SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Byfield trade

Créé par: Richard88
Équipe: 2022-23 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 7 sept. 2022
Publié: 7 sept. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
COL
  1. Byfield, Quinton
Détails additionnels:
Not sure what adds would be either side to balance value. Just curious on how each fanbase would view a swap like this in principle.
2.
LAK
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (COL)
COL
  1. Walker, Sean
Détails additionnels:
To replace Toews in Colorado, and also bring LAK under the cap again.
Rachats de contrats
Frais de résiliation
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de PIT
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2024
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2025
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de COL
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $77 892 500 $637 500 $1 595 000 $4 607 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance150 000 $$150K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance262 500 $$262K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
750 000 $750 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 sept. 2022 à 7 h 40
#1
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,253
Mentions "j'aime": 24,106
This is a type of move you don’t do. You don’t trade a 20 year old for a 28 year old. This would be worse than the Sens trading Zibanejad for Brassard
Ledge_And_Dairy a aimé ceci.
7 sept. 2022 à 7 h 52
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,542
Mentions "j'aime": 19,684
Quoting: csick
This is a type of move you don’t do. You don’t trade a 20 year old for a 28 year old. This would be worse than the Sens trading Zibanejad for Brassard


Excellent example of a trade that ended up backfiring really badly despite Brassard still playing well in Ottawa
csick a aimé ceci.
7 sept. 2022 à 7 h 57
#3
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,253
Mentions "j'aime": 24,106
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Excellent example of a trade that ended up backfiring really badly despite Brassard still playing well in Ottawa


A trade like that works for 2 years and then the younger player is just starting to pop off. And the other is a bottom 6 player 😂
7 sept. 2022 à 8 h 14
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 929
Mentions "j'aime": 217
Quoting: csick
A trade like that works for 2 years and then the younger player is just starting to pop off. And the other is a bottom 6 player 😂


I think the point of the trade is exactly that... a "2 year" cup window where you can't wait for the player to pop-off
7 sept. 2022 à 8 h 16
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,542
Mentions "j'aime": 19,684
Quoting: csick
A trade like that works for 2 years and then the younger player is just starting to pop off. And the other is a bottom 6 player 😂


I don't see Toews falling to a 3rd pair guy in 2 years but I can certainly see him playing for a different team. Definitely not worth it for LA here, especially when they can probably get the better and younger player in Chychrun for a package around Turcotte
csick a aimé ceci.
7 sept. 2022 à 8 h 17
#6
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,253
Mentions "j'aime": 24,106
Quoting: TheeDjeeEem
I think the point of the trade is exactly that... a "2 year" cup window where you can't wait for the player to pop-off


If that were the case , it would be Colorado making that desperation trade. Not a team coming out of the rebuild and making the playoffs 1 year and still developing their youngsters
7 sept. 2022 à 8 h 20
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 929
Mentions "j'aime": 217
Modifié 7 sept. 2022 à 8 h 50
Quoting: csick
If that were the case , it would be Colorado making that desperation trade. Not a team coming out of the rebuild and making the playoffs 1 year and still developing their youngsters


and where did the Sens finish in 2016/17 when Brassard for Zibanejad took place?
7 sept. 2022 à 10 h 47
#8
Hidalgo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 481
Mentions "j'aime": 223
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I don't see Toews falling to a 3rd pair guy in 2 years but I can certainly see him playing for a different team. Definitely not worth it for LA here, especially when they can probably get the better and younger player in Chychrun for a package around Turcotte


I wouldn’t make it if I were Colorado either. I know Makar can play with anyone but when you’re able to find him a partner he plays thar well with I wouldn’t mess with it
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
7 sept. 2022 à 10 h 54
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,348
Mentions "j'aime": 2,239
Quoting: csick
This is a type of move you don’t do. You don’t trade a 20 year old for a 28 year old. This would be worse than the Sens trading Zibanejad for Brassard


This is a Colorado fan making the trade. Kings absolutely don't do this, you're right.

IF... IF. IF. IF. IF. IF..... IF the Kings were ever interested in a Byfield trade with Colorado, the ONLY player that would be reasonable to ask for and address the Defense (cuz, obviously Makar isn't available) is Bowen Byram. Nobody else would interest the Kings, for a variety of reasons (age, UFA/RFA status, contract, ceiling, etc). And I believe Colorado would need to add, but I'm also biased, so I'd have to see what unbiased fans said about that. Cuz I'm sure Colorado fans would say LA would have to add in a Byfield/Byram swap.

And, for the record, Byfield is an absolute untouchable for me, who I make a franchise icon for two decades.. CF is a place to air out "out-of-the-box" ideas though, which is why I'm entertaining the thought of a Byfield trade. It's the ONLY reason.
7 sept. 2022 à 11 h 3
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,830
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
Ya'll realize that Toews, Byram and Girard all outscore Byfield as dmen right? I understand wanting to hold onto a prospect with such promise and I think the Kings 100% should. But if a team wants to win a cup, you trade Byfield all day for Toews.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
7 sept. 2022 à 11 h 26
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,155
Mentions "j'aime": 417
Girard makes more sense for both sides imo should LA go down this route.

Ultimately though I think Byfield isn't far enough into his development for Col for this to make sense for them and I don't think LA fans will be willing to give up on the futures dream they've been preached too for year and accept how much of a win now direction the team has went in

No from both sides.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
7 sept. 2022 à 11 h 49
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,542
Mentions "j'aime": 19,684
Quoting: Hidalgo
I wouldn’t make it if I were Colorado either. I know Makar can play with anyone but when you’re able to find him a partner he plays thar well with I wouldn’t mess with it


Well they certainly shouldn't even market Toews, if anything Girard should be the one on the block, and for an established young center with similar value (Bennett comes to mind as an example).
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
7 sept. 2022 à 11 h 56
#13
Hidalgo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 481
Mentions "j'aime": 223
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Well they certainly shouldn't even market Toews, if anything Girard should be the one on the block, and for an established young center with similar value (Bennett comes to mind as an example).


Remember when I thought Bennett was worth like a 4th :/. I do
Ledge_And_Dairy et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
7 sept. 2022 à 12 h 12
#14
Iglesias
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 487
Mentions "j'aime": 292
Cant tell if this is a troll? There is no conversation to be had here for the Kings to trade Byfield. A deal like this is not in the realm of possibility.
7 sept. 2022 à 12 h 14
#15
Démarrer sujet
John 3 16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 9,582
Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Well they certainly shouldn't even market Toews, if anything Girard should be the one on the block, and for an established young center with similar value (Bennett comes to mind as an example).


The issue with trading Girard is that Toews is an UFA in <2 years and will need a big raise. Unless the cap rises a lot by 2023 or 2024 it would be more cost-effective to keep Girard and use Toews to get a 2C, just like they used Barrie as a pending UFA to get Kadri.
14 sept. 2022 à 16 h 12
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,595
Mentions "j'aime": 6,735
Ouff, I don't think so man. Colorado cannot resign Toews and every team knows that. LAK are better off getting a cheaper rental at the TDL and putting their hat in the ring for Toews next off season.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage