SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Team Canada today not in 2022

Créé par: habslover43
Équipe: 2020-21 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 25 nov. 2020
Publié: 25 nov. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Let me know what you think or if I missed anyone.

I tried to balance the team with a mix of new faces and old ones from previous olympic games and world cup.

This is the most realistic and strongest lineup imo.
I already know i am going to get hate for including some players. If you do not like my picks, tell me why instead of insulting me or just saying he should not be on there. Tell me who you would have instead.
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2799 999 999 $195 393 476 $0 $0 $-95 393 477 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 333 333 $4 333 333 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
8 800 000 $8 800 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
5 200 000 $5 200 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 nov. 2020 à 17 h 36
#1
I make typos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 5,324
Mentions "j'aime": 4,991
Hart should be in here not Kuemper
25 nov. 2020 à 17 h 39
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,180
Mentions "j'aime": 664
Quoting: oilersguy
Hart should be in here not Kuemper


😂😂😂
habslover43 a aimé ceci.
25 nov. 2020 à 17 h 40
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,749
Mentions "j'aime": 7,382
Doughty shouldn't be there now, but he qould be because team canada always loves to invite a couple guys who uses to be really good but refuse to acknowledge they arnt anymore
Xqb15a, oilersguy et bhavikp27 a aimé ceci.
25 nov. 2020 à 17 h 41
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,474
Mentions "j'aime": 9,109
Makar will push his way into the team. Also just because they could do it I’d die to see a McDavid, Crosby MacKinnon line.
oilersguy a aimé ceci.
25 nov. 2020 à 17 h 41
#5
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,231
Mentions "j'aime": 7,011
I think this is pretty good. I actually think the big media surprise would be doughty over Hamilton. I expect that to happen though. Hockey canada loves doughty and hates dougie
oilersguy a aimé ceci.
25 nov. 2020 à 17 h 44
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,586
Mentions "j'aime": 5,457
I would have different lines but if I'm only talking about the roster: no Toews, Doughty, Weber, Binnington for me. Spurgeon, Ellis for the two defenseman and Hart in.

Agreed with the rest and it's realistic.
oilersguy a aimé ceci.
25 nov. 2020 à 17 h 45
#7
I make typos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 5,324
Mentions "j'aime": 4,991
Quoting: lebronisdagoat
😂😂😂


what is wrong with Hart, imo Hart is better than price, although Kuemper could probably make it over Binnington
bhavikp27 a aimé ceci.
25 nov. 2020 à 17 h 46
#8
I make typos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 5,324
Mentions "j'aime": 4,991
Quoting: bhavikp27
I would have different lines but if I'm only talking about the roster: no Toews, Doughty, Weber, Binnington for me. Spurgeon, Ellis for the two defenseman and Hart in.

Agreed with the rest and it's realistic.


100% agree
bhavikp27 a aimé ceci.
25 nov. 2020 à 18 h 7
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
if this was all about skill I would say yeah close.
But this is about winning, and you look at what team USA is going to ice, and it's bigger, grittier and also has a lot of skill. AND you just know it will be coached by Torts or something.
I other words, this can't be the team that goes up against that. You look at that top 12, you got Stone and Scheifele.
Its one thing if you got a team with less skill you can get around the physicality of the game they will bring. It's another when they are physical and they are just as dangerous.
This team wouldn't win. they need to put something together that has a bit more bite.
25 nov. 2020 à 18 h 15
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 40
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: pharrow
if this was all about skill I would say yeah close.
But this is about winning, and you look at what team USA is going to ice, and it's bigger, grittier and also has a lot of skill. AND you just know it will be coached by Torts or something.
I other words, this can't be the team that goes up against that. You look at that top 12, you got Stone and Scheifele.
Its one thing if you got a team with less skill you can get around the physicality of the game they will bring. It's another when they are physical and they are just as dangerous.
This team wouldn't win. they need to put something together that has a bit more bite.


Remember the world cup when the U.S did exactly what you described. They put together a tough and gritty team to "beat Canada" and they completely failed. It is not smart to sacrifice a skilled player for a slower and tougher one just because you need more grit. Looking at this lineup, who would you sacrifice and who would you add realistically to add more grit.
25 nov. 2020 à 18 h 20
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,060
Mentions "j'aime": 12,070
Quoting: oilersguy
Hart should be in here not Kuemper


Hart should be there imo, but for Binnington, not Kuemper. Over the last two years, Kuemper is clearly the top of the heap for Team Canada imo.
oilersguy a aimé ceci.
25 nov. 2020 à 18 h 37
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: habslover43
Remember the world cup when the U.S did exactly what you described. They put together a tough and gritty team to "beat Canada" and they completely failed. It is not smart to sacrifice a skilled player for a slower and tougher one just because you need more grit. Looking at this lineup, who would you sacrifice and who would you add realistically to add more grit.


that team was no where near what they have now.
they ain't slower with less skill. what part of that don't you get.

Look at that team and read the comments.
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/2115802

Ain't no part of that team "slow and less skilled"
25 nov. 2020 à 18 h 48
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 3,446
Mentions "j'aime": 1,805
Quoting: Xqb15a
Makar will push his way into the team. Also just because they could do it I’d die to see a McDavid, Crosby MacKinnon line.


Quoting: oilersguy
Hart should be in here not Kuemper


Makar will make it for sure. Today, Hart is debatable rn but by 2022 he could be the best in the league
oilersguy et Xqb15a a aimé ceci.
25 nov. 2020 à 18 h 50
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
I know it would force a tough decision or two but I think inviting chemistry to the team gets taken into consideration for that reason I could see nuge getting the invite because him and mcdavid complement each other extremely well. I’d love to see nuge mcdavid stone let’s mcdavid think 100% offence
oilersguy a aimé ceci.
25 nov. 2020 à 19 h 3
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 40
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: pharrow
that team was no where near what they have now.
they ain't slower with less skill. what part of that don't you get.

Look at that team and read the comments.
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/2115802

Ain't no part of that team "slow and less skilled"


I said who on team Canada would you add to add more grit and size. And that American team is not much more grittier than this team with the exception of few players. I get what you are saying perfectly well.

It doesn't make any sense when you say that this team would not win because they dont have size or grit, but they've won literally every single other competition they've been in with a same looking team, while the U.S who has had bigger and grittier and skilled players in all those competitions have not. Your argument has zero evidence to back it up.
25 nov. 2020 à 19 h 6
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 40
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: Timmah007
I know it would force a tough decision or two but I think inviting chemistry to the team gets taken into consideration for that reason I could see nuge getting the invite because him and mcdavid complement each other extremely well. I’d love to see nuge mcdavid stone let’s mcdavid think 100% offence


For sure. Kinda like Kunitz or Sharp kind of deal in 2014. It's 100% a possibility, just tough to do that and sacrifice one of these guys.
Timmah007 a aimé ceci.
26 nov. 2020 à 6 h 25
#17
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: habslover43
I said who on team Canada would you add to add more grit and size. And that American team is not much more grittier than this team with the exception of few players. I get what you are saying perfectly well.

It doesn't make any sense when you say that this team would not win because they dont have size or grit, but they've won literally every single other competition they've been in with a same looking team, while the U.S who has had bigger and grittier and skilled players in all those competitions have not. Your argument has zero evidence to back it up.


they haven't won every single game, and Canada always takes guys who have more push back. Like Weber, Getzlaf, Bouwmeester. Perry, Kunitz, Nash, Carter. I mean come on, they have had way more push back on their rosters in the past. Pronger, Heatly, Staal, Thornton.... I don't know what teams you think they are sending over there, but it's not this crap you have in your head. They have sent a lot of willing to battle it out for the gold. This is not that. At all.
26 nov. 2020 à 9 h 55
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 40
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: pharrow
they haven't won every single game, and Canada always takes guys who have more push back. Like Weber, Getzlaf, Bouwmeester. Perry, Kunitz, Nash, Carter. I mean come on, they have had way more push back on their rosters in the past. Pronger, Heatly, Staal, Thornton.... I don't know what teams you think they are sending over there, but it's not this crap you have in your head. They have sent a lot of willing to battle it out for the gold. This is not that. At all.


You still haven't even answered my question i asked you at the beginning. Those guys were on the team not because they had push back but because they were good hockey players. The only reason you might think of them as gritty us because of their size. Like I keep asking, tell me who you would have on this team instead, because it seems like the way you answer that you don't even know what it is your talking about. Those gritty guys you have on team U.S.A. are on the team because they are great hockey players. Canada has proved that they do not need grit to win games and medals, so your argument has no substance at all.
26 nov. 2020 à 11 h 14
#19
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: habslover43
You still haven't even answered my question i asked you at the beginning. Those guys were on the team not because they had push back but because they were good hockey players. The only reason you might think of them as gritty us because of their size. Like I keep asking, tell me who you would have on this team instead, because it seems like the way you answer that you don't even know what it is your talking about. Those gritty guys you have on team U.S.A. are on the team because they are great hockey players. Canada has proved that they do not need grit to win games and medals, so your argument has no substance at all.


The only reason you might think of them as gritty us because of their size.... are you kidding me? Look at that list I gave you, they aren't gritty based on just their size.
And the point is you have to build a complete roster not just a hot rod. They get this. They have done it year after year in the OG. And Canada has never proven you don't need grit to win those games, because every time they go they are bringing it.
At the end of the day it's about who wants it more. You have to be willing to go to those corners and dog fight it out to dig that puck out. They will bring in some more meat that are good players and bring a few less hot rods. Because that's how you win games.
26 nov. 2020 à 11 h 39
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 40
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: pharrow
The only reason you might think of them as gritty us because of their size.... are you kidding me? Look at that list I gave you, they aren't gritty based on just their size.
And the point is you have to build a complete roster not just a hot rod. They get this. They have done it year after year in the OG. And Canada has never proven you don't need grit to win those games, because every time they go they are bringing it.
At the end of the day it's about who wants it more. You have to be willing to go to those corners and dog fight it out to dig that puck out. They will bring in some more meat that are good players and bring a few less hot rods. Because that's how you win games.


all your doing is saying random stuff that doesn't make sense and you keep completely ignoring my question. Your fighting an argument you have no idea about.
26 nov. 2020 à 13 h 0
#21
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: habslover43
all your doing is saying random stuff that doesn't make sense and you keep completely ignoring my question. Your fighting an argument you have no idea about.


yeah random stuff, clearly, totally random, I mean has nothing to do with the actual rosters they put forward every OG, but ok, random stuff.
No one has ignored anything. Other than your ignoring facts and reality.
26 nov. 2020 à 13 h 33
#22
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 40
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: pharrow
yeah random stuff, clearly, totally random, I mean has nothing to do with the actual rosters they put forward every OG, but ok, random stuff.
No one has ignored anything. Other than your ignoring facts and reality.


You still haven't even answered my question that i asked you from your first comment on the post because you know that your wrong and have no way of giving a good answer. You keep completely ignoring it and talking about other stuff that brings nothing to the argument. Your argument has nothing to back it up and your just saying stuff that makes zero sense. And why are you getting so angry and insulting me? were just having a debate bro chill its not that deep.
26 nov. 2020 à 13 h 40
#23
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: habslover43
You still haven't even answered my question that i asked you from your first comment on the post because you know that your wrong and have no way of giving a good answer. You keep completely ignoring it and talking about other stuff that brings nothing to the argument. Your argument has nothing to back it up and your just saying stuff that makes zero sense. And why are you getting so angry and insulting me? were just having a debate bro chill its not that deep.


no one is insulting you, you lip off, so you get it back. But cry when you can't take it.
My job is not to run around rebuilding your roster.
I am simply pointing out facts for you. At no point has team Canada sent a roster to something like OG like this. Period. The proof is in the pudding but you seem to ignore it.
There were plenty of other more "skilled" guys at the time they built those rosters, but yet they CHOOSE to pick players that create a whole team and can fill all the roles a team needs.
But you keep sitting around trying to insult people with "you don't understand" and "you get angry" blah blah blah blah.
The only angry frustrated one is you.
There will be more grit on any team they take. Period. Take 2 minutes to look at past rosters and you'll figure it out.
26 nov. 2020 à 16 h 56
#24
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 40
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: pharrow
no one is insulting you, you lip off, so you get it back. But cry when you can't take it.
My job is not to run around rebuilding your roster.
I am simply pointing out facts for you. At no point has team Canada sent a roster to something like OG like this. Period. The proof is in the pudding but you seem to ignore it.
There were plenty of other more "skilled" guys at the time they built those rosters, but yet they CHOOSE to pick players that create a whole team and can fill all the roles a team needs.
But you keep sitting around trying to insult people with "you don't understand" and "you get angry" blah blah blah blah.
The only angry frustrated one is you.
There will be more grit on any team they take. Period. Take 2 minutes to look at past rosters and you'll figure it out.


Ah, I see now
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage