SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

NEW CAP SOLUTION

Créé par: Bluejackets2000
Équipe: 2020-21 Lightning de Tampa Bay
Date de création initiale: 22 oct. 2020
Publié: 23 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
TB's real problem is twofold....
signing Cirelli & Sergachev now, and
losing one of Cirelli or Point in 2021 to Seattle expansion (they have too many (6) players currently under NMC/NTC/M-NTC clauses)
Stamkos has had some recent injury issues, and at 30 with 4 years remaining, this may be the most feasible/best solution for TB.
He has meant a lot to the organization but has not yet reached "franchise" status like Crosby in Pittsburgh or Ovi in Washington (IMO)
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
24 300 000 $
24 300 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
Transactions
TBL
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (DET)
Détails additionnels:
Debate the value of the assets all you want.
I'm just putting in something to get the transaction completed.
DET
  1. Stamkos, Steven
Détails additionnels:
Stamkos likes Yzerman, as well as Bob Seger music, and agrees to waive and spend final years of his career in Motor City.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de DET
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de NSH
Logo de NJD
2022
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
2023
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $81 462 499 $0 $500 000 $37 501 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 166 666 $5 166 666 $
C, AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
833 333 $833 333 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
737 500 $737 500 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
G
UFA - 8
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 6
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 oct. 2020 à 10 h 42
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,565
Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
How do you plan on resigning Point in two years. Not hating, but that’s gonna be another mess to deal with.
Bluejackets2000 a aimé ceci.
23 oct. 2020 à 10 h 46
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 2,400
Mentions "j'aime": 866
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
How do you plan on resigning Point in two years. Not hating, but that’s gonna be another mess to deal with.


Agreed, but the 2 year bridge on Cirelli & Sergachev buys time. The Seattle expansion will help if they can move one of the NMC's of Killorn, Gourde, Palat or Johnson.
Otherwise, waive one of them like they just tried to do with Johnson recently.
Once the cap crunch is past in 2021, and salary cap (most likely) goes up, there will be a team that would take one of these players for nothing other than their contract value.
They are just kicking the can down the road and buying some time, as best they can with all of the adverse contracts they have to deal with.
HOCKEYBOY448 a aimé ceci.
23 oct. 2020 à 10 h 49
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,565
Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
Quoting: Bluejackets2000
Agreed, but the 2 year bridge on Cirelli & Sergachev buys time. The Seattle expansion will help if they can move one of the NMC's of Killorn, Gourde, Palat or Johnson.
Otherwise, waive one of them like they just tried to do with Johnson recently.
Once the cap crunch is past in 2021, and salary cap (most likely) goes up, there will be a team that would take one of these players for nothing other than their contract value.
They are just kicking the can down the road and buying some time, as best they can with all of the adverse contracts they have to deal with.


God I hope the cap goes up dude. This is just frustrating when players get jettisoned because of the cap.
Bluejackets2000 a aimé ceci.
23 oct. 2020 à 11 h 0
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 1,759
Mentions "j'aime": 801
No Cernak.

And NTCs are not required to be protected.

Try again.
Bluejackets2000 et benjgc a aimé ceci.
23 oct. 2020 à 11 h 4
#5
redw1n9s
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2016
Messages: 1,911
Mentions "j'aime": 572
Wings have no interest in a severely over-rated, over-paid 30 year old who will be injured for most of the year.

Thanks though.
23 oct. 2020 à 11 h 16
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 4,181
Mentions "j'aime": 2,928
as of right now they protect Stamkos, Cirelli, Point, Kucherov, Coleman Goodrow....... Paquette? (or something like that) Hedman, Cernak Sergachev and Vasy.

They hope that Seattle takes McD, Johnson, Killer, Palat or Gourde
23 oct. 2020 à 11 h 21
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 1,141
Mentions "j'aime": 387
Quoting: Rangsey
as of right now they protect Stamkos, Cirelli, Point, Kucherov, Coleman Goodrow....... Paquette? (or something like that) Hedman, Cernak Sergachev and Vasy.

They hope that Seattle takes McD, Johnson, Killer, Palat or Gourde


why Paquette? i would rather keep Palat or if we win a cup Maroon
23 oct. 2020 à 11 h 24
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 4,181
Mentions "j'aime": 2,928
Quoting: VastBluepuppy424
why Paquette? i would rather keep Palat or if we win a cup Maroon


Paquette, Stephens, Volkov any to leave those middle 6 contracts exposed. I'd rather keep Palat too but id rather have the cap space to keep Point. Maroon will be a UFA so Seattle wont claim him. If he wants to come back he'll sign after the expansion draft.
23 oct. 2020 à 11 h 25
#9
PlusMinus is stupid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 7,319
Mentions "j'aime": 7,154
Quoting: redw1n9s
Wings have no interest in a severely over-rated, over-paid 30 year old who will be injured for most of the year.

Thanks though.


Speak for yourself... I'd take that deal. If he's hurt, LTIR him, if he's healthy, he's still capable of being a 30+ goal scorer for at LEAST the next 3 years of the 4 left on his deal. Actual salary goes down after this season too. Now, I don't see there being any chance he'd waive his NMC, but from Detroit's perspective, you'd be crazy not to take the chance on him.
23 oct. 2020 à 11 h 25
#10
Pop Pop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 14,642
Mentions "j'aime": 8,285
Now if you used detroit in a 3 way trade with like ny and we eat maybe 1.5 or 2 million a season to get him to the rangers maybe. I love stamkos but hes not ideal for detroit but if we eat money for like a pick and player maybe.
Bluejackets2000 a aimé ceci.
23 oct. 2020 à 11 h 27
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 1,141
Mentions "j'aime": 387
Quoting: Rangsey
Paquette, Stephens, Volkov any to leave those middle 6 contracts exposed. I'd rather keep Palat too but id rather have the cap space to keep Point. Maroon will be a UFA so Seattle wont claim him. If he wants to come back he'll sign after the expansion draft.


Maroon is on a 2 year deal and palat will be the cap space for point
23 oct. 2020 à 11 h 30
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 4,181
Mentions "j'aime": 2,928
Quoting: VastBluepuppy424
Maroon is on a 2 year deal and palat will be the cap space for point


Forgot Maroon was a 2 year. And yes Palat would be the cap for Point, that's what I said. So Maroon over Paquette.
VastBluepuppy424 a aimé ceci.
23 oct. 2020 à 11 h 32
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 1,141
Mentions "j'aime": 387
Quoting: Rangsey
Forgot Maroon was a 2 year. And yes Palat would be the cap for Point, that's what I said. So Maroon over Paquette.


yea
23 oct. 2020 à 11 h 33
#14
redw1n9s
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2016
Messages: 1,911
Mentions "j'aime": 572
Quoting: DeadWingsv2
Speak for yourself... I'd take that deal. If he's hurt, LTIR him, if he's healthy, he's still capable of being a 30+ goal scorer for at LEAST the next 3 years of the 4 left on his deal. Actual salary goes down after this season too. Now, I don't see there being any chance he'd waive his NMC, but from Detroit's perspective, you'd be crazy not to take the chance on him.


What chance? What does he do for us besides take up cap space?

This team isn't contending for anything in 4 years that he is under contract. He can score 50 goals it doesn't matter.

Complete waste of space unless we are getting compensated handsomely for taking him.

Your username is quite appropriate because it looks like you'd like to have this team dead for even longer.
23 oct. 2020 à 11 h 52
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 4,181
Mentions "j'aime": 2,928
Quoting: redw1n9s
What chance? What does he do for us besides take up cap space?

This team isn't contending for anything in 4 years that he is under contract. He can score 50 goals it doesn't matter.

Complete waste of space unless we are getting compensated handsomely for taking him.

Your username is quite appropriate because it looks like you'd like to have this team dead for even longer.


He taught Kuch and Sergachev how to jail a onetimer. So there's that. You got anyone in Detroit that would benefit from playing with a guy who scored 90 points last year? differnce between building a team the way Detroit used to do vs how Detroit has failed to do it recently. What Tampa had vs what Edmonton and Buffalo has lacked. Extremely talented veteran leadership in a young team is massive.
Bluejackets2000 et DeadWingsv2 a aimé ceci.
23 oct. 2020 à 12 h 7
#16
redw1n9s
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2016
Messages: 1,911
Mentions "j'aime": 572
Quoting: Rangsey
He taught Kuch and Sergachev how to jail a onetimer. So there's that. You got anyone in Detroit that would benefit from playing with a guy who scored 90 points last year? differnce between building a team the way Detroit used to do vs how Detroit has failed to do it recently. What Tampa had vs what Edmonton and Buffalo has lacked. Extremely talented veteran leadership in a young team is massive.


I am quite confident Kuch would be scoring goals without Stamkos....The team was arguably better without him, and won a cup without him. What makes you think he is such an unbelievable leader that the Wings need?

I am sure he's a good guy, but the Wings have no reason to take on that contract unless they are incentivized to do so.
23 oct. 2020 à 13 h 26
#17
PlusMinus is stupid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 7,319
Mentions "j'aime": 7,154
Modifié 23 oct. 2020 à 13 h 43
Quoting: redw1n9s
What chance? What does he do for us besides take up cap space?

This team isn't contending for anything in 4 years that he is under contract. He can score 50 goals it doesn't matter.

Complete waste of space unless we are getting compensated handsomely for taking him.

Your username is quite appropriate because it looks like you'd like to have this team dead for even longer.


So salty. What would you prefer they spend the cap on? They still have to get to the floor. Also, I think they can contend a lot sooner than that, I would say by year 3 of his deal, they'd be legit contenders. If you think they can't by then, then this rebuild is taking WAY longer than it should anyways and we would have already wasted the prime years of our current "core"
23 oct. 2020 à 13 h 52
#18
redw1n9s
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2016
Messages: 1,911
Mentions "j'aime": 572
Quoting: DeadWingsv2
So salty. What would you prefer they spend the cap on? They still have to get to the floor. Also, I think they can contend a lot sooner than that, I would say by year 3 of his deal, they'd be legit contenders. If you think they can't by then, then this rebuild is taking WAY longer than it should anyways and we would have already wasted the prime years of our current "core"


They're at the floor....with ease. They haven't signed Bert or Mantha yet and I assume Stevie is not done trading for a cap dump or two.

They will not be contending in 3 years lol....what. They might be a Wild Card team. Unless the draft goes perfectly in our favor and EVERY single prospect turns out to be what we want/expect, then maybe contend in that time frame. Reality is that definitely won't happen.

Holland left this org and roster absolutely empty. One of the worst rosters in NHL history (both in record and on-ice talent). This will take a while.
23 oct. 2020 à 14 h 0
#19
PlusMinus is stupid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 7,319
Mentions "j'aime": 7,154
Quoting: redw1n9s
They're at the floor....with ease. They haven't signed Bert or Mantha yet and I assume Stevie is not done trading for a cap dump or two.

They will not be contending in 3 years lol....what. They might be a Wild Card team. Unless the draft goes perfectly in our favor and EVERY single prospect turns out to be what we want/expect, then maybe contend in that time frame. Reality is that definitely won't happen.

Holland left this org and roster absolutely empty. One of the worst rosters in NHL history (both in record and on-ice talent). This will take a while.

Even with Bert and Mantha signed, plus extensions for other RFAs, they will struggle to hit the floor next season, without taking on a large contract. Look long term.

Next year, they will only be bottom 10, not bottom 3. The following season, wild-card level or damn close and the season after that at least CONTENDING. They won't be a favorite for longer, for sure, I'm not arguing that. But even if only a fraction the prospects pan out, mixed in with shrewd FA periods, they can and should be expected to compete a hell of a lot sooner than 4 years+. They're already 3 years into a rebuild and even with the piss poor job Holland did with contracts, he still made some solid picks and there is a LOT in the pipeline.
23 oct. 2020 à 15 h 2
#20
redw1n9s
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2016
Messages: 1,911
Mentions "j'aime": 572
Quoting: DeadWingsv2
Even with Bert and Mantha signed, plus extensions for other RFAs, they will struggle to hit the floor next season, without taking on a large contract. Look long term.

Next year, they will only be bottom 10, not bottom 3. The following season, wild-card level or damn close and the season after that at least CONTENDING. They won't be a favorite for longer, for sure, I'm not arguing that. But even if only a fraction the prospects pan out, mixed in with shrewd FA periods, they can and should be expected to compete a hell of a lot sooner than 4 years+. They're already 3 years into a rebuild and even with the piss poor job Holland did with contracts, he still made some solid picks and there is a LOT in the pipeline.


We must have different definitions of contending, so let's agree to disagree. I'd gladly take that bet that this teams finishes bottom 3....who's worse?

Also the cap floor is no issue. Hronek and Cholo need new contracts, and there will be more UFAs and cap dumps for Stevie to take on while this team remains in the lottery.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage