Please feel free to explain why the Canucks would do that trade…

I've got no reason to roast you personally, but these trades need a lot of work.

Ottawa and Vancouver decline

I don’t think they would, I am just a silly Leaf’s fan dreaming of what it will take to compete in their division

Incredibly far off for the Sens. Mrazek is negative value, Holl isn't AWFUL but far from a needle-mover, Blackwell isn't far from a throw-in. Forsberg, if the Sens were willing to move him, which it sounds like they're not, would cost a 2nd+, and Connor Brown is a 1st+. If you call the 2nd and Holl the Forsberg part of the deal, the 4th and Blackwell probably still wouldn't be enough for a team to take on Mrazek (who is literally gonna pass through waivers). Then you're just getting Connor Brown for free.

I don’t disagree with you, just being a crazy, unrealistic Leafs fan my friend. Great points that make sense, but the Sens did a trade earlier for Hamonic which most also consider to be a negative value guy too, so you just never know.

Mrazek, Holl and pick is the new Mrazek, Dermott and a pick

THE KING IS DEAD

LONG LIVE THE KING

Cue up the Muzzin for Pesce and a pick

Saw Kerfoot to Jackets, swiped left.

HA fair enough. I like to keep armchair gm as "what would I do" or "what should they do" instead of "what WOULD the actual management do", or else the Sens will be just as sewered here as they are in real life