SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

How much for Newhook

Créé par: HOCKEYBOY448
Équipe: 2020-21 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 18 mars 2021
Publié: 18 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Just curious is this in the ballpark? If not this, drop the second and Robertson and we include Schneider.
Transactions
NYR
  1. Newhook, Alex [Liste de réserve]
COL
  1. Georgiev, Alexandar
  2. Robertson, Matthew
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (NYR)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de BUF
Logo de NYR
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2023
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $73 941 466 $0 $10 362 500 $7 558 534 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
725 000 $725 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
825 000 $825 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
DG/DD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
833 333 $833 333 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $ (3 725 000 $$4M3 725 000 $$4M)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $ (75 000 $$75K75 000 $$75K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
809 167 $809 167 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 mars 2021 à 21 h 42
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2016
Messages: 916
Mentions "j'aime": 221
COL fans over value all their prospect that Panarin + + won't be enough to get Newhook. Get ready for COL fans to start trashing you.
HOCKEYBOY448 a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2021 à 21 h 46
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
Avs need Newhook as their future 2C. The timeline works perfectly as he will have Kadri to shelter him for his rookie year then the following year he can take on a bigger role. His 3 year ELC comes at a perfect time for the Avs and it doesnt make sense to move him even if they get fair value back
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2021 à 21 h 51
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,565
Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
Quoting: moli92
Avs need Newhook as their future 2C. The timeline works perfectly as he will have Kadri to shelter him for his rookie year then the following year he can take on a bigger role. His 3 year ELC comes at a perfect time for the Avs and it doesnt make sense to move him even if they get fair value back


Well that’s the question is this trade fair value? I understand the reasoning for wanting to keep him, I’m just curious about the actual proposal here.
18 mars 2021 à 21 h 58
#4
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,507
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
Well that’s the question is this trade fair value? I understand the reasoning for wanting to keep him, I’m just curious about the actual proposal here.


It’s hard to come up with “fair value” if you’re trading for a player who is a plan of someone’s future. We’d have to overpay for Newhook.

Change Robertson to Schneider and add Morgan Barron
HOCKEYBOY448 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2021 à 21 h 59
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,706
Mentions "j'aime": 1,646
Do they really need any more Dmen? I doubt it
Riley816 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2021 à 22 h 3
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
Well that’s the question is this trade fair value? I understand the reasoning for wanting to keep him, I’m just curious about the actual proposal here.


Newhook-level prospects arent moved for quantity, so ill say no. Im not saying that the offer doesnt have some quality pieces, but the upside is clearly way higher with Newhook in this deal

Avs are stacked on the wing and stacked on D. G is a short term need while Francouz is out, and Newhook being NHL ready with 3 years of an ELC is the last thing they should trade. Hes the perfect fit for their roster so its not really reasonable to ask COL to trade him for fair value. Plus he hasnt played an NHL game so its tough to gauge value anyway

Quoting: mhroblak
It’s hard to come up with “fair value” if you’re trading for a player who is a plan of someone’s future.


Agreed
HOCKEYBOY448, Masonh618 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2021 à 22 h 22
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 5,062
Mentions "j'aime": 2,008
Col really doesn't need dmen.

Depends on opinion on Georgiev. I'm sure Ranger fans will tell you he's better than 41st in GAA and 47 th in Sv%. Why tie up money in him when Col can use the money to re-sign Grubauer next year????
HOCKEYBOY448 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2021 à 22 h 50
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Not in the ball park
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2021 à 22 h 51
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Root
COL fans over value all their prospect that Panarin + + won't be enough to get Newhook. Get ready for COL fans to start trashing you.


No man it’s a civil conversion but if You want it start throwing jabs about over valuing, might want to look in the mirror first
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2021 à 22 h 55
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2016
Messages: 916
Mentions "j'aime": 221
Quoting: coga16
No man it’s a civil conversion but if You want it start throwing jabs about over valuing, might want to look in the mirror first


Point in case Winking with Tongue Out
18 mars 2021 à 22 h 56
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,588
Mentions "j'aime": 3,449
Here's the thing. Colorado doesn't have multiple needs. As such, they aren't going to trade a top prospect for any type of quantity. Additionally, Newhook is the only C in the system with top 6 potential (maybe Foudy but more realistically just Newhook). It will be really tough to get him for anything less than an overpay.

A guy like Barron could be move due to depth at the position. Newhook isn't going anywhere though.
HOCKEYBOY448 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2021 à 23 h 14
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,529
Mentions "j'aime": 1,070
Quoting: Root
Point in case Winking with Tongue Out


If an Avs fan made the same post for Miller, Fox, Kakko, or Laffy, we'd be having the same conversation, so sit this one out while the adults talk
coga16, TJTwolf et Masonh618 a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2021 à 23 h 19
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,529
Mentions "j'aime": 1,070
@HOCKEYBOY448 Your proposal would be akin to us asking for Miller of Fox and offering up Barron, Beaucage, a first, and a second. It doesn't help you at all right now, so why do it? Same case with Newhook. He's not established like Miller or Fox, but he means more or less the same to the team as he's the 2C to be after Kadri's deal expires. That and he could be an ELC pickup in April for us a la Makar in his rookie year.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2021 à 23 h 52
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,565
Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
Quoting: Foppa21
@HOCKEYBOY448 Your proposal would be akin to us asking for Miller of Fox and offering up Barron, Beaucage, a first, and a second. It doesn't help you at all right now, so why do it? Same case with Newhook. He's not established like Miller or Fox, but he means more or less the same to the team as he's the 2C to be after Kadri's deal expires. That and he could be an ELC pickup in April for us a la Makar in his rookie year.


I gotcha dude. I was honestly curious to see how highly thought of he is because from what I’ve seen, he looks like he’s gonna be great at the NHL level. I think our best might be trading up to draft Kent Johnson this year or get lucky and take Matthew Berniers.
TJTwolf et Anus_McLeod a aimé ceci.
19 mars 2021 à 0 h 39
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,664
Mentions "j'aime": 4,607
It's basically going to have to be a massive overpay and even then I don't think the Avs entertain it. The problem is basically that the Avs biggest needs are future #2C, #3C and back up G so with a piece like Newhook covering the future #2C, nothing coming back is going to really add up in value to the Avs, not trade value, just because of their needs. Or put it this way, if you were trading for Newhook the Avs would want a future #2C to replace Newhook and if you had that to trade there'd be no reason for either team to make the trade, ergo it doesn't happen.

Only way I could see any possibility of it happening at all would be in some kind of three way situation where there is a team that needs something else more than #2C and NYR sent that something to them, the extra team sends their #2C to COL and NYR gets Newhook, (plus obviously additional pieces involved) but you can play with that idea lol.
HOCKEYBOY448, Xqb15a et Anus_McLeod a aimé ceci.
19 mars 2021 à 0 h 55
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,526
Mentions "j'aime": 9,150
IMO here are the guys that straight untouchable, MacKinnon, Makar, Rantanen, Girard, and Byram. Basically untouchable unless there is an insane over pay, Toews, Landeskog and Newhook. The Avs hit the lottery with Byram and Newhook not just because of their talent but because of their contracts. Newhook’s projected development dovetails so perfectly with Kadri’s contract, joining the team next year and taking over the 2C the following year that COL to trade him would have to be getting an almost borderline elite C coming back, because there isn’t anybody in the pipeline that remotely has his upside as a top 6 C.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
19 mars 2021 à 0 h 58
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,565
Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
Quoting: Xqb15a
IMO here are the guys that straight untouchable, MacKinnon, Makar, Rantanen, Girard, and Byram. Basically untouchable unless there is an insane over pay, Toews, Landeskog and Newhook. The Avs hit the lottery with Byram and Newhook not just because of their talent but because of their contracts. Newhook’s projected development dovetails so perfectly with Kadri’s contract, joining the team next year and taking over the 2C the following year that COL to trade him would have to be getting an almost borderline elite C coming back, because there isn’t anybody in the pipeline that remotely has his upside as a top 6 C.


I gotcha dude. Seems like that’s one thing every Avs fan has agreed with and said on the thread. Dude looks like he’ll be a fantastic player for you guys.
Xqb15a et Anus_McLeod a aimé ceci.
19 mars 2021 à 1 h 0
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,526
Mentions "j'aime": 9,150
Quoting: Root
COL fans over value all their prospect that Panarin + + won't be enough to get Newhook. Get ready for COL fans to start trashing you.

Not the reasonable ones. Byram and Newhook are elite prospects. Barron and Helleson are top 4 d prospects. Kaut a middle 6 winger, Bowers a bottom 6 C, Annunen a starting goalie then guys with varying upside like Ranta a top 6 winger (who could bust) Foudy a middle 6 forward, Etc... Byram and Newhook aren’t getting trade not only because of their talent but because they are expected to be significant contributors on their ELC.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
19 mars 2021 à 1 h 3
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,664
Mentions "j'aime": 4,607
Quoting: Root
Point in case Winking with Tongue Out


Nah! We'd all rather trash you for being an a** than jump all over the OP for asking an intelligent question and starting a discussion about hockey.
19 mars 2021 à 9 h 57
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,529
Mentions "j'aime": 1,070
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
I gotcha dude. I was honestly curious to see how highly thought of he is because from what I’ve seen, he looks like he’s gonna be great at the NHL level. I think our best might be trading up to draft Kent Johnson this year or get lucky and take Matthew Berniers.


Totally understandable, but because of how he's looked so far, it'd have to be an overpayment. Especially because of the value in his ELC to a team like ours looking to be at the cap for the next few years. That carries incredible value when you're looking at re-signing Landeskog, Makar, and Grubauer this summer.
TJTwolf et HOCKEYBOY448 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage