SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2023-24 Habs

Créé par: Dom1422
Équipe: 2023-24 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 29 janv. 2023
Publié: 29 janv. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 250 000 $
87 750 000 $
42 100 000 $
21 250 000 $
2875 000 $
1775 000 $
2900 000 $
2875 000 $
88 125 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
16 375 000 $
1800 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Benson, Zach
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Edmundson, Joel
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (VGK)
Détails additionnels:
2023 Trade Deadline
2.
MTL
  1. Olausson, Oskar
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (COL)
COL
  1. Monahan, Sean (3 153 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
2023 Trade Deadline
3.
MTL
  1. Meier, Timo [Droits de RFA]
SJS
  1. Mesar, Filip
  2. Pitlick, Rem
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (MTL)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de PIT
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de COL
Logo de EDM
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2583 500 000 $80 663 833 $1 170 000 $4 195 000 $2 836 167 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 7
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
8 125 000 $8 125 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
897 500 $897 500 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
885 000 $885 000 $
C
RFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance275 000 $$275K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 925 000 $1 925 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
828 333 $828 333 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 janv. 2023 à 23 h 34
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Dom1422
His value comes from what he is when he is on the ice. When he was playing he was being talked about by every credible insider as one of the best rentals on the market, someone who would net a 1st+. Now that the injury is involved it clearly reduces his value. But he won’t be traded at all unless he makes a full recovery before the trade deadline. If he is cleared by the medical staff the receiving team will be privy to al of that info. A 2nd (basically a 3rd) and a B prospect who’s struggled immensely in the ahl this year is not a high price to pay. Could it be another prospect like Jean-Luc Foudy? Sure. But this price is general is not much to pay. They just gave up their former 16th overall pick for a 4th liner in Nieto and a useless prospect in Merkley,.


Kaut passed through waivers twice this year and so did Jacob Macdonald. Are you really trying up say the avs gave up high value here? Neito is the best player in the deal

Dude you are being ridiculous

Also foudy is 100% not being moved for a rental especially Monahan good grief
29 janv. 2023 à 23 h 35
#27
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 16,292
Mentions "j'aime": 8,961
Timo Meier is looking for $9,000,000 per

And that offer would be blown away by both Buffalo and New jersey.
29 janv. 2023 à 23 h 35
#28
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 1,363
Mentions "j'aime": 295
Quoting: coga16
He never confirmed anything, you need to do a better job at comprehending the content insiders are posting bc nothing even close to confirmation is out there


You really seem to have it in your head that Friedman and Lebrun are just some random beat writers or something. Is it because you’re American and there are no real insiders there, that you can’t get it through your head who these guys are?

They don’t just state their opinion, and when they rarely do, they preface it by letting you know it is strictly their opinion. They have their credibility on the line.

He wouldn’t say it, if he didn’t have some inside knowledge. Take this info, digest it, let it sink in and believe it.
29 janv. 2023 à 23 h 38
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Dom1422
You really seem to have it in your head that Friedman and Lebrun are just some random beat writers or something. Is it because you’re American and there are no real insiders there, that you can’t get it through your head who these guys are?

They don’t just state their opinion, and when they rarely do, they preface it by letting you know it is strictly their opinion. They have their credibility on the line.

He wouldn’t say it, if he didn’t have some inside knowledge. Take this info, digest it, let it sink in and believe it.


I’m Canadian and live in Canada. I see insider trading almost every day.

I can comprehend what Lebrun and Friedman are saying clearly you can not

They routinely give their opinion. 32 thoughts podcast is filled with marek and Friedman giving out their thoughts opinions and ideas on what teams might do.

Lebruns exact words. LeBrun: I think the Colorado Avalanche is the team to monitor when it comes to Sean Monahan. What do you think “I think” means. That’s prefacing his opinion
MeetYourMakar et CD282 a aimé ceci.
29 janv. 2023 à 23 h 39
#30
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 1,363
Mentions "j'aime": 295
Quoting: HockeyIsMyPassion61
Timo Meier is looking for $9,000,000 per

And that offer would be blown away by both Buffalo and New jersey.


Players never get exactly what they’re looking for, I’m sure his agency is set at 9 at the moment, it’s very early in negotiations. I’d be surprised if he got more than 8.5. Buffalo and New Jersey could make very competitive offers, but i doubt they’d blow this offer away. Buffalo definitely wouldn’t. New Jersey could if they offer Nemec but I don’t see them doing that.
29 janv. 2023 à 23 h 40
#31
we miss leo k
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 6,039
Mentions "j'aime": 5,152
Quoting: Dom1422
They just gave up their former 16th overall pick for a 4th liner in Nieto and a useless prospect in Merkley,.


Jeez what a biased framing. They gave up Martin Kaut (#16OA in 2018, 47 career NHL GP) and Jacob MacDonald (29 year old 3rd pair/7th D type with 78 career GP) for Ryan Merkley (#21OA in 2018, 39 career NHL GP) and Matt Nieto (30 year old bottom-6 with 600+ career NHL GP and 55 playoff GP on top of that). Or, the Avs and the Sharks swapped struggling older prospects and the Avs also got a cheap veteran with tons of experience for an AHL depth player. Don't act like it's similar to them trading Drew Helleson or Justin Barron a year or two after they were drafted - Kaut was #16 5 drafts ago.

Monahan to the Avs specifically also ignores the fact that right now the only reason they show $7.2M in cap space is because of Gabe Landeskog's $7M on LTIR - he's expected back by the deadline, so if the Avs trade for Monahan, they're going to have find a way to clear out about $2.9M in cap space in order to activate Landy. I just don't see the fit, even if Lebrun thinks the Avs are a "team to monitor" with regards to Monahan.
turtlemountain a aimé ceci.
29 janv. 2023 à 23 h 47
#32
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 1,363
Mentions "j'aime": 295
Modifié 29 janv. 2023 à 23 h 53
Quoting: dannibalcorpse
Jeez what a biased framing. They gave up Martin Kaut (#16OA in 2018, 47 career NHL GP) and Jacob MacDonald (29 year old 3rd pair/7th D type with 78 career GP) for Ryan Merkley (#21OA in 2018, 39 career NHL GP) and Matt Nieto (30 year old bottom-6 with 600+ career NHL GP and 55 playoff GP on top of that). Or, the Avs and the Sharks swapped struggling older prospects and the Avs also got a cheap veteran with tons of experience for an AHL depth player. Don't act like it's similar to them trading Drew Helleson or Justin Barron a year or two after they were drafted - Kaut was #16 5 drafts ago.

Monahan to the Avs specifically also ignores the fact that right now the only reason they show $7.2M in cap space is because of Gabe Landeskog's $7M on LTIR - he's expected back by the deadline, so if the Avs trade for Monahan, they're going to have find a way to clear out about $2.9M in cap space in order to activate Landy. I just don't see the fit, even if Lebrun thinks the Avs are a "team to monitor" with regards to Monahan.


Regardless. They have no use for Merkely whatsoever. He’ll never even play a game for them let alone become an nhler. Kaut will probably end up with a bottom 6 role, the same role that Nieto plays… They gave up a current/future bottom sixer for a veteran that helps them more now, even if its slightly. They don’t care about their future bottom 6. They’re trying to win now. Olausson is at best a bottom 6 player, the 2nd is late and is lucky to even become a 4th liner.. They would 100% make this deal.

Is Monahan their 1st option? I highly doubt it, but there are a ton of teams looking to acquire the same players. There are far more buyers than sellers this deadline. They could easily strike out on a guy or two and set their focus on Monahan.

I’m sure they’ll make the money work, unless you’re suggesting that Colorado isn’t going to add anything,.. because every player they look to acquire for an upgrade at C is going to come with a 3 mill cap hit with or without retention.. minimum.
29 janv. 2023 à 23 h 51
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Modifié 29 janv. 2023 à 23 h 58
Quoting: Dom1422
Regardless. They have no use for Merkely whatsoever. He’ll never even play a game for them let alone become an nhler. Kaut will probably end up with a bottom 6 role, the same role that Nieto plays… They gave up a current/future bottom sixer for a veteran that helps them more now, even if its slightly. They don’t care about their future bottom 6. They’re trying to win now. Olausson is at best a bottom 6 player, the 2nd is late and is lucky to even become a 4th liner.. They would 100% make this deal.

Is Monahan their 1st option? I highly doubt it, but there are a ton of teams looking to acquire the same players. There are for more buyers than sellers this deadline. They could easily strike out on a guy or two and set their focus on Monahan.


They have a large use for merkley. Their d prospect pool is the weakest part of their farm stystem, they are hoping to rebuild him up bc his talent and skill set meshes exactly what the avs do and how they play

You really don’t have a grasp on what the avs do and what their needs are

Again you just make up everything, they do care about their bottom 6, that is literally what they are doing with their prospects, the reason they moved kaut is bc he couldn’t be consistent enough, bednar does not want unknown effort levels with his bottom 6 players,.

Olausson Has a nhl level talent that teams can envision in their top 6, that’s his shot, it’s elite,. That’s how a guy like mike Hoffman made a career, his game wasn’t elite but his shot was. He was a top 6 winger for the majority of his career with that talent, I don’t think you know much about Olausson either

Dude I wouldn’t make claims about the avs when you don’t know a thing about them
29 janv. 2023 à 23 h 57
#34
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 1,363
Mentions "j'aime": 295
Quoting: coga16
They have a large use for merkley. Their d prospect pool is the weakest part of their farm stystem, they are hoping to rebuild him up bc his talent and skill set meshes exactly what the avs do and how they play

You really don’t have a grasp on what the avs do and what their needs are

Again you just make up everything, they do care about their bottom 6, that is literally what they are doing with their prospects, the reason they moved kaut is bc he couldn’t be consistent enough, bednar does not want unknown effort levels with his bottom 6 players,.

Dude I wouldn’t make claims about the avs when you don’t know a thing about them


So you’re telling me they care so much about their future bottom 6 that if they strike out on their initial targets and Monahan is still available, that they will not trade a likely bottom 6 prospect (Olausson, Foudy) for said player?

A bottom 6 player that you can sign for 1 mill at any time in free agency.. they just can’t lose that basic prospect even if it means helping them win in THIS years playoffs? Don’t kid yourself.
30 janv. 2023 à 0 h 1
#35
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Dom1422
So you’re telling me they care so much about their future bottom 6 that if they strike out on their initial targets and Monahan is still available, that they will not trade a likely bottom 6 prospect (Olausson, Foudy) for said player?

A bottom 6 player that you can sign for 1 mill at any time in free agency.. they just can’t lose that basic prospect even if it means helping them win in THIS years playoffs? Don’t kid yourself.


Yes bc they care about a dynasty and keep their team together as long as they can, not burning assets for players who aren’t even upgrades to what they currently have in compher and Rodrigues

You really are starting to embarrass yourself, you make a lot of claims about the avs and they are just so wrong I am wondering if you are doing this on purpose

Monahan is didn’t become suddenly amazing in 20
Games, he is a very flawed player, at the cost you want for him avs can get a better player than him. You are over rating his value and demand.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
30 janv. 2023 à 0 h 9
#36
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 1,363
Mentions "j'aime": 295
Quoting: coga16
Yes bc they care about a dynasty and keep their team together as long as they can, not burning assets for players who aren’t even upgrades to what they currently have in compher and Rodrigues

You really are starting to embarrass yourself, you make a lot of claims about the avs and they are just so wrong I am wondering if you are doing this on purpose

Monahan is didn’t become suddenly amazing in 20
Games, he is a very flawed player, at the cost you want for him avs can get a better player than him. You are over rating his value and demand.


Monahan is a very flawed player? He’s a 27 year old player who’s battled injuries.. at full health he was a 70 point first line centre. Minimum a very high end 2nd line centre.

In Montreal this very season he was on pace for almost 60 points playing with Dadanov, Hoffman, Armia etc. he was doing that playing with complete trash. Those 3 were garbage.

His health in a concern, this deal is moot unless he comes back fully healthy before the deadline.

Don’t claim that he’s a flawed asset when healthy, that is ridiculous. He was awesome for the Habs when healthy. The talk of the league.

As for a “Dynasty” they sure as hell won’t be a dynasty if they don’t improve their C depth this deadline. They’re mediocre this season. They know they have to add, and they will.
30 janv. 2023 à 0 h 13
#37
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Dom1422
Monahan is a very flawed player? He’s a 27 year old player who’s battled injuries.. at full health he was a 70 point first line centre. Minimum a very high end 2nd line centre.

In Montreal this very season he was on pace for almost 60 points playing with Dadanov, Hoffman, Armia etc. he was doing that playing with complete trash. Those 3 were garbage.

His health in a concern, this deal is moot unless he comes back fully healthy before the deadline.

Don’t claim that he’s a flawed asset when healthy, that is ridiculous. He was awesome for the Habs when healthy. The talk of the league.

As for a “Dynasty” they sure as hell won’t be a dynasty if they don’t improve their C depth this deadline. They’re mediocre this season. They know they have to add, and they will.


Monahan is poor defensively, a weak skater and has a track record of being awful in the playoffs

That is the definition of a flawed player, you act like fans and other teams having watched him the last 8 past seasons or so, they didn’t all disappear bc he played 20
Games in Montreal

And no his most common linemates was Anderson,
Suzuki and caulfield and most common pair were those 2
This info can be looked up you know

Monahan hasn’t been a high end anything for like 3 seasons now. He was moved to the 4th line in Calgary for a reason. Again 20 games in Montreal didn’t make him a high end 2c fixing his bad defensive and poor skating
MeetYourMakar a aimé ceci.
30 janv. 2023 à 0 h 15
#38
we miss leo k
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 6,039
Mentions "j'aime": 5,152
Quoting: Dom1422
Regardless. They have no use for Merkely whatsoever. He’ll never even play a game for them let alone become an nhler. Kaut will probably end up with a bottom 6 role, the same role that Nieto plays… They gave up a current/future bottom sixer for a veteran that helps them more now, even if its slightly. They don’t care about their future bottom 6. They’re trying to win now. Olausson is at best a bottom 6 player, the 2nd is late and is lucky to even become a 4th liner.. They would 100% make this deal.

Is Monahan their 1st option? I highly doubt it, but there are a ton of teams looking to acquire the same players. There are far more buyers than sellers this deadline. They could easily strike out on a guy or two and set their focus on Monahan.


Saying they have no use for Merkley is just not looking at their roster construction at all. Erik Johnson is their current RD3, he turns 35 next month and is on an expiring deal. The only other RHD they currently have in their system besides Merkley are Wyatt Aamodt (25 year old undrafted free agent with 8 points in 30 AHL GP this year), Nathan Clurman (24 year old 6th rounder from 2016 splitting time between the ECHL & AHL this year), and Josh Jacobs (about to be 27 year old journeyman who's played for as many organizations as he's played NHL games to date - 3.) After trading Drew Helleson and Justin Barron last year they have a huge hole in their RHD depth, and Merkley both is younger (22) and has more NHL experience (39 career GP) than anyone else currently in their system.

Kaut's a year older than Merkley and has scored the same amount of points (6) in more NHL games (47 vs 39) than Merkley. Not saying he can't carve out a decent bottom-6 role, but most folks would take the 22 year old RHD who's still on his ELC over the 23 year old winger on his second deal, if only because of the positional scarcity and the extra year of team control.

And you still didn't address the question of how Monahan would fit onto the Avalanche's cap. Josh Manson & Bowen Byram are expected back after the All-Star Break, which you could argue clears about $1.5M in cap (assuming they waive Brad Hunt & Andreas Englund); if Gabe Landeskog is activated as expected (first week of March) his $7M goes back on the books. Since they're only running 12 forwards right now, I wouldn't be shocked if they don't waive any of their current forward group and have a depth guy traveling with the team. Once Landeskog's off LTIR, there's only about $200K of extra space available - meaning that Colorado likely has about $1.7M in wiggle room at the deadline. Not sure how Sean Monahan's $3.1M retained cap hit is going to fit into that, and I think once you talk about Colorado having to add *another* asset to get a 3rd team to retain Monahan down to an affordable cap hit, the acquisition cost makes less sense than just targeting a slightly less productive player that fits under the cap (Nick Bjugstad or Ivan Barbashev spring to mind as comparable options.)
MeetYourMakar et CD282 a aimé ceci.
30 janv. 2023 à 0 h 20
#39
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 1,363
Mentions "j'aime": 295
Quoting: coga16
Monahan is poor defensively, a weak skater and has a track record of being awful in the playoffs

That is the definition of a flawed player, you act like fans and other teams having watched him the last 8 past seasons or so, they didn’t all disappear bc he played 20
Games in Montreal

And no his most common linemates was Anderson,
Suzuki and caulfield and most common pair were those 2
This info can be looked up you know


What you’ve mentioned is a good argument for why he’s not a full fledged 1c, but it is not a good argument for why he’s not an attractive asset to add to a contender. Those teams already have 1c’s. In Colorado’s case they’re trying to add a 2c, Monahan would be night and day better than anyone they have to fill that role right now.

Even if he ends up going to a different team to be their 3c, they’ll still pay a premium even for that role because it is so critical in the playoffs. Hell if you don’t have a high end 3c and your 2c ends up injured, youre screwed. If said team needed to put Monahan in that role it’s basically be like they didn’t lose anything..

Again, don’t speak about his value when healthy. He is incredibly valuable.

If you want to talk about health, fine. Like I’ve already said, this deal is moot if he doesn’t come back fully healthy. I wouldn’t even be surprised if Montreal is keeping him out longer, just to make sure he’s healthy enough to play in the playoffs.
Considering he is their greatest asset at this years deadline.
30 janv. 2023 à 0 h 23
#40
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 1,363
Mentions "j'aime": 295
Quoting: dannibalcorpse
Saying they have no use for Merkley is just not looking at their roster construction at all. Erik Johnson is their current RD3, he turns 35 next month and is on an expiring deal. The only other RHD they currently have in their system besides Merkley are Wyatt Aamodt (25 year old undrafted free agent with 8 points in 30 AHL GP this year), Nathan Clurman (24 year old 6th rounder from 2016 splitting time between the ECHL & AHL this year), and Josh Jacobs (about to be 27 year old journeyman who's played for as many organizations as he's played NHL games to date - 3.) After trading Drew Helleson and Justin Barron last year they have a huge hole in their RHD depth, and Merkley both is younger (22) and has more NHL experience (39 career GP) than anyone else currently in their system.

Kaut's a year older than Merkley and has scored the same amount of points (6) in more NHL games (47 vs 39) than Merkley. Not saying he can't carve out a decent bottom-6 role, but most folks would take the 22 year old RHD who's still on his ELC over the 23 year old winger on his second deal, if only because of the positional scarcity and the extra year of team control.

And you still didn't address the question of how Monahan would fit onto the Avalanche's cap. Josh Manson & Bowen Byram are expected back after the All-Star Break, which you could argue clears about $1.5M in cap (assuming they waive Brad Hunt & Andreas Englund); if Gabe Landeskog is activated as expected (first week of March) his $7M goes back on the books. Since they're only running 12 forwards right now, I wouldn't be shocked if they don't waive any of their current forward group and have a depth guy traveling with the team. Once Landeskog's off LTIR, there's only about $200K of extra space available - meaning that Colorado likely has about $1.7M in wiggle room at the deadline. Not sure how Sean Monahan's $3.1M retained cap hit is going to fit into that, and I think once you talk about Colorado having to add *another* asset to get a 3rd team to retain Monahan down to an affordable cap hit, the acquisition cost makes less sense than just targeting a slightly less productive player that fits under the cap (Nick Bjugstad or Ivan Barbashev spring to mind as comparable options.)


They don’t care as much as you about their “system”… Tbey have Makar and Manson on the right side. Theyre set for multiple years. Merkely will never even play a game for them, I PROMISE you that.
30 janv. 2023 à 0 h 25
#41
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Dom1422
What you’ve mentioned is a good argument for why he’s not a full fledged 1c, but it is not a good argument for why he’s not an attractive asset to add to a contender. Those teams already have 1c’s. In Colorado’s case they’re trying to add a 2c, Monahan would be night and day better than anyone they have to fill that role right now.

Even if he ends up going to a different team to be their 3c, they’ll still pay a premium even for that role because it is so critical in the playoffs. Hell if you don’t have a high end 3c and your 2c ends up injured, youre screwed. If said team needed to put Monahan in that role it’s basically be like they didn’t lose anything..

Again, don’t speak about his value when healthy. He is incredibly valuable.

If you want to talk about health, fine. Like I’ve already said, this deal is moot if he doesn’t come back fully healthy. I wouldn’t even be surprised if Montreal is keeping him out longer, just to make sure he’s healthy enough to play in the playoffs.
Considering he is their greatest asset at this years deadline.


He’s not better than compher or Rodrigues, even Newhook has better under lying numbers than him

You are really over rating monahan, clearly bc you seriously he could be a 1c if healthy which now in know you are trolling so I’m going to leave this thread

No point in continuing a convo with trolling points like that, especially when you have continued to just fabricating everything just to be proven incorrect
30 janv. 2023 à 0 h 39
#42
we miss leo k
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 6,039
Mentions "j'aime": 5,152
Quoting: Dom1422
They don’t care as much as you about their “system”… Tbey have Makar and Manson on the right side. Theyre set for multiple years. Merkely will never even play a game for them, I PROMISE you that.


jesus, you'd think if a fan of ANY team in the NHL would understand the likelihood of an AHL guy getting a call up because someone got hurt, it'd be a fan of the team that literally just had to emergency call-up a guy from juniors so they had enough healthy skaters for last night's game. but go off, i guess.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
30 janv. 2023 à 9 h 24
#43
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,720
Mentions "j'aime": 3,035
Late to the party here, but just want to circle back on the Lebrun stuff. Colorado doesn’t really talk to media about their trade aspirations. They’re very tight lipped. I can’t remember the last time we heard rumors about an Avs trade before it happened.

If an insider is reporting on Avs moves, they’re likely either speculating or being fed something from another team. The Avs front office doesn’t talk.
30 janv. 2023 à 9 h 36
#44
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,964
Mentions "j'aime": 2,603
Quoting: turtlemountain
Late to the party here, but just want to circle back on the Lebrun stuff. Colorado doesn’t really talk to media about their trade aspirations. They’re very tight lipped. I can’t remember the last time we heard rumors about an Avs trade before it happened.

If an insider is reporting on Avs moves, they’re likely either speculating or being fed something from another team. The Avs front office doesn’t talk.


Loose lips sink (champion)ships
CD282 a aimé ceci.
30 janv. 2023 à 11 h 2
#45
we miss leo k
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 6,039
Mentions "j'aime": 5,152
Quoting: turtlemountain
Late to the party here, but just want to circle back on the Lebrun stuff. Colorado doesn’t really talk to media about their trade aspirations. They’re very tight lipped. I can’t remember the last time we heard rumors about an Avs trade before it happened.

If an insider is reporting on Avs moves, they’re likely either speculating or being fed something from another team. The Avs front office doesn’t talk.


This is what I have to assume OP is referencing Lebrun said

Quoting: ProHockeyRumorscom
LeBrun also spoke on Insider Trading about Montreal Canadiens center Sean Monahan. LeBrun reported that the Colorado Avalanche are a “team to monitor” when it comes to a potential trade fit for the veteran pivot. The Avalanche have long been rumored to be seeking help down the middle and could opt for the injured Monahan, who has scored 17 points in 25 games in Montreal, as a cheaper option than higher-end choices such as Ryan O’Reilly or Bo Horvat.


So, speculation and rumors, nothing beyond that.
30 janv. 2023 à 13 h 5
#46
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 1,363
Mentions "j'aime": 295
Quoting: dannibalcorpse
jesus, you'd think if a fan of ANY team in the NHL would understand the likelihood of an AHL guy getting a call up because someone got hurt, it'd be a fan of the team that literally just had to emergency call-up a guy from juniors so they had enough healthy skaters for last night's game. but go off, i guess.


The point is Merkely is not going to be an nhler.
30 janv. 2023 à 13 h 12
#47
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 1,363
Mentions "j'aime": 295
Modifié 30 janv. 2023 à 13 h 32
Quoting: turtlemountain
Late to the party here, but just want to circle back on the Lebrun stuff. Colorado doesn’t really talk to media about their trade aspirations. They’re very tight lipped. I can’t remember the last time we heard rumors about an Avs trade before it happened.

If an insider is reporting on Avs moves, they’re likely either speculating or being fed something from another team. The Avs front office doesn’t talk.


Lebrun wouldn’t say it if there weren’t some truth to it. But regardless, if you don’t trust any insiders, then just use your brain. It’s pretty obvious that the Avs have interest in Monahan.
30 janv. 2023 à 13 h 13
#48
we miss leo k
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 6,039
Mentions "j'aime": 5,152
Quoting: Dom1422
The point is Merkely is not going to be an nhler.


Yet the forward that's a year older and has been less productive in his NHL time is a "future bottom-6er" according to you.

Feels like you're just spinning everything to make it match the narrative you're trying to push here, but you do you pal.
30 janv. 2023 à 13 h 24
#49
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 1,363
Mentions "j'aime": 295
Modifié 30 janv. 2023 à 13 h 37
Quoting: dannibalcorpse
Yet the forward that's a year older and has been less productive in his NHL time is a "future bottom-6er" according to you.

Feels like you're just spinning everything to make it match the narrative you're trying to push here, but you do you pal.


Merkley is an offensive defenseman who doesn’t produce much even in the ahl.. he sure as hell isn’t going to produce in the nhl. Kaut filling a bottom 6 role is far more likely.

Who do you think the Avs are going to look to acquire at the deadline to upgrade at C? Not Horvat, Not O’Rielly, Toews is unlikely though I’m sure they’ll try. There are like 6 people in this thread. One guy thinks the Avs have zero interest in Monahan, which is obviously not true. Do you think they have no interest or that this is too high of a price to pay?
30 janv. 2023 à 13 h 42
#50
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 1,363
Mentions "j'aime": 295
Quoting: coga16
He’s not better than compher or Rodrigues, even Newhook has better under lying numbers than him

You are really over rating monahan, clearly bc you seriously he could be a 1c if healthy which now in know you are trolling so I’m going to leave this thread

No point in continuing a convo with trolling points like that, especially when you have continued to just fabricating everything just to be proven incorrect


He’s better than Compher, Rodrigues, and Newhook. Rodrigues and Newhook are wingers though so not sure why you even brought them up. If they considered them upgrades at C they’d be currently playing C, but they’re not.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage