SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Could this be viable

Créé par: Letsgoleafs
Équipe: 2022-23 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 3 nov. 2022
Publié: 3 nov. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
IDK the price for Boeser
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de NJD
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de FLA
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2025
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $76 373 925 $0 $0 $6 126 075 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 343 750 $2 343 750 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
825 000 $825 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 nov. 2022 à 17 h 45
#1
Leafs Fan Forever!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 269
Mentions "j'aime": 76
Too little?
3 nov. 2022 à 17 h 47
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 3,338
Mentions "j'aime": 1,183
Way too little man.. would love Boeser, but it will cost much more.
Letsgoleafs a aimé ceci.
3 nov. 2022 à 17 h 56
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 3,207
Mentions "j'aime": 1,077
Still can't believe Garland for Marino didn't happen in the offseason.
3 nov. 2022 à 17 h 57
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,142
Mentions "j'aime": 18,352
I think Canucks want to move a forward for a young, controllable RD.
3 nov. 2022 à 18 h 3
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 1,246
Mentions "j'aime": 316
boeser hasn't been great but we all know he has a 30 goal season in him waiting to happen. Those three pieces won't be anything on the canucks, we already have too many forwards. Only piece we would've traded for is Marino but that's passed.
3 nov. 2022 à 18 h 5
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 2,109
Mentions "j'aime": 480
Quoting: Canucks33
Still can't believe Garland for Marino didn't happen in the offseason.


I feel like there may have been a high asking price coming from Vancouvers side. Thinking about it now LA wanted Garland or Boeser last season and what the asking price from Vancouver was Brock Faber and a 1st for either Garland or Boeser. LA declined and look at what a 1st and Faber got them. It got them Fiala. So as much as it sounds, I think Boeser and Garland have always been very overvalued by Canucks management and Canucks fans. If a trade that got us a RHD were to happen it should’ve already happened. Vancouvers asking price may just be too high for other teams.
3 nov. 2022 à 18 h 15
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 3,207
Mentions "j'aime": 1,077
Quoting: BestGMBenning
I feel like there may have been a high asking price coming from Vancouvers side. Thinking about it now LA wanted Garland or Boeser last season and what the asking price from Vancouver was Brock Faber and a 1st for either Garland or Boeser. LA declined and look at what a 1st and Faber got them. It got them Fiala. So as much as it sounds, I think Boeser and Garland have always been very overvalued by Canucks management and Canucks fans. If a trade that got us a RHD were to happen it should’ve already happened. Vancouvers asking price may just be too high for other teams.


I don't blame them for having a high asking price, but at some point landing a RHD means more than landing one in a good deal. Marino was such a perfect target for the team given his age, contract and playstyle and history with JR that overpaying in a trade would still be a net positive for the organization.

I would have easily done a Garland for Marino trade if it was on the table since apparently the Penguins were looking for wingers in the summer. They likely knew that they were going to re-sign Rust and Rakell, which is why Garland didn't interest them, which is fair. However, apparently the Penguins asked for Rathbone and a 2nd for Marino, which is similar to the deal they ended up getting in Smith + 3rd. I know the market and fanbase would have gone ballistic over moving another 2nd and a young player, but again Marino was a perfect fit. I would have made that move.
Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
3 nov. 2022 à 18 h 20
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,767
Mentions "j'aime": 14,514
What is Vancouver supposed to do with 3 new forwards? They will have to lose 2 other players off their roster to be compliant
3 nov. 2022 à 18 h 21
#9
MajorMoose
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 3,425
Mentions "j'aime": 2,602
Boeser would cost a good defenseman not a bunch of 4th liners
3 nov. 2022 à 18 h 33
#10
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
This doesn't make the Canucks better in any way so I don't see why they would accept
3 nov. 2022 à 18 h 42
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,705
Mentions "j'aime": 994
Quoting: Canucks33
Still can't believe Garland for Marino didn't happen in the offseason.


It was too obvious and would have been beneficial for both teams so of course Hextall wasn't going to do it.
3 nov. 2022 à 19 h 6
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,887
Mentions "j'aime": 6,391
fu*k no lmaooooo
3 nov. 2022 à 19 h 18
#13
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,570
Mentions "j'aime": 1,087
Quoting: BestGMBenning
I feel like there may have been a high asking price coming from Vancouvers side. Thinking about it now LA wanted Garland or Boeser last season and what the asking price from Vancouver was Brock Faber and a 1st for either Garland or Boeser. LA declined and look at what a 1st and Faber got them. It got them Fiala. So as much as it sounds, I think Boeser and Garland have always been very overvalued by Canucks management and Canucks fans. If a trade that got us a RHD were to happen it should’ve already happened. Vancouvers asking price may just be too high for other teams.


Where do you get these detailed rumours from? Honestly I never hear them, none of the main reporters ever report that kind of stuff but there is always someone saying "reports were that the trade was this for this". Where do you read this?
3 nov. 2022 à 19 h 20
#14
Hockey IQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 3,008
Mentions "j'aime": 1,484
Quoting: Letsgoleafs
Too little?


Quoting: Marcsnack
Way too little man.. would love Boeser, but it will cost much more.


Quoting: Canucks33
Still can't believe Garland for Marino didn't happen in the offseason.


Quoting: jedihonesy
boeser hasn't been great but we all know he has a 30 goal season in him waiting to happen. Those three pieces won't be anything on the canucks, we already have too many forwards. Only piece we would've traded for is Marino but that's passed.


Yeah for boeser it would be a kapanen, 1st round pick, and Pickering type trade and that doesn’t make sense for PIT
3 nov. 2022 à 20 h 37
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 2,109
Mentions "j'aime": 480
Quoting: Canucks33
I don't blame them for having a high asking price, but at some point landing a RHD means more than landing one in a good deal. Marino was such a perfect target for the team given his age, contract and playstyle and history with JR that overpaying in a trade would still be a net positive for the organization.

I would have easily done a Garland for Marino trade if it was on the table since apparently the Penguins were looking for wingers in the summer. They likely knew that they were going to re-sign Rust and Rakell, which is why Garland didn't interest them, which is fair. However, apparently the Penguins asked for Rathbone and a 2nd for Marino, which is similar to the deal they ended up getting in Smith + 3rd. I know the market and fanbase would have gone ballistic over moving another 2nd and a young player, but again Marino was a perfect fit. I would have made that move.


The Canucks really should’ve. Especially since Pittsburgh was looking to just dump Marino like that for in my opinion really low value.
3 nov. 2022 à 20 h 41
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 2,109
Mentions "j'aime": 480
Quoting: BigShoots
Where do you get these detailed rumours from? Honestly I never hear them, none of the main reporters ever report that kind of stuff but there is always someone saying "reports were that the trade was this for this". Where do you read this?


Usually people from sportsnet or TSN. There’s always insiders to these kind of things. It isn’t that hard to find these sources.
4 nov. 2022 à 0 h 7
#17
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,570
Mentions "j'aime": 1,087
Quoting: BestGMBenning
Usually people from sportsnet or TSN. There’s always insiders to these kind of things. It isn’t that hard to find these sources.


Literally never heard anyone on sportsnet or tsn speculate as to the exact players a team was asking for in a deal. Can you share one?
4 nov. 2022 à 0 h 46
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 2,109
Mentions "j'aime": 480
Quoting: BigShoots
Literally never heard anyone on sportsnet or tsn speculate as to the exact players a team was asking for in a deal. Can you share one?


https://theprovince.com/sports/hockey/nhl/vancouver-canucks/canucks-taking-trade-swing-for-john-marino-wasnt-worth-plausible-price/wcm/bbc14c14-78ec-4241-8b70-4961138d6f3f/amp/

The asking price from Pittsburgh was Rathbone and a second according to this source and a few other that I know of. Really isn’t that hard to find them.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage