Modifié 24 déc. 2020 à 13 h 36
Quoting: HatterTParty
Just for the record, I wasn’t and have no intention of comparing them to other successful teams. I certainly don’t think I did in that comment.
Since it’s brought up though, just remember neither the bruins nor the penguins are rebuilding yet. In Boston’s case, their players, coaching, and management have just willed themselves to keep competing as long as possible and that will come to an end eventually. With Pittsburgh, crosby and malkin are literally so good that they themselves just will that team to be a playoff team year in and year out. They are close to the end too. In both cases though, they’ve still managed to compete far longer than the hawks either because of better players, better management, or a combo of both.
With the kings, based on just pure potential, I have to disagree with you. The prospect pool they are making is just ridiculous and it’s helping that they are accepting that their time was over years ago. I would gladly bet they would win another cup before the hawks do honestly. Everyone in that organization from top to bottom is in sync with each other.
As for the hawks, I very clearly stated our under 25s are very good, but i do emphasize on paper they do. That’s not a hit on them, but more of a concern about the people coaching and managing them. Then you factor injuries into it. Hawks did fine “retooling” by getting youth but getting no where fast, now we will see what an actual “rebuild” will look like.
No, but I compared them since it's a good relevant reference.
Pens are pretty much at the end, some would argue last year they were. The Bruins are getting close and they don't nearly have anything as close to the success the Hawks have had in the last decade. Pens have, but their back to back cups came after the Hawks, but now their runway is out. In both cases, neither had the success of the Hawks did over 10 years winning 3 cups; maybe you can argue the Pens but the 2009 squad was pretty different then the 2016 and 2017 squad.
The Kings I'd argue don't have the young talent the Hawks do. They have a good prospect pool but a lot more unproven young talent then the Hawks. Further, that organization has been going through a rebuild for how long? 19/20 = 1 point above last place, 18/19 = last place. In the last 6 seasons, they've made the playoffs twice and have only won 1 game in the playoffs. They are not an organization to idealize Hatter, no way you can spin it.
Not only on paper, but actually on the ice and results from guys like Dach, Strome, Debrincat, Kubalik, Highmore (who I personally love), Carlsson, Boqvist at an incredibly young age for a D guy. Then all the reinforcements coming along and Hawks likely are a lottery pick and a guy like Power would make the Hawks youth movement top 3 in the league with a guy like him added. Why don't we just wait to see if McD was the problem or Bowman?