SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

ANA 2022-23 Starting lineup

Créé par: JoeThorntonsBeard
Équipe: 2022-23 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 30 mars 2022
Publié: 30 mars 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Anaheim Ducks Opening night roster 2022-23

- Sign Marchment to add grit and scoring to top 6
- Trade Gibson to add more future picks + Ceci to somewhat replace Manson
- Sign Chariot to replace Lindholm (more importantly to help reach cap floor)
- Bring in Korp on a prove-it deal
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
2900 000 $
21 350 000 $
22 400 000 $
21 500 000 $
2850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 350 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
22 000 000 $
2950 000 $
1800 000 $
1925 000 $
1975 000 $
1900 000 $
44 000 000 $
33 333 000 $
21 750 000 $
Transactions
ANA
  1. Ceci, Cody
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de NSH
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de EDM
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de COL
Logo de ANA
Logo de MIN
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de EDM
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $53 290 917 $0 $4 200 000 $29 209 083 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 037 500 $2 037 500 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
3 333 000 $3 333 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 mars 2022 à 1 h 54
#1
56 years and countin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,039
Mentions "j'aime": 173
I can't see Anahiem trading Gibson at all, he's the present and future goalie of that team but yeah the Marchment and Chiarot additions are nice.
30 mars 2022 à 2 h 4
#2
Démarrer sujet
Sir
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 254
Mentions "j'aime": 16
Quoting: PrisonMike
I can't see Anahiem trading Gibson at all, he's the present and future goalie of that team but yeah the Marchment and Chiarot additions are nice.


Gibson has not had over a 905% SVP over the last 3 years, but his value is still high, Trade him while you can. At this point he is replaceable. Also ANA will not be a contender for a few more years.
30 mars 2022 à 4 h 8
#3
LosPatos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,359
Mentions "j'aime": 1,885
This is satire right?
30 mars 2022 à 4 h 48
#4
Démarrer sujet
Sir
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 254
Mentions "j'aime": 16
Quoting: AntreDiAnaheim
This is satire right?


tell me how?
30 mars 2022 à 5 h 31
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,913
Mentions "j'aime": 562
Oilers accept
30 mars 2022 à 6 h 6
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,575
Mentions "j'aime": 11,956
Mason Marchment - I’m absolutely for it! I would say I want this as our ‘big’ off season signing if we could only get one

John Gibson - can’t see him being traded

Ben Chiarot - offer sheet Nicolas Hague instead
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
30 mars 2022 à 6 h 8
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,575
Mentions "j'aime": 11,956
Quoting: JoeThorntonsBeard
Gibson has not had over a 905% SVP over the last 3 years, but his value is still high, Trade him while you can. At this point he is replaceable. Also ANA will not be a contender for a few more years.


I don’t see Anaheim getting the return we would want for Gibson so I can’t see a trade happening

I also think we will be solid and starting to compete in 2 seasons (23/24)
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
30 mars 2022 à 6 h 44
#8
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: JoeThorntonsBeard
tell me how?


So the 1st is to take on that awful Ceci contract, and the 3rd is for Gibson?

And yeah, I absolutely get that Gibson hasn't put up the numbers over the past couple of years, but given that they don't have any cap issues, I don't know why you'd sell super low on him.
OldNYIfan et GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
30 mars 2022 à 7 h 43
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 2,389
Mentions "j'aime": 1,946
Verbeek isn't dumb enough to sign Chiarot to anything more than a 1x$1.5M deal.

I'd love Marchment.

Why would the Ducks take back Ceci? I'd prefer to play someone like Helleson.
OldNYIfan et GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
30 mars 2022 à 8 h 5
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,091
Mentions "j'aime": 7,772
Quoting: Lenny7
So the 1st is to take on that awful Ceci contract, and the 3rd is for Gibson?

And yeah, I absolutely get that Gibson hasn't put up the numbers over the past couple of years, but given that they don't have any cap issues, I don't know why you'd sell super low on him.

Ceci has positive value, he's been very good this year. Edmonton isn't trading their defacto 1RD AND a 1st for a cap dump of a goalie.
30 mars 2022 à 8 h 9
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,091
Mentions "j'aime": 7,772
Quoting: GrinReaper
Oilers accept


No. Gibson is all reputation. Edmonton needs a goalie that can actually stop pucks and doesn't cost $6.4M for term.
30 mars 2022 à 8 h 14
#12
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: CD282
Ceci has positive value, he's been very good this year. Edmonton isn't trading their defacto 1RD AND a 1st for a cap dump of a goalie.


S'all good, you can keep him.
OldNYIfan et GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
30 mars 2022 à 8 h 32
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,091
Mentions "j'aime": 7,772
Quoting: Lenny7
S'all good, you can keep him.


Will do!
30 mars 2022 à 8 h 34
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,091
Mentions "j'aime": 7,772
Quoting: PrisonMike
I can't see Anahiem trading Gibson at all, he's the present and future goalie of that team but yeah the Marchment and Chiarot additions are nice.


Quoting: AntreDiAnaheim
This is satire right?


Quoting: GeneralLandro
Mason Marchment - I’m absolutely for it! I would say I want this as our ‘big’ off season signing if we could only get one

John Gibson - can’t see him being traded

Ben Chiarot - offer sheet Nicolas Hague instead


Quoting: Lenny7
So the 1st is to take on that awful Ceci contract, and the 3rd is for Gibson?

And yeah, I absolutely get that Gibson hasn't put up the numbers over the past couple of years, but given that they don't have any cap issues, I don't know why you'd sell super low on him.


Quoting: TZ11
Verbeek isn't dumb enough to sign Chiarot to anything more than a 1x$1.5M deal.

I'd love Marchment.

Why would the Ducks take back Ceci? I'd prefer to play someone like Helleson.

If Ducks want to keep Gibson, will they trade Dostal? What is he worth?

@oldnyifan
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
30 mars 2022 à 9 h 53
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,575
Mentions "j'aime": 11,956
Quoting: CD282
If Ducks want to keep Gibson, will they trade Dostal? What is he worth?

oldnyifan


I think Dostal becomes the full time starter/taxi squad guy next year and Stolarz gets delt at the deadline — Dostal becomes full time backup for a year or two after then takes over for Gibson

That’s what I think happens
OldNYIfan et Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
30 mars 2022 à 10 h 7
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 2,389
Mentions "j'aime": 1,946
Quoting: CD282
If Ducks want to keep Gibson, will they trade Dostal? What is he worth?

oldnyifan


They won't, there's just no reason to. He's amazing in the AHL at just 21 years old.
OldNYIfan et GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
30 mars 2022 à 10 h 25
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,091
Mentions "j'aime": 7,772
Quoting: TZ11
They won't, there's just no reason to. He's amazing in the AHL at just 21 years old.


He's blocked by Gibson for the next 5 years though.
30 mars 2022 à 10 h 33
#18
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,526
Mentions "j'aime": 25,402
Quoting: CD282
If Ducks want to keep Gibson, will they trade Dostal? What is he worth?

oldnyifan


The Ducks will move Dostal in for the 2023-2024 season. They won't trade him, but they might do as my friend @GeneralLandro says -- trade Stolarz at the trade deadline next year, or keep him through that season and let him go as a free agent.
GeneralLandro et TZ11 a aimé ceci.
30 mars 2022 à 10 h 45
#19
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,526
Mentions "j'aime": 25,402
Quoting: JoeThorntonsBeard
Gibson has not had over a 905% SVP over the last 3 years, but his value is still high, Trade him while you can. At this point he is replaceable. Also ANA will not be a contender for a few more years.

It's a chicken-and-egg conundrum -- is Gibson bad because the team is bad, or is the team bad because Gibson is bad?

In the first half of the season, while the team was completely healthy, Gibson was 15-10-8 and was only one of nine starting goalies with a save rate over 92% and a GAA under 2.5, and the team was in a playoff spot. Since then, the team has stunk and Gibson's numbers have collapsed. But last night's game was typical -- Gibson made 29 saves on 32 shots, but some of those saves wouldn't have been made by at least half of the starting goalies in the NHL. And one game in the current string of ten consecutive losses the Ducks have suffered his save rate was 92.9%.

You can argue that his numbers aren't good, but numbers are just facts; facts aren't truth. I have no doubt that if Gibson played for Boston, say, his numbers would be better than their two goalies' numbers, and that Gibson will be our starting goaltender for at least the next three seasons.
Lenny7 et GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
30 mars 2022 à 11 h 22
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,575
Mentions "j'aime": 11,956
Quoting: OldNYIfan
It's a chicken-and-egg conundrum -- is Gibson bad because the team is bad, or is the team bad because Gibson is bad?

In the first half of the season, while the team was completely healthy, Gibson was 15-10-8 and was only one of nine starting goalies with a save rate over 92% and a GAA under 2.5, and the team was in a playoff spot. Since then, the team has stunk and Gibson's numbers have collapsed. But last night's game was typical -- Gibson made 29 saves on 32 shots, but some of those saves wouldn't have been made by at least half of the starting goalies in the NHL. And one game in the current string of ten consecutive losses the Ducks have suffered his save rate was 92.9%.

You can argue that his numbers aren't good, but numbers are just facts; facts aren't truth. I have no doubt that if Gibson played for Boston, say, his numbers would be better than their two goalies' numbers, and that Gibson will be our starting goaltender for at least the next three seasons.


This is probably the ultimate Gibson take there could/is out there right now — it’s all spot on

My friend, another great job
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
30 mars 2022 à 11 h 28
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,091
Mentions "j'aime": 7,772
Quoting: OldNYIfan
It's a chicken-and-egg conundrum -- is Gibson bad because the team is bad, or is the team bad because Gibson is bad?

In the first half of the season, while the team was completely healthy, Gibson was 15-10-8 and was only one of nine starting goalies with a save rate over 92% and a GAA under 2.5, and the team was in a playoff spot. Since then, the team has stunk and Gibson's numbers have collapsed. But last night's game was typical -- Gibson made 29 saves on 32 shots, but some of those saves wouldn't have been made by at least half of the starting goalies in the NHL. And one game in the current string of ten consecutive losses the Ducks have suffered his save rate was 92.9%.

You can argue that his numbers aren't good, but numbers are just facts; facts aren't truth. I have no doubt that if Gibson played for Boston, say, his numbers would be better than their two goalies' numbers, and that Gibson will be our starting goaltender for at least the next three seasons.

He's allowed 3 or more goals in every single one of his last 15 starts. His GSAx over that span is -22.76!! You can't blame the team for that - not when Stolarz posted a GSAx of +2.23 in 7 games in the same span.

Here are their stats from the past 2 months:

Stolarz: 2-1-1, 2.44 GAA, .922 sv%
Gibson: 2-12-1, 4.61 GAA, .860 sv%

Stolarz hasn't had an easier ride, either:

Stolarz: 2.83 xGA/60, 9.59 HDSA/60, 3.14 Rush Attempts Against/60
Gibson: 2.89 xGA/60, 9.22 HDSA/60, 1.81 Rush Attempts Against/60

The Ducks season is in the toilet because they insist on starting Gibson when he's clearly struggling. That's not in the defense, that's on Gibson and Eakins.
30 mars 2022 à 11 h 43
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 2,389
Mentions "j'aime": 1,946
Quoting: CD282
He's blocked by Gibson for the next 5 years though.


Not really. Gibson could be traded in the future but just not right now and the Ducks might go 50/50 in terms of starts in a few years. But Dostal is definitely not being dealt.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage