SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What Couldve Been

Créé par: ForsbergForVezina
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 28 mars 2022
Publié: 9 avr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Still not a good team by any stretch of the imagination, but much better set up for success in the next 2-3 years than the current one is, who probably won't be back to the playoffs for at least another half decade.

Thoughts?
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Bean, Jake
  2. Boqvist, Adam
  3. Sillinger, Cole
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
CBJ
  1. Allan, Nolan
  2. Jones, Seth
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (CBJ)
2.
CHI
  1. Hagel, Brandon
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (CHI)
TBL
  1. Katchouk, Boris
  2. Raddysh, Taylor
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TBL)
3.
4.
5.
MIN
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (MIN)
6.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $71 610 881 $452 439 $3 580 000 $9 889 119 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 avr. 2022 à 11 h 56
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,567
Mentions "j'aime": 11,949
Would have been a much much much better start to rebuilding imo
9 avr. 2022 à 12 h 9
#2
Démarrer sujet
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,661
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Would have been a much much much better start to rebuilding imo


It would've been. Maybe even passing on Hamilton might've been a good route to take too. That cap space could be used on young guys coming off ELCs or future UFAs when we would've been really ready to compete again

Of course, who knows if Hamilton even wanted to come, but it sounds like Bowman and Co. were set on Jones from the start
9 avr. 2022 à 12 h 10
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,567
Mentions "j'aime": 11,949
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
It would've been. Maybe even passing on Hamilton might've been a good route to take too. That cap space could be used on young guys coming off ELCs or future UFAs when we would've been really ready to compete again


ehh I don't know, I think every team needs a number 1 d man and he is that -- even if he became a number 2 in the future that isn't a bad 1 2 punch
ForsbergForVezina a aimé ceci.
9 avr. 2022 à 12 h 29
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,297
Mentions "j'aime": 4,946
I would feel a lot better about the state of this team if we had Boqvist, Sillinger/Coronato, our 2023 1st, etc
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
9 avr. 2022 à 12 h 30
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,236
Mentions "j'aime": 2,176
I still would do that Hagel trade. Thats just too much value to pass up
Not_Isles5513, exo2769, Nqutilus and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
9 avr. 2022 à 12 h 33
#6
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,682
Mentions "j'aime": 9,833
Hindsight is always 20/20.

The Seth Jones trade should have never happened. We could have just signed him this offseason. He had already told everyone that he didn't think his future was in CBJ...so why give up SOO much for him? I don't even mind losing Boqvist. He's a puck mover and might get a few points here are there, but I don't think he's going to be a 2-way Dman in the NHL. He just hasn't shown the level of commitment needed to be a physical player. That doesn't mean he needs to go fight people, but just hustling and harassing forwards. I hadn't seen it in CHI and the games I did watch of CBJ (not too many to be honest) I hadn't seen it there either. He's scored on the same set piece play a bunch on the PP, which is good for him, but he'll be a PP specialist like Eric Gustafsson.

I would not sign Douggie Hamilton. Having watched him a bunch in CAR...he's a fine player, but he's not worth his contract. I say that because the defensive puck movers are easier to find. Maybe a NJD fan can tell me he's finally graduated into a 2-way dman, but he'd get exposed and bailed out by Slavin a bunch in CAR. His version of defense is to sell out at the blue line to prevent the opposing rush, but it's a high risk high reward venture and he'd often get penalties for that style. I'm also not a big fan of his defensive play when the opposing team is cycling down low. AGAIN, he's a fine Dman. I know it sound like it hate him...I DON'T HATE HIM. I just think $9M is $2M too much for his services.

The counter to some of this is...would MAF actually come to CHI in the first place if Bowman hadn't have made the Seth Jones trade? We'll never know for sure, but he might have retired. I'd still do the Hagel trade. TRad has been nice. Yes, Hagel is far better, but we do need those picks.
9 avr. 2022 à 12 h 34
#7
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,744
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Quoting: Wadejos123
I would feel a lot better about the state of this team if we had Boqvist, Sillinger/Coronato, our 2023 1st, etc


I’m a Long Island guy so I like Coronato a lot, but Sillinger’s dad was an NHL center for almost two decades. That combined with Cole’s positional value made him the right pick at #12 IMO.
Wadejos123 et ForsbergForVezina a aimé ceci.
9 avr. 2022 à 12 h 38
#8
Démarrer sujet
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,661
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
Quoting: GeneralLandro
ehh I don't know, I think every team needs a number 1 d man and he is that -- even if he became a number 2 in the future that isn't a bad 1 2 punch


I agree completely. Even in a down year, he's still been one of the best offensive d-men in the league this year on a bad (but improving) NJ team. He could've taken some pressure off Boqvist too as he kept maturing on both sides of the puck. At least pursuing him seemed like a no brainer for where we were at and I don't know if they really ever considered it. Still blows my mind.
9 avr. 2022 à 12 h 41
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,297
Mentions "j'aime": 4,946
Quoting: Isles5513
I’m a Long Island guy so I like Coronato a lot, but Sillinger’s dad was an NHL center for almost two decades. That combined with Cole’s positional value made him the right pick at #12 IMO.


Probably. My guess is the hawks would have taken Coronato though. Home town kid that they were showing a lot of pre draft interest in
ForsbergForVezina a aimé ceci.
9 avr. 2022 à 12 h 53
#10
Démarrer sujet
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,661
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
Quoting: SlickWilly
I still would do that Hagel trade. Thats just too much value to pass up


Quoting: exo2769
Hindsight is always 20/20.

The Seth Jones trade should have never happened. We could have just signed him this offseason. He had already told everyone that he didn't think his future was in CBJ...so why give up SOO much for him? I don't even mind losing Boqvist. He's a puck mover and might get a few points here are there, but I don't think he's going to be a 2-way Dman in the NHL. He just hasn't shown the level of commitment needed to be a physical player. That doesn't mean he needs to go fight people, but just hustling and harassing forwards. I hadn't seen it in CHI and the games I did watch of CBJ (not too many to be honest) I hadn't seen it there either. He's scored on the same set piece play a bunch on the PP, which is good for him, but he'll be a PP specialist like Eric Gustafsson.

I would not sign Douggie Hamilton. Having watched him a bunch in CAR...he's a fine player, but he's not worth his contract. I say that because the defensive puck movers are easier to find. Maybe a NJD fan can tell me he's finally graduated into a 2-way dman, but he'd get exposed and bailed out by Slavin a bunch in CAR. His version of defense is to sell out at the blue line to prevent the opposing rush, but it's a high risk high reward venture and he'd often get penalties for that style. I'm also not a big fan of his defensive play when the opposing team is cycling down low. AGAIN, he's a fine Dman. I know it sound like it hate him...I DON'T HATE HIM. I just think $9M is $2M too much for his services.

The counter to some of this is...would MAF actually come to CHI in the first place if Bowman hadn't have made the Seth Jones trade? We'll never know for sure, but he might have retired. I'd still do the Hagel trade. TRad has been nice. Yes, Hagel is far better, but we do need those picks.


Hagel trade is arguable. I'm still of the opinion that you don't trade 23 year old energy wingers on pace for 30+ goals in the first year of a $1.5 mil x 3 year deal. Raddysh has been great and the picks (low as they may be) are nice, but Hagel could've been here when we were good again. Players like that don't grow on trees.

I understand your concerns with Hamilton. I don't have the same experience watching him that you do, but I was always skeptical of his vastly improved defensive metrics in CAR and others in the analytics community were too. He's declined a bit in that respect in NJ, but he's still an elite offensive player. I'd rather have him at $9 million for 7 years than Seth at $9.5 million for 8 (9 with this season), which was kinda the point of including him in the post at all.
9 avr. 2022 à 12 h 53
#11
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,744
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Quoting: Wadejos123
Probably. My guess is the hawks would have taken Coronato though. Home town kid that they were showing a lot of pre draft interest in


Oh because he played the steel. Yeah him and Ryan Ufko are LI guys who played for Chicago.
Wadejos123 a aimé ceci.
9 avr. 2022 à 12 h 56
#12
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,682
Mentions "j'aime": 9,833
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
Hagel trade is arguable. I'm still of the opinion that you don't trade 23 year old energy wingers on pace for 30+ goals in the first year of a $1.5 mil x 3 year deal. Raddysh has been great and the picks (low as they may be) are nice, but Hagel could've been here when we were good again. Players like that don't grow on trees.

I understand your concerns with Hamilton. I don't have the same experience watching him that you do, but I was always skeptical of his vastly improved defensive metrics in CAR and others in the analytics community were too. He's declined a bit in that respect in NJ, but he's still an elite offensive player. I'd rather have him at $9 million for 7 years than Seth at $9.5 million for 8 (9 with this season), which was kinda the point of including him in the post at all.


That's fair. As for the two players straight up...with the contracts, but without the trade...I would prefer Seth Jones and is $9.5M vs Hamilton and his $9M. The trade makes a huge difference. We shouldn't have given up that much for a pending UFA that wanted to leave. Just bad asset management.
9 avr. 2022 à 13 h 3
#13
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,770
Mentions "j'aime": 22,800
Man, that Jones trade and the his resigning may go down as the worst move of the decade.
ForsbergForVezina a aimé ceci.
9 avr. 2022 à 15 h 51
#14
Chris Peralta
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 1,299
Mentions "j'aime": 369
Why would you trade for Sillinger just to bench him?
9 avr. 2022 à 16 h 3
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,236
Mentions "j'aime": 2,176
Quoting: ChrisNapoleon
Why would you trade for Sillinger just to bench him?


We've botched the development of Dach, Boqvist, Jokiharju, etc by playing them too soon. No reason to rush him to the majors if we're rebuilding
ChrisNapoleon a aimé ceci.
9 avr. 2022 à 20 h 45
#16
Démarrer sujet
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,661
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
Quoting: ChrisNapoleon
Why would you trade for Sillinger just to bench him?


CBJ took him with our pick from the Jones trade. I wouldve liked him but idk if we would’ve taken him
ChrisNapoleon a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage