SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

How good is this

Équipe: 2020-21 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 19 oct. 2020
Publié: 19 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $76 339 523 $0 $32 500 $5 160 477 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Cirelli, Anthony
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
Hoffman, Mike
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 083 333 $3 083 333 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Ullmark, Linus
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
Logo de Predators de Nashville
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 300 000 $4 300 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Fleury, Haydn
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
875 000 $875 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 2

Unités spéciales

Avantage numérique 1
Cirelli, A.
Hoffman, M.
Avantage numérique 2
Infériorité numérique 1
Cirelli, A.
Infériorité numérique 2
Fleury, H.

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 oct. 2020 à 11 h 30
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 2,495
Mentions "j'aime": 1,047
Tbh not very. hardly a playoff team. 98 pts maybe win one round.
villenash et Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
19 oct. 2020 à 11 h 32
#2
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,896
Mentions "j'aime": 23,939
2nd round possibly. Its a good team, just has some weaknesses specifically on RD and in nets
dzad96 a aimé ceci.
19 oct. 2020 à 11 h 33
#3
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 16,172
Mentions "j'aime": 20,495
Quoting: dzad96
Tbh not very. hardly a playoff team. 98 pts maybe win one round.


How? I'm curious to see your reasoning because this is easily a playoffs team in my book.
Saskleaf et csick a aimé ceci.
19 oct. 2020 à 11 h 34
#4
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,241
Mentions "j'aime": 9,191
Its ok, but not sure they win anything. Playoff team though.
dzad96 a aimé ceci.
19 oct. 2020 à 11 h 34
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 10,252
Mentions "j'aime": 7,116
Yeah, I'm not a big fan of OEL + Martinez + Deangelo -- but I like Ekholm and think Fleury + Stecher could be a fine 3rd pair. Ullmark does not provide me with any real confidence, and neither does Holtby anymore. I like their center depth, but none of them are particularly offensive guys (Bergeron does put up a lot of points now, but that's because he's sandwiched between 90+ point players in Marchand and Pastrnak. The wing depth is fine, but nothing crazy. I'd say that this team makes it to the 2nd round max.
csick, SevenLeg et dzad96 a aimé ceci.
19 oct. 2020 à 11 h 36
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 2,495
Mentions "j'aime": 1,047
Quoting: SevenLeg
How? I'm curious to see your reasoning because this is easily a playoffs team in my book.


You have a questionable goaltending tandem. Forward group is lacking star power, very average. Defense is subject. Ekholm is great, Ekman-Larsson had a bad year last year, Martinez is an average top 4 at best. Deangelo in the 2nd pairing role is fine. that 3rd pair could be okay could be very bad, you have two small offensive young guys playing together. It's just not a great team. Like I said, 98 pts and maybe a playoff round 1. This squad never wins a cup.

Also, I said playoff team. But not a lock by any means.
19 oct. 2020 à 11 h 37
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 2,495
Mentions "j'aime": 1,047
Quoting: villenash
Yeah, I'm not a big fan of OEL + Martinez + Deangelo -- but I like Ekholm and think Fleury + Stecher could be a fine 3rd pair. Ullmark does not provide me with any real confidence, and neither does Holtby anymore. I like their center depth, but none of them are particularly offensive guys (Bergeron does put up a lot of points now, but that's because he's sandwiched between 90+ point players in Marchand and Pastrnak. The wing depth is fine, but nothing crazy. I'd say that this team makes it to the 2nd round max.


Bang on. Said it better than I did.
villenash a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage