Forums/Armchair-GM

Contingency Planning for most possible outcomes

Créé par: Sagecoll
Date de création initiale: 16 juin 2021
Publié: 1 juill. 2021
Équipe: 2021-22 Rangers de New York
Description
Mika trade done before Expansion draft.
Eichel trade done post Expansion draft
Dvorak trade done post Entry Draft
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
Buchnevich, Pavel56 250 000 $
Chytil, Filip32 450 000 $
Gauthier, Julien2990 000 $
Shesterkin, Igor65 450 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
McCabe, Jake11 080 000 $
Bonino, Nick22 000 000 $
Lindgren, Charlie1750 000 $
Pysyk, Mark11 100 000 $
Sceviour, Colton1800 000 $
Transactions
1.
NYR
SEA
  1. Blackwell, Colin
2.
NYR
  1. Dumba, Matt
  2. Khusnutdinov, Marat [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 2021 ronde en 1e (PIT)
  4. Choix de 2022 ronde en 2e (MIN)
MIN
  1. Zibanejad, Mika (1 350 000 $ retained)
3.
NYR
  1. Eichel, Jack
BUF
  1. Howden, Brett [Droits de RFA]
  2. Schneider, Braden
  3. Strome, Ryan
  4. Choix de 2021 ronde en 1e (NYR)
  5. Choix de 2021 ronde en 1e (PIT)
4.
NYR
  1. Dvorak, Christian
ARI
  1. Dumba, Matt
  2. Lindbom, Olof [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 2022 ronde en 2e (MIN)
5.
NYR
  1. Carpenter, Ryan
  2. Choix de 2023 ronde en 7e (CHI)
CHI
  1. Hájek, Libor [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
  • Henrik Lundqvist: 1 500 000 $
  • Kevin Shattenkirk: 1 433 333 $
  • Dan Girardi: 1 111 111 $
  • Brad Richards: 0 $
  • Anthony Deangelo: 383 334 $
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
  • Mika Zibanejad: 1 350 000 $ (25.23%)
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGE1E RONDE2E RONDE3E RONDE4E RONDE5E RONDE6E RONDE7E RONDE
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de BUF
Logo de LAK
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2023
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $77 490 635 $0 $8 400 000 $4 009 365 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
Lafrenière, Alexis
925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
Eichel, Jack
10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
Buchnevich, Pavel
6 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
Panarin, Artemi
11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
Chytil, Filip
2 450 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
Kakko, Kaapo
925 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
Kreider, Chris
6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
Dvorak, Christian
4 450 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
Kravtsov, Vitali
925 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
Carpenter, Ryan
1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Bonino, Nick
2 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
Gauthier, Julien
990 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
Miller, K'Andre
925 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
Fox, Adam
925 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
Shesterkin, Igor
5 450 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
Lindgren, Ryan
3 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
Lundkvist, Nils
925 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
Georgiev, Alexandar
2 425 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
Jones, Zachary
925 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
Trouba, Jacob
8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
McCabe, Jake
1 080 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Rangers de New York
Rooney, Kevin
750 000 $ (0 $)
C
UFA - 1
Pysyk, Mark
1 100 000 $ (0 $)
DD
UFA - 1
Sceviour, Colton
800 000 $ (0 $)
AD, C
UFA - 1

Unités spéciales

Avantage numérique 1
Panarin, A.
Eichel, J.
Lafrenière, A.
Kreider, C.
Fox, A.
Avantage numérique 2
Lundkvist, N.
Buchnevich, P.
Kakko, K.
Kravtsov, V.
Jones, Z.
Infériorité numérique 1
Carpenter, R.
Buchnevich, P.
Miller, K.
Fox, A.
Infériorité numérique 2
Gauthier, J.
Kakko, K.
Lindgren, R.
Trouba, J.

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 juill. 2021 à 11 h 55
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 4,110
Mentions "j'aime": 2,624
Zibanejad trade only works for Minnesota if he has a reasonable extension in place.
1 juill. 2021 à 11 h 56
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,638
Mentions "j'aime": 7,010
If I'm Guerin I take this. I've wanted Zibanejad for years. Just hope he'd re-sign if we did this.
Sagecoll a aimé ceci.
1 juill. 2021 à 11 h 58
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 4,110
Mentions "j'aime": 2,624
Quoting: TanSor
If I'm Guerin I take this. I've wanted Zibanejad for years. Just hope he'd re-sign if we did this.


This is way too much value to give up if he doesn't already come with an extension.
1 juill. 2021 à 12 h 1
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,638
Mentions "j'aime": 7,010
Quoting: Caerii
This is way too much value to give up if he doesn't already come with an extension.


It's definitely a lot, I'm just a huge Zibanejad fan
Sagecoll a aimé ceci.
1 juill. 2021 à 12 h 1
#5
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 17,442
Mentions "j'aime": 7,044
Quoting: Caerii
This is way too much value to give up if he doesn't already come with an extension.



It's too much value to give up even if he does. The Eichel trade is also supremely lopsided in favor of the Rangers.
Devil et RavensShadow a aimé ceci.
1 juill. 2021 à 12 h 19
#6
W A G O N
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 23,126
Mentions "j'aime": 25,441
Not enough for Eichel but good luck next offseason
RavensShadow a aimé ceci.
1 juill. 2021 à 12 h 21
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 4,110
Mentions "j'aime": 2,624
Quoting: mokumboi
It's too much value to give up even if he does. The Eichel trade is also supremely lopsided in favor of the Rangers.


I could stomach it if he has a return, but he's still not my first choice. I have no idea why Wild fans still want to give out big contracts to other teams UFA's who are leaving their primes and about to enter their 30s though. We've complained about that for years, yet they turn around and keep making the same mistakes.
1 juill. 2021 à 12 h 46
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 975
Mentions "j'aime": 225
1) Mika Z age will make him highly likely to not be wanted even with wild needing C by wild gm whose moves has been to go younger

2) Even with Mika being close to Zuccarello, he's going to want a boatload, & doubt he resigns with Minnesota

3) Minnesota wild traded Luke kunin so Judd brackett can select Marat Khusnutdinov. So not to be disrespectful but highly doubt wild trade Marat
1 juill. 2021 à 12 h 47
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,450
Mentions "j'aime": 1,464
Quoting: Caerii
Zibanejad trade only works for Minnesota if he has a reasonable extension in place.


Guerin is welcome to negotiate one!

Not really the Rangers responsibility there to get that done.
1 juill. 2021 à 12 h 50
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 4,110
Mentions "j'aime": 2,624
Quoting: Sagecoll
Guerin is welcome to negotiate one!

Not really the Rangers responsibility there to get that done.


Sure, but you're not getting this return until Guerin has an extension in place.
1 juill. 2021 à 13 h 25
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 1,140
Mentions "j'aime": 195
Chicago would accept this
Sagecoll a aimé ceci.
1 juill. 2021 à 13 h 32
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,450
Mentions "j'aime": 1,464
Quoting: Caerii
Sure, but you're not getting this return until Guerin has an extension in place.


As was said.. it’s not the Rangers responsibility to negotiate one and it has no impact on the return.

Though not sure what you mean about the return…

Mika would be the best traded C in about a decade. I’m not sure why you’d expect the return to be less.

At this point Dumba appears to be expansion fodder with the number of teams with expansion protection slots, cap space and assets to trade In return amounting to less than a handful.

Khusnutdinov at this point is maybe 6th or 7th on the prospect depth chart. And at least 2-3 years away from touching the NHL if he even makes it.

And the pick is late in a poor draft.

The Wild would’ve literally traded no one who would be on the roster next year nor any of their top 5 prospects for what would be the best Center in the Wild’s franchise history.

If there’s any side that would be complaining about the return it’s not the Wild haha.
1 juill. 2021 à 13 h 34
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 4,110
Mentions "j'aime": 2,624
Quoting: Sagecoll
As was said.. it’s not the Rangers responsibility to negotiate one and it has no impact on the return.

Though not sure what you mean about the return…



It means you're not getting this return you've asked for unless Guerin is able to negotiate an extension prior to the trade. It's a really simple concept, it shouldn't be this difficult to understand.
If Guerin can't negotiate an extension prior to the trade taking place, you won't get this much in return.
1 juill. 2021 à 14 h 8
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,450
Mentions "j'aime": 1,464
Quoting: Caerii
It means you're not getting this return you've asked for unless Guerin is able to negotiate an extension prior to the trade. It's a really simple concept, it shouldn't be this difficult to understand.
If Guerin can't negotiate an extension prior to the trade taking place, you won't get this much in return.


LOL ok cool - Guerin's allowed to negotiate an extension. Enjoy.
1 juill. 2021 à 19 h 58
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,426
Mentions "j'aime": 1,680
I mean theres no issue with the value on the CHI trade, but it just adds another LD in the mix and someone we likely don't have a spot to protect.
1 juill. 2021 à 21 h 12
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,450
Mentions "j'aime": 1,464
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
I mean theres no issue with the value on the CHI trade, but it just adds another LD in the mix and someone we likely don't have a spot to protect.


I don't think protection is much of an issue there. Stillman/Zadorov would get picked before Hajek. Or if Keith is traded, it'll more likely be a F like Hagel/Connolly/Borgstrom
1 juill. 2021 à 21 h 16
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,426
Mentions "j'aime": 1,680
Quoting: Sagecoll
I don't think protection is much of an issue there. Stillman/Zadorov would get picked before Hajek. Or if Keith is traded, it'll more likely be a F like Hagel/Connolly/Borgstrom


Stillman and Z would b getting protected if Keith goes, Hagel and Borgstrom would also likely be protected. Adding Hajek would mean one of Stillman or Z would be unprotected and my guess is Z due to the costs associated with his next contract. I also think the leaked press release is to put Seattle off of taking him.
2 juill. 2021 à 10 h 26
#18
Jimbo1119
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,548
Mentions "j'aime": 602
Quoting: mokumboi
It's too much value to give up even if he does. The Eichel trade is also supremely lopsided in favor of the Rangers.


If you want a bona fide 1C you have to part with a lot....just the way it works since most real good teams are built out through the C position. Using this year for example some of the teams with the highest aspirations fell short largely due to weakness down the middle (Veg, COL (after Kadri out), TOR (after JT injured), etc).

As far as Eichel value...if his neck was of no concern there is almost no reasonable trade that BUF could demand which any other team would make. But the neck issue creates a world of uncertainty for which no one knows the return will be...Big game of poker here- and time does not favor BUF. The package listed here might actually be more generous than it has to be.
2 juill. 2021 à 10 h 30
#19
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 17,442
Mentions "j'aime": 7,044
Quoting: Jimbo1119
If you want a bona fide 1C you have to part with a lot....just the way it works since most real good teams are built out through the C position. Using this year for example some of the teams with the highest aspirations fell short largely due to weakness down the middle (Veg, COL (after Kadri out), TOR (after JT injured), etc).

As far as Eichel value...if his neck was of no concern there is almost no reasonable trade that BUF could demand which any other team would make. But the neck issue creates a world of uncertainty for which no one knows the return will be...Big game of poker here- and time does not favor BUF. The package listed here might actually be more generous than it has to be.


1- Heh. The Blues certainly didn't.

2- Yeah, I don;t agree with that. The package has to be 1) what Buffalo will accept & at the same time 2) what won't be bested by other teams.
2 juill. 2021 à 10 h 38
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,450
Mentions "j'aime": 1,464
Quoting: Jimbo1119
If you want a bona fide 1C you have to part with a lot....just the way it works since most real good teams are built out through the C position. Using this year for example some of the teams with the highest aspirations fell short largely due to weakness down the middle (Veg, COL (after Kadri out), TOR (after JT injured), etc).

As far as Eichel value...if his neck was of no concern there is almost no reasonable trade that BUF could demand which any other team would make. But the neck issue creates a world of uncertainty for which no one knows the return will be...Big game of poker here- and time does not favor BUF. The package listed here might actually be more generous than it has to be.


Yeah I mean there's a non-zero possibility that Eichel doesn't play hockey again following this surgery, and an almost probable likelihood he's not the same player he was.

I don't think most fans - particularly Buffalo fans - have come to terms with that yet.

This isn't Philly dealing for Lindros from Quebec. This is the Rangers dealing for Lindros from Philly.
Jimbo1119 a aimé ceci.
2 juill. 2021 à 13 h 44
#21
Jimbo1119
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,548
Mentions "j'aime": 602
Quoting: mokumboi
1- Heh. The Blues certainly didn't.

2- Yeah, I don;t agree with that. The package has to be 1) what Buffalo will accept & at the same time 2) what won't be bested by other teams.


1. Not sure who you're thinking of (ROR?) regarding that 1st response- if so this exchange for Mika isn't far from what that trade went for.
2. What BUF will accept? They have minimal leverage here- other than (as you mention) interest of other teams....but every team realizes the risk associated with his neck.
2 juill. 2021 à 13 h 48
#22
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 17,442
Mentions "j'aime": 7,044
Quoting: Jimbo1119
1. Not sure who you're thinking of (ROR?) regarding that 1st response- if so this exchange for Mika isn't far from what that trade went for.
2. What BUF will accept? They have minimal leverage here- other than (as you mention) interest of other teams....but every team realizes the risk associated with his neck.



1- Yes, Papa O'Reilly. And I certainly would not expect every team to make the boneheaded trade Buffalo did.
2- Not sure how you figure Buffalo has "minimal leverage". And yes, the interest of multiple teams pretty much cancels that theory out. Exactly.
2 juill. 2021 à 14 h 24
#23
Jimbo1119
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,548
Mentions "j'aime": 602
Quoting: mokumboi
1- Yes, Papa O'Reilly. And I certainly would not expect every team to make the boneheaded trade Buffalo did.
2- Not sure how you figure Buffalo has "minimal leverage". And yes, the interest of multiple teams pretty much cancels that theory out. Exactly.


1. Given that the some of the comments on this thread are about the return for Mika...I'm not exactly sure where you are going in criticizing BUF for their return in the ROR trade.
2. Minimal leverage because time is not on BUF side....unless PT works wonders for his neck and he is ready to start the season and play at his usual level- yet there is no information out confirming anything close to this. If he demands a trade his value drops further...and if this goes beyond next year I believe movement clauses kick in- which also hurt their leverage. And yes- there are multiple teams "interested"...but risk vs (hoped for) reward will determine how interested these teams really are.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage