it.
27 févr. 2023 à 10 h 27
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,475
Mentions "j'aime": 19,636
4th in hits, 5th in PIM, 24 goals last year, 9 fights this year, pending RFA that they can sign long term. I really don't think they are that comparable
27 févr. 2023 à 10 h 30
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,567
Mentions "j'aime": 3,319
Quoting: Garak
Well, it sounds like it is not happening and EK will be staying put at the deadline. If EDM goes for him, good luck, I guess. But EDM has much more obvious holes and shortcomings in their roster than spending an absolute BUTTLOAD adding another offensive weapon with a gigantic cap hit. And EK's price will only go up, the more retention there is, which will be very expensive considering his actual salary and term.

EK to EDM has "MISTAKE" written all over it.


It does lol, but I hope it happens in the off-season.
27 févr. 2023 à 10 h 41
#18
CbjSabresDucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 4,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,180
Quoting: ginandtacos
One GM making a baffling deal doesn't imply that another GM will make an equally baffling deal.

I think Laff and Raddysh have more value than the average ACGM trade suggests, but...not THIS much. The Jeannot deal was probably an outlier.


He was an outlier due to his 19% sh% last year. If that was more at his average, he would have gotten a 2nd at most
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage