SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kane duh

Créé par: BDAvs
Équipe: 2022-23 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 19 févr. 2023
Publié: 19 févr. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2024
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2025
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $72 806 667 $25 000 $2 500 000 $9 693 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
-2 625 000 $-2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
987 500 $987 500 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 févr. 2023 à 16 h 31
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,697
Mentions "j'aime": 3,013
I’m actually shocked this is coming from an Avs poster. This is really bad for Colorado. Kane isn’t the player he used to be. You’re trading away from the Avs area of positional weakness (Center) and adding a 1st? Madness
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
19 févr. 2023 à 16 h 32
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 4,402
Mentions "j'aime": 2,250
CHI should take that and RUN. What an overpay!!
19 févr. 2023 à 16 h 33
#3
Démarrer sujet
BDAvs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 330
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Quoting: turtlemountain
I’m actually shocked this is coming from an Avs poster. This is really bad for Colorado. Kane isn’t the player he used to be. You’re trading away from the Avs area of positional weakness (Center) and adding a 1st? Madness


I was being nice. Agreed it’s a bit much. But Newhook isn’t the answer.
19 févr. 2023 à 16 h 35
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 4,402
Mentions "j'aime": 2,250
Quoting: BDAvs
I was being nice. Agreed it’s a bit much. But Newhook isn’t the answer.


Even if he isn't the answer for the Avs, he's more than worth renting Kane now.
NMAvsFan, MeetYourMakar et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
19 févr. 2023 à 16 h 37
#5
Representing the 505
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,496
Mentions "j'aime": 3,683
Quoting: BDAvs
I was being nice. Agreed it’s a bit much. But Newhook isn’t the answer.


You don't trade a young C that has less than two NHL seasons under his belt for an over-the-hill rental. This is terrible asset management.
MeetYourMakar et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
19 févr. 2023 à 16 h 38
#6
Démarrer sujet
BDAvs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 330
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Quoting: NJDevils1317
Even if he isn't the answer for the Avs, he's more than worth renting Kane now.


Did you check out the top 2 forward lines or just jump to an opinion on the trade?
19 févr. 2023 à 16 h 46
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: BDAvs
Did you check out the top 2 forward lines or just jump to an opinion on the trade?


considering landeskog is not a C, yeah the top 2 lines dont make any sense

As an Avs fan you should know that Landeskog never has played centre in his career.
19 févr. 2023 à 16 h 52
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 4,402
Mentions "j'aime": 2,250
Quoting: BDAvs
Did you check out the top 2 forward lines or just jump to an opinion on the trade?


Did you see what Kane has done this season or did you jump to the conclusion he's still a 1st line winger?
19 févr. 2023 à 16 h 52
#9
Démarrer sujet
BDAvs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 330
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Quoting: coga16
considering landeskog is not a C, yeah the top 2 lines dont make any sense

As an Avs fan you should know that Landeskog never has played centre in his career.


Oh shoot you’re right. After sweetening the trade for the Avs I forgot to finalize the lineup. 🤩
19 févr. 2023 à 16 h 53
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,697
Mentions "j'aime": 3,013
Quoting: coga16
considering landeskog is not a C, yeah the top 2 lines dont make any sense

As an Avs fan you should know that Landeskog never has played centre in his career.


I’d argue that Landeskog functionally plays center a lot of the time based on his defensive role and how many face offs he takes.

Nevertheless, this is bad. Even if Newhook never develops beyond what he is today: Newhook and a 1st for Kane is just bad for who Kane is at this point of his career.

He was fun to watch in his prime, but those days are long gone unfortunately.
NJDevils1317 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
19 févr. 2023 à 16 h 54
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: BDAvs
Oh shoot you’re right. After sweetening the trade for the Avs I forgot to finalize the lineup. 🤩


and mikko is not a Center either, once agin as an Avs fan you should know better than this
NJDevils1317 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
19 févr. 2023 à 16 h 56
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: turtlemountain
I’d argue that Landeskog functionally plays center a lot of the time based on his defensive role and how many face offs he takes.

Nevertheless, this is bad. Even if Newhook never develops beyond what he is today: Newhook and a 1st for Kane is just bad for who Kane is at this point of his career.

He was fun to watch in his prime, but those days are long gone unfortunately.


he never plays up the middle of the ice, face-offs are not what being a Center is about, He would have to change how he plays his game to actually play C, its not as simple as hes good defensively and takes draws so lets shift him to the middle. I dont doubt that Landy could learn to play Centre but he has never in his career, so why force it now
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
19 févr. 2023 à 16 h 57
#13
Démarrer sujet
BDAvs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 330
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Quoting: coga16
and mikko is not a Center either, once agin as an Avs fan you should know better than this


Landeskog and Rantanen play center quite often. They make $16 mil combined and should be able to figure it out. If not we’re in trouble.
19 févr. 2023 à 16 h 57
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,068
Mentions "j'aime": 9,382
Quoting: NJDevils1317
Did you see what Kane has done this season or did you jump to the conclusion he's still a 1st line winger?


Yeah because a NHL top player last season goes to average this season just months later all because of that mighty birthday passed! LOL Ever think there is more to the story?
BDAvs a aimé ceci.
19 févr. 2023 à 16 h 58
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: BDAvs
Landeskog and Rantanen play center quite often. They make $16 mil combined and should be able to figure it out. If not we’re in trouble.


landeskog has never played centre...not one game in his career.
Rantanen had to shift over to C for 3-4 games bc of Kadri injury

once again as an avs fan you should know this.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
19 févr. 2023 à 17 h 0
#16
Démarrer sujet
BDAvs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 330
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Quoting: coga16
landeskog has never played centre...not one game in his career.
Rantanen had to shift over to C for 3-4 games bc of Kadri injury

once again as an avs fan you should know this.


Well, Kadri no longer exists. You like to offer problems but no solutions.
19 févr. 2023 à 17 h 3
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: BDAvs
Well, Kadri no longer exists. You like to offer problems but no solutions.


Well trading for wingers and forcing players to play a position that is not their natural role is not a solution either

I have said Many times in the past that Adam Henrique is the ideal trade piece for the avs, he adds a nice short term solution to the 2c spot, allows newhook to grow into it more, and Henrique does what the avs do well, hes smart, a good skater, great defensively

your solution doesnt really fit with bendar, Kane as offensively gifted he is, is a awful defensibly, like one of the worst in the leagues for a top line player. Hes not gong to change how he plays on the avs, and that wont work well under Bednar
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
19 févr. 2023 à 17 h 7
#18
Démarrer sujet
BDAvs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 330
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Quoting: coga16
Well trading for wingers and forcing players to play a position that is not their natural role is not a solution either

I have said Many times in the past that Adam Henrique is the ideal trade piece for the avs, he adds a nice short term solution to the 2c spot, allows newhook to grow into it more, and Henrique does what the avs do well, hes smart, a good skater, great defensively

your solution doesnt really fit with bendar, Kane as offensively gifted he is, is a awful defensibly, like one of the worst in the leagues for a top line player. Hes not gong to change how he plays on the avs, and that wont work well under Bednar


I like that idea as well. What’s the cost?
19 févr. 2023 à 17 h 9
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,598
Mentions "j'aime": 4,580
Targeting Kane for the Avs is beyond awful. Doesn't fit a team need and hasn't been producing, plus will cost waaay more than the Avs can afford to give up. Give your head a shake lol. If the Avs have to overpay at all it should be targeting someone like Henrique/Jenner/Bennett, who can insulate Newhook for 1-3 years whilst he learns the 2C job, and then either be moved, let go or dropped down to 3C.
19 févr. 2023 à 17 h 11
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: BDAvs
I like that idea as well. What’s the cost?


having some nice disuccions with Ducks fans on the site, a 1st for him 50% retained. Which would be nice pick up bc of the additional term and you get a transitional 2C over the next season and a half
BDAvs a aimé ceci.
19 févr. 2023 à 17 h 11
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,697
Mentions "j'aime": 3,013
Quoting: coga16
he never plays up the middle of the ice, face-offs are not what being a Center is about, He would have to change how he plays his game to actually play C, its not as simple as hes good defensively and takes draws so lets shift him to the middle. I dont doubt that Landy could learn to play Centre but he has never in his career, so why force it now


Playing center largely about what your role is in each zone. For periods of MacKinnon’s career, Landeskog was almost always F3 in the defensive zone while MacKinnon had easier defensive responsibilities more like a winger. Once they move to the offensive zone, MacKinnon takes over as a more traditional C.

It’s not ideal and it’d be an awkward fit, but stranger things have been posted on this godforsaken website.
BDAvs a aimé ceci.
19 févr. 2023 à 17 h 15
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: turtlemountain
Playing center largely about what your role is in each zone. For periods of MacKinnon’s career, Landeskog was almost always F3 in the defensive zone while MacKinnon had easier defensive responsibilities more like a winger. Once they move to the offensive zone, MacKinnon takes over as a more traditional C.

It’s not ideal and it’d be an awkward fit, but stranger things have been posted on this godforsaken website.


but if hes not playing on Macks Line, hes not goign to get that transitional fluid hybrid role at C, it will be more straight line C which I think isnt that easy to shift to so late in his career. He really will be playing a traditional C position with his responsibilities in all zones. I think its risky
BDAvs a aimé ceci.
19 févr. 2023 à 17 h 17
#23
Démarrer sujet
BDAvs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 330
Mentions "j'aime": 49
Quoting: coga16
having some nice disuccions with Ducks fans on the site, a 1st for him 50% retained. Which would be nice pick up bc of the additional term and you get a transitional 2C over the next season and a half


It’d be cool if we could do Newhook for their 2024 1st.
19 févr. 2023 à 17 h 18
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,697
Mentions "j'aime": 3,013
Quoting: coga16
but if hes not playing on Macks Line, hes not goign to get that transitional fluid hybrid role at C, it will be more straight line C which I think isnt that easy to shift to so late in his career. He really will be playing a traditional C position with his responsibilities in all zones. I think its risky


Yeah I guess my point is that in a thread where the Avs are trading Newhook+1st for Patrick Kane, Landeskog playing C is the least crazy thing to worry about lol.
BDAvs a aimé ceci.
19 févr. 2023 à 17 h 19
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: turtlemountain
Yeah I guess my point is that in a thread where the Avs are trading Newhook+1st for Patrick Kane, Landeskog playing C is the least crazy thing to worry about lol.


thats fair,
BDAvs a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage