SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next Season

Créé par: KingBurns
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 15 mars 2021
Publié: 16 mars 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Building off of the last post a bit...

San Jose is not in any position to make the playoffs and have a good run. I also don't think rebuilding is really an option given all the big contracts, nor do I really think it is necessary. I think if we can give Seattle a bigger contract and sign some quality players in free agency then we have a real shot in the 2021-22 season.

Trade Explanations

#1- I don't think Seattle will take Burns for free, so we would need to add some sweeteners. Gambrell is a decent prospect who could grow into a solid 3rd line forward after averaging close to a point per game in the AHL at 22 and 23 years of age. Jaros is decent and could develop into a decent 2nd pairing right-shot defenseman. The 2nd has solid value too as the 2022 draft is expected to be a strong one.

#2- Gregor is a solid prospect with middle-6 potential but I don't see anywhere for him in our lineup other than on the bottom line. He could be useful for the Caps on a team that needs youth.

#3- Same goes for Donato, not really sure where he would fill in. We just traded a 4th for him and I think he's performed well, so I think a 3rd and some scraps is a fair price.

#4- Similar situation to Gregor. Not really sure where he would slot-in other than on the 4th line and I think we could get a decent return for him.


Forward Lines

#1- Couture-Hertl-Meier
Solid top-line with our two young forwards and the captain. Good physicality and offense from Hertl and Meier could mesh well with the solid two-way ability from Couture.

#2- Kane-Danault-Labanc
A bit of everything. Kane has a solid physical game which could make up for the lack of physicality from Labanc. Danault is strong at faceoffs and solid defensively as well.

#3- Leonard-Bozak-Blichfeld
Bozak is good at faceoffs and his veteran presence could help the will-be 23-year-olds take their game to the next level.

#4- Armia-Handemark-True
With a bottom line of everyone being over 6'3 and 200 pounds, this line would be able to play a strong physical game. There is decent skill on this line as well.

Defensive Pairings

#1- With Burns gone, Karlsson would have to take the reigns as the clear #1 defenseman. Playing with EK65, Ferraro should be able to take his game to the next level.

#2- Merkley should be able to use his offensive talent knowing that Simek could cover for him with his strong shutdown game.

#3- Vlasic is fine, but nowhere close to where he used to be. Playing with the big Knyzhov, they might be able to become a sort of shutdown pair.

Goalies

Starter- Driedger has looked very solid in the small number of games he's played. He should be able to be a solid starter in the future as he is only 26.

Backup- Jones has had bright spots this season but hasn't been consistent. Playing as a backup, the extra rest should give him time to be strong in the games he will play.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
2750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
34 500 000 $
12 500 000 $
34 500 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
23 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
    Seattle
    ANA
    1. Burns, Brent
    2. Gambrell, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
    3. Jaros, Christian [Droits de RFA]
    4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
    2.
    SJS
    1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (WSH)
    WSH
    1. Gregor, Noah [Droits de RFA]
    3.
    SJS
    1. Portillo, Erik [Liste de réserve]
    2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (BUF)
    3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
    BUF
    1. Donato, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
    4.
    SJS
    1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (NYI)
    NYI
    1. Balcers, Rūdolfs [Droits de RFA]
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de BUF
    2022
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de MIN
    2023
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $67 193 696 $0 $725 000 $14 306 304 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C
    UFA
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    796 667 $796 667 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    725 000 $725 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    16 mars 2021 à 19 h 36
    #1
    sensonfire
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 11,893
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,466
    If Balcers was placed on waivers recently, he probably doesn't get the Sharks a 3rd round pick IMO.
    16 mars 2021 à 19 h 39
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 4,928
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,670
    No thx. Portillo looks like a good prospect and we have had problems with the goalie's position for a long time. Donato does little for us.
    Jdfitz77 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    16 mars 2021 à 19 h 49
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 5,229
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,875
    Nothing wrong here tbh but I think you're asking for a bit much on Gregor and maybe Balcers as well. Burns expansion compensation is a bit rich for my tastes but if that's what it takes, I wouldn't be too mad. UFA signings are solid.
    KingBurns a aimé ceci.
    16 mars 2021 à 19 h 51
    #4
    Sabres fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 4,909
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,054
    The Sabres will take Donato for a 3rd rounder, But that’s about it.
    KingBurns, Jdfitz77 et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    16 mars 2021 à 20 h 18
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Go Sharks Go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2021
    Messages: 238
    Mentions "j'aime": 116
    Quoting: sensonfire
    If Balcers was placed on waivers recently, he probably doesn't get the Sharks a 3rd round pick IMO.


    that's possible, but he's looked solid in the NHL so far so maybe that boosts his value. You're probably right tho.
    sensonfire a aimé ceci.
    16 mars 2021 à 20 h 19
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Go Sharks Go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2021
    Messages: 238
    Mentions "j'aime": 116
    Quoting: SalamiCheese
    No thx. Portillo looks like a good prospect and we have had problems with the goalie's position for a long time. Donato does little for us.


    would you do it for just the 3rd?
    Jdfitz77 a aimé ceci.
    16 mars 2021 à 20 h 24
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Go Sharks Go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2021
    Messages: 238
    Mentions "j'aime": 116
    Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
    Nothing wrong here tbh but I think you're asking for a bit much on Gregor and maybe Balcers as well. Burns expansion compensation is a bit rich for my tastes but if that's what it takes, I wouldn't be too mad. UFA signings are solid.


    I mean a point per game at 22 is really good I think, but it's possible. Maybe a 3rd + a decent player/prospect is fairer? Since he was on waivers Balcers may be less too.

    I mean it is a decent amount of compensation, but it's in places that we don't have a need for. Gambrell is good, but we have many players similar to him like Gregor/Blichfeld/Leonard/True, etc.
    Jaros is decent as well, but we have Karlsson and Merkley who should be able to play top 4 minutes on the right side for a fair amount of time.
    Losing that 2nd could hurt, but as you said, probably worth it if it gets rid of Burns' contract.
    FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
    16 mars 2021 à 22 h 36
    #8
    John Leonard Viewer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 1,325
    Mentions "j'aime": 444
    Possibly overpaid on Armia but for sure underpaid Danault. He's rejected a 4x5 from MTL. I would also strongly consider buying out Jones, just the term is a little brutal
    16 mars 2021 à 22 h 43
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Go Sharks Go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2021
    Messages: 238
    Mentions "j'aime": 116
    Quoting: jfrojelin
    Possibly overpaid on Armia but for sure underpaid Danault. He's rejected a 4x5 from MTL. I would also strongly consider buying out Jones, just the term is a little brutal


    Oh, I didn't know. We still have a million in cap space so would 5.5 do the trick?

    Jones' save percentage is obviously terrible, but he's had some great games and some terrible ones, terribly inconsistent. I think he could be decent as a backup tho. We'll see how the rest of the season goes.
    17 mars 2021 à 0 h 2
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 5,120
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,850
    I like Donato, but he’s a 3rd line player
    We do have UPL as a really good goalie prospect, but he isn’t a sure thing either- so I’d like us to hang on to Portillo

    If u wanna dump Donato for a pick, maybe
    Not for a 3rd though- maybe a 4th
    If we are about to trade Eichel & go into a rebuild, then we’d likely want to keep all our picks
    gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    17 mars 2021 à 0 h 51
    #11
    Démarrer sujet
    Go Sharks Go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2021
    Messages: 238
    Mentions "j'aime": 116
    Quoting: Jdfitz77
    I like Donato, but he’s a 3rd line player
    We do have UPL as a really good goalie prospect, but he isn’t a sure thing either- so I’d like us to hang on to Portillo

    If u wanna dump Donato for a pick, maybe
    Not for a 3rd though- maybe a 4th
    If we are about to trade Eichel & go into a rebuild, then we’d likely want to keep all our picks


    I mean I personally think he's worth a 3rd but the main point is to get rid of him so ig a 4th is fine
    17 mars 2021 à 1 h 49
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 5,120
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,850
    Quoting: KingBurns
    I mean I personally think he's worth a 3rd but the main point is to get rid of him so ig a 4th is fine


    U might be able to get a 3rd for him somewhere,
    but that could be pushing it
    KingBurns a aimé ceci.
    17 mars 2021 à 13 h 26
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 5,229
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,875
    Quoting: KingBurns
    I mean a point per game at 22 is really good I think, but it's possible. Maybe a 3rd + a decent player/prospect is fairer? Since he was on waivers Balcers may be less too.

    I mean it is a decent amount of compensation, but it's in places that we don't have a need for. Gambrell is good, but we have many players similar to him like Gregor/Blichfeld/Leonard/True, etc.
    Jaros is decent as well, but we have Karlsson and Merkley who should be able to play top 4 minutes on the right side for a fair amount of time.
    Losing that 2nd could hurt, but as you said, probably worth it if it gets rid of Burns' contract.


    Yeah probably something more like that. Unfortunately guys who aren't really proven in the NHL aren't gonna draw a ton of value I think. Balcers is more established but still doesn't have a ton of experience and Gregor is just a tweener at the moment. As for the expansion draft, losing another 2nd kinda sucks and Gambrell is one of the few centers that we've had in our system that is both a good skater and a solid 200-foot game. But like I said, if that's what it takes to dump burns it's fine, it just stings.
    KingBurns a aimé ceci.
    17 mars 2021 à 14 h 31
    #14
    AllJonedOut
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 1,463
    Mentions "j'aime": 266
    Why trade backers of Gregor and then sign armia to put on the 4th line. And also Gregor doesn’t fetch a 2nd.
    17 mars 2021 à 18 h 46
    #15
    Démarrer sujet
    Go Sharks Go
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2021
    Messages: 238
    Mentions "j'aime": 116
    Quoting: Ihaveajoner
    Why trade backers of Gregor and then sign armia to put on the 4th line. And also Gregor doesn’t fetch a 2nd.


    Because I don't really think it's worth it to put guys with lot's of potential on the 4th line. Maybe wishful thinking, but I think it's possible.
    AllJonedOut a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage