SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Fauteuil - DG

Byfield

Créé par: habslife
Équipe: 2020-21 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 29 juill. 2020
Publié: 29 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
66 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 250 000 $
1975 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
78 500 000 $
12 250 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Byfield, Quinton
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (LAK)
Détails additionnels:
#2 overall
LAK
  1. Caufield, Cole [Liste de réserve]
  2. Kotkaniemi, Jesperi
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (MTL)
Détails additionnels:
#9 overall
2.
MTL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (NYI)
OTT
  1. Byron, Paul (750 000 $ retained)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de LAK
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de STL
Logo de NYI
Logo de MTL
Logo de WSH
Logo de MTL
Logo de ANA
Logo de WPG
Logo de MTL
Logo de FLA
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
2021
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
Logo de STL
Logo de VGK
Logo de MTL
Logo de OTT
Logo de PHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $78 740 476 $0 $1 620 000 $2 759 524 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 083 333 $3 083 333 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Byfield, Quinton
925 000 $925 000 $
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
975 000 $975 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 juill. 2020 à 16 h 42
#1
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
MTL turns it down
29 juill. 2020 à 16 h 43
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Kings decline. Kot is an AHLer compared to Vilardi and Turcotte. Caufield can be acquired another way and we want Stutzle.
29 juill. 2020 à 16 h 49
#3
Nick
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,595
Mentions "j'aime": 823
MTL pukes and declines the LAK deal, but accept that Ottawa deal.
29 juill. 2020 à 16 h 52
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 17,007
Mentions "j'aime": 12,008
Nobody is giving up a 2nd for Byron. He's a 4th liner who can't stay healthy.
mhockey91 et MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
29 juill. 2020 à 16 h 58
#5
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
No
jpsnow13 a aimé ceci.
29 juill. 2020 à 17 h 3
#6
HabsFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,448
Mentions "j'aime": 933
I think at same age Byfield and KK where similare... so why giving on top Caufield and one of Lundell/Holtz for a uncertain 1C... this worth only if its for Laffy 1-OA
29 juill. 2020 à 17 h 23
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 658
Mentions "j'aime": 337
Quoting: Bf3351
Kings decline. Kot is an AHLer compared to Vilardi and Turcotte. Caufield can be acquired another way and we want Stutzle.


That's one hell of a wrong statment. Moving up 7spot is not worth one of the top prospect in the NHL and a 20 year old former 3rd overall pick. Yes he had a really bad second season but he still was one of the younger player to make the NHL and had a very decent season. Vilardi sure looks better but the sample is really small and he's also a year older and Turcotte did not prove anything yet even if he looks like a monster. Even if KK is not a their level (which I don't believe but the argument could be made) he still holds a lot of value and this offer is really bad for MTL. And about the "there's other way to get Caufield" not really. Beside this pick, Turcotte or Vilardi, who you won't trade anyway, there is nothing interesting enough in the entire LA organization to give Caufield for...
Subbanator7667 a aimé ceci.
29 juill. 2020 à 17 h 31
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: Daredevil514
That's one hell of a wrong statment. Moving up 7spot is not worth one of the top prospect in the NHL and a 20 year old former 3rd overall pick. Yes he had a really bad second season but he still was one of the younger player to make the NHL and had a very decent season. Vilardi sure looks better but the sample is really small and he's also a year older and Turcotte did not prove anything yet even if he looks like a monster. Even if KK is not a their level (which I don't believe but the argument could be made) he still holds a lot of value and this offer is really bad for MTL. And about the "there's other way to get Caufield" not really. Beside this pick, Turcotte or Vilardi, who you won't trade anyway, there is nothing interesting enough in the entire LA organization to give Caufield for...


Wasn't Kot projected to go in the late teens when they drafted him at 3OA? Lol
29 juill. 2020 à 18 h 9
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 658
Mentions "j'aime": 337
Quoting: Bf3351
Wasn't Kot projected to go in the late teens when they drafted him at 3OA? Lol


No he was around 9 to 12 on most list but he had a really strong international competition close to the draft and went up. Sure he was a reach but that doesn't erase everything I just said. Seider was a reach last year and it does not affect how great he looks right now. Even if KK was a 20th overall pick the offer is still not worth it if you consider his progression and what he already did since being drafted. I don't think the gap between him and Byfield or Stutzle is Caufield and the 9th overall pick in a very strong top10 draft. They sure look good but they are not concession players either.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage