SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

leave seattle nothing worth taking

Créé par: DEdward
Équipe: 2021-22 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 5 juill. 2021
Publié: 5 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
trades before expansion
Benson for Smith
Jones for Strome

Larsson deal after expansion

protection list
7-3-1
McDavid, Draisaitl, Nuge, Yamamoto, Puljujarvi, Strome, Smith
Nurse, Bear, Lagesson
Skinner

Enough cap flexibility left for next year to sign RFAs/UFAs Nurse, Bear, Puljujarvi, Strome and room for rookies Holloway and Broberg to make team.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
1850 000 $
21 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 000 000 $
12 000 000 $
33 750 000 $
54 500 000 $
44 000 000 $
12 750 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Jones, Caleb
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
2.
EDM
  1. Smith, Reilly (1 000 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
salary dump. they took a 3rd for Schmidt last year.
3.
EDM
    Seattle are actually taking Neal at 50% retained and buying out. costing each team just under $1M per year.
    Seattle gets a 2nd and an almost NHL ready D prospect.
    SEA
    1. Neal, James (1 000 000 $ retained)
    2. Samorukov, Dmitri
    3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
    4.
    EDM
    1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
    Détails additionnels:
    TB needs a cheap experienced back up
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de PIT
    Logo de EDM
    2022
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de EDM
    2023
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $80 816 839 $669 339 $907 500 $683 161 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 175 000 $1 175 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
    AG, C
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 6
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    834 167 $834 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    850 000 $850 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 2
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    C, AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 600 000 $5 600 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 4
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    725 000 $725 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    5 juill. 2021 à 14 h 38
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 399
    Mentions "j'aime": 91
    Smith a cap dump? Yeah, I don't think so lol.
    5 juill. 2021 à 14 h 40
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 7,152
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,640
    You can make no moves and it leaves Seattle with nothing worth taking
    DEdward et nikel29 a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 14 h 45
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 20,030
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
    Klefboms not exempt so you are going to risk Seattle taking a shot on him? He’s suppose to be healthy to start next season right? They could even take him just for the ltir benefits later if he’s not
    DEdward a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 14 h 46
    #4
    Pistol Pete
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 5,140
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,479
    seattle can't buy out Neal until year 2 its in the rules.
    DEdward a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 14 h 53
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    DEdward
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 70
    Mentions "j'aime": 7
    Quoting: nikel29
    Smith a cap dump? Yeah, I don't think so lol.


    Vagas seems to be in on everyone every year all while being against the cap. Smith at $5M is an overpay that they could put elsewhere.
    5 juill. 2021 à 14 h 54
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 399
    Mentions "j'aime": 91
    Quoting: DEdward
    Vagas seems to be in on everyone every year all while being against the cap. Smith at $5M is an overpay that they could put elsewhere.


    I personally don't think Smith at 5m is an overpay. But I see where you are getting at.
    DEdward a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 14 h 59
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    DEdward
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 70
    Mentions "j'aime": 7
    Quoting: coga16
    Klefboms not exempt so you are going to risk Seattle taking a shot on him? He’s suppose to be healthy to start next season right? They could even take him just for the ltir benefits later if he’s not


    There are reports that people close to Klefbom are saying he is closernto retirement than playing again. This thought also lends credibility to why Edmonton seems to be so interested in Keith.
    Seattle doesn't need LTIR help and I don't believe Klefbom's salary was covered by insurance for this injury, sorry I can't find the source it was a guest on either Oilers now or TSN 1260 Edmonton. If that is true that's a pretty expensive risk for Seattle to be taking. I think the payment os more than enough for eating $1M cap space.
    5 juill. 2021 à 15 h 0
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 20,030
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
    Quoting: DEdward
    There are reports that people close to Klefbom are saying he is closernto retirement than playing again. This thought also lends credibility to why Edmonton seems to be so interested in Keith.
    Seattle doesn't need LTIR help and I don't believe Klefbom's salary was covered by insurance for this injury, sorry I can't find the source it was a guest on either Oilers now or TSN 1260 Edmonton. If that is true that's a pretty expensive risk for Seattle to be taking. I think the payment os more than enough for eating $1M cap space.


    Seattle doesnt need LTIR help but other teams could. They could flip his contract to a team who needs it.

    You dont think Tampa would like to buy a guaranteed LTIR contract off Seattle so they can use it to keep their team depth together. They could get a good asset for that
    5 juill. 2021 à 15 h 3
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 8,322
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,970
    hawks decline
    5 juill. 2021 à 15 h 4
    #10
    Démarrer sujet
    DEdward
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 70
    Mentions "j'aime": 7
    Quoting: Zmach
    seattle can't buy out Neal until year 2 its in the rules.


    I didn't know this rule. I thought I read through them all. Thank-you.
    I wonder what it would take in a 3 way trade.
    Edmonton retains 50% trade to Seattle.
    Seattle retains 50% of remaining salary tradingbto 3rd team to buy out. Edmonton eats $1M a year while Seattle and 3rd team eat $500K each a year. Creative trade but little risk for Settle and team 3.
    5 juill. 2021 à 15 h 5
    #11
    Démarrer sujet
    DEdward
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 70
    Mentions "j'aime": 7
    Quoting: Wadejos123
    hawks decline


    I don't think they do. agree to disagree I guess
    5 juill. 2021 à 15 h 8
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 8,322
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,970
    Quoting: DEdward
    I don't think they do. agree to disagree I guess


    The only benefit to getting Caleb Jones is if it gets his brother to sign here. We don't really want Caleb. He's okay but nothing special. Strome is worth more than this
    MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 15 h 20
    #13
    MisstheWhalers
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2019
    Messages: 23,812
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,457
    Quoting: Wadejos123
    The only benefit to getting Caleb Jones is if it gets his brother to sign here. We don't really want Caleb. He's okay but nothing special. Strome is worth more than this


    I see lots of Strome trades where he's dealt for a bag of pucks, I don't get it.
    DEdward a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 15 h 20
    #14
    Démarrer sujet
    DEdward
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 70
    Mentions "j'aime": 7
    Quoting: Wadejos123
    The only benefit to getting Caleb Jones is if it gets his brother to sign here. We don't really want Caleb. He's okay but nothing special. Strome is worth more than this


    agree to disagree
    5 juill. 2021 à 15 h 28
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 24,162
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,791
    The Seattle trade, if it were even possible, is shockingly stupid. Edmonton saves just $950k x 4 and somehow that's worth a 2nd and a good prospect??

    Asset mismanagement at its finest!
    DEdward a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 15 h 33
    #16
    Démarrer sujet
    DEdward
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 70
    Mentions "j'aime": 7
    Quoting: coga16
    Seattle doesnt need LTIR help but other teams could. They could flip his contract to a team who needs it.

    You dont think Tampa would like to buy a guaranteed LTIR contract off Seattle so they can use it to keep their team depth together. They could get a good asset for that


    someone correct me if I'm wrong but this isn't how LTIR works. Tampa, if trading for Klefbom, can go over the cap the amount of his AAV but Klefbom's AAV is counted in that amount. So a team in Tampa's position doesn't actually benifit from this considering they are already over the cap for next year. Sure if he was LTIR all year and then ready for playoffs it would work but that isn't what is happening.
    5 juill. 2021 à 15 h 34
    #17
    Démarrer sujet
    DEdward
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 70
    Mentions "j'aime": 7
    Quoting: CD282
    The Seattle trade, if it were even possible, is shockingly stupid. Edmonton saves just $950k x 4 and somehow that's worth a 2nd and a good prospect??

    Asset mismanagement at its finest!


    $1M a year for 4 years. I don't want to be paying Neal just shy of $2M in years 3-4
    5 juill. 2021 à 15 h 35
    #18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2017
    Messages: 8,322
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,970
    Quoting: MisstheWhalers
    I see lots of Strome trades where he's dealt for a bag of pucks, I don't get it.


    a lot of people that don't atcually watch hawks games like to make those posts yes, there are some people on this site that know what they are talking about and then a lot that don't have a clue. But then again thats with any fan base
    5 juill. 2021 à 15 h 40
    #19
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 24,162
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,791
    Quoting: DEdward
    $1M a year for 4 years. I don't want to be paying Neal just shy of $2M in years 3-4


    Buy him out yourself and the cost is $1.9M x 4.
    Retain 50% for Seattle to buyout costs $.95 x 4.
    Savings of $.95M x 4 is not worth a 2nd and Samorukov.

    That's just incredibly poor asset management.
    DEdward a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 15 h 46
    #20
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 20,030
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
    Quoting: DEdward
    someone correct me if I'm wrong but this isn't how LTIR works. Tampa, if trading for Klefbom, can go over the cap the amount of his AAV but Klefbom's AAV is counted in that amount. So a team in Tampa's position doesn't actually benifit from this considering they are already over the cap for next year. Sure if he was LTIR all year and then ready for playoffs it would work but that isn't what is happening.


    this is in response to him retiring. He still gets paid and not playing but teams use his contract for LTIR purposes
    5 juill. 2021 à 15 h 59
    #21
    Démarrer sujet
    DEdward
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 70
    Mentions "j'aime": 7
    Quoting: coga16
    this is in response to him retiring. He still gets paid and not playing but teams use his contract for LTIR purposes


    again correct me if I'm wrong but adding Klefbom and placing him on LTIR doesn't mean Tampa gets to spend $85.2M on dressed players plus all their LTIR players. They need to get right up to the cap including LTIR for openning night roster then place on player on LTIR. They can then go over by that amount. If they are over the cap before LTIR is used the relief you recieve is simply the amount you are over not the full amount of the player's cap hit. That's why the Oilers were still up against the cap all least year dispite Klefbom being on LTIR
    5 juill. 2021 à 16 h 0
    #22
    Démarrer sujet
    DEdward
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 70
    Mentions "j'aime": 7
    Quoting: CD282
    Buy him out yourself and the cost is $1.9M x 4.
    Retain 50% for Seattle to buyout costs $.95 x 4.
    Savings of $.95M x 4 is not worth a 2nd and Samorukov.

    That's just incredibly poor asset management.


    What if anything do you thinknis fair compensation for all teams involved?
    5 juill. 2021 à 16 h 14
    #23
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 20,030
    Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
    Quoting: DEdward
    again correct me if I'm wrong but adding Klefbom and placing him on LTIR doesn't mean Tampa gets to spend $85.2M on dressed players plus all their LTIR players. They need to get right up to the cap including LTIR for openning night roster then place on player on LTIR. They can then go over by that amount. If they are over the cap before LTIR is used the relief you recieve is simply the amount you are over not the full amount of the player's cap hit. That's why the Oilers were still up against the cap all least year dispite Klefbom being on LTIR


    d if you have an unsigned RFAs for exmaple, you can wait to sign them after the guy goes on LTIR and you have the space to do it, teams can activate and use it in multiple of ways
    DEdward a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 16 h 40
    #24
    Démarrer sujet
    DEdward
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 70
    Mentions "j'aime": 7
    Quoting: coga16
    d if you have an unsigned RFAs for exmaple, you can wait to sign them after the guy goes on LTIR and you have the space to do it, teams can activate and use it in multiple of ways


    It doesn't help Tampa as they are more than $5M over the cap next year with 12F 5D and 2G signed and no Young players they can send down without risking waivers.
    It could work for some other teams, I'm not going through every team, but that still leaves the matter of still paying out the $8.25M owed to Klefbom. After the last year I'm not sure there the apatite for that.
    5 juill. 2021 à 16 h 43
    #25
    Simpleton
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 1,365
    Mentions "j'aime": 502
    Quoting: coga16
    Klefboms not exempt so you are going to risk Seattle taking a shot on him? He’s suppose to be healthy to start next season right? They could even take him just for the ltir benefits later if he’s not


    Klefbom will not be healthy to start next season and it has yet to be determined whether he will be able to play again.

    Its a given that Nurse, and Bear will be protected during the expansion draft. What is not known is whether the Oilers will sign either Larsson or Barrie before Seattle is given an exclusive window in which to negotiate with UFAs. Rumor has it that Larsson is the priority in Edmonton, if his contract is extended then he will be protected as well. If Holland chooses a 7-3-1 protection strategy, he has no room to include Klefbom or Jones.

    Given their current roster and prospect pool, it seems reasonable to project their d-core might look like Nurse/Bouchard, Broberg/Bear, Samorukov/Kesselring or Kemp. Samorukov may be ready for limited NHL exposure next season, but Broberg is probably at least one season away from regular NHL action. Signing Larsson provides time for Kesselring or Kemp to learn the pro game. With Klefbom's future in doubt, Holland has to find a veteran 2LD. He can't gamble on Klefbom being back because his team needs to improve now while not giving up its future.
    DEdward a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage