SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hanifin to Colorado

Créé par: Richard88
Équipe: 2020-21 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 4 oct. 2020
Publié: 4 oct. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Would Hanifin ($4.95m x 4 years) be a good it in Colorado, and what would the cost be to acquire him?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
45 000 000 $
32 750 000 $
22 000 000 $
22 350 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Timmins, Conor
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (COL)
Détails additionnels:
I have no idea what his value is. Please feel free to comment below.
2.
COL
    To whoever for futures. Or could be included in the Hanifin trade?
    CGY
    1. Zadorov, Nikita [Droits de RFA]
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2020
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de COL
    2021
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    2022
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2281 500 000 $74 155 595 $0 $5 425 000 $7 344 405 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    5 571 429 $5 571 429 $
    AG, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
    AD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    725 000 $725 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
    DG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
    DG/DD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    3 450 000 $3 450 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance150 000 $$150K)
    C
    RFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    4 oct. 2020 à 18 h 57
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 11,202
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
    I just don't know why you need a long term LHD, it doesn't make sense. If you really think Graves is better on the 3rd pair and that Cole doesn't belong, fine, but just get a 1-2 year stopgap top4 LD because soon enough Byram will need a spot in the top 4.

    Not sure why you'd tinker much with Girard-Makar-Byram-Timmins for the future
    NMAvsFan a aimé ceci.
    4 oct. 2020 à 19 h 2
    #2
    Flames22
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 225
    Mentions "j'aime": 31
    There seems to be pretty good value here, Calgary definitely thinks about it. The only thing is that from the Flames' perspective, Hanifin is (or at least should be) here to stay for a long time. When paired with Andersson in the playoffs, the two of them did pretty well. He's got a team-friendly deal and is still super young. Calgary's not rebuilding, so Timmins would have to be pretty close to NHL-ready. Is he? If so, Calgary might think about it.
    4 oct. 2020 à 19 h 3
    #3
    Representing the 505
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 4,492
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,682
    I feel like that's a pretty big overpay for a one-dimensional D and, as mentioned, he is going to block the younger guys from coming in.
    Richard88 a aimé ceci.
    4 oct. 2020 à 19 h 5
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    John 3 16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 9,581
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
    Quoting: leafs101
    I just don't know why you need a long term LHD, it doesn't make sense. If you really think Graves is better on the 3rd pair and that Cole doesn't belong, fine, but just get a 1-2 year stopgap top4 LD because soon enough Byram will need a spot in the top 4.

    Not sure why you'd tinker much with Girard-Makar-Byram-Timmins for the future


    I'm just playing with the idea, given that Ryan Clark said that Colorado are looking for a LHD in the $4m range.
    4 oct. 2020 à 19 h 6
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    John 3 16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 9,581
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
    Quoting: Flames22
    There seems to be pretty good value here, Calgary definitely thinks about it. The only thing is that from the Flames' perspective, Hanifin is (or at least should be) here to stay for a long time. When paired with Andersson in the playoffs, the two of them did pretty well. He's got a team-friendly deal and is still super young. Calgary's not rebuilding, so Timmins would have to be pretty close to NHL-ready. Is he? If so, Calgary might think about it.


    Timmins is very much NHL ready. He played a couple of games in the playoffs against Dallas for example.
    Flames22 a aimé ceci.
    4 oct. 2020 à 19 h 10
    #6
    Flames22
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 225
    Mentions "j'aime": 31
    Quoting: Richard88
    Timmins is very much NHL ready. He played a couple of games in the playoffs against Dallas for example.


    In that case, I think Calgary would be very interested. It would save us some money, give us a really nice young piece moving forward, and a good pick in this year's deep draft. I guess the question is whether it's something Sakic would really want to do. Either way, interesting idea!
    Richard88 a aimé ceci.
    4 oct. 2020 à 19 h 10
    #7
    Representing the 505
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 4,492
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,682
    Quoting: Richard88
    Timmins is very much NHL ready. He played a couple of games in the playoffs against Dallas for example.


    He played but he looked very uncomfortable in his own end. He's ready if he doesn't have to play a ton of minutes or play during high-pressure points of the game. I think his chances of making the team are 50/50 rather than 80/20 as many fans would like to believe. It's important to remember that he lost 18 months to concussion recovery which is brutal. He may be 22 but he's more like a 20 year-old in terms of development. There are stopgaps available so no need to put him in if he isn't ready.
    MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
    4 oct. 2020 à 19 h 33
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2017
    Messages: 8,440
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
    I saw rumours of COL adding a D man but I just dont see how adding a D would help this team more than adding a forward tbh
    4 oct. 2020 à 19 h 55
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 3,584
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
    Brodie or DeMelo make sense if they would do a year or two. Trading for a defenseman doesn't in most circumstances (imo).
    4 oct. 2020 à 19 h 59
    #10
    Démarrer sujet
    John 3 16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 9,581
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
    Quoting: moli92
    I saw rumours of COL adding a D man but I just dont see how adding a D would help this team more than adding a forward tbh


    We could do both.
    Anus_McLeod a aimé ceci.
    4 oct. 2020 à 20 h 31
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 10
    Mentions "j'aime": 1
    Calgary hangs up the phone because Sakic can't stop laughing. Timmins and 1st for Hanafin lol. Timmins for Hanafin is already unfair. Calgary would have to add a pick not Colorado. Timmins is 100% ready for the NHL and can be a 1-2 D in the near future. Yes Zads will be sold to the highest bidder. Which won't be that high at all. Good hitter but thats about it
    4 oct. 2020 à 21 h 0
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 13
    Mentions "j'aime": 0
    Timmins is 22 and has room to grow, but Hanifin is 23.. he still has room to improve and is already a solid top 4 D.
    5 oct. 2020 à 8 h 2
    #13
    Démarrer sujet
    John 3 16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 9,581
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
    Quoting: Knight44
    Calgary hangs up the phone because Sakic can't stop laughing. Timmins and 1st for Hanafin lol. Timmins for Hanafin is already unfair. Calgary would have to add a pick not Colorado. Timmins is 100% ready for the NHL and can be a 1-2 D in the near future. Yes Zads will be sold to the highest bidder. Which won't be that high at all. Good hitter but thats about it


    I don't disagree that Timmins is NHL-ready and has top 4 upside, but being realistic he hasn't proved it yet and has also had some concussion issues which may sidetrack his career.

    I'm not necessarily saying that I would trade Timmins for Hanafin, but I'm just exploring value. I really like Timmins and he fits perfectly into our long-term plans.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage