SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Different Morgan Rielly Trades

Créé par: Rodzikhockey93
Équipe: 2019-20 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 23 juill. 2020
Publié: 23 juill. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
2.
TOR
  1. Boqvist, Adam
Détails additionnels:
Add ?
CHI
3.
TOR
  1. Bear, Ethan
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
EDM
4.
TOR
  1. Ekblad, Aaron
Détails additionnels:
TML Adds?
FLA
5.
TOR
  1. Turcotte, Alex [Droits de RFA]
  2. Walker, Sean
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (LAK)
LAK
6.
TOR
  1. Fabbro, Dante
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (NSH)
Détails additionnels:
Another Add?
NSH
7.
TOR
  1. Deangelo, Anthony
  2. Lundkvist, Nils [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (CAR)
NYR
8.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de NSH
Logo de CAR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de LAK
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
3681 500 000 $117 100 200 $0 $1 837 500 $-35 600 200 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 634 000 $11 634 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 893 000 $10 893 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance117 500 $$118K)
AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
720 000 $720 000 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
745 000 $745 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 juill. 2020 à 11 h 23
#26
Buljujarvi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4,209
Mentions "j'aime": 2,552
Quoting: ConnorMcHellebucyk
The oilers don’t need more LHD we’d rather have bear and the first.


Lol idk why I quoted your post
23 juill. 2020 à 11 h 29
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
Quoting: Rodzikhockey93
Well Everyone one of these teams can definetly use a top pairing LHD by the end of the offseason.

BOS for example could lose both chara and Krug potentially

CAR was for more of a TML need but Mo fits the style CAR plays with high intensity and strong puck moving

CHI if They want to try and squeeze another cup out of the Kane and Toews Era

EDM can be interested Depending on how Broberg and Bouchard perform

FLA could look for a change of scenary on the blue line

LA could look for a long term solution on the LHD especially if an extension is in sight

NSH was more of a TML idea and would not see this happening unless instead of Fabbro its Ekholm involved

Rangers have the opposite problem as the leafs as they have no LHD and All RHD

and STL could look for a way to solidify the top 4


Even if forget about broberg and bouch for a minute oilers wouldn’t pay a significant price for a LD with klef and nurse in town. Broberg and jones pushing for more time on that left side just makes it absolutely crazy to even consider.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
23 juill. 2020 à 11 h 37
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,287
Mentions "j'aime": 4,931
Hawks will keep Boqvist
23 juill. 2020 à 11 h 58
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,044
Mentions "j'aime": 7,749
Quoting: Timmah007
Oilers wouldn’t want him. No offence to him as a player is fantastic but already dealing with a log jam of promising youth there I won’t start any debate suggesting that youth is better but it’s far too good to block the progression of them


Yup. We need all of our top-4 RHD and we already have 2-3 top-4 LHD with another (Broberg) coming very soon. Zero interest in Rielly.
23 juill. 2020 à 11 h 58
#30
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,540
Mentions "j'aime": 22,687
I just wonder if some of those trades overvalue two years of Reilly before he hits UFA
hanson493 a aimé ceci.
23 juill. 2020 à 12 h 2
#31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,617
Mentions "j'aime": 2,764
Quoting: Rodzikhockey93
Well Everyone one of these teams can definetly use a top pairing LHD by the end of the offseason.

BOS for example could lose both chara and Krug potentially


as a boston fan you didnt take into account mcavoy needs a new contract in 2 years too. now you end up paying both top line dmen? and they lose their best center prospect to replace an aging bergeron and krejci? i mean "creativity" doesnt matter when you dont match the needs of the other team. not to mention if the LEAFS were starting negotiations with the bruins the price would increase regardless due to in division rivals. I just dont know why you would bother with this one as it truly would NEVER happen.
23 juill. 2020 à 12 h 9
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
Quoting: CD282
Yup. We need all of our top-4 RHD and we already have 2-3 top-4 LHD with another (Broberg) coming very soon. Zero interest in Rielly.

I wouldn’t be surprised in a year or so bear and nurse hit the trade block due to broberg and bouch coming up. It’s only a matter of time until some tough decisions need to be made but that just further points out spending assets on d right now is an incredibly huge mistake.
23 juill. 2020 à 12 h 24
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,044
Mentions "j'aime": 7,749
Quoting: Timmah007
I wouldn’t be surprised in a year or so bear and nurse hit the trade block due to broberg and bouch coming up. It’s only a matter of time until some tough decisions need to be made but that just further points out spending assets on d right now is an incredibly huge mistake.


Not a chance if I'm GM. Broberg and Bouchard, if they play fewer than 10 games this summer, have THREE YEARS on their ELC's. There is absolutely zero reason to trade anyone. IF they both keep developing at their current rate we'll end up with something like this:

Klefbom - Bear
Nurse - Bouchard
Broberg - Larsson
Jones

Based on say a $2M x 2 bridge for Bear, this corps sports THREE 1st pairs (if they continue current trajectory) and a 2nd pair spare for just $18.6M - that's incredible value. No way am I trading any of these guys.
23 juill. 2020 à 12 h 34
#34
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
Quoting: CD282
Not a chance if I'm GM. Broberg and Bouchard, if they play fewer than 10 games this summer, have THREE YEARS on their ELC's. There is absolutely zero reason to trade anyone. IF they both keep developing at their current rate we'll end up with something like this:

Klefbom - Bear
Nurse - Bouchard
Broberg - Larsson
Jones

Based on say a $2M x 2 bridge for Bear, this corps sports THREE 1st pairs (if they continue current trajectory) and a 2nd pair spare for just $18.6M - that's incredible value. No way am I trading any of these guys.


I agree with you to a certain extent I like the idea of three pairs you could be rolling out at anytime not reliant on one pair to play 25 min a night. I do like how you balanced those pairings with experience and youth that is the only reason I’d consider Larsson on third pair If rolling fairly even minutes amongst all pairings which in your case there is doable.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
23 juill. 2020 à 12 h 52
#35
MMBzFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 1,111
Mentions "j'aime": 281
Bruins say NO to giving up Carlo and Studnicka in that trade.
Silkysmooth42 et bhavikp27 a aimé ceci.
23 juill. 2020 à 13 h 19
#36
HabsFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,448
Mentions "j'aime": 933
What about Domi, CHiarot. Poehling, 2nd (10M) for Reilly, Kappy, Kerfoot (12M)
Domi would be a better TOPLW fit with Hyman...and Chiarot is a great defensive bigbody LD/ If you prefer one year of Petry with 2M retain instead that could work to.

BUt at the end NO WAY TOronto is trading Reilly
23 juill. 2020 à 13 h 38
#37
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: Teemu_salami
think of morgan rielly as a top 15 D man so put these trades in perspective with that information.


That is a wicked user name, that is all...
23 juill. 2020 à 13 h 56
#38
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: Rodzikhockey93
the creativity police have arrived


Its not about the creativity, its about the value.

You have it all over the place.

Sayin that him for Parayko 1 for 1 is ok, but then him for Carlo and Stucnicka is also ok, thats giving him two wayyyyy different values

Its just a little weird

(bruins would reject so quickly by the way that offer is just insulting)
23 juill. 2020 à 19 h 1
#39
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 915
Mentions "j'aime": 190
Quoting: Isles777
Hamilton, Theodore, Ellis, josi, Carlson , Letang , fox, Marino , Mcavoy , spurgeon , hedman , slavin , ekblad , pietrangelo , parayko , heiskanen


i agree with most of those, but not ellis ekblad or marino.
23 juill. 2020 à 19 h 16
#40
Isles7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 12,222
Mentions "j'aime": 5,299
Quoting: Teemu_salami
i agree with most of those, but not ellis ekblad or marino.


Ellis Is elite offensively and defensively. He’s a top 5 RHD in the league right now.

Ekblad you’re right , but Marino provides more value than rielly. He’s elite defensively and is pretty solid offensively. He’ll be the pens #1 D next season.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage