SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

stackd 22-23

Créé par: Tintin
Équipe: 2022-23 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 10 juin 2022
Publié: 10 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Ultimately I believe that trading for DeBrincat (or Fiala, Tkachuk etc) this off season would be a big mistake.
But that doesn't mean you can't make an agm about it.

Might do another post exploring the long term consequences of grabbing such a player.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 250 000 $
66 363 636 $
1975 000 $
1975 000 $
13 500 000 $
64 166 666 $
54 166 666 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Firkus, Jagger
3925 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Puljujärvi, Jesse4 166 666 $
Choix de 2e ronde en 2023
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Tatar, Tomas
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
2023 is playoff protected.
Tatar to balance salary, will put up play befitting a middle sixer for a few months before Chicago flips him with retention at the deadline.
If it wasn't clear, we're assuming Chicago are more less tanking for 22-23.
2.
NJD
  1. Vanecek, Vitek [Droits de RFA]
WSH
  1. Zacha, Pavel [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (NJD)
3.
VGK
  1. Smith, Ty
  2. Thompson, Tyce [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
4.
NJD
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (VGK)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
Détails additionnels:
Suggested fair value.
VGK
  1. Johnsson, Andreas
  2. Kuokkanen, Janne
Détails additionnels:
Traded to whomever can make use of them.
5.
NJD
    Offersheeting Bulju.
    EDM
      2023 2nd rd pick.
      Rachats de contrats
      Frais appliqués
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2022
      Logo de NJD
      Logo de VGK
      Logo de NJD
      Logo de NYR
      Logo de NJD
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de NYI
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de NJD
      Logo de NJD
      2023
      Logo de NJD
      Logo de NJD
      Logo de NJD
      Logo de NJD
      2024
      Logo de NJD
      Logo de NJD
      Logo de NJD
      Logo de NJD
      Logo de NJD
      Logo de NJD
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2382 500 000 $81 863 635 $0 $1 332 500 $636 365 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
      C
      UFA - 8
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      C, AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
      7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
      AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
      C
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      6 363 636 $6 363 636 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      AD, AG
      RFA - 3
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
      AD, C
      RFA - 2
      4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
      AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      975 000 $975 000 $
      C, AG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      975 000 $975 000 $
      AD
      RFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      3 166 667 $3 166 667 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
      DD
      NMC
      UFA - 6
      3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
      G
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      925 000 $925 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
      DG
      RFA - 3
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      975 000 $975 000 $
      C
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      825 000 $825 000 $
      AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
      DG
      RFA - 1
      Équipe de réserve
      Firkus, Jagger
      925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      789 167 $789 167 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
      DG
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Devils du New Jersey
      863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
      AG
      RFA - 2

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      10 juin 2022 à 9 h 25
      #1
      FireStan
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2020
      Messages: 139
      Mentions "j'aime": 29
      not enough for debrincat
      SociallyHawkward et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
      10 juin 2022 à 9 h 46
      #2
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 518
      Mentions "j'aime": 144
      Quoting: mac2033
      not enough for debrincat


      This is more than enough.
      10 juin 2022 à 9 h 49
      #3
      Caps fan
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2022
      Messages: 337
      Mentions "j'aime": 124
      as a caps fan, ur paying vitek way too much
      10 juin 2022 à 10 h 44
      #4
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2019
      Messages: 5,699
      Mentions "j'aime": 5,914
      Quoting: sh51_aa
      This is more than enough.


      No. It's not.
      ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
      10 juin 2022 à 11 h 6
      #5
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 19,219
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,579
      Quoting: sh51_aa
      This is more than enough.


      LMAO no it's not even close. Chicago will want a A prospect and a 1st to even get the conversation going. A prospect that has the potential to be a franchise guy plus a 1st giving the Hawks at least 2 chances to end up with a player as valuable as Cat; a chance is not worth the same as someone who is proven elite.
      10 juin 2022 à 11 h 11
      #6
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2022
      Messages: 208
      Mentions "j'aime": 108
      Quoting: sh51_aa
      This is more than enough.


      Remove Tatar and insert Holtz and there is a conversation here.
      10 juin 2022 à 11 h 15
      #7
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 518
      Mentions "j'aime": 144
      Quoting: ChiHawk
      LMAO no it's not even close. Chicago will want a A prospect and a 1st to even get the conversation going. A prospect that has the potential to be a franchise guy plus a 1st giving the Hawks at least 2 chances to end up with a player as valuable as Cat; a chance is not worth the same as someone who is proven elite.


      So you‘re telling me that with the 2OA pick you‘re not able to draft a „ prospect that has the potential to be a franchise guy“? Maybe you should invest more into your amateur scouting then.

      2OA, 2023 1st + roster player (doesn‘t necessarily have to be Tuna) is more than enough get things started.
      10 juin 2022 à 11 h 16
      #8
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 518
      Mentions "j'aime": 144
      Quoting: Cincod1
      Remove Tatar and insert Holtz and there is a conversation here.


      Lol
      10 juin 2022 à 11 h 26
      #9
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 19,219
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,579
      Quoting: sh51_aa
      So you‘re telling me that with the 2OA pick you‘re not able to draft a „ prospect that has the potential to be a franchise guy“? Maybe you should invest more into your amateur scouting then.

      2OA, 2023 1st + roster player (doesn‘t necessarily have to be Tuna) is more than enough get things started.


      Cat is proven elite franchise player. A CHANCE at getting one #2 OA is not equal to a proven player. Hawks are going to rightfully so want a couple chances to hit on a franchise player. Do I really need to go through all the failed top 5 picks over the years to demonstrate even the best scouts get it wrong? That's why they aren't going to trade Cat for just once lucky chance they end up with a player as good as Cat.
      10 juin 2022 à 11 h 34
      #10
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 518
      Mentions "j'aime": 144
      Quoting: ChiHawk
      Cat is proven elite franchise player. A CHANCE at getting one #2 OA is not equal to a proven player. Hawks are going to rightfully so want a couple chances to hit on a franchise player. Do I really need to go through all the failed top 5 picks over the years to demonstrate even the best scouts get it wrong? That's why they aren't going to trade Cat for just once lucky chance they end up with a player as good as Cat.


      So, now I'm curious. Give me then a package including a "proven" player that has more value than this deal and that also makes sense for the opposing team. Other than that, what do you think how many deals start with high expectations and have to be settled for lesser value because you just don't always get what you wish for.

      I'm pretty sure if Debrincat is traded within the next ouple of months it won't be for a more valuable package than this.
      10 juin 2022 à 11 h 48
      #11
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 19,219
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,579
      Quoting: sh51_aa
      So, now I'm curious. Give me then a package including a "proven" player that has more value than this deal and that also makes sense for the opposing team. Other than that, what do you think how many deals start with high expectations and have to be settled for lesser value because you just don't always get what you wish for.

      I'm pretty sure if Debrincat is traded within the next ouple of months it won't be for a more valuable package than this.


      You realize adding Tatar has little to no value unless the Hawks can retain half his salary and flip him at the TDL? Tatar is coming off a pretty bad season in which he certainly didn't play like a $5.3M player.

      Eichel; and Cat isn't headed for a major surgery with a unkown long term prognosis, isn't a year older, isn't at odds with his team and the team being forced to trade him, isn't being traded in season where very few teams can do cap gymnastics to fit in $10M, isn't carrying a $10M cap hit and isn't a UFA in 4 years. Start with that trade and realize Cat will have more interest from a lot more teams given the timing, being a RFA in another year, lower cap hit, and never been injured and not heading for a major surgery and you'll understand why he probably gets more.

      I promise, no team in their right mind would take take Nemec or Cooley for Cat, a 31 year old 1 year rental that carries a $5.3M cap hit coming off a 30 point season, and another 1st that will end up being mid to late given the team you put together here...zero chance any team trades a elite young player for that.
      10 juin 2022 à 11 h 48
      #12
      VGKNation702
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2019
      Messages: 5,128
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,636
      Lol not close for patches and Hague
      10 juin 2022 à 11 h 56
      #13
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 518
      Mentions "j'aime": 144
      Quoting: ChiHawk
      You realize adding Tatar has little to no value unless the Hawks can retain half his salary and flip him at the TDL? Tatar is coming off a pretty bad season in which he certainly didn't play like a $5.3M player.

      Eichel; and Cat isn't headed for a major surgery with a unkown long term prognosis, isn't a year older, isn't at odds with his team and the team being forced to trade him, isn't being traded in season where very few teams can do cap gymnastics to fit in $10M, isn't carrying a $10M cap hit and isn't a UFA in 4 years. Start with that trade and realize Cat will have more interest from a lot more teams given the timing, being a RFA in another year, lower cap hit, and never been injured and not heading for a major surgery and you'll understand why he probably gets more.

      I promise, no team in their right mind would take take Nemec or Cooley for Cat, a 31 year old 1 year rental that carries a $5.3M cap hit coming off a 30 point season, and another 1st that will end up being mid to late given the team you put together here...zero chance any team trades a elite young player for that.


      So thanks for confirming me by not answering my question. Well done.

      Didn‘t I write „doesn‘t necessarily have to be Tuna“? I sure did. So instead of ranting about a serviceable middle six player (who does have a lower cap hit btw) give me some other options the Blackhawks could be interested in from out current roster.
      10 juin 2022 à 12 h 6
      #14
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 19,219
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,579
      Quoting: sh51_aa
      So thanks for confirming me by not answering my question. Well done.

      Didn‘t I write „doesn‘t necessarily have to be Tuna“? I sure did. So instead of ranting about a serviceable middle six player (who does have a lower cap hit btw) give me some other options the Blackhawks could be interested in from out current roster.


      It's going to take Holtz and a 1st to get the Hawks interested. Future potential value is not the same as proven elite value. Tatar is only worth what a team will pay for him at the deadline and he's not worth his contract...30 point players grow on trees in the league...a 2nd rounder at best.
      10 juin 2022 à 12 h 9
      #15
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 518
      Mentions "j'aime": 144
      Quoting: ChiHawk
      It's going to take Holtz and a 1st to get the Hawks interested. Future potential value is not the same as proven elite value. Tatar is only worth what a team will pay for him at the deadline and he's not worth his contract...30 point players grow on trees in the league...a 2nd rounder at best.


      "Future potential value is not the same as proven elite value." and then you want Holtz and a 1st? Dude.. I'm sorry but I can't help you.
      10 juin 2022 à 12 h 17
      #16
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 19,219
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,579
      Quoting: sh51_aa
      "Future potential value is not the same as proven elite value." and then you want Holtz and a 1st? Dude.. I'm sorry but I can't help you.


      Holtz is proven elite talent? He showed to be a ppg player in the AHL but as we all know, that often doesn't translate to the NHL. Why would the Hawks trade Cat for the #2 this draft year or Holtz? It would be absolutely crazy for them to roll the dice and think they have a lock of getting another Cat with the Holtz or the #2 thus making it senseless to move a 24 year old player for. Keep in mind, when Cat was Holtz's age he put up 28 goals in the NHL.
      10 juin 2022 à 12 h 30
      #17
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 518
      Mentions "j'aime": 144
      Quoting: ChiHawk
      Holtz is proven elite talent? He showed to be a ppg player in the AHL but as we all know, that often doesn't translate to the NHL. Why would the Hawks trade Cat for the #2 this draft year or Holtz? It would be absolutely crazy for them to roll the dice and think they have a lock of getting another Cat with the Holtz or the #2 thus making it senseless to move a 24 year old player for. Keep in mind, when Cat was Holtz's age he put up 28 goals in the NHL.


      Dude.. you want Holtz included in the deal - not me 😂
      10 juin 2022 à 12 h 33
      #18
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 19,219
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,579
      Quoting: sh51_aa
      Dude.. you want Holtz included in the deal - not me 😂


      I'm saying holtz and a 1st to get the conversation started. It gives the Hawks a couple darts to throw hoping they hit a bullseye with one or the other in return for a proven elite level player. Not sure what you're laughing at what logic you're trying to convey
      10 juin 2022 à 12 h 38
      #19
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 518
      Mentions "j'aime": 144
      Quoting: ChiHawk
      I'm saying holtz and a 1st to get the conversation started. It gives the Hawks a couple darts to throw hoping they hit a bullseye with one or the other in return for a proven elite level player. Not sure what you're laughing at what logic you're trying to convey


      Thanks for the flowers - I can give them right back to you.

      Just be prepared to be disappointed when you see the return.
      10 juin 2022 à 13 h 3
      #20
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 19,219
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,579
      Quoting: sh51_aa
      Thanks for the flowers - I can give them right back to you.

      Just be prepared to be disappointed when you see the return.


      LMAO okay smart ass

      I'm not going to be disappointed as it is highly unlikely he is traded in the next few months and if a team pries him away, it's going to be a king's ransom
      sh51_aa a aimé ceci.
      10 juin 2022 à 17 h 14
      #21
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2022
      Messages: 208
      Mentions "j'aime": 108
      Quoting: sh51_aa
      Lol


      Maybe a little more even, add Holtz, remove Tuna and Hawks kick in Murphy.
      10 juin 2022 à 17 h 18
      #22
      Démarrer sujet
      do not Devil my ass
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2020
      Messages: 4,910
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,269
      Quoting: VGKNation702
      Lol not close for patches and Hague


      One 1st rd pedigree prospect, one b level prospect, a 2nd rd pick and 7m+ ni cap relief for a 17 man roster with 200k cap space isn't enough?

      Fine I guess I'll just offersheet Hague then.
      Goodluck matching.
      10 juin 2022 à 17 h 31
      #23
      Démarrer sujet
      do not Devil my ass
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2020
      Messages: 4,910
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,269
      Quoting: Cincod1
      Maybe a little more even, add Holtz, remove Tuna and Hawks kick in Murphy.


      Devils have no need for Murphy.
      In my mind it should be either pick#2 ++ or Holtz++ , I choose the former.

      Quoting: mac2033
      not enough for debrincat


      I think it is.
      Not that I'd want the Devils to do my suggested trade anyways.

      Quoting: BackstromIsTheGoat
      as a caps fan, ur paying vitek way too much


      Really? Always felt he was kinda underrated, looked good pretty much every time I've watched him and last seasons stats are encouraging.

      Quoting: SociallyHawkward
      No. It's not.


      Quoting: ChiHawk
      LMAO no it's not even close. Chicago will want a A prospect and a 1st to even get the conversation going. A prospect that has the potential to be a franchise guy plus a 1st giving the Hawks at least 2 chances to end up with a player as valuable as Cat; a chance is not worth the same as someone who is proven elite.


      That's not how it works when players like DeBrincat are made available.
      I think someone said the same thing but a rebuilding / tanking team doesn't get a franchise player back.
      They get a combination of blue chip prospects and picks.
      Hawks get the chance to draft Cooley or Slafkovsky here along with another pick in what looks to be a fantastic 2023 draft class + whatever return they could swing for Tatar.
      The return I suggested is plenty for DeBrincat, not that I'd actually want the Devils to go through with it irl.

      Quoting: Cincod1
      Remove Tatar and insert Holtz and there is a conversation here.


      It's either Holtz++ or the #2 pick++.
      Hawks are certainly not getting both Holtz and #2.
      10 juin 2022 à 18 h 26
      #24
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 19,219
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,579
      Quoting: Tintin
      Devils have no need for Murphy.
      In my mind it should be either pick#2 ++ or Holtz++ , I choose the former.



      I think it is.
      Not that I'd want the Devils to do my suggested trade anyways.



      Really? Always felt he was kinda underrated, looked good pretty much every time I've watched him and last seasons stats are encouraging.





      That's not how it works when players like DeBrincat are made available.
      I think someone said the same thing but a rebuilding / tanking team doesn't get a franchise player back.
      They get a combination of blue chip prospects and picks.
      Hawks get the chance to draft Cooley or Slafkovsky here along with another pick in what looks to be a fantastic 2023 draft class + whatever return they could swing for Tatar.
      The return I suggested is plenty for DeBrincat, not that I'd actually want the Devils to go through with it irl.



      It's either Holtz++ or the #2 pick++.
      Hawks are certainly not getting both Holtz and #2.


      Holtz and the 2023 1st is realistic IMO. Hawks are going to want a couple chances to develop a potential franchise player since they are giving up an elite one unless the Hawks are that high on Cooley or Nemec then fair enough.
      15 août 2022 à 4 h 8
      #25
      Démarrer sujet
      do not Devil my ass
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2020
      Messages: 4,910
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,269
      Quoting: ChiHawk
      Holtz and the 2023 1st is realistic IMO. Hawks are going to want a couple chances to develop a potential franchise player since they are giving up an elite one unless the Hawks are that high on Cooley or Nemec then fair enough.


      Quoting: Cincod1
      Maybe a little more even, add Holtz, remove Tuna and Hawks kick in Murphy.


      Quoting: SociallyHawkward
      No. It's not.


      Quoting: mac2033
      not enough for debrincat


      Went through some older AGMs and came across these gems.
      What a goldmine haha.
      CD282 a aimé ceci.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage