SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If MTL wants to get rid of gallagher

Créé par: RIP_RICK_RYPIEN
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 3 janv. 2022
Publié: 3 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Gallagher, Brendan (2 250 000 $ retained)
MTL
  1. Dowling, Justin
  2. Pearson, Tanner
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
  4. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
2.
VAN
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de WPG
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $74 985 659 $648 780 $2 550 000 $6 514 341 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 janv. 2022 à 20 h 4
#1
Bedard23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 9,315
Mentions "j'aime": 4,491
Your paying us to take on Hamonic
3 janv. 2022 à 20 h 11
#2
v5 Minnesota GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 8,120
Mentions "j'aime": 4,684
Habs say no right away. If gally is getting retained like that, give me the value of Garland plus some more. Gally is a 25 30 goal scorer you are not just sending us a 4th liner and depth pieces
RobbStark03 a aimé ceci.
3 janv. 2022 à 20 h 19
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,236
Mentions "j'aime": 9,450
Quoting: HabsIsland
Habs say no right away. If gally is getting retained like that, give me the value of Garland plus some more. Gally is a 25 30 goal scorer you are not just sending us a 4th liner and depth pieces


Garland alone has much more value than Gallagher. He has a terrible contract and at this point is close to a cap dump
3 janv. 2022 à 20 h 30
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,525
Mentions "j'aime": 668
I'm a canucks fan, and that's bad for the Habs. Pearson has pretty low value, and Dowling and a few depth picks aren't very useful to the Habs. They would reject, even without retention.
3 janv. 2022 à 20 h 33
#5
Go Habs Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,667
Mentions "j'aime": 4,091
Montreal doesn't want to get rid of Gallagher. He might not want to stay if they rebuild, but that doesn't mean they are giving him away.
FiveForFighting, raph222b, RobbStark03 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
3 janv. 2022 à 22 h 8
#6
Démarrer sujet
BIGG PAPI LOCASTA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 355
Mentions "j'aime": 35
Quoting: HabsIsland
Habs say no right away. If gally is getting retained like that, give me the value of Garland plus some more. Gally is a 25 30 goal scorer you are not just sending us a 4th liner and depth pieces


lol
3 janv. 2022 à 22 h 9
#7
Démarrer sujet
BIGG PAPI LOCASTA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 355
Mentions "j'aime": 35
Quoting: ricochetii
Montreal doesn't want to get rid of Gallagher. He might not want to stay if they rebuild, but that doesn't mean they are giving him away.


Quoting: HabsIsland
Habs say no right away. If gally is getting retained like that, give me the value of Garland plus some more. Gally is a 25 30 goal scorer you are not just sending us a 4th liner and depth pieces


getting paid 300k less that MacKinnon
3 janv. 2022 à 23 h 10
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 1,626
Mentions "j'aime": 1,228
I'd rather have Pearson than Gallagher. Pearson's contract is shorter and at lower cap hit which will matter when we have to resign Pettersson.
PeterForsberg21 a aimé ceci.
3 janv. 2022 à 23 h 41
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 1,626
Mentions "j'aime": 1,228
Quoting: HabsIsland
Habs say no right away. If gally is getting retained like that, give me the value of Garland plus some more. Gally is a 25 30 goal scorer you are not just sending us a 4th liner and depth pieces


Pearson has 6G 9A and is +6 while Gallagher has 4G 6A and is -6. If Pearson is a 4th line player, then so is Gallagher and at half the cost and term. Also, you're crazy if you think Gallagher is worth Garland plus some.
RIP_RICK_RYPIEN a aimé ceci.
4 janv. 2022 à 0 h 10
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,900
Mentions "j'aime": 6,397
Quoting: HabsIsland
Habs say no right away. If gally is getting retained like that, give me the value of Garland plus some more. Gally is a 25 30 goal scorer you are not just sending us a 4th liner and depth pieces


Garland hahahahahahahahahaha good luck with that
4 janv. 2022 à 0 h 16
#11
Go Habs Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,667
Mentions "j'aime": 4,091
Quoting: RIP_RICK_RYPIEN
getting paid 300k less that MacKinnon


If MacKinnon is your measuring stick for contracts, it's no wonder your valuation is off.
4 janv. 2022 à 8 h 58
#12
v5 Minnesota GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 8,120
Mentions "j'aime": 4,684
Quoting: mv21227
Garland alone has much more value than Gallagher. He has a terrible contract and at this point is close to a cap dump


What is Pearson? A luxury? No! He is a cap dump. But if you were retaining that much on gallly pay us the equivalent of boeser
4 janv. 2022 à 8 h 59
#13
v5 Minnesota GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 8,120
Mentions "j'aime": 4,684
Before gally signed his contract there were rumors of Vancouver sends boeser and Habs send gally. Gally had a 3.75m contract. Almost the same that you retained
4 janv. 2022 à 9 h 1
#14
v5 Minnesota GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 8,120
Mentions "j'aime": 4,684
Quoting: audiodave
Pearson has 6G 9A and is +6 while Gallagher has 4G 6A and is -6. If Pearson is a 4th line player, then so is Gallagher and at half the cost and term. Also, you're crazy if you think Gallagher is worth Garland plus some.


Gally played 10 games less than Pearson. He was playing injured every game. He would've surpassed Pearson in points 100%
4 janv. 2022 à 9 h 2
#15
v5 Minnesota GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 8,120
Mentions "j'aime": 4,684
Quoting: HabsIsland
Gally played 10 games less than Pearson. He was playing injured every game. He would've surpassed Pearson in points 100%


Just look at his stats from before this year. Look at Pearson's also. See who is better
4 janv. 2022 à 9 h 7
#16
v5 Minnesota GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 8,120
Mentions "j'aime": 4,684
Quoting: RIP_RICK_RYPIEN
getting paid 300k less that MacKinnon


Just proof you have no known of hockey whatsoever. In a couple years figure out how much more Mackinnon makes. Read up some more.
4 janv. 2022 à 9 h 20
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 245
Mentions "j'aime": 59
Lmao "get rid of Gallagher."

Friedman yesterday:
"Before you're trading Brendan Gallagher, even if you're even considering it, you're going to him and you're saying, look, you've earned the right to help make this decision. I just think that's there's going to be someone that's going to be interested in him. I think that the way he plays is a thing that a lot of people respect, I really think that you're going to be able to find somebody who's going to be interested."
4 janv. 2022 à 13 h 8
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,236
Mentions "j'aime": 9,450
Quoting: HabsIsland
What is Pearson? A luxury? No! He is a cap dump. But if you were retaining that much on gallly pay us the equivalent of boeser


If you want Boeser then you better be giving us Caufield+++ or your first this year. Even with that retention Gallagher is a cap dump, who is on a way longer contract than Pearson
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage