SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next Year

Créé par: SevenLeg
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 12 févr. 2021
Publié: 12 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
26 000 000 $
810 000 000 $
23 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
2800 000 $
22 550 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 000 000 $
1750 000 $
22 000 000 $
11 050 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Eriksson, Loui
  2. Holtby, Braden
  3. Juolevi, Olli [Droits de RFA]
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
2.
VAN
  1. Bennett, Sam [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Louis Domingue
3.
VAN
    Seattle
    ANA
    1. Motte, Tyler
    Détails additionnels:
    Protection List :

    Boeser, Horvat, Miller, Kane, Bennett, Gaudette, Pettersson
    Schmidt, Rafferty, Brisebois
    Demko

    Notable Exposures :
    Motte, MacEwen, Roussel, Domingue, Beagle
    Frais appliqués
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    2022
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    2023
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2281 500 000 $74 421 022 $648 780 $232 500 $7 078 978 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
    C
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    825 000 $825 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    DG
    RFA
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    800 000 $800 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    12 févr. 2021 à 18 h 39
    #1
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,736
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,467
    Technically, should SJ make this trade, they'd more or less give Simek for free to Seattle, as they'd have to protect Juolevi.

    It's an interesting trade idea, but I think ExD kinda ruins it. I don't see them risking losing their best LHD.

    That being said, it's kind of sad that a player like Simek actually is Sharks' best LHD lol.
    SevenLeg a aimé ceci.
    12 févr. 2021 à 18 h 40
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 7,897
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,396
    The 2021 1st is probably gonna be top 5 so there's no way it gets moved. Edler is probably done in Vancouver I could see them signing Savard to play with Hughes. Podkolzin should also be here
    SevenLeg a aimé ceci.
    12 févr. 2021 à 18 h 42
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    Hop on the Slaftrain
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 16,188
    Mentions "j'aime": 20,503
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Technically, should SJ make this trade, they'd more or less give Simek for free to Seattle, as they'd have to protect Juolevi.

    It's an interesting trade idea, but I think ExD kinda ruins it. I don't see them risking losing their best LHD.

    That being said, it's kind of sad that a player like Simek actually is Sharks' best LHD lol.


    I'm not that high on Simek tbh. I'm not too familiar with the Sharks, but I think he could be replaced via free agency, despite him having great chemistry with Burns. Also, if I'm not mistaken, Juolevi has to play 18 more games to be eligible.
    12 févr. 2021 à 18 h 45
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Hop on the Slaftrain
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 16,188
    Mentions "j'aime": 20,503
    Quoting: TheAlien
    The 2021 1st is probably gonna be top 5 so there's no way it gets moved. Edler is probably done in Vancouver I could see them signing Savard to play with Hughes. Podkolzin should also be here


    Make it a 2022 then, I should have thought of that. I don't know about Savard, he's already over 30 and will likely sign long-term. I'd look for a RHD via trade. I think it's safe to assume that Podkolzin will spend some time in the AHL, just like Denisenko.
    12 févr. 2021 à 18 h 46
    #5
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,736
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,467
    Quoting: SevenLeg
    I'm not that high on Simek tbh. I'm not too familiar with the Sharks, but I think he could be replaced via free agency, despite him having great chemistry with Burns. Also, if I'm not mistaken, Juolevi has to play 18 more games to be eligible.


    Well tbh he's going to play those 18 games this year, but there's no game restriction to get eligible. As long as the player is playing his 3rd pro year, he becomes eligible.

    SJ seems to be high on Simek though.
    12 févr. 2021 à 18 h 48
    #6
    Grierless Sharks Fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2017
    Messages: 2,978
    Mentions "j'aime": 934
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Technically, should SJ make this trade, they'd more or less give Simek for free to Seattle, as they'd have to protect Juolevi.

    It's an interesting trade idea, but I think ExD kinda ruins it. I don't see them risking losing their best LHD.

    That being said, it's kind of sad that a player like Simek actually is Sharks' best LHD lol.


    Sharks best LD is Ferraro.
    ASharksFan et MJC13 a aimé ceci.
    12 févr. 2021 à 18 h 49
    #7
    Grierless Sharks Fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2017
    Messages: 2,978
    Mentions "j'aime": 934
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Well tbh he's going to play those 18 games this year, but there's no game restriction to get eligible. As long as the player is playing his 3rd pro year, he becomes eligible.

    SJ seems to be high on Simek though.


    Simek was great the first year he was here, but he's still coming back from injury sadly. He could get back though and has been improving.
    justaBoss a aimé ceci.
    12 févr. 2021 à 18 h 49
    #8
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,736
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,467
    Quoting: goodfella
    Sharks best LD is Ferraro.


    Ain't something to be happy about, really...
    12 févr. 2021 à 18 h 50
    #9
    Grierless Sharks Fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2017
    Messages: 2,978
    Mentions "j'aime": 934
    Assuming VAN is one of Kane's 3 teams, this could happen.
    12 févr. 2021 à 18 h 51
    #10
    Grierless Sharks Fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2017
    Messages: 2,978
    Mentions "j'aime": 934
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Ain't something to be happy about, really...


    Actually, it is. He's underrated. He's playing top line quite a lot lately and doing fairly well. Have you watched any Sharks games this year?
    papishark et MJC13 a aimé ceci.
    12 févr. 2021 à 18 h 53
    #11
    What in tarnation
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 32,736
    Mentions "j'aime": 31,467
    Quoting: goodfella
    Actually, it is. He's underrated. He's playing top line quite a lot lately and doing fairly well. Have you watched any Sharks games this year?


    I've wanted to, but it's near impossible as I live in Europe and their games start like 6 AM my time.
    12 févr. 2021 à 18 h 53
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 7,897
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,396
    Quoting: SevenLeg
    Make it a 2022 then, I should have thought of that. I don't know about Savard, he's already over 30 and will likely sign long-term. I'd look for a RHD via trade. I think it's safe to assume that Podkolzin will spend some time in the AHL, just like Denisenko.


    Ya I agree the price would have to be right for Savard but I can almost guarantee Podkolzin isn't gonna be sent to the AHL
    12 févr. 2021 à 18 h 59
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 5,267
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,892
    Gonna be a no thanks from the Sharks. First probably covers Eriksson but Juolevi and Holtby aren't what the doctor ordered in both need and value if we're shipping out Kane as well.
    ASharksFan a aimé ceci.
    12 févr. 2021 à 19 h 6
    #14
    Démarrer sujet
    Hop on the Slaftrain
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2019
    Messages: 16,188
    Mentions "j'aime": 20,503
    Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
    Gonna be a no thanks from the Sharks. First probably covers Eriksson but Juolevi and Holtby aren't what the doctor ordered in both need and value if we're shipping out Kane as well.


    I think shipping out Kane is what's best going forward. The team is going nowhere with these massive contracts, and Kane most be the most moveable but has a 28-teams no trade list. The options are limited, Vancouver could be one of three destinations, Kane being from there. After Eriksson expires this year, you've got a 1st, a young dman with top 4 potential & an improvement over Jones in net that could be re-signed cheaper. This is just my personal view.
    FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
    12 févr. 2021 à 19 h 11
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 8,799
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
    Quoting: justaBoss
    Ain't something to be happy about, really...


    Ferraro is fantastic. I have no issue with him being the best LHD. It would be awesome if Vlasic wasnt dog**** but cant wish for the impossible
    12 févr. 2021 à 19 h 15
    #16
    Grierless Sharks Fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2017
    Messages: 2,978
    Mentions "j'aime": 934
    Quoting: justaBoss
    I've wanted to, but it's near impossible as I live in Europe and their games start like 6 AM my time.


    I wouldn't get up at 6am to watch Sharks games and I'm in their time zone. I'm too old.
    SevenLeg et justaBoss a aimé ceci.
    12 févr. 2021 à 19 h 43
    #17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 5,267
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,892
    Quoting: SevenLeg
    I think shipping out Kane is what's best going forward. The team is going nowhere with these massive contracts, and Kane most be the most moveable but has a 28-teams no trade list. The options are limited, Vancouver could be one of three destinations, Kane being from there. After Eriksson expires this year, you've got a 1st, a young dman with top 4 potential & an improvement over Jones in net that could be re-signed cheaper. This is just my personal view.


    You have some decent points here. I agree the team has a stupid amount of bad contracts and Kane is probably one of the more moveable assets. Vancouver could very well be one of the teams on his trade list. We all know Eriksson is...well...Eriksson. Not much to say there but like I mentioned earlier the first probably covers the cap dump.

    I just don't really know how to feel about Juolevi and Holtby. I know Juolevi is starting to come around but I'm not sure he's what we need really. I like him but I can't say I see him being anything more than a decent 2nd pair defensman. I could be wrong there but that's just my outlook at this stage. Holtby is okay as well but feels redundant if we don't find a way to trade or buyout Jones.

    At the end of the day getting rid of Kane just feels silly because of all the overpaid contracts on this team, his is probably the least harmful at the moment. Not a bad trade but it's also not one which turns the needle a lot.
    SevenLeg a aimé ceci.
    12 févr. 2021 à 20 h 9
    #18
    Hockey Fan13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2019
    Messages: 3,935
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,497
    I think if the Sharks came to the realization that they need big changes then they consider this, but I would like to see the deal changed up to have Vancouver retain some money here even money in and out. So if Canucks retained roughly 3 million I think it's closer also I feel like Canucks would lottery protect the 1st rounder.
    Not sure Sharks would mind losing Simek in expansion at this point.
    SevenLeg a aimé ceci.
    12 févr. 2021 à 20 h 18
    #19
    SJSharksNews
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2021
    Messages: 19
    Mentions "j'aime": 10
    As a Sharks Fan I want absolutely no part of that deal at all
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage