Not sure why the Rangers wouldnt be going after Danault instead

Change Robertson to Lundqvist and you might have something closer. As is, Ducks won't give up Steel with Lindholm

Ah the quantity over quality trade, haven't seen this on ACGM before

Anderson = Steel, so let's leave them out of this.

Georgiev is the offset for the cap dump, and we don't need a backup goalie, so let's leave them out of this.

Lindholm for De Angelo, Robertson, the first and the third is fair. Or you could substitute Nils Lundkvist for Robertson and the third.

Steel = Andersson?!!
What??!

I get what @OldNYIfan is saying...I wouldn't agree that Steel = Lias, but in terms of the overall value of the trade, he's 100% right. Take both of them out.

As much as I like Domi, that’s not a bad offer for him. In fact if the second was changed to this year I would be even more interested.

For MTL, I'D think about it a lot. Very interesting offer.

As usual, @Lenny7 got what I was saying: for purposes of analyzing this deal, just assume Steel is worth either Andersson or Georgiev and you see why this deal is so slanted against Anaheim. The Ducks don't need Andersson, Georgiev or the cap dump, so there's no need to include Steel in this whatever his actual value.