SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Dont Match Wait and See

Créé par: Shanesaw9
Équipe: 2021-22 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 29 août 2021
Publié: 1 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I've already made a team where MTL matches and to be honest it made thing's a real headache for MTL... and it only works if you make the following assumptions:
- KK progresses and has a good year (40 - 50 pts)
- KK's demands for a long term contract are reasonable... (I don't believe the claim that KK would sign a lesser deal than $6.1M unless he has a poor season, in which case MTL would be better taking the picks).
- The cap rises to $82.5M

To be honest KK was very replaceable last season, at least in MTL management's eyes. So replaceable that even Eric Staal was seen as an upgrade, Jake Evans was more trusted by the coaching staff, and Kotkaniemi was a scratch in the Stanley Cup finals (the team is only going with what they believe is the best lineup in that situation and they believed at the time KK was not deserving of a spot - no politics there). Despite this, MTL still seen long term potential in KK obviously otherwise they wouldn't have let Danault go... unless they were just planning to trade KK which is a theory I've heard (KK signing the offersheet negates the possibility that he gets traded somewhere he doesn't want to play).

Anyways, back to the point, KK is very easily replaceable, in the short term at least, therefore MTL should just take the wait and see approach.

- TAKE THE PICKS
Do not trade them away in a package for a C like Dvorak (Evans and Poehling can be C's in the mold of Dvorak), I would only trade the picks for a legit top 6 C, a C with talents that MTL doesn't already have in the system. Even then, I would not trade the picks before the season starts and you know how Carolina is performing, this pick could range anywhere from 1st overall to 32nd so wait and see... right now it is generally assumed that the pick will be late so waiting would not really hurt the value of the pick although it could potentially become very valuable.

- SHORT TERM PATCH
Kotkaniemi P/60 last year was 1.4, his career high came as a rookie when he had 1.9. There are numerous free agent options out there that would be an upgrade over Kotkaniemi with respect to P/60:

Galchenyuk's lowest P/60 of his career came last season when he put up 1.8 (2.0 with TOR), his highest was 2.7 as a rookie with MTL and again with MTL as a 22 year old. I don't know if Galchenyuk would ever be given another chance by MTL or if Galchenyuk would be interested, but he did play the best hockey of his career for them... I'd take a chance on him for sure, why not? It doesn't necessarily have to be Galchenyuk, he's just one player I'm aware of but I'd take a chance on any tweener who has the potential to suprise.

If Galchenyuk is the risky option, Tyler Bozak would be the safe choice. He put up a P/60 of 2.2 last season and that's including time spent shorthanded (KK doesn't kill penalties) so Bozak would arguably be an immediate upgrade over KK in the short term. For reference, Dvorak's P/60 was 1.8 last year and his career high is 2.0, so this is my point... why are there so many armchair GM teams with MTL paying a big price for Dvorak when there are options in free agency? Bozak would be an excellent one year patch and gives MTL time to assess the situation, which leads me to my next point.

- REPLACE KK FROM WITHIN
Jonathan Drouin recently said in an interview that he is willing and ready to play C and I believe him. I bet he is crazy hungry to return and show he belongs and KK leaving opens up an opportunity for Drouin. Drouin's worst P/60 of his career came last season and it was 1.9... identical to KK's career high and a definitive upgrade over him last season. His only season at C with MTL he had a 2.0, and I would not entirely blame Drouin for what happened that season (MTL was a terrible team that year). This time around MTL has way better wingers, some solid defensive defenseman, and Suzuki is the #1C not Drouin. If people are willing to give Kotkaniemi the chance to be top 6 C then I don't see how you could argue against giving Drouin the chance. Hoffman - Drouin - Anderson would make for a good offensive line.

Jake Evans is already expected to replace Danault, but Ryan Poehling is also a dark horse for MTL. With Kotkaniemi leaving, there's an opportunity for Poehling in camp to prove he deserves a spot in the NHL.

- ASSESS THE SITUATION, MAKE YOUR MOVE
Once you know exactly what you have in Evans, Poehling, Drouin and potentially Bozak and/or Galchenyuk you can make your move. There's the possibility that MTL are out of the playoffs and they are sellers at the deadline (Bozak, Chiarot, Kulak, Galchenyuk etc... all pending UFA's)... in which case I would argue they would have found themselves in the same spot with KK anyways (KK is not a difference maker yet), at least then they would have two firsts in a strong draft and a potential lottery pick.

There's also the chance that someone steps up and claims the 2C spot, or at the very least plays well enough to give MTL a chance to add at the deadline when more C options become available.

If all else fails there is always free agency, and MTL's young C's Suzuki, Poehling, and Evans should only to continue to get better each year.

To be clear I'm fine with either outcome, it all depends on if you see KK becoming an impact player or not. I always did, but there's a good chance he doesn't ever become that player and I don't know if I'd risk blowing up the salary cap situation to take it.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 750 000 $
11 075 000 $
Transactions
MTL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CAR)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CAR)
CAR
    Offersheet Compensation
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de STL
    2023
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    2024
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $63 647 144 $597 561 $1 557 500 $17 852 856 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    950 000 $950 000 $
    AG, AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    950 000 $950 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    875 000 $875 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    2 343 750 $2 343 750 $
    DD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance637 500 $$638K)
    DG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    859 167 $859 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    DG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
    DD
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    1 sept. 2021 à 9 h 11
    #1
    Fall River Habs
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2021
    Messages: 881
    Mentions "j'aime": 333
    This is well thought out. I am guilty of wanting Mtl to get a shiny new toy like Eichel, Dvorak (meh) or something else, but your process is probably closer to what most GMs do. The only thing that makes me think Mtl should be more aggressive is the thought of building on last year with a big improvement on the roster. Mtl is not a top 10 Cup contender as it stands right now, but if they could add a shiny new toy (impact center) AND CATCH LIGHTNING IN A BOTTLE AGAIN (because that would be what is necessary for them to get through teh Eastern Conference, even with an Eichel on the team) it could be worth swinging big. Price is not getting younger
    Shanesaw9 a aimé ceci.
    1 sept. 2021 à 9 h 44
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Habs 2010
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2020
    Messages: 1,518
    Mentions "j'aime": 951
    Quoting: KentMcNally
    This is well thought out. I am guilty of wanting Mtl to get a shiny new toy like Eichel, Dvorak (meh) or something else, but your process is probably closer to what most GMs do. The only thing that makes me think Mtl should be more aggressive is the thought of building on last year with a big improvement on the roster. Mtl is not a top 10 Cup contender as it stands right now, but if they could add a shiny new toy (impact center) AND CATCH LIGHTNING IN A BOTTLE AGAIN (because that would be what is necessary for them to get through teh Eastern Conference, even with an Eichel on the team) it could be worth swinging big. Price is not getting younger


    Thanks,

    Agreed, and there is theory maybe MTL was already planning on trying to trade Kotkaniemi in a package for a top C who knows. I could see it, because I don't think bergevin was very confident with KK as the 2C, but he can't be happy with the offersheet. Buffalo would probably be more interested in Kotkaniemi than a 1st + 3rd, so maybe this offersheet blows that up, and it also puts MTL in weak negotiating position because they NEED to add a center now as opposed to just trying to upgrade at center.

    That's why I think the best choice right now is the wait and see approach, they can always circle back to the trade market during the season if they need to. If there is a good trade partner right now I'd do it but I think everyone is generally OK with entering the season with their current rosters (except for Eichel... but he needs a surgery anyways).
    1 sept. 2021 à 9 h 56
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 15,493
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,431
    FFS Drouin is NOT a center, we tried to force that once and it went extremely bad! Can we please use a little logic and realize that the only thing that makes sense is to match the OS. Even if you think KK wants out, he will need to raise his value with the QO waiting for him at the end of the season. With matching the OS we have 4 scenarios that could play out 1. KK explodes and becomes our 2C and signs and extension. 2. KK wants out and is forced to play well enough to prove that his 6.1 Mil QO is not an overpayment and we trade him later in the season or offseason. 3. KK just stays on the same track or slightly better and he signs his QO cause he does not have enough value to move at that cap hit. 4. We send KK his QO to keep his rights then he turns it down and we file for arbitration and get his cap hit reduced to 85% of his current salary (5.185 Mil) and he again must either prove his value to be traded later or the cycle continues until he is 27 and walks in FA. Montreal holds all of the cards right now on the KK front, by letting him walk we weaken the team and get next to nothing back for it.
    1 sept. 2021 à 9 h 58
    #4
    v5 CBJ GM
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 15,924
    Mentions "j'aime": 8,570
    i read the whole thing (which is something i dont do very often) and it makes sense. I like the idea of signing Bozak, but then the problem with that is what we do when Byron returns. someone needs to be traded, not sent down. we gotta get something from losing a player. I'd say trade paquette/perreault, but they just signed with MTL
    Shanesaw9 a aimé ceci.
    1 sept. 2021 à 10 h 7
    #5
    Fall River Habs
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2021
    Messages: 881
    Mentions "j'aime": 333
    Quoting: Campabee
    FFS Drouin is NOT a center, we tried to force that once and it went extremely bad! Can we please use a little logic and realize that the only thing that makes sense is to match the OS. Even if you think KK wants out, he will need to raise his value with the QO waiting for him at the end of the season. With matching the OS we have 4 scenarios that could play out 1. KK explodes and becomes our 2C and signs and extension. 2. KK wants out and is forced to play well enough to prove that his 6.1 Mil QO is not an overpayment and we trade him later in the season or offseason. 3. KK just stays on the same track or slightly better and he signs his QO cause he does not have enough value to move at that cap hit. 4. We send KK his QO to keep his rights then he turns it down and we file for arbitration and get his cap hit reduced to 85% of his current salary (5.185 Mil) and he again must either prove his value to be traded later or the cycle continues until he is 27 and walks in FA. Montreal holds all of the cards right now on the KK front, by letting him walk we weaken the team and get next to nothing back for it.



    I do not see Jesperi coming back at this point. When Aho was given the offer sheet a few years ago Carolina came out and almost immediately said "We will match". To date there has been nothing from Montreal management close to such a statement. I think that the decision to sit him at different points in the playoffs and the lack of a public vote of confidence (i.e. "We believe in Kotkaniemi..he is a part of our future... there is nothing a team could do to take him away from us") speaks volumes about how they view him. I think the Habs are shopping the picks or taking the wait and see position mentioned in this post.
    It would be tough to say to Kotkaniemi: "Yes, we benched you in the playoffs and yes we took our sweet time matching the offer sheet (relatively speaking), but welcome back! You're our future building block, forget the other stuff".
    1 sept. 2021 à 10 h 16
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 15,493
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,431
    Quoting: KentMcNally
    I do not see Jesperi coming back at this point. When Aho was given the offer sheet a few years ago Carolina came out and almost immediately said "We will match". To date there has been nothing from Montreal management close to such a statement. I think that the decision to sit him at different points in the playoffs and the lack of a public vote of confidence (i.e. "We believe in Kotkaniemi..he is a part of our future... there is nothing a team could do to take him away from us") speaks volumes about how they view him. I think the Habs are shopping the picks or taking the wait and see position mentioned in this post.
    It would be tough to say to Kotkaniemi: "Yes, we benched you in the playoffs and yes we took our sweet time matching the offer sheet (relatively speaking), but welcome back! You're our future building block, forget the other stuff".


    MB plays everything close to the vest never showing his cards until he absolutely has to. No one knows if MB reached out to KK and had a chat with him about his future with the team, he probably has if I had to guess. MB will not let anyone know what he is going to do until he has to.
    1 sept. 2021 à 10 h 23
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Habs 2010
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2020
    Messages: 1,518
    Mentions "j'aime": 951
    Quoting: Campabee
    FFS Drouin is NOT a center, we tried to force that once and it went extremely bad! Can we please use a little logic and realize that the only thing that makes sense is to match the OS. Even if you think KK wants out, he will need to raise his value with the QO waiting for him at the end of the season. With matching the OS we have 4 scenarios that could play out 1. KK explodes and becomes our 2C and signs and extension. 2. KK wants out and is forced to play well enough to prove that his 6.1 Mil QO is not an overpayment and we trade him later in the season or offseason. 3. KK just stays on the same track or slightly better and he signs his QO cause he does not have enough value to move at that cap hit. 4. We send KK his QO to keep his rights then he turns it down and we file for arbitration and get his cap hit reduced to 85% of his current salary (5.185 Mil) and he again must either prove his value to be traded later or the cycle continues until he is 27 and walks in FA. Montreal holds all of the cards right now on the KK front, by letting him walk we weaken the team and get next to nothing back for it.


    @Campabee we tried to force that once yes, but that was under Julien's system and MTL was legitimately terrible that year. What a lot of people don't remember about that year is Drouin finishing that season with 13 pts in the last 14 games, if I recall it was when he had Byron and Gallagher as linemates.

    The difference this year is MTL actually has really good wingers for Drouin to potentially play with, Ducharme is the coach not Julien (Drouin played C for Ducharme in Junior), and Drouin is not THE GUY, Suzuki is.

    I mean if you aren't willing to give Drouin a 2nd chance then why would you be willing to give KK a 3rd chance?

    And I'm not sitting here claiming it will work, I'm only advocating for trying it (what is there to lose?). I'm fine with matching KK or not, I see sides to both argument. I've made my team for Pro Matching and now this is my team for being against it.

    Quoting: Zuki9797
    i read the whole thing (which is something i dont do very often) and it makes sense. I like the idea of signing Bozak, but then the problem with that is what we do when Byron returns. someone needs to be traded, not sent down. we gotta get something from losing a player. I'd say trade paquette/perreault, but they just signed with MTL


    Honestly I'm not entirely confident everything I mentioned above will work out which is why there are plan B's.

    Drouin might be awful at C, Poehling might not not be NHL ready, Evans could struggle or get another concussion etc.

    I'd rather have the options and not need them, then not have the options and need them.
    zk97 a aimé ceci.
    1 sept. 2021 à 10 h 33
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 15,493
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,431
    Quoting: Shanesaw9
    Campabee we tried to force that once yes, but that was under Julien's system and MTL was legitimately terrible that year. What a lot of people don't remember about that year is Drouin finishing that season with 13 pts in the last 14 games, if I recall it was when he had Byron and Gallagher as linemates.

    The difference this year is MTL actually has really good wingers for Drouin to potentially play with, Ducharme is the coach not Julien (Drouin played C for Ducharme in Junior), and Drouin is not THE GUY, Suzuki is.

    I mean if you aren't willing to give Drouin a 2nd chance then why would you be willing to give KK a 3rd chance?

    And I'm not sitting here claiming it will work, I'm only advocating for trying it (what is there to lose?). I'm fine with matching KK or not, I see sides to both argument. I've made my team for Pro Matching and now this is my team for being against it.



    Honestly I'm not entirely confident everything I mentioned above will work out which is why there are plan B's.

    Drouin might be awful at C, Poehling might not not be NHL ready, Evans could struggle or get another concussion etc.

    I'd rather have the options and not need them, then not have the options and need them.


    @Shanesaw9 fair enough on the Drouin points it was definitely under a different system and things could be different but Drouin has had way way way more chances than KK will ever get. Drouin is not good enough defensively to play center in the NHL though. I just don't see Drouin as an option at center, I really like Drouin though he has a spot on the team just not at center.
    Shanesaw9 a aimé ceci.
    1 sept. 2021 à 10 h 37
    #9
    Lets Get Kraken
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 8,639
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,470
    Coming from a canes fans perspective, I really like KK and I think his development has been severely limited by the Habs. Assuming that the Habs do not match the offer sheet, canes fill their hole at 2LW. KK would be playing with Trocheck and Necas on that second line, and in theory, he should excel on that line and become a higher offensive threat. Contract extensions would be the big chatter with KK after January 1st, 2022, and that way, CAR can avoid that 6.1 mil QO. KK should be taking a big step forward this year assuming he ends up with the Canes. Plus, if the comparisons to Barkov end ip being true, and KK develops into that extremely elite forward that Barkov is, it would be worth every penny of the 1st and 3rd. KK, depending on how he performs on Trocheck’s wing, could act as leverage for the Canes to resign Trocheck.

    The main reason for the offer sheet to KK was to get revenge for Aho. But the OS also was extended with the purpose of filling a hole that the Canes have. The canes were trying to trade for KK before sending the OS.

    I have seen so much unwarranted bashing of KK because he signed the OS it’s ridiculous. If you look at one of Nick Suzuki’s quotes on the OS to KK, he even says that it is good for KK. I don’t believe KK had any intentions of screwing over the Habs, but I guarantee anyone who is offered 3 times the amount they are actually worth will take that deal.

    Carolina is also kind of trying to recreate team Finland, so there’s that connection as well.
    Shanesaw9 et Campabee a aimé ceci.
    1 sept. 2021 à 10 h 37
    #10
    LongtimeLeafsufferer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2015
    Messages: 59,518
    Mentions "j'aime": 22,676
    Habs shouldn't match the ridiculous offer sheet. As you suggest their are better/cheaper ways to fill KK centre positions this season. Bozak, and Zajeck are two unsigned centres whose might total 4m if signed.
    Shanesaw9 et McSchleep a aimé ceci.
    1 sept. 2021 à 10 h 40
    #11
    Démarrer sujet
    Habs 2010
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2020
    Messages: 1,518
    Mentions "j'aime": 951
    Quoting: Campabee
    Shanesaw9 fair enough on the Drouin points it was definitely under a different system and things could be different but Drouin has had way way way more chances than KK will ever get. Drouin is not good enough defensively to play center in the NHL though. I just don't see Drouin as an option at center, I really like Drouin though he has a spot on the team just not at center.


    I won't dispute this, it's entirely possible (maybe more of a certainty) that Drouin is unable to handle the responsibility of being a C but I'm not against giving him a chance (just make sure there is a plan B). I personally feel like I've seen a difference in Drouin's game defensively over the last two years and he has more compete than when he was a C in his first year.

    I think Drouin gets dumped on a lot in MTL because he hasn't live up to expectations, but I think those expectations were and still are entirely unfair. He is still a good player IMO, just don't expect him to be a great player.
    1 sept. 2021 à 10 h 50
    #12
    Démarrer sujet
    Habs 2010
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2020
    Messages: 1,518
    Mentions "j'aime": 951
    Quoting: evelutions2
    Coming from a canes fans perspective, I really like KK and I think his development has been severely limited by the Habs. Assuming that the Habs do not match the offer sheet, canes fill their hole at 2LW. KK would be playing with Trocheck and Necas on that second line, and in theory, he should excel on that line and become a higher offensive threat. Contract extensions would be the big chatter with KK after January 1st, 2022, and that way, CAR can avoid that 6.1 mil QO. KK should be taking a big step forward this year assuming he ends up with the Canes. Plus, if the comparisons to Barkov end ip being true, and KK develops into that extremely elite forward that Barkov is, it would be worth every penny of the 1st and 3rd. KK, depending on how he performs on Trocheck’s wing, could act as leverage for the Canes to resign Trocheck.

    The main reason for the offer sheet to KK was to get revenge for Aho. But the OS also was extended with the purpose of filling a hole that the Canes have. The canes were trying to trade for KK before sending the OS.

    I have seen so much unwarranted bashing of KK because he signed the OS it’s ridiculous. If you look at one of Nick Suzuki’s quotes on the OS to KK, he even says that it is good for KK. I don’t believe KK had any intentions of screwing over the Habs, but I guarantee anyone who is offered 3 times the amount they are actually worth will take that deal.

    Carolina is also kind of trying to recreate team Finland, so there’s that connection as well.


    Agreed 100% that his development has been hampered by the habs. That said I wouldn't be so sure he will fill a hole for Carolina next season, maybe down the road he could.

    He was given an opportunity to play Wing on MTL's top in with Danault and Gallagher last season and he looked out of place, so I'm honestly not sure KK will fit in on Carolina's LW as well as you think. Given that Carolina's C core is currently stacked with Aho, Trocheck, and Staal wing is the only realistic spot for KK, however I'm not sure he is an upgrade over any of Carolina's top 6 wingers.

    I don't think anyone is comparing him to Barkov or Koptiar anymore... I recently made a comparison to Couturier with respect to how he didn't crack 40 pts until he was 25 and now he's a 70+ pt C, however Couturier also won't make more than $6M a year until he turns 30 next season plus he has won the Selke.

    I like KK, and it's a shame it hasn't come together for him yet, maybe you're right and he will figure it out in Carolina, but honestly I think he'd have a better chance in Montreal where he would be the undisputed 2C this year.
    Campabee a aimé ceci.
    1 sept. 2021 à 11 h 5
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 15,493
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,431
    Quoting: Shanesaw9
    I won't dispute this, it's entirely possible (maybe more of a certainty) that Drouin is unable to handle the responsibility of being a C but I'm not against giving him a chance (just make sure there is a plan B). I personally feel like I've seen a difference in Drouin's game defensively over the last two years and he has more compete than when he was a C in his first year.

    I think Drouin gets dumped on a lot in MTL because he hasn't live up to expectations, but I think those expectations were and still are entirely unfair. He is still a good player IMO, just don't expect him to be a great player.


    I like Drouin and even don't see why many think he is overpaid. When you look around the league at similar players with similar numbers, they get paid between 4.5-6 Mil. Drouin has definitely been better defensively than what he was but still not up to what you would expect an NHL center to be IMO. I understand that we need many alternate plans and Drouin maybe should be an option just more like a plan D, E or F IMO.
    1 sept. 2021 à 11 h 11
    #14
    Habs4ever
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 2,728
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,195
    Seeing as I’m having hockey withdrawals, this was a better read than some of the articles I read from sports writers. I agree with all of it.

    Evans and Poehling are good players. My only cringe moment was reading Drouin at C. Yes it was a disaster but he’s older now and maybe with a better supporting cast it wouldn’t be as bad.

    I’m looking forward to seeing what Habs do. I like the team and don’t agree with the negative bashing on here and other sites.
    Shanesaw9 a aimé ceci.
    1 sept. 2021 à 12 h 8
    #15
    Lets Get Kraken
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2021
    Messages: 8,639
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,470
    Quoting: Shanesaw9
    Agreed 100% that his development has been hampered by the habs. That said I wouldn't be so sure he will fill a hole for Carolina next season, maybe down the road he could.

    He was given an opportunity to play Wing on MTL's top in with Danault and Gallagher last season and he looked out of place, so I'm honestly not sure KK will fit in on Carolina's LW as well as you think. Given that Carolina's C core is currently stacked with Aho, Trocheck, and Staal wing is the only realistic spot for KK, however I'm not sure he is an upgrade over any of Carolina's top 6 wingers.

    I don't think anyone is comparing him to Barkov or Koptiar anymore... I recently made a comparison to Couturier with respect to how he didn't crack 40 pts until he was 25 and now he's a 70+ pt C, however Couturier also won't make more than $6M a year until he turns 30 next season plus he has won the Selke.

    I like KK, and it's a shame it hasn't come together for him yet, maybe you're right and he will figure it out in Carolina, but honestly I think he'd have a better chance in Montreal where he would be the undisputed 2C this year.


    I don’t think the danault Gallagher line was the top offensive line for the Habs, but the top defensive line I would believe. I think he was being used in a more defensive role, which didn’t allow him to develop into the offensive player that he could be. In Carolina he would be used as an offensive forward. If KK had been playing with Suzuki and caufield his numbers would probably be a bit higher, but we don’t know that for sure. Players have their own unique playing styles, and I don’t think that KK is that kind of defensive player.
    Shanesaw9 a aimé ceci.
    1 sept. 2021 à 12 h 24
    #16
    Démarrer sujet
    Habs 2010
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2020
    Messages: 1,518
    Mentions "j'aime": 951
    Quoting: evelutions2
    I don’t think the danault Gallagher line was the top offensive line for the Habs, but the top defensive line I would believe. I think he was being used in a more defensive role, which didn’t allow him to develop into the offensive player that he could be. In Carolina he would be used as an offensive forward. If KK had been playing with Suzuki and caufield his numbers would probably be a bit higher, but we don’t know that for sure. Players have their own unique playing styles, and I don’t think that KK is that kind of defensive player.


    True I was going to mention that but forgot... and I just realized he was actually playing with Danault and Tatar because Gallagher was injured.

    Agreed if he's a wing he would have to be given an offensive opportunity, I always wanted to see what Suzuki and KK could do together on a line but I don't think it was ever even given a shot by habs management.

    He was a winger in the LIIGA when he was drafted so he does have experience there, it just might be a bit of an adjustment having not played there recently.
    evelutions2 a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage